Yeah bro being nonNT has absolutely ZERO bearing on you're dating life. Who cares if you can't read social cues, just suck it up and 'put yourself out there'!!!! "I lack basic hygience" how the fuck do you know that? "I'm rude" How the fuck do you know that? 
2. The Hygiene Strawman
high IQRebuttal: The Reddit Post Built on Ignorance, Projection, and Cope
1. Misunderstanding Autism and Its Social Impact
The author dismisses autism's effect on dating by reducing it to a "self-diagnosed cope." This betrays an ignorant misunderstanding of autism and its social consequences.
Key Facts:
- 44.6% of high-functioning autistic men remain virgins into adulthood (Renty & Roeyers, 2007).
- Social communication deficits—core to autism—hinder the ability to read social cues, maintain conversations, and engage in reciprocal emotional exchanges (American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5).
- Autistic men are judged as awkward and less attractive within seconds (Sasson et al., 2017)—even without overt stimming behaviors.
Reality Check:
Autistic men are not "dodging accountability"—they're being penalized for innate neurological differences. Evolutionary psychology explains this:
- Women instinctively seek partners who demonstrate high social intelligence (Miller, 2000), as it signals resource access, group integration, and emotional stability.
- Autism inhibits these behaviors despite the individual's intentions or effort.
This isn't laziness. It's neurobiology.
The post strawmans autistic men by assuming:
This is projection disguised as critique.
- Autism often presents with sensory sensitivities to hygiene products and routines (Baranek et al., 2006)—not a refusal to "improve themselves."
- Literal thinking can result in misunderstanding social grooming standards, not rejecting them outright.
Examples:
- An autistic man might shower but fail to apply deodorant because he wasn't explicitly told it was expected.
- Others struggle with sensory overstimulation from strong scents and textures, not apathy or laziness.
Reality Check:
Assuming lack of hygiene equals lack of effort reflects neurotypical ignorance. Education helps—mockery doesn't.
3. The "Emotional Intelligence" Fallacy
This is a misunderstanding of autistic cognition.
- Emotional intelligence in autism is often situationally dependent. Autistic individuals experience emotions deeply but struggle with neurotypical expression patterns (Hill et al., 2004).
- Alexithymia—common in autism—impairs emotional articulation, not empathy (Bird et al., 2010).
The Reality:
- Autistic individuals may express empathy differently but feel it as strongly as neurotypicals (Rogers et al., 2007).
- Women often misinterpret autistic emotional processing as coldness or apathy, reinforcing social exclusion.
Reality Check:
Women often equate social smoothness with emotional depth—a cognitive bias that disadvantages autistic men.
4. The "Plenty of Autistic Guys Have Girlfriends" Myth
Anecdotal logic to dismiss a documented social phenomenon.
Statistical Reality:
- Autistic men have a 10x higher chance of lifelong celibacy (Sizoo et al., 2015).
- High-functioning autistic individuals report extreme difficulty forming romantic relationships, with only 16% achieving long-term romantic success (Strunz et al., 2017).
So, "plenty" actually means "a statistically insignificant minority."
Reality Check:
"Some succeed" doesn't negate the systemic disadvantage autistic men face.
- If 98% of autistic men struggle, highlighting the 2% is intellectual dishonesty.
5. The "Blame and Shame" Coping Mechanism
The post concludes with:
This rhetoric reeks of insecurity and projection.
Psychological Insight:
- When people mock vulnerable groups, it's often a defense mechanism to validate their own social success (Adler, 1927).
- The hostility toward autistic men mirrors historical scapegoating patterns—blame the victim to preserve the illusion of meritocratic success.
Reality Check:
The OP's entire argument hinges on ad hominem attacks, not data.
- Mockery isn't refutation.
- Dismissal isn't logic.
Final Verdict:
This Reddit post isn't a critique—it's a tantrum wrapped in internet bravado.
- Autistic men face documented social exclusion.
- Women judge autistic men harshly based on neurological traits, not personal failures.
