Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill WOMEN DO NOT LIKE INTELLIGENCE. BRUTAL NTpill

sennaGTR

sennaGTR

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Jul 3, 2024
Posts
362
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

1723583318984

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:
females are children 100% they can only cope with life through basic surface level activities - they turn into the worst drug addicts, they make the best consumers. They have no mind for art or science or creativity just consuming candy and shopping. Notice how all the famous females just sell their bodies or show their ass while doing basic activities? ayn rand type of females are genetic deviants and more like men than women
A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:
From this scientific article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567215/



Firstly, am I the only one who finds it kinda funny how they more or less state that "different cognitive functions which impact literal brain functions exist between men & women, but oh don't worry, it won't impact intelligence levels at all!:soy::feels:" Jfl, that kind of logic exemplifies the flaws within the modern scientific community: Simply, as I have stated before, they say the "quiet part out loud" whilst never acknowledging the pure, inescapable truth of the facts they discovered.


I would just like to remind everyone here, that foids by predisposition have an increased amount of increased amount of grey matter:


And what is this usually associated with?



The fact foids have an increased amount of this reinforces a theory which is stated within a novel, The Manipulated Man:



Summarizing what I have discerned already, it seems that science again more or less is reinforcing our beliefs in concordance with the blackpill.

But back on topic, let's take a look at the overall findings of the article:


Now, what does synaptic density, primarily in the temporal neocortex, have to do with my title? Well, according to most facts of basic biology, synaptic density is strongly correlated with that of the ability for neurons to communicate with each other more adeptly & profusely:



Essentially, this allows for humans to utilize their brains capacity of intelligence, cognitive ability, and the such -which they were predisposed with- at its peak, essentially.

Since foids seem to lack this in comparison to males, it proves many theories shared here & elsewhere:
-Foids, by default, are inferior to males.
-Foids cannot utilize their high-IQ genes, should they have been predisposed with them.
-Foids utilize any "intelligence" they may wield in order to lie, instead of utilizing it to create the way males do.

@WorthlessSlavicShit @LeFrenchCel @Uggo Mongo @Ventingblackpiller @based_meme @GeckoBus @wereq @RegularManlet

The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

1723581081953



7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

Chrome 58q4bZW3Xg

They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.
 
Over for high IQcels like me then.
 
Survival ensured by strong genetics
 
Interesting & high-effort thread; thanks for the tag & citing a thread of mine GrAY

Will give it a read
 
The issue is that good genes come in a package therefore good looking men are more likely to be intelligent.
 
Over for @DarkStar
 
They like brutal intelligence, they want to get smashed in the head and raped in my cave.
 
This seems legit
 
Sorry I can't contribute, but thank you for this thoughtful post. Maybe I'll sleep over it and have some ideas.
 
Yes, woe from wit. The smarter you are, the harder it is for you to live. That's how it works with foids, not Chad, not Tyrone, they are not intellectuals, they usually study normally in college due to athletic achievements on the local football team or something like that. Even if you just communicate with the foid, pretend to be stupid, do not use clever terms. Intelligence scares away foids like sunlight scares away a vampire.
 
Being smart and having a high IQ is a curse.
 
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

View attachment 1223788

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:

A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:


The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

View attachment 1223762


7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

View attachment 1223777
They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.

Ayn Rand is not smart, her libertarian philosophy created the hell we have today. Instead of a welfare state, we have the tyranny of corporations, and the growth of economic inequality is closely linked to sexual inequality. Ayn Rand is a Jewish whore who told the Goyim that the rich should get richer and the poor should get poorer and the Goyim applauded her and voted for Reagan and Thatcher.
 
Ayn Rand is not smart, her libertarian philosophy created the hell we have today. Instead of a welfare state, we have the tyranny of corporations, and the growth of economic inequality is closely linked to sexual inequality. Ayn Rand is a Jewish whore who told the Goyim that the rich should get richer and the poor should get poorer and the Goyim applauded her and voted for Reagan and Thatcher.
Libertarianism is obvious BS. Ayn Rand didn't create libertarianism: von Hayek and Milton Friedman are more significant figures. Now, empirical evidence shows that the Nordic welfare states are better off than the brutal capitalist US, and the theory that market dictates everything in the right direction and that a person's moral means nothing is BS. Because all the US techo-giants pursue relentless politically correct censorship/cultural marxist nonsense whilst simulatenously being fine with free market liberalism.
 
Ayn Rand is not smart, her libertarian philosophy created the hell we have today. Instead of a welfare state, we have the tyranny of corporations, and the growth of economic inequality is closely linked to sexual inequality. Ayn Rand is a Jewish whore who told the Goyim that the rich should get richer and the poor should get poorer and the Goyim applauded her and voted for Reagan and Thatcher.

Based and big brained, fuck ayn rand and her amphetamine fueled philosophy. :feelsree:
 
fax tbh ayn rand was absolutely retarded
The whole philosophy of Ayn Rand was created to convince the rich not to share money with ordinary mortals. And the boomers lived well at the expense of what? Because there was a legacy of Roosevelt's new deal, when corporations could give the state 70% of their earned profits, and the state passed them on to everyone else.
 
Women like every single type of man, as long as he looks like Chad. Personality and skill is IR-FUCKING-RELEVANT. Have a good day, brocel.
 
Since when has James Bond sacrificed the mission for some foid? The closest thing is him dying because of not touching his daughter in the last one but that movie was panned by the critics and also bombed hard.

Bumping the thread because the rest is very high IQ.
 
This was a good read thank you mang. But yeah heavy socialisation probably makes people retarded and their individual minds get turned off as they’re tuned into the hive mind. When your mind is free from distraction and normie BS it tends to discover and think some pretty amazing original stuff
 
Civilization is a pendulum between the masculine desire to build a better world (of intelligent men) and the destruction of primitive feminine desires.
 
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

View attachment 1223788

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:

A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:


The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

View attachment 1223762


7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

View attachment 1223777
They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.

Bro looks like a LTN or even Sub5, and on top of it hes retarded and a murderer. If he pulled a chick like that it might not be totally over
 
Libertarianism is obvious BS. Ayn Rand didn't create libertarianism: von Hayek and Milton Friedman are more significant figures. Now, empirical evidence shows that the Nordic welfare states are better off than the brutal capitalist US, and the theory that market dictates everything in the right direction and that a person's moral means nothing is BS. Because all the US techo-giants pursue relentless politically correct censorship/cultural marxist nonsense whilst simulatenously being fine with free market liberalism.
The welfare state was dismantled by Reagan in the USA and Thatcher in the UK and the whole world followed them. Reagan was elected by 35-40-year-old boomers who wanted their wealth to be inaccessible to anyone from American generations ever again.
 
Just be retard is law.
 
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

View attachment 1223788

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:

A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:


The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

View attachment 1223762


7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

View attachment 1223777
They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.

8. Last but not least: women don't like smart men because of their small dick size, while retarded guys have the opposite.
 
To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: "
I think this sums me up. Yeah, I could arrangemarriagemaxx but I know how depressed it would make both me and the foid long term. If you have high material wealth (like me) but low genetic wealth (also me), then you are in a situation where you either accept inceldom or maybe pay for whores.
 
this post is unfathomably based and highly deserves a pin.

Intelligent men are often cowards. If you are modestly intelligent and not a coward you will get very far in life

This passage struck me the most:

"She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months."


This is the basis for every foid's claim that they 'like nerds' comes from. Like when Hugh Jackman played a dude who typed fast in a terminal in Swordfish.

Also this passage:

"These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out."

This sort of intelligence is MUCH more in common with foids. You say things with implications that are OBVIOUS to you and other men, but it's completely lost on women. Women seem to really really hate emotional ambiguity. It's like they don't even care if what you say makes sense, it doesn't matter, as long as it doesn't contract what they already know, and the tone is PC. They also lack agency, yet demand the option for agency at any moment. You have to communicate to them like a sensitive spoiled child.
 
