Serious Women like mental connection. Material substance based attraction is the most important however.

[Pinpoint]

Material substance is the cake-taker. It takes the cake because women are looking for who is best suited for the value-veins that are exclusive to relationships.
Rarely does immaterial/ emotional substance make them derailed from their own interpersonal criteria for intimacy.
If they say no baldies or no shorties, then they will be firm in that. No amount of PUA or Swag can get calculating girls to get off their personal checklist. They're not hormonal enough for that. And if they were, they're probably not worth it and are dangerous to have in the first place.
Primal resonance works, but girls are smart enough to be mentally calculated in some degrees. Which essentially makes PUA redundnat because anything you hope you could do to her means that she could pick up too.
Your best hope if you're PUA/ Charlataning is reverse psychology/ mental distraction trapping that distracts a person with what someone of typical, or her particular human complexity would think/ take for what's going on, and in reality it's something else.
Make her feel you're not someone you would implement tricks, and what's casual and typical behavior is really just a trap. Typical dark triading. But you have to realize how complex she is, and how she'd view something is in the same depth of sentience as how you would. If not more. So essentially you'll have to use what would fool, attract yourself to have PUA work... while making it so that you don't have any real competent knowledge on presenting yourself artificially.

Women want mental connection. It's not the caketaker but it is substantial to get things off the ground. But they will still only want to choose to get on the ground with those who have the solid foundation of traits that they see suitorship in. And a lot of those things are unchangeable.

There is a primal pride in having higher born traits like LMS that is unavailable to others. Women want exclusivities only available in relationships, that can't be fully accessed without meeting criteria only a select few can meet in a monogamous society.

Material substance most usually outclasses the significance of mental and emotional substance.

 

[Konon]

Female behavior apologetics.

Learn this my boy: women are not people and deserve to be boiled alive. Amen.

 

[Mickeyonacid]

The mental chemistry between you two matters little to nothing.
You can literally beat her up every time she makes your sandwich wrong but if you're attractive enough she'll love you anyways.

 

[Pinpoint]

Female behavior apologetics.

Learn this my boy: women are not people and deserve to be boiled alive. Amen.

I didn't deny that. Read my post.
I am encouraging you incels to be charlataning them if you have the material substance value possible enough to even conduct courting/ talking with them, and meet their criteria of recognition. Be careful about how you do it. They're not all of lower sentience. It's a gender role for them to act like it though as a trap for male ego.
PUA takes female sentience, and hormonality in an improper proportioning sometimes.
They have some liking for immaterial value but AGAIN the materialistics of people that are accessible for primal hierarchical dominance (social circle vanity supremacy) are something their vain nature wants and it's only possible through relationships.
Such as his money, genetics, social status. Those things are one of the primary components of the human hierarchical primal/ feral/ dominarchy structure that compose the distinctioning and divisioning of individuals.

Humans are herd animals but they seek to be the most prominent in the herd. For people who don't want that, they'll just LDAR and averagemax their mate for security. Which I personally hate. I prefer humanity to be hypergamic. But I encourage anger and hatred for those who dont' have the value to be top dog or close to that in this system.

They can only have 1 baby a year, and a guy can impregnate 10 women a day. They need to make their criteria airtight. Looks on a guy are way more demanding than for a girl.
But a girl with no superficial value will be unsought for in almost every way. A guy at least has the stronger gender thing going for him, power, dominance, the right testosterone/ hormones that give a better work ethic so you can beta buxx, etc.

The mental chemistry between you two matters little to nothing.
You can literally beat her up every time she makes your sandwich wrong but if you're attractive enough she'll love you anyways.

Not from my experience. But it's 1 in a thousand for you to make a dealbreaker with a girl with only mental connection. When a species has a 99% tendency, then that is the rule of the genome. The exceptions are the minority.
Women are hierarchical superficialists.
You can get off the ground and be an entertainment joy source. But a suitor will require the things that are appropriate for suitship. And things that aren't distinct, rare, unattainable for the general public to get won't make you a special choice to her.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

You're grossly overestimating women. Firstly, women aren't particularly complex. They are simple creatures, this mysticism attributed to women stems from men trying to think of them as equally rational and moral beings.

Women are shallow, boring, vapid and only driven by their drifts like animals. The only type of mental connection she's seeking is one where she can find a male whom she respects in his masculine features enough to obey so that she can fulfill her desired role of being a passive feminine little girl.

 

[NoMoreSlaving]

Personality matters slightly when you meet a minimum looks requirement
Study:

https://googleweblight.com/i?u=http...ttractive-men-dating-material-study/&hl=pt-BR


Personality I'm assuming is about extroversion, narcissism and violent behaviour though

 

[Pinpoint]

You're grossly overestimating women. Firstly, women aren't particularly complex. They are simple creatures, this mysticism attributed to women stems from men trying to think of them as equally rational and moral beings.

Women are shallow, boring, vapid and only driven by their drifts like animals. The only type of mental connection she's seeking is one where she can find a male whom she respects in his masculine features enough to obey so that she can fulfill her desired role of being a passive feminine little girl.

They're calculating but I didn't say it was rational or logical. It's very fluctuated by feeling.