- Insulting marginalized groups doesn't invalidate their struggles—it validates your own insecurities.
Cope harder, Reddit.
The facts don't care about your feelings.
deepseek ahhh postRebuttal: The Reddit Post Built on Ignorance, Projection, and Cope
1. Misunderstanding Autism and Its Social Impact
The author dismisses autism's effect on dating by reducing it to a "self-diagnosed cope." This betrays an ignorant misunderstanding of autism and its social consequences.
Key Facts:
- 44.6% of high-functioning autistic men remain virgins into adulthood (Renty & Roeyers, 2007).
- Social communication deficits—core to autism—hinder the ability to read social cues, maintain conversations, and engage in reciprocal emotional exchanges (American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5).
- Autistic men are judged as awkward and less attractive within seconds (Sasson et al., 2017)—even without overt stimming behaviors.
Reality Check:
Autistic men are not "dodging accountability"—they're being penalized for innate neurological differences. Evolutionary psychology explains this:
- Women instinctively seek partners who demonstrate high social intelligence (Miller, 2000), as it signals resource access, group integration, and emotional stability.
- Autism inhibits these behaviors despite the individual's intentions or effort.
This isn't laziness. It's neurobiology.
The post strawmans autistic men by assuming:
This is projection disguised as critique.
- Autism often presents with sensory sensitivities to hygiene products and routines (Baranek et al., 2006)—not a refusal to "improve themselves."
- Literal thinking can result in misunderstanding social grooming standards, not rejecting them outright.
Examples:
- An autistic man might shower but fail to apply deodorant because he wasn't explicitly told it was expected.
- Others struggle with sensory overstimulation from strong scents and textures, not apathy or laziness.
Reality Check:
Assuming lack of hygiene equals lack of effort reflects neurotypical ignorance. Education helps—mockery doesn't.
3. The "Emotional Intelligence" Fallacy
This is a misunderstanding of autistic cognition.
- Emotional intelligence in autism is often situationally dependent. Autistic individuals experience emotions deeply but struggle with neurotypical expression patterns (Hill et al., 2004).
- Alexithymia—common in autism—impairs emotional articulation, not empathy (Bird et al., 2010).
The Reality:
- Autistic individuals may express empathy differently but feel it as strongly as neurotypicals (Rogers et al., 2007).
- Women often misinterpret autistic emotional processing as coldness or apathy, reinforcing social exclusion.
Reality Check:
Women often equate social smoothness with emotional depth—a cognitive bias that disadvantages autistic men.
4. The "Plenty of Autistic Guys Have Girlfriends" Myth
Anecdotal logic to dismiss a documented social phenomenon.
Statistical Reality:
- Autistic men have a 10x higher chance of lifelong celibacy (Sizoo et al., 2015).
- High-functioning autistic individuals report extreme difficulty forming romantic relationships, with only 16% achieving long-term romantic success (Strunz et al., 2017).
So, "plenty" actually means "a statistically insignificant minority."
Reality Check:
"Some succeed" doesn't negate the systemic disadvantage autistic men face.
- If 98% of autistic men struggle, highlighting the 2% is intellectual dishonesty.
5. The "Blame and Shame" Coping Mechanism
The post concludes with:
This rhetoric reeks of insecurity and projection.
Psychological Insight:
- When people mock vulnerable groups, it's often a defense mechanism to validate their own social success (Adler, 1927).
- The hostility toward autistic men mirrors historical scapegoating patterns—blame the victim to preserve the illusion of meritocratic success.
Reality Check:
The OP's entire argument hinges on ad hominem attacks, not data.
- Mockery isn't refutation.
- Dismissal isn't logic.
Final Verdict:
This Reddit post isn't a critique—it's a tantrum wrapped in internet bravado.
- Autistic men face documented social exclusion.
- Women judge autistic men harshly based on neurological traits, not personal failures.
- Insulting marginalized groups doesn't invalidate their struggles—it validates your own insecurities.
Cope harder, Reddit.
The facts don't care about your feelings.