Last edited:
this post is unfathomably based and highly deserves a pin
100%, this post is the truth

Also the fact that for example when it comes to interracial dating, most women would prefer to date a black man over an asian man.. that should tell everyone what women think about intelligence. I'd go as far as to say that a man being intelligent is a complete pussy repellant
 
A smart man would make himself a dumb one just to get bitches but being smart and dumb doesn't mean shit. It's all about looking like Alein Delon. They hate smart men because the majority of smart men are ugly asf.

If you look like Dolph Lundgren or Harry Cavill which are the biggest neards but also biggest top tier sex symbols, then women would don't mind your smartness or your neardness. When a bitch let's say get a GigaChad she will summit to him with all her life, she will be his slave voluntarily.

Looks = everything
 
Last edited:
they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment.
Can you elab on this please? I always wondered why they like these incredibly loud spaces, why they like having a lot of people talking around them and shit like that. I can't handle even a minute of an environment like this. Why are they like that? How? I'm usually pretty good at empathy naturally, but I don't understand this aspect of normie life at all.



I recently saw a selfie video of a foid and her friends dancing in a club to some bullshit pop song with atrocious brainrotted lyrics, they were making weird faces and the dance moves were retarded. I watched it a couple times and just couldn't understand what possible state of mind you have to be in in order to do something like that, and to find it enjoyable. They didn't seem to be on drugs either.
 
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

View attachment 1223788

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:

A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:


The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

View attachment 1223762


7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

View attachment 1223777
They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.

well written, I am retarded and I read the whole thing start to finish on my phone. Post more long threads :feelsokman: :feelsokman: :feelsokman:

Can you elab on this please? I always wondered why they like these incredibly loud spaces, why they like having a lot of people talking around them and shit like that. I can't handle even a minute of an environment like this. Why are they like that? How? I'm usually pretty good at empathy naturally, but I don't understand this aspect of normie life at all.



I recently saw a selfie video of a foid and her friends dancing in a club to some bullshit pop song with atrocious brainrotted lyrics, they were making weird faces and the dance moves were retarded. I watched it a couple times and just couldn't understand what possible state of mind you have to be in in order to do something like that, and to find it enjoyable. They didn't seem to be on drugs either.
I have thought about this.
Just sit down and imagine you had no health issues whatsoever. You can drink anything, eat pizza and coke, sleep instantly for 12h and wake up 100% refreshed. You have no social anxiety because your parents support you. You don't view the world as a threatening place at all.
This turns you borderline psychopathic with your outlook on life.

It gives a sort of "abundance mindset" for the whole of existence - "the world is your oyster" as they say. Sensitive people are often unhealthy with overactive nervous systems, maybe from trauma. They can be stuck in permanent "fight or flight" mode. Because of this, tiny things like a youtube video can make them cry. Or a nice passage in a book.

To a normie this makes no sense. They are so healthy, text on a screen would never ever make them feel shit. They are bulldozing through life feeling nothing for most things since they are so fucking internally stable, they have ZERO self-doubt. That's also why they use status symbols, interests and shit as a signaling method -> unlike the sensitive person who accidentally falls in love with something, normies pick and choose their identity freely without attachments.

Like I said, it is sort of psychopathic. They are not committed to causes, events, trends, interests. If you have known a normie for a long time, you will see them flip their opinion like 10x over 10 years. Or they are giga upset about something that is trendy right now, but also not? Like they will talk about racism but then shit on black people when talking to others on break.

Or they "care" about bird flu, sars, covid, swine flu, iraq-, gulf, - afghan, -ukraine war. But a year later they dont care anymore. It is a sort of uncommitted, psychopathic, pick or choose mentality, resulting from being so healthy they can afford to not care.
A lot of their beliefs are "luxury" beliefs that they just hold because they can, not because they are forced to by circumstances (living in war zone, being ugly and unhealthy etc).

Going back to the beginning, imagine you felt like this

- zero self doubt
- incredible health, especially when young (cant eat anything, do sports, travel, work and its not even exhausting, they party after work)
- no pressing issues that make you question yourself or think about shit
- no social anxiety, view people as non-threat most of the time cuz never bullied, nice family supporting them since childhood, making them feel that the world is a happy and safe place

As others have said in this thread, their primary state is BOREDOM due to LACK of stimulation. I have never felt bored in my entire life. I feel the opposite, my life is a mix of warzone and FOMO (fear of missing out) and wondering when I will die. I am constantly moving.

This is why they seek out stimulation, they are so fucking healthy, they are looking for ways to self-sabotage by stressing themselves. They seek out risk and pain (sports, alcohol, drugs, sex, travel) because they have so little in their lives.

The life many of us live as truecels would be unbearable to them - text on a screen is not enough stimulation. Rotting at home, playing video games, is giga understimulating to them. They need to go out, bombard every orifice with stimulation until they are burned out. But the hunger never ends. They are so healthy, just one night of sleep recovers them instantly, and the hunger comes back.

This continues until they get a bit older and finally start paying the toll of this psychopathic lifestyle. Most normies life is like a rocket launch - initial boost face for first 20 years, then max altitude is reached and they enter a slow, very gradual decline. The health and mental issues we deal with since childhood only BEGIN touching them in like their 50s. I am not joking.

I recently watched a boomer on YT and he said, I didn't think about retirement until I was 50. Meanwhile I have talked to countless incels and truecels, we always think about death, what will happen to us etc, and we are like age 16-25 on average. You are not supposed to view the world as a hostile warzone where you have to surive somehow as a teenager. That is giga abnormal.

When you see some old boomer complain about his life, keep in mind many truecels here have been living a worse life than him for decades at that point. The boomers issues seem more relevant to HIM only, because its the first time he ever had any setbacks in life. They are like, oh, I can't do this as easily anymore, or that. Meanwhile some truecel has been homeless in his 20s, been abused by parents, beaten up, born with health issue, skin condition etc since they were children.

This is why they go to loud parties when young and seek out all that stimulation. Just like psychopaths, they are in constant need for dopamine hits. If they pursue an intellectual path, they replace the stimulation from loud noises and sex and shit with competition. They will debate tons of people, hunt degrees and meaningless accolades and little letters behind their name - phd, md, pp, poopoo etc. Competition gives them the same stimulating boost, destroying others, pushing them out the race, mogging others income wise, flexing your sports car as a doctor.
Most young people going to med school just want to finish their studies and make money. They dont give a fuck about medicine jfl.

Just take into account everything I said just now, and it makes sense why they engage in these activities while we fight to avoid them. This is why I don't expect true sympathy and empathy from normies. They can not relate to this. I have to manipulate them by abusing their virtue signaling programming to get the help I need. If I just went "i am a subhuman autist with isses, I cant work and need disability or I will die on the street" - they will not help me. They always project you are like them, healthy, capable etc. Your words are seen as virtue signaling, intentional display to get shit from them.

So what I do is, I leverage their biases against them by virtue signalling about shit they can't deny me, i.e. racism. If you tell a normie you experience racism, they ideologically can not doubt you. Or when you larp as a trauma victim, tell them you have sisters that got abused too (appealing to pro-foid bias). If you just say you got abused as a guy, they wont care. I have had welfare office bitch literally say to me on phone, "you are a young man, you can figure it out" and end convo.

Get diagnoses. Normies trust authority. They don't understand that psychology is not even a scientific discipline, that the entire field is based on axiomatic, unproven theoretical constructs about how the brain/mind works. That there is debate about the veracity of diagnostic labels in the field itself etc. They don't get there is no such thing as "adhd" or "autism" when you dig deep into the field, especially from a philosophy of science approach.

But to a normie, they see that little label, "diagnosis: autism" and because of their ideology which includes blind trust in authorities and the belief mental disorders are real, they have to change their whole behavior to accomdate you know, or they are "bad people." You have to steelman their position againts them, or they will project you are like them: A super-healthy, young, perma-bored psychopath who is just trying to get freebies from the social welfare state.

