![FrothySolutions](/data/avatars/m/6/6633.jpg?1677392582)
FrothySolutions
Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 6, 2018
- Posts
- 19,894
I approach the table with a proposal...
I don't consider myself "transphobic." But I do think the idea of transness is nonsense based on nothing objective or factual. I don't think trans people are dumber or more dangerous than anyone else, I don't think they should be barred from office or certain jobs, and if you wanna have sex with a trans person by all means go have it. But not only will I never have sex with a transwoman, I stand by the biology that says transwomen are men. The only reason anyone is asked to validate transness is because it's nice to the trans people, and it's better to be nice than "correct."
Some people say "But the biology DOES say transwomen are women!" In order to say this, you must first abandon the idea that everyone is whatever they identify as regardless of biology. With science, a thing either is or isn't something. We might not know which, but science has rules. It's not just up to your opinion. Then, you have to actually show me where it says that. What we've discovered recently that changes modern medicine's understanding of sex. Because I've looked into the argument and no one has brought up anything we didn't know decades ago. People are saying "What about hormonal/chromosomal abnormalities? What about people with malformed genitalia?" Yes, some women grow facial hair, some men have bitch tits and small dicks. Maybe even very small dicks. But hairy women are still women and bitchy men are still men. Any further and what you have is someone who is "intersex." But never ever until very recently did we say "Well she's got a fully formed dick and no vagina, but she's a woman." And it was not "transphobic" to deny those kinds of ideas.
We knew all this back in 1997. This right here is how people become conservatives. When progressives move too far left of sanity, the only ones left are conservatives. This was simply sanity back in 1997. This was not "conservative comedy" back in 1997, it was common sense.
So you might say "Trans people aren't asking you to fuck them, just validate them." And that's where my proposal comes in. I'm not asking for your body. But I am asking for what the trans people are asking for: You to fight for the very valid idea that I am attractive and valid, and anyone who disagrees is on the wrong side of history.
I don't consider myself "transphobic." But I do think the idea of transness is nonsense based on nothing objective or factual. I don't think trans people are dumber or more dangerous than anyone else, I don't think they should be barred from office or certain jobs, and if you wanna have sex with a trans person by all means go have it. But not only will I never have sex with a transwoman, I stand by the biology that says transwomen are men. The only reason anyone is asked to validate transness is because it's nice to the trans people, and it's better to be nice than "correct."
Some people say "But the biology DOES say transwomen are women!" In order to say this, you must first abandon the idea that everyone is whatever they identify as regardless of biology. With science, a thing either is or isn't something. We might not know which, but science has rules. It's not just up to your opinion. Then, you have to actually show me where it says that. What we've discovered recently that changes modern medicine's understanding of sex. Because I've looked into the argument and no one has brought up anything we didn't know decades ago. People are saying "What about hormonal/chromosomal abnormalities? What about people with malformed genitalia?" Yes, some women grow facial hair, some men have bitch tits and small dicks. Maybe even very small dicks. But hairy women are still women and bitchy men are still men. Any further and what you have is someone who is "intersex." But never ever until very recently did we say "Well she's got a fully formed dick and no vagina, but she's a woman." And it was not "transphobic" to deny those kinds of ideas.
We knew all this back in 1997. This right here is how people become conservatives. When progressives move too far left of sanity, the only ones left are conservatives. This was simply sanity back in 1997. This was not "conservative comedy" back in 1997, it was common sense.
So you might say "Trans people aren't asking you to fuck them, just validate them." And that's where my proposal comes in. I'm not asking for your body. But I am asking for what the trans people are asking for: You to fight for the very valid idea that I am attractive and valid, and anyone who disagrees is on the wrong side of history.