High IQ makes this a postRebuttal: The Reddit Post Built on Ignorance, Projection, and Cope
1. Misunderstanding Autism and Its Social Impact
The author dismisses autism's effect on dating by reducing it to a "self-diagnosed cope." This betrays an ignorant misunderstanding of autism and its social consequences.
Key Facts:
- 44.6% of high-functioning autistic men remain virgins into adulthood (Renty & Roeyers, 2007).
- Social communication deficits—core to autism—hinder the ability to read social cues, maintain conversations, and engage in reciprocal emotional exchanges (American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5).
- Autistic men are judged as awkward and less attractive within seconds (Sasson et al., 2017)—even without overt stimming behaviors.
Reality Check:
Autistic men are not "dodging accountability"—they're being penalized for innate neurological differences. Evolutionary psychology explains this:
- Women instinctively seek partners who demonstrate high social intelligence (Miller, 2000), as it signals resource access, group integration, and emotional stability.
- Autism inhibits these behaviors despite the individual's intentions or effort.
This isn't laziness. It's neurobiology.
The post strawmans autistic men by assuming:
This is projection disguised as critique.
- Autism often presents with sensory sensitivities to hygiene products and routines (Baranek et al., 2006)—not a refusal to "improve themselves."
- Literal thinking can result in misunderstanding social grooming standards, not rejecting them outright.
Examples:
- An autistic man might shower but fail to apply deodorant because he wasn't explicitly told it was expected.
- Others struggle with sensory overstimulation from strong scents and textures, not apathy or laziness.
Reality Check:
Assuming lack of hygiene equals lack of effort reflects neurotypical ignorance. Education helps—mockery doesn't.
3. The "Emotional Intelligence" Fallacy
This is a misunderstanding of autistic cognition.
- Emotional intelligence in autism is often situationally dependent. Autistic individuals experience emotions deeply but struggle with neurotypical expression patterns (Hill et al., 2004).
- Alexithymia—common in autism—impairs emotional articulation, not empathy (Bird et al., 2010).
The Reality:
- Autistic individuals may express empathy differently but feel it as strongly as neurotypicals (Rogers et al., 2007).
- Women often misinterpret autistic emotional processing as coldness or apathy, reinforcing social exclusion.
Reality Check:
Women often equate social smoothness with emotional depth—a cognitive bias that disadvantages autistic men.
4. The "Plenty of Autistic Guys Have Girlfriends" Myth
Anecdotal logic to dismiss a documented social phenomenon.
Statistical Reality:
- Autistic men have a 10x higher chance of lifelong celibacy (Sizoo et al., 2015).
- High-functioning autistic individuals report extreme difficulty forming romantic relationships, with only 16% achieving long-term romantic success (Strunz et al., 2017).
So, "plenty" actually means "a statistically insignificant minority."
Reality Check:
"Some succeed" doesn't negate the systemic disadvantage autistic men face.
- If 98% of autistic men struggle, highlighting the 2% is intellectual dishonesty.
5. The "Blame and Shame" Coping Mechanism
The post concludes with:
This rhetoric reeks of insecurity and projection.
Psychological Insight:
- When people mock vulnerable groups, it's often a defense mechanism to validate their own social success (Adler, 1927).
- The hostility toward autistic men mirrors historical scapegoating patterns—blame the victim to preserve the illusion of meritocratic success.
Reality Check:
The OP's entire argument hinges on ad hominem attacks, not data.
- Mockery isn't refutation.
- Dismissal isn't logic.
Final Verdict:
This Reddit post isn't a critique—it's a tantrum wrapped in internet bravado.
- Autistic men face documented social exclusion.
- Women judge autistic men harshly based on neurological traits, not personal failures.
- Insulting marginalized groups doesn't invalidate their struggles—it validates your own insecurities.
Cope harder, Reddit.
The facts don't care about your feelings.