It is fucked up, I understand that. But I don't want to die on the street because some retard judged me in 0.13s by my looks and went, aight, this nigga larping as sick to get welfare, imma make his life hell until he gets a job (litearlly how ive been treated). I could have faked the entire fuckkng autism diagnosis except for the part where they talked to my parents. I spent 6 months writing a 10000 word essay on my life, my issues, why I think I have autism, why I exclude other disorders etc. Then I met the doctors and realized I know more about the field than them. I had to play dumb to get the diagnosis, because if I showed my power-level, they would not have given it, I am 100% certain.

I read a fucking academic textbook about autism before coming in, I annotated the whole thing. They were doing shit in my diagnosis that are specifically mentioned in the textbook as shit the diagnoser is NOT supposed to do. I did not show them my essay because I realized after 30s of talking to them that this would undermine everything. From then on, I faked my way through half the diagnosis, because I knew this was war. They did not want to give me this diagnosis, they'd refused before in 2018 and just sent me home from mental hospital because I bought into their manipulation.

This time I was prepared, I knew how they think, their philosophy, their methods.
One example: They made me do an autism test I had never seen before - reading a hemingway short story and interpreting the characters motivations and intent. Besides this being kind of laughable scientifically to diagnose anything kek, I knew what they were looking for. They believe, and I stress "believe" because nothing in autism research is more than conjecture, that autistic people must be incapable of understanding peoples motives and intentions by default, including in fictional media.

This being blatantly wrong and just one out of like 1000 models trying to capture "autism" (an empty umbrella term) , like "hyper male brain theory" "theory of mind theory of autism" "montropism theory of autism" and like 90034234 other theories, didn't even matter. They wanted me to read the text and then magically guess that this somehow indicated autism or not.

Again, I realized this is warfare. I am male, ugly and ethnic. My diagnoser was a middle aged white female. I would have to go hard in the paint to overcome these biases. I read a lot of fiction my youth, including multiple hemingway books. However, I pretended to be completely retarded and that I did not know any of the characters intentions at all and shit. She treated me like a baby, taking shots at me. She said shit like, you dont read a lot, do you? The usually attacks. But I just acted like I didn't get she was mocking me and kept going.

I had to pretend I don't read fiction at all, when I read over 10 warhammer 40k novels in the last 2 years alone (I recorded it on an app on my phone where you can keep track of your reading list). This is so becaues one thing autism researchers believe is that autistic people do not read fiction. I am not joking, this is the level of "science" we are talking about here. Talk to any diagnosed autist on r/aspergers or on this forum, we all read fiction. But because I knew their presuppositions better than them, I knew better than to admit that I read fiction. So I said I don't and the foid, as mentioned, lolled in my face with a shit-eating grin and said you dont read a lot do you?

She did shit like that a few more times, treating me like a retard. She pointed at a clock and went DA BIG POINTER MEANDS DAT etc like im in 1st grade - again, not exaggerating or joking. She thought she is giga IQ and mogging me to death, cuz im ethnic, male and ugly. But I had the drop on her the entire time, I knew blackpill wise what she was doing and why, I knew the tests, I knew the data, I knew what they were looking for and I gave it to them in spades.

Additionally, I sleep deprived myself a ton before the appointment to come off as more retarded. When you are ugly, people think you are retarded anyway. So by fucking yourself up and acting retarded on top of being ugly, people start treating you like you have down syndrome - very low expectations. Sometimes they even virtue signal at you cuz they see you as such a victim.

The hemingway test I mentioned, I found online. The diagnosers name was on it. The bitch did not even know how to use google maps. Normies tend to assume I can't use a smartphone, install basic apps or browse the internet. They never had to. That's why universities still exist, normies want the status labels from getting degrees and also dont realize you can get every study online for free.

Another test they did with me was called "reading the mind in the eyes test" - another unfounded claim, that autitsic people can't read facial expressions. Mixed data on that. For instance, the double empathy problem of autism. They found autistic people can perfectly communicate with other autitsic people and read then normally. So there can not be a deficit in social skills with autists jfl, impossible.

Further, this test is based on the "sasha bron cohen model of autism" - the different tests I was administered were based on completely different theories of what autism is, coming from different researchers. Like I said, there is no unified concept of autism, just like adhd. Just a bunch of theoretical constructs with no supporting evidence. Some is neuroscience, some philosophical. They keep coming up with new random testing methods for autism, which are always proven to be insufficient after a few years.

The "eye reading" test is this: They show you eye areas and then you have to pick from four words that describe the expression, i.e. anger, fear, disgust, joy. This test is available online, I did it like 5 times just for fun. It is retarded. Facial expressions are not standard among people. Some people have resting bitch face despite being happy. A lot of facial expressions are "intentional display" aka, they are made to fit in, not because of genuine underlying feeling.

But again, in the test I had to ignore this. It also says online that like 50% of autist pass that test easily jfl, so how is it valid? Idk. But I recognized most of the expressions but just ticked the wrong box on purpose. Like I said, it takes nothing to fake these tests, tomas szasz moment (most of psych-testing is based on self-report. Spot the problem).

Anyway, to make a long matter short, I finally got the diagnosis. Social workers were congratulating me like I just achieved shit. Saying I must feel so much better now, that I have this random-ass label made up by jews in the 80s (when the term "aspergers" was first coined). People were saying you must feel good, finally having "certainity" about whats wrong with you bla bla bla. I just said yes and played along, they know nothing. It is a joke. I need this shit or I will die on the street.

Rn I am using this dumb fucking label I had to fight to get for two fucking years to get on disability for life. I tell them about my "traumatic childhood" and they have to treat me with satin gloves. Again, a presupposition they have is number one, what people talk about they care about. Big assumption in therapy as well. The idea that someone could talk about something just because or because they want to share info is lost on them. What you talk about = must be emotionally relevant to you. No. But anyway. Second, they assume bad experience = trauma.

This is a staple presuppositions of psychology and the therapy industry. Notice how the word "trauma" has become common parlance in our time. It's because they push it as a selling point to get people into therapy sessions. And women love it cuz its an easy way to label yourself a victim. Meanwhile actual therapists have pointed out that a ton of people are NOT traumatized by what we would assume to be "traumatic events." Take ww1 and ww1, millions served. Did everyone have trauma? Only a tiny minority of people that served were traumatized.

I have a book on that called, manufacturing victims.


They want you to ignore this though and generally, lower tier goons of the mental health fields like social workers never quetions anything they are taught at university. So when I tell them my parents beat my ass and force-fed me spaghetti while threatening violence, they default to, this person must be severely fucked up and shit. I am, but not nearly as much as they assume. My main stressor in life is being unhealthy and ugly, not what happened to me in the past.

If they payed any attention to what I told them about my family, they would also have to conclude that "trauma" somehow does not affect some people even though they go through the same things. I have four siblings, all of which are normal despite living in same "traumatic" household. Idk how the social worker is not picking up on this shit but fuck it, we ball.

It is endless, I could go on and on how I am mentally running circles around these people because I have spent every waking minute since 13 online and literally seen every single thing they will say in advance. All the typical shrink advice, self-help tropes, stoicism, do sport, positive thinking, CBT therapy, behaviorism vs cognitivism, history of psychology, etc. Everything they say, I already know and can connect to something in my head. For instance, last time my social worker (female) was here, I was sleep deprived and stressed, which makes my nervous system giga prone to overreactin (shit health not trauma).

So I almost cried a few times, but she interpreted that as "trauma." She then said I should do sports (of course), and gave me some of these concepts from psychology they borrowed form psycho-analysis and pretend its somehow scientific like "u are identifying with your parents, this is called parentification bla bla bla" bitch I dont think about my parents at all most day, what are you talking about. I just go along with it, gotta play the game to get the brownie points.

They dont know I am in habit of double guessing every single thought I have, I dont trust my emotions, beliefs nothing. They assume they can just say words and I pick it up because I identify with it - another classic therapy trick. Give people horoscope tier concepts that everyone can identify with, i.e. "trauma" and then claim your "model" applies to reality with high accuracy. Nobody can even define trauma, how much pain it takes, for how long etc. By that metric, stubbing my toe can be highly traumatic, if I am the type of person that gets, you know, traumatized by that. It is purely subjective.

But I already realized in my teens that identifying with things is just confirmation bias. Just approach it logically, you only like what you already like. If something aggrees with you, you probably liked that thing to begin with. So you gain nothing, it is confirmation bias. Normies do that all the time, they read a self-help book or whatever, see some phrase they like and then say the book is high iq.

Look into barnum effect, literally half of psychology is just barnum effect, so is self help, stoicism and other shit. Giving labels to people that are suffering, so they can fit their own beliefs in pre-defined labeled boxes, is literally CREATING THE DISEASE YOU ARE TRYING TO DIAGNOES HELLO? This is why they always claim high accruacy rate with diagnosis and shit. People also adopt their behavior to fit these boxes after learning about them, further exaggerting the issue.

One personal funny example. I have spent so much time reading and diving into autism on reddit, literature, videos, I have begun acting way more autistic lmfao. My parents thought I had brain damage when they met me again after 2 years of homelessness. I make way less eye contact and shit. Not because I became "more" autistic, but becaues I unwittingly absored the identity of autism while studying it and self-identifying with it to get the fucking diagnosis.

Would highly recc reading this and applying the approach to everything mental health. Also getting into phil critique of CBT, cognitivism, behaviorism, history of psychology as an outgrowth of failed philsophical projects of enlightement (psychology depends on specific unfounded assmuption about theory of mind, theory of knowledge and even metaphysical assumptions - it is a philosphical position, not scientific):


Anyway, this is just an example of how fucking insane this planet is and the shit I have to deal with on a daily basis just to survive. Now imagine NEVER having to think about any of this. You just stuff your holes with dildos, food, music and cock. Stimulate every cells as much as possible.
Heck, they even have to increase their sensitive of nervous system by using drugs, something fucked up people feel all the time.

Like that shit when that nigger cried about getting his "reefer" or some MDMAed out faggot is like crying "its beautiful mayne" while looking at a pic of mikey mouse - yeah I have that level of sensitivty every waking second because my life is hell and I have to maneuver through FLAK, and AA fire like ww2 kamikaze pilot everytime I interact with the system keeping me on life support - social services and their designated representatives.



If I was not this sensitive and constantly in threat detection mode, I would be dead. It is not trauma, autism etc - it is survival. Exactly what Thomas Szasz said in his critiques of psychiatry. Not that any of the people I am working with, including social workers, MDs, trained psychologists and therapists know who Thomas Szasz is or what he said. Szasz said mental illness is a construct created with no solid basis in science or philosophy and also, patients abuse these constructs because they give them a feeling of purpose, identity, or because they need the label of the construct to survive on welfare or get support that is otherwise denied to them (social validation - "morbid gain" is the technial term for this).

Anyway, I am rotting in bed, thinking about next week when I have multiple appointments with social workers. I dread these appointments because I have to larp at them and do pit-fighting with their retarded worldview on the go. This scene is literally my worst nightmare, timestamp 1:10:


View: https://youtu.be/Zb-RVIETRCE?t=70


Whatever, I will not go down. It's either this or being homeless again and dying. I hope I could kind of give insight why normies act like that and why people like us act the way we do, out of necessity, not for pleasures sake out of choice, like them.
 
Last edited:
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men.

View attachment 1223788

1. what is a smart man​

Women do not even understand what smart means. To women, smart means cunning. street smarts. social smarts. They don't understand any other definition of intelligence.

Real intelligence, can be related to nervous system sensitivity. A sensitive amygdala. The ability to think abstractly. Having an impressionable mind. An intelligent person is able to perceive something that isn't in front of them, that hasn't happened yet, and visualize it in their head, play with it, marinate on it, etc. that's true intelligence. Not your ability to memorize things and answer questions quickly. like IQ tests and schools try to measure.

If you think of the term "think before acting", it is telling people to be intelligent. (the fact that that term is popular and nuanced tells you how intelligent the average person is). For people lacking in intelligence, you have to do the thinking for them. You have to say "Hey, don't go to the casino, the house always wins!" "hey, don't do heroin, you'll probably get fucking addicted!". These things are incredibly fairly obvious, but you'd be surprised how incompetent these people are. These people genuinely have their brains turned off the majority of the time, they might not even have internal dialogue. The stimuli and information they receive does not get processed, it does not impress into their minds and give them lessons on the future of their actions, the data just comes in and immediately goes out.

Because of this they are limited to the local, what they immediately perceive. You can tell a retard there's millions starving on the planet. They will look around and say "no one is starving". Even though they can get on a plane and go see starving people, the statement doesn't impress in their minds, they don't understand what the issue or concern is. These idiots are confined to the immediate, they are incredibly bored, they require harsh stimuli like a club or a room full of other idiots yapping to enjoy the moment. I could make a whole post about this, but whatever. intelligence is tied to brain sensitivity and abstract thinking.

2. women hate smart men because of: empathy​

Brain sensitivty leads to empathy. Empathy is retsrained, it's a lack of willingness to dominate others but instead do the opposite, to have a peaceful, low-stimulating and conflict free environment. (psychopaths often have blunted and short lasting emotions and no affective empathy, their amygdalas are not as sensitive. That's why they can take on a ton of risk, they can seem "cool" under extreme pressure, etc.)

Empathy is a red flag in women. To women, men are SERFS. They are little robots and mules that only exist to provide them with food and safety, and for the best of them, good genes and offspring. In reality, 90% of men would be incels if women didn't use them for betabuxx. Normies are highly suceptible to chasing a foid just because she offers some pussy, so they end up in these goofy arrangements called marriages. Chads get genuine desire. average men/normies get betabuxx when women can't find chad, the ones that didn't make the cut end up as incels, at an ever increasing rate. A average/mule/robot that is overly sensitive? red flag to women, they will avoid and pick someone else to betabuxx from. (while they look for chad).


3. women hate smart men because of: introspection​

introspecition and the ability to self reflect makes you hard to manipulate. If you are intelligent, your emotions have subtlety. You are not a meat puppet that reacts predictably to everything women do. To women, the sum total of a man's value = (what the man has) * (what the foid can extract). Someone who has a lot of value, money, resources, but isn't willing to be manipulated or hypnotized by sex is a man they don't have control over. That pisses them off. For physically attractive men it makes them a challenge or some fun prospect they can try and trap, but if that man is physically unattractive, they don't want anything to do with him. "oh, you won't accept being friend zoned? you won't shower me in attention and gifts with no sex as a reward? fuck off then :foidSoy: ". If you have the ability to self reflect and think abstractly and understand your past actions and future outcomes of your present actions, you're unlikely to be manipulated.

it also makes you less likely to take risks. four guys in the middle of the night come towards you and a foid. What are you gonna do? risk your fucking life to protect a foid in an obviously high risk low reward fight with four fucking men? no you're gonna turn and run. Another thing women don't like apparently.

4. women hate smart men because of: self interest​

Intelligent people tend to act in their own self interest. Not the interest of their genetic code or the interests of women or the interests of their body and horomones. Intelligent people tend to see through the trap and game of life. They're less likely to pull the cart of society in order to chase the carrot on the stick because they see the suffering and pain that brings. Instead of trying to amass status and become fabulously wealthy by working a billion hours or grinding in some company. They decide to live lives of minimal suffering, getting the fuck out of the system, getting nerdsniped and dedicating themselves to their interests, art science and so forth.

if you don't play the game of being a meat puppet, the master of the game won't give you the prize (pussy). Women have no interest in men that are intelligent in this regard. They would rather string some normie betabuxxer along, making him go to work all week, all month, buy them a house and shiny things, suffering and slaving, to give him one night of dead bedroom sex.