ALL I SEE ARE FACTS TERABASEDRebuttal: The Reddit Post Built on Ignorance, Projection, and Cope
1. Misunderstanding Autism and Its Social Impact
The author dismisses autism's effect on dating by reducing it to a "self-diagnosed cope." This betrays an ignorant misunderstanding of autism and its social consequences.
Key Facts:
- 44.6% of high-functioning autistic men remain virgins into adulthood (Renty & Roeyers, 2007).
- Social communication deficits—core to autism—hinder the ability to read social cues, maintain conversations, and engage in reciprocal emotional exchanges (American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5).
- Autistic men are judged as awkward and less attractive within seconds (Sasson et al., 2017)—even without overt stimming behaviors.
Reality Check:
Autistic men are not "dodging accountability"—they're being penalized for innate neurological differences. Evolutionary psychology explains this:
- Women instinctively seek partners who demonstrate high social intelligence (Miller, 2000), as it signals resource access, group integration, and emotional stability.
- Autism inhibits these behaviors despite the individual's intentions or effort.
This isn't laziness. It's neurobiology.
The post strawmans autistic men by assuming:
This is projection disguised as critique.
- Autism often presents with sensory sensitivities to hygiene products and routines (Baranek et al., 2006)—not a refusal to "improve themselves."
- Literal thinking can result in misunderstanding social grooming standards, not rejecting them outright.
Examples:
- An autistic man might shower but fail to apply deodorant because he wasn't explicitly told it was expected.
- Others struggle with sensory overstimulation from strong scents and textures, not apathy or laziness.
Reality Check:
Assuming lack of hygiene equals lack of effort reflects neurotypical ignorance. Education helps—mockery doesn't.
3. The "Emotional Intelligence" Fallacy
This is a misunderstanding of autistic cognition.
- Emotional intelligence in autism is often situationally dependent. Autistic individuals experience emotions deeply but struggle with neurotypical expression patterns (Hill et al., 2004).
- Alexithymia—common in autism—impairs emotional articulation, not empathy (Bird et al., 2010).
The Reality:
- Autistic individuals may express empathy differently but feel it as strongly as neurotypicals (Rogers et al., 2007).
- Women often misinterpret autistic emotional processing as coldness or apathy, reinforcing social exclusion.
Reality Check:
Women often equate social smoothness with emotional depth—a cognitive bias that disadvantages autistic men.
4. The "Plenty of Autistic Guys Have Girlfriends" Myth
Anecdotal logic to dismiss a documented social phenomenon.
Statistical Reality:
- Autistic men have a 10x higher chance of lifelong celibacy (Sizoo et al., 2015).
- High-functioning autistic individuals report extreme difficulty forming romantic relationships, with only 16% achieving long-term romantic success (Strunz et al., 2017).
So, "plenty" actually means "a statistically insignificant minority."
Reality Check:
"Some succeed" doesn't negate the systemic disadvantage autistic men face.
- If 98% of autistic men struggle, highlighting the 2% is intellectual dishonesty.
5. The "Blame and Shame" Coping Mechanism
The post concludes with:
This rhetoric reeks of insecurity and projection.
Psychological Insight:
- When people mock vulnerable groups, it's often a defense mechanism to validate their own social success (Adler, 1927).
- The hostility toward autistic men mirrors historical scapegoating patterns—blame the victim to preserve the illusion of meritocratic success.
Reality Check:
The OP's entire argument hinges on ad hominem attacks, not data.
- Mockery isn't refutation.
- Dismissal isn't logic.
Final Verdict:
This Reddit post isn't a critique—it's a tantrum wrapped in internet bravado.
- Autistic men face documented social exclusion.
- Women judge autistic men harshly based on neurological traits, not personal failures.
- Insulting marginalized groups doesn't invalidate their struggles—it validates your own insecurities.
Cope harder, Reddit.
The facts don't care about your feelings.
girl autism = cute and unique
If you think "Non NT" means being shy around girls then yeah it doesnt mean shit
It will surely worsen your live quality, cuz to normies looks doesn't matter, but social skills, thus with these being worse, your interactions with normies will be worse.