5. women hate smart men because of: their fetish for abstraction​

The abstract. Physics, mathematics, ideas, concepts. Intelligent people tend to fall in love with those things. Schopenhauer says that intelligence and madness are very close. As both the intelligent and the insane person can see a world which no one else sees. They are playing with concepts in their head which are beautiful to them, but no one else can experience that beauty or understand it unless they think about it themselves. Women obviously do not tend to think abstractly. As I mentioned one time:

A man with a fetish for abstraction does not have time for the real world. They are interested in topics that fly millions of miles over a females head. A woman can't decipher what status someone who studies calabi yau manifolds and string theory has. She might understand the term "doctor" or "scientist" and assume they make money, but actual medicine? actual theories and concepts? she could not care less about. If you're a top level security expert she has no clue what the fuck that means. She doesn't know the difference between someone doing some cool trick on their computer and a skilled hacker leaking data from the NSA. The most she will care about a hacker is if some chad plays one in a movie and she has a fetish for men who like computers for a few months.

6. women themselves are unlikely to be intelligent.​

women are social creatures. They are incredibly specialized and experts at socializing. Socializing and mating is their job. The only expertise required of them is knowing how to become a mother, and how to receive things from the group and their husband. There is zero fucking pressure on them to earn an income, to gain knowledge of anything, to compete in anything other than beauty, that's it. It's the path of least resistance especially for good looking women. They get everything for free. You can measure how good a woman looks to the group by what kind of attention and gifts she receives and in what quantity. They can be as stupid as possible, so they usually are as stupid as possible. EVEN if attractive women had a brain capable of intelligence, it is very unlikely to be used because of the way they are treated. They can just live in "entertainment mode". This is exatly why if you show up to a club and found an attractive foid in there, you as an intelligent man would have nothing to talk about. Why would a foid care about the amount of compute required to train generative ai when she can sit there and receive free drinks and chase chad.

For more understanding on this checkout @DarkStar study on high iq foids:


The only women who really show intelligence are fucking genetic deviants, probably ugly, they were forced into a life adjacent to men because of their mind and looks. People like ayn rand, incredibly rare.

View attachment 1223762


7. women actually like retarded men.​

if you go back to what a woman's definition of smart is, you'll understand women actually like idiot men. Women prefer men with brains like james bond over einstein (ontop of the fact that they prefer men who look good) Because those men play social games and "win fights" and use their cunning to fight for women.

They want attractive men who work in their genetic interests. Taking insane risks for the chance of sexual selection. Women watch fifty shades of grey and james bond and the main storyline is a physically attractive chad fights and uses guns and does incredibly risky stupid shit, centering his whole life around a woman and putting his life on the line for her protection.

View attachment 1223777
They want men who would take a gun and put a bullet through an aggressors head immediately, regardless of how fucking stupid it would be to commit murder and go to jail for life instead of just running away from an aggressor. They want a man who will do some stupid fucking shit like this:



https://www.news18.com/viral/shocki...acebook-post-with-laughing-emoji-7736293.html

They want men who's genetic survival is more important to them than their self interest, and men who can get away with murdering someone for them. Essentially they want retarded chad criminals.

intelligence is a man who says fuck the genetic interest, fuck the reward system the body has, I will pursue the deep joy of abstraction. Lack of intelligence is men who chase women like a dog chasing a squirrel risking everything and killing others just to cum. And that is why women don't like truly intelligent men.

yep another tldr thread
 
well written, I am retarded and I read the whole thing start to finish on my phone. Post more long threads :feelsokman: :feelsokman: :feelsokman:


I have thought about this.
Just sit down and imagine you had no health issues whatsoever. You can drink anything, eat pizza and coke, sleep instantly for 12h and wake up 100% refreshed. You have no social anxiety because your parents support you. You don't view the world as a threatening place at all.
This turns you borderline psychopathic with your outlook on life.

It gives a sort of "abundance mindset" for the whole of existence - "the world is your oyster" as they say. Sensitive people are often unhealthy with overactive nervous systems, maybe from trauma. They can be stuck in permanent "fight or flight" mode. Because of this, tiny things like a youtube video can make them cry. Or a nice passage in a book.

To a normie this makes no sense. They are so healthy, text on a screen would never ever make them feel shit. They are bulldozing through life feeling nothing for most things since they are so fucking internally stable, they have ZERO self-doubt. That's also why they use status symbols, interests and shit as a signaling method -> unlike the sensitive person who accidentally falls in love with something, normies pick and choose their identity freely without attachments.

Like I said, it is sort of psychopathic. They are not committed to causes, events, trends, interests. If you have known a normie for a long time, you will see them flip their opinion like 10x over 10 years. Or they are giga upset about something that is trendy right now, but also not? Like they will talk about racism but then shit on black people when talking to others on break.

Or they "care" about bird flu, sars, covid, swine flu, iraq-, gulf, - afghan, -ukraine war. But a year later they dont care anymore. It is a sort of uncommitted, psychopathic, pick or choose mentality, resulting from being so healthy they can afford to not care.
A lot of their beliefs are "luxury" beliefs that they just hold because they can, not because they are forced to by circumstances (living in war zone, being ugly and unhealthy etc).

Going back to the beginning, imagine you felt like this

- zero self doubt
- incredible health, especially when young (cant eat anything, do sports, travel, work and its not even exhausting, they party after work)
- no pressing issues that make you question yourself or think about shit
- no social anxiety, view people as non-threat most of the time cuz never bullied, nice family supporting them since childhood, making them feel that the world is a happy and safe place

As others have said in this thread, their primary state is BOREDOM due to LACK of stimulation. I have never felt bored in my entire life. I feel the opposite, my life is a mix of warzone and FOMO (fear of missing out) and wondering when I will die. I am constantly moving.

This is why they seek out stimulation, they are so fucking healthy, they are looking for ways to self-sabotage by stressing themselves. They seek out risk and pain (sports, alcohol, drugs, sex, travel) because they have so little in their lives.

The life many of us live as truecels would be unbearable to them - text on a screen is not enough stimulation. Rotting at home, playing video games, is giga understimulating to them. They need to go out, bombard every orifice with stimulation until they are burned out. But the hunger never ends. They are so healthy, just one night of sleep recovers them instantly, and the hunger comes back.

This continues until they get a bit older and finally start paying the toll of this psychopathic lifestyle. Most normies life is like a rocket launch - initial boost face for first 20 years, then max altitude is reached and they enter a slow, very gradual decline. The health and mental issues we deal with since childhood only BEGIN touching them in like their 50s. I am not joking.

I recently watched a boomer on YT and he said, I didn't think about retirement until I was 50. Meanwhile I have talked to countless incels and truecels, we always think about death, what will happen to us etc, and we are like age 16-25 on average. You are not supposed to view the world as a hostile warzone where you have to surive somehow as a teenager. That is giga abnormal.

When you see some old boomer complain about his life, keep in mind many truecels here have been living a worse life than him for decades at that point. The boomers issues seem more relevant to HIM only, because its the first time he ever had any setbacks in life. They are like, oh, I can't do this as easily anymore, or that. Meanwhile some truecel has been homeless in his 20s, been abused by parents, beaten up, born with health issue, skin condition etc since they were children.

This is why they go to loud parties when young and seek out all that stimulation. Just like psychopaths, they are in constant need for dopamine hits. If they pursue an intellectual path, they replace the stimulation from loud noises and sex and shit with competition. They will debate tons of people, hunt degrees and meaningless accolades and little letters behind their name - phd, md, pp, poopoo etc. Competition gives them the same stimulating boost, destroying others, pushing them out the race, mogging others income wise, flexing your sports car as a doctor.
Most young people going to med school just want to finish their studies and make money. They dont give a fuck about medicine jfl.

Just take into account everything I said just now, and it makes sense why they engage in these activities while we fight to avoid them. This is why I don't expect true sympathy and empathy from normies. They can not relate to this. I have to manipulate them by abusing their virtue signaling programming to get the help I need. If I just went "i am a subhuman autist with isses, I cant work and need disability or I will die on the street" - they will not help me. They always project you are like them, healthy, capable etc. Your words are seen as virtue signaling, intentional display to get shit from them.

So what I do is, I leverage their biases against them by virtue signalling about shit they can't deny me, i.e. racism. If you tell a normie you experience racism, they ideologically can not doubt you. Or when you larp as a trauma victim, tell them you have sisters that got abused too (appealing to pro-foid bias). If you just say you got abused as a guy, they wont care. I have had welfare office bitch literally say to me on phone, "you are a young man, you can figure it out" and end convo.

Get diagnoses. Normies trust authority. They don't understand that psychology is not even a scientific discipline, that the entire field is based on axiomatic, unproven theoretical constructs about how the brain/mind works. That there is debate about the veracity of diagnostic labels in the field itself etc. They don't get there is no such thing as "adhd" or "autism" when you dig deep into the field, especially from a philosophy of science approach.

But to a normie, they see that little label, "diagnosis: autism" and because of their ideology which includes blind trust in authorities and the belief mental disorders are real, they have to change their whole behavior to accomdate you know, or they are "bad people." You have to steelman their position againts them, or they will project you are like them: A super-healthy, young, perma-bored psychopath who is just trying to get freebies from the social welfare state.

It is fucked up, I understand that. But I don't want to die on the street because some retard judged me in 0.13s by my looks and went, aight, this nigga larping as sick to get welfare, imma make his life hell until he gets a job (litearlly how ive been treated). I could have faked the entire fuckkng autism diagnosis except for the part where they talked to my parents. I spent 6 months writing a 10000 word essay on my life, my issues, why I think I have autism, why I exclude other disorders etc. Then I met the doctors and realized I know more about the field than them. I had to play dumb to get the diagnosis, because if I showed my power-level, they would not have given it, I am 100% certain.

I read a fucking academic textbook about autism before coming in, I annotated the whole thing. They were doing shit in my diagnosis that are specifically mentioned in the textbook as shit the diagnoser is NOT supposed to do. I did not show them my essay because I realized after 30s of talking to them that this would undermine everything. From then on, I faked my way through half the diagnosis, because I knew this was war. They did not want to give me this diagnosis, they'd refused before in 2018 and just sent me home from mental hospital because I bought into their manipulation.

This time I was prepared, I knew how they think, their philosophy, their methods.
One example: They made me do an autism test I had never seen before - reading a hemingway short story and interpreting the characters motivations and intent. Besides this being kind of laughable scientifically to diagnose anything kek, I knew what they were looking for. They believe, and I stress "believe" because nothing in autism research is more than conjecture, that autistic people must be incapable of understanding peoples motives and intentions by default, including in fictional media.

This being blatantly wrong and just one out of like 1000 models trying to capture "autism" (an empty umbrella term) , like "hyper male brain theory" "theory of mind theory of autism" "montropism theory of autism" and like 90034234 other theories, didn't even matter. They wanted me to read the text and then magically guess that this somehow indicated autism or not.

Again, I realized this is warfare. I am male, ugly and ethnic. My diagnoser was a middle aged white female. I would have to go hard in the paint to overcome these biases. I read a lot of fiction my youth, including multiple hemingway books. However, I pretended to be completely retarded and that I did not know any of the characters intentions at all and shit. She treated me like a baby, taking shots at me. She said shit like, you dont read a lot, do you? The usually attacks. But I just acted like I didn't get she was mocking me and kept going.

I had to pretend I don't read fiction at all, when I read over 10 warhammer 40k novels in the last 2 years alone (I recorded it on an app on my phone where you can keep track of your reading list). This is so becaues one thing autism researchers believe is that autistic people do not read fiction. I am not joking, this is the level of "science" we are talking about here. Talk to any diagnosed autist on r/aspergers or on this forum, we all read fiction. But because I knew their presuppositions better than them, I knew better than to admit that I read fiction. So I said I don't and the foid, as mentioned, lolled in my face with a shit-eating grin and said you dont read a lot do you?

She did shit like that a few more times, treating me like a retard. She pointed at a clock and went DA BIG POINTER MEANDS DAT etc like im in 1st grade - again, not exaggerating or joking. She thought she is giga IQ and mogging me to death, cuz im ethnic, male and ugly. But I had the drop on her the entire time, I knew blackpill wise what she was doing and why, I knew the tests, I knew the data, I knew what they were looking for and I gave it to them in spades.

Additionally, I sleep deprived myself a ton before the appointment to come off as more retarded. When you are ugly, people think you are retarded anyway. So by fucking yourself up and acting retarded on top of being ugly, people start treating you like you have down syndrome - very low expectations. Sometimes they even virtue signal at you cuz they see you as such a victim.

The hemingway test I mentioned, I found online. The diagnosers name was on it. The bitch did not even know how to use google maps. Normies tend to assume I can't use a smartphone, install basic apps or browse the internet. They never had to. That's why universities still exist, normies want the status labels from getting degrees and also dont realize you can get every study online for free.

Another test they did with me was called "reading the mind in the eyes test" - another unfounded claim, that autitsic people can't read facial expressions. Mixed data on that. For instance, the double empathy problem of autism. They found autistic people can perfectly communicate with other autitsic people and read then normally. So there can not be a deficit in social skills with autists jfl, impossible.

Further, this test is based on the "sasha bron cohen model of autism" - the different tests I was administered were based on completely different theories of what autism is, coming from different researchers. Like I said, there is no unified concept of autism, just like adhd. Just a bunch of theoretical constructs with no supporting evidence. Some is neuroscience, some philosophical. They keep coming up with new random testing methods for autism, which are always proven to be insufficient after a few years.

The "eye reading" test is this: They show you eye areas and then you have to pick from four words that describe the expression, i.e. anger, fear, disgust, joy. This test is available online, I did it like 5 times just for fun. It is retarded. Facial expressions are not standard among people. Some people have resting bitch face despite being happy. A lot of facial expressions are "intentional display" aka, they are made to fit in, not because of genuine underlying feeling.

But again, in the test I had to ignore this. It also says online that like 50% of autist pass that test easily jfl, so how is it valid? Idk. But I recognized most of the expressions but just ticked the wrong box on purpose. Like I said, it takes nothing to fake these tests, tomas szasz moment (most of psych-testing is based on self-report. Spot the problem).

Anyway, to make a long matter short, I finally got the diagnosis. Social workers were congratulating me like I just achieved shit. Saying I must feel so much better now, that I have this random-ass label made up by jews in the 80s (when the term "aspergers" was first coined). People were saying you must feel good, finally having "certainity" about whats wrong with you bla bla bla. I just said yes and played along, they know nothing. It is a joke. I need this shit or I will die on the street.

Rn I am using this dumb fucking label I had to fight to get for two fucking years to get on disability for life. I tell them about my "traumatic childhood" and they have to treat me with satin gloves. Again, a presupposition they have is number one, what people talk about they care about. Big assumption in therapy as well. The idea that someone could talk about something just because or because they want to share info is lost on them. What you talk about = must be emotionally relevant to you. No. But anyway. Second, they assume bad experience = trauma.

This is a staple presuppositions of psychology and the therapy industry. Notice how the word "trauma" has become common parlance in our time. It's because they push it as a selling point to get people into therapy sessions. And women love it cuz its an easy way to label yourself a victim. Meanwhile actual therapists have pointed out that a ton of people are NOT traumatized by what we would assume to be "traumatic events." Take ww1 and ww1, millions served. Did everyone have trauma? Only a tiny minority of people that served were traumatized.

I have a book on that called, manufacturing victims.


They want you to ignore this though and generally, lower tier goons of the mental health fields like social workers never quetions anything they are taught at university. So when I tell them my parents beat my ass and force-fed me spaghetti while threatening violence, they default to, this person must be severely fucked up and shit. I am, but not nearly as much as they assume. My main stressor in life is being unhealthy and ugly, not what happened to me in the past.

If they payed any attention to what I told them about my family, they would also have to conclude that "trauma" somehow does not affect some people even though they go through the same things. I have four siblings, all of which are normal despite living in same "traumatic" household. Idk how the social worker is not picking up on this shit but fuck it, we ball.

It is endless, I could go on and on how I am mentally running circles around these people because I have spent every waking minute since 13 online and literally seen every single thing they will say in advance. All the typical shrink advice, self-help tropes, stoicism, do sport, positive thinking, CBT therapy, behaviorism vs cognitivism, history of psychology, etc. Everything they say, I already know and can connect to something in my head. For instance, last time my social worker (female) was here, I was sleep deprived and stressed, which makes my nervous system giga prone to overreactin (shit health not trauma).

So I almost cried a few times, but she interpreted that as "trauma." She then said I should do sports (of course), and gave me some of these concepts from psychology they borrowed form psycho-analysis and pretend its somehow scientific like "u are identifying with your parents, this is called parentification bla bla bla" bitch I dont think about my parents at all most day, what are you talking about. I just go along with it, gotta play the game to get the brownie points.

They dont know I am in habit of double guessing every single thought I have, I dont trust my emotions, beliefs nothing. They assume they can just say words and I pick it up because I identify with it - another classic therapy trick. Give people horoscope tier concepts that everyone can identify with, i.e. "trauma" and then claim your "model" applies to reality with high accuracy. Nobody can even define trauma, how much pain it takes, for how long etc. By that metric, stubbing my toe can be highly traumatic, if I am the type of person that gets, you know, traumatized by that. It is purely subjective.

But I already realized in my teens that identifying with things is just confirmation bias. Just approach it logically, you only like what you already like. If something aggrees with you, you probably liked that thing to begin with. So you gain nothing, it is confirmation bias. Normies do that all the time, they read a self-help book or whatever, see some phrase they like and then say the book is high iq.

Look into barnum effect, literally half of psychology is just barnum effect, so is self help, stoicism and other shit. Giving labels to people that are suffering, so they can fit their own beliefs in pre-defined labeled boxes, is literally CREATING THE DISEASE YOU ARE TRYING TO DIAGNOES HELLO? This is why they always claim high accruacy rate with diagnosis and shit. People also adopt their behavior to fit these boxes after learning about them, further exaggerting the issue.

One personal funny example. I have spent so much time reading and diving into autism on reddit, literature, videos, I have begun acting way more autistic lmfao. My parents thought I had brain damage when they met me again after 2 years of homelessness. I make way less eye contact and shit. Not because I became "more" autistic, but becaues I unwittingly absored the identity of autism while studying it and self-identifying with it to get the fucking diagnosis.

Would highly recc reading this and applying the approach to everything mental health. Also getting into phil critique of CBT, cognitivism, behaviorism, history of psychology as an outgrowth of failed philsophical projects of enlightement (psychology depends on specific unfounded assmuption about theory of mind, theory of knowledge and even metaphysical assumptions - it is a philosphical position, not scientific):


Anyway, this is just an example of how fucking insane this planet is and the shit I have to deal with on a daily basis just to survive. Now imagine NEVER having to think about any of this. You just stuff your holes with dildos, food, music and cock. Stimulate every cells as much as possible.
Heck, they even have to increase their sensitive of nervous system by using drugs, something fucked up people feel all the time.

Like that shit when that nigger cried about getting his "reefer" or some MDMAed out faggot is like crying "its beautiful mayne" while looking at a pic of mikey mouse - yeah I have that level of sensitivty every waking second because my life is hell and I have to maneuver through FLAK, and AA fire like ww2 kamikaze pilot everytime I interact with the system keeping me on life support - social services and their designated representatives.

View attachment 1227495

If I was not this sensitive and constantly in threat detection mode, I would be dead. It is not trauma, autism etc - it is survival. Exactly what Thomas Szasz said in his critiques of psychiatry. Not that any of the people I am working with, including social workers, MDs, trained psychologists and therapists know who Thomas Szasz is or what he said. Szasz said mental illness is a construct created with no solid basis in science or philosophy and also, patients abuse these constructs because they give them a feeling of purpose, identity, or because they need the label of the construct to survive on welfare or get support that is otherwise denied to them (social validation - "morbid gain" is the technial term for this).

Anyway, I am rotting in bed, thinking about next week when I have multiple appointments with social workers. I dread these appointments because I have to larp at them and do pit-fighting with their retarded worldview on the go. This scene is literally my worst nightmare, timestamp 1:10:


View: https://youtu.be/Zb-RVIETRCE?t=70


Whatever, I will not go down. It's either this or being homeless again and dying. I hope I could kind of give insight why normies act like that and why people like us act the way we do, out of necessity, not for pleasures sake out of choice, like them.

Too long, dnr



I'm kidding brocel :feelsaww: read every word, was extremely insightful & mirin' the mastermind manipulator social skills level you have, to successfuly play le autismo in front of these retards like that to get what you need, and these niggas think they got you figured out while being played like that JFL

I love when you let yourself go and make these long ass posts, I never skip them. Always an interesting read

Also yeah, I understand the need for stimulation a little bit better now. I can remember being a kid (like <8 years or so) and it's probably exactly like that for normies. Like the parts of their brains responsible for abstract thinking, self-reflection and empathy never developed. They're kids in grown people's bodies
 
I'm kidding brocel :feelsaww: read every word, was extremely insightful & mirin' the mastermind manipulator social skills level you have, to successfuly play le autismo in front of these retards like that to get what you need, and these niggas think they got you figured out while being played like that JFL
its not hard when you have just a little bit of curiosity and skepticism.

Also yeah, I understand the need for stimulation a little bit better now. I can remember being a kid (like <8 years or so) and it's probably exactly like that for normies. Like the parts of their brains responsible for abstract thinking, self-reflection and empathy never developed. They're kids in grown people's bodies
This is the most important part. Keep that in mind. Normies often mistake change for progress. And also we tend to mistake global changes for individual changes in our lives. We are swept up in trends too big for us to see and then assume we experienced personal transformation. That includes blackpill, incel culture, current dietary stuff. Example: I did not invent the carnivore diet, I discovered it in 2017 because there was a spike of attention on diets back then, lots of vegan vs carnivore online drama - see this graph:

1723904156984


Another example, most young people experience an increase in income in their late 20s, but mistake that for personal development, when everyone experiences that on average:

1723904304430

1723904327203



Or how most young people on this forum move on and get gfs. Don't take it from me, take it from this autism researcher foid who has been interacting with us for years now timestamp (17:12):


View: https://youtu.be/dhEfIdXxRuk?t=1032


Young people are especially prone to thinking they are unique, their experience is unqiue, for a lack of experience. When they get a gf, they assume it has to be something they did, and thus incels were wrong, it was just a phase they went through as a teenager.
"Fundamental attribution error" is another term used in psychology for this type of thinking. Essentially when things happen to us that we like/want/prefer, we tend to assume we deserved it somehow and that we are responsible for our own success - "pats himself on shoulder."
But when things happen to other people that we would like to happen to us, we dismiss it as coincidence.

This turns around for negative experiences. If negative happens to others - "they are dumb, they had it coming" and for us "I didnt do anything, I had no control."

Neither of these options consider the simple possibility that it does not matter at all. Maybe nobody did anything to deserve anything. Maybe things just happen? How do you know whether they are good or bad to begin with? Because you like them or dislike them? More on that problem of judging things from human centric viewpoint later ("autonomous epistemology"). An alternative would be to attribute purpose and reason for events to either

a) impersonal universe (imo kinda gay and self-contradictory because if entire universe impersonal and you part of universe, then you no person, shieet mayng, so how you making arguments?)

b) personal universe (theonomous epistemology), creator god(s) are behind everything, meaning while we still struggle to interpret why events happen and whether they are good or bad, we at least know they are intentional and purposeful. There is no random event in a personal created universe, no accident, no chance. If you believe in a inherently good deity, then everything that happens would be necessarily good in the long run and you can just submit to your own ignorance of not how it is good, even it you experience it as bad on your own terms.

These problems and others are what I refer to as the jump-start problem. How do we jump-start the
foundations of our epistemology? At this point it becomes clear that autonomous philosophers have been
reduced to wild guesses as to their foundations. Most people hold to all the above listed beliefs, but they do
so as articles of faith, not justified beliefs.

Anyway, as people age and their life "improves" (they get more money like everyone else in their age group etc), just-world-fallacy kicks in and in addition to fading looks, they assume that they "matured" somehow, despite not being able to define that term. Or people that go to the gym and get a gf, assuming that gym = female attention, when it could just be that women go to gyms to find betabuxxers in their late 20s, and the guy just turned 27.

Another thing is that peoples optimism increases as they age. Unfounded confidence boosts delusional thinking, obviously. They tend to remember positive things and forget negative. This turbo-boosts just world fallacy. This is why old people always say we are all degen loosers now, and their generation mogged. Meanwhile if you talk to an old person that had a hard life and is not well off in old age (no reason for believing in just world), they will readily tell you nothing has changed, young people are the same they were back then, no more or less virtuous, just as much degen.


All this together leads to old people thinking themselves to be more and more mature and wise, when they literally are becoming more retarded by believing that. More retarded, obnoxious, entitled, self-righteous. As you said, they are mentally still children but think themselves superior to that.

Actually changing as a person is extremely difficult, even with nuclear levels of self-awareness and skepticism. Anyone who has actually tried to do something they don't want to do, out of sheer willpower, not because compelled by circumstance, knows that. In my experience, even with high self awareness, you just become like a captain waking up on his boat in a storm, aware of the situation but incapable of saving himself. Your body falls apart, you keep making dumb choices despite knowing better. You just watch while you self-destruct, like you are playing yourself from a 3rd person perspective.

To use the words from the Apostle Paul in the bible, who was aware of this:

15 I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do.
16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good.
17 As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me.
18 For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature.[a] For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out.
19 For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.

Romans 7:15-20

When you are self-critical, as Christianity demands, you will just grow in the realization of your own inadequacy, to the point where you surrender yourself completely to the unknown powers that be, aka God. Hence they say, the further you spiritually progress, the more you realize your "sin." Sin in the orthodox sense here, as a sort of disease that we are not responsible for, not in the western, legalistic sense of sin.

In our society however, we advocate for the opposite. Optimism, positive thinking, pride, confidence in your beliefs are taught as the basis for being "healthy." But outside of having faith in a higher principle that protects you, you are just left with believing in yourself. And who wants to trust themselves at the end of the day kek? If you are the final word in everything you say, you engage in circular reasoning, you are brain rotting yourself or worst case, you go schizo by looking for answers in yourself, while self-defining the answers. But if you are a self-critical person, then you will critique yourself endlessly, including your answers - How do I know, how do I know, how, how, how - infinitely.


If Nietzsche had not ended in imbecility, Nietzscheism would end in imbecility. Thinking in isolation and with pride ends in being an idiot. Every man who will not have softening of the heart must at last have softening of the brain.

Kinda schizophrenic. I imagine it like that mathematical paradox of the man who can not catch up to the turtle, because the distance between him and the turtle just shrinks infinitely. You can slice and dice and analyze everything for infinity, there will be no answers.
In the end, you are left with nothing, just nihilism.

This is the current state in philosophy as well, hence, our culture looks like that, promotes what I described. No foundations, just endless walking in circles, no answers.

Nicholas Everitt in his book “Modern Epistemology” says of the current state of analysis that, “… this
search for foundations has been unsuccessful.” It has failed in mathematics and it has failed in science. All
particular proposals have failed, and it fails in principle.[5] Everitt concludes with the question, “Given this
inevitable failure, what if anything is left for the epistemologist to do?”[6]


So when we look at modern man and we see that his state is the result of a failed philosophical tradition, and that "culture is downstream from philosophy" then we can also understand why people in our time never group and remain immature their entire life.

1. In the current popular worldview, there is no set definitions for any beliefs. Everything is arbitrary. So everyone defines "maturity" his own way. Some say they suffered, so they are "mature" (morally superior), some say they avoided suffering by becoming "successful" - another term they define themselves, and therefore they are "mature" (morally superior). Just-world-fallacy, or simply put, the sword of self-justifcation cuts both ways. It takes no prisoners.

Given that everyone ends up justfiying themselves and all their beliefs on their own basis anyway, everyone thinks they are mature. It is narcissism and borderline psychosis on a societal level. And its also baby-tier reasoning. "I want what I want and that is good and I know it is good because I want it, and if you disagree you are just trying to take my stuff away from me, you are oppressing me by disagreeing with my wants waaaaaaa!"

2. In order to even define maturity and measure our progress towards it, we can't rely on subjective definitions. We have to appeal to something outside of human experience, an idependent, perfect and all knowing personal arbiter. Sure we can deny his existence all we want, but we end up where we started - nacissism, incapability of justifying anything, not even knowing what we want or whether that is good or bad, outside of appealing to our own, ever changing opinions.

A meta view of this entire issue would be that in order to even have acess to objective maturity, you would have to submit, aka humble yourself, to a higher, objective principle that supercedes your fallible human reasoning. Submission of the intellect.

This is how I see the issue of maturity and normies. They are just stumbling around, guideless, holding a light out infront of themselves, thinking it leads anywere, not realizing they are the ones holding the light.
 
I was inspired to make this thread after I came across a journal entry I made ages ago. In summary here are my notes and reasons on why women do not like intelligent men. They don't like 80% of men, they're okay with using them as betabuxx, but they especially don't like intelligent men
While this is not bad, and I don't disagree on the core message, I think that the reason women don't like really intelligent men is much simpler: high intelligence negatively correlates with traits women consider attractive -
:incel:
aggression,
extroversion,
spontaneity,(nerds like order)
confidence,(Dunning/Kruger)
physicality (most nerds are super skinny or skinny fat),
wearing eyeglasses (not going outside during childhood and reading causes this)
Low agreeableness,(nerds do not cause conflict)
Also, very high intelligence tends to present itself in autistic traits in general.
So, a very smart man is likely to have a persona opposite that of the ideal GigaChad:chad:

While women say they like intelligence, they like success and status itself - most women think that CEOs, professors and presidents are the smartest people in the world.
Most people in general cannot recognize intelligence and try to measure it through proxies.
 
well written, I am retarded and I read the whole thing start to finish on my phone. Post more long threads :feelsokman: :feelsokman: :feelsokman:
The problem with psychology is that it tries classifying abnormalities in the brain for quick intervention, without the means of finding the cause.

To give a frame of reference, it is like giving a guy from 18th century a working Windows PC and telling him to reverse engineer the software to fix the bugs. Even now reverse engineering any piece of software is a gruelling endeavour needing multiple people and countless years. I'm working on a project porting code from a mainframe to modern frameworks, and even then it will take close to a decade, despite having all the code.

Diagnoses like Autism were based on patterns found on multiple people, but without knowing the cause, we cannot classify the disease, unlike physical ailments that can usually be recognized through a biopsy, x-ray, blood test, etc.

Also I feel like social sciences, including psychology are overrun by pseuds since inception, which set back the sciencies by decades.
I think that Gert Uwe Postel only could have conned psychiatrists, real surgeons need actual skill to succeed.

You most certainly have some kind of abnormality, whether it would be very high intelligence, autism, or whatever, though.
 
High IQ-post. Remember that women have no incentive to think creatively or abstractly or philosophically. 99% of all inventions have been invented by men. Think about it, what reason would a woman have to invent something? Men have the all-important incentive that an invention will bring him fame and riches and thus access to females. Women have access to reproduction by merely existing, they haven't developed to become world builders and explorers.
 
Spot on. Women who society considers intelligent generally are just good at memorizing stuff. Men are almost always the ones who think outside the box and push the boundaries of what we know while "intelligent" women simply reinforce what's already been established.
 

Similar threads

spermretentionmax
Replies
39
Views
737
notcracklord
notcracklord
V
Replies
5
Views
222
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Replies
16
Views
512
AvPDcel
A
Deep.Nest
Replies
35
Views
543
notcracklord
notcracklord
veqdera
Replies
3
Views
226
lifesucksandyoudie
lifesucksandyoudie

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top