Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Women are the primary motivators for men to create progress and development in society

[UWSL]At the end of the day it doesn’t matter if you have 10 houses, you can only live in one house at a time. It doesn’t matter if you have 10 cars, you can only drive one car at a time.[/UWSL]

Therefore, men never chase resources for PRACTICAL USE of the resources ITSELF. The reason Men chase resources is because of what resources attract: WOMEN.

A man doesn’t need much to be satisfied in life, Our bodies are stronger than a woman’s, our bodies are made for hardship which is why unlike women our bodies do not require a great amount of luxury in order to feel comfort. We are happy with less in life.

However, women can’t live simple lives like men, they have high standards of living because their bodies (by nature) are built in such a way that require luxury in order to feel true comfort.

that’s the reason men aggressively chase wealth and power, why else would a man be buying 10 houses and 10 cars? If it wasn’t for the purpose of using his wealth to attract women, he would be satisfied with living in a one bedroom apartment, eating basic food, wearing unbranded clothes and driving an average car.

A mans desire to attract a woman leaves him with no choice but to innovate, invent, facilitate progress and development in society, in order to generate wealth so that women will consider him a viable partner for sex/reproduction. Society uses women as the carrot on the stick to convince/coerce men to advance their civilisation to higher levels.

Men chase women because women hold the keys to reproduction, women are the ones who give birth to our children who represent the next generation which will carry on society once we’re gone.

[UWSL]This is the reason that Wars have been fought throughout history by men in order to create a safer, more secure and more pleasurable life for [/UWSL][UWSL]Women and children, on the back of the hard work and sacrifice made by men. Women have always been the primary motivators of men. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]If [/UWSL][UWSL]Society rewards men with the ability to attract women, men will become valued contributors to society, but deny men the ability to attract women and watch as they become intent on destroying the society which they consider to be their enemy.[/UWSL]

If men cannot be creators Of society, they will be destroyers of society.

Now It’s up to society which role they want us to follow.
fucking based. enforced monogamy is the only salvation
 
This personal interests/drives are (to some degree) separated from women.
[UWSL]Things you actually want to do (like following your interests/passions - like drawing/making music/etc.) can be done still. But for me the motivation to do anything but the bare minimum for everything else (e.g. for things I don't have an internal drive towards) is simply not there - like working for others extra-hard to realize a common goal or improving community life. [/UWSL]
[UWSL]If society owes me nothing, I (in turn) owe society nothing.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]A society like ours will ultimately lead to more and more people leading solipsistic/atomized lifes or (even worse) doing shit to themselves/others, the only way to levitate the stress of this modern dystopia is connecting with like-minded individuals both off-and online and cope-/interestmaxxing. On the individual plane there is still some hope, but for most of society there isn't.[/UWSL]
 
I’m honestly surprised that a women faccade that “a man in a suit is a turn-on” even exists. I guess I came from the sticks
 
[UWSL]At the end of the day it doesn’t matter if you have 10 houses, you can only live in one house at a time. It doesn’t matter if you have 10 cars, you can only drive one car at a time.[/UWSL]

Therefore, men never chase resources for PRACTICAL USE of the resources ITSELF. The reason Men chase resources is because of what resources attract: WOMEN.

A man doesn’t need much to be satisfied in life, Our bodies are stronger than a woman’s, our bodies are made for hardship which is why unlike women our bodies do not require a great amount of luxury in order to feel comfort. We are happy with less in life.

However, women can’t live simple lives like men, they have high standards of living because their bodies (by nature) are built in such a way that require luxury in order to feel true comfort.

that’s the reason men aggressively chase wealth and power, why else would a man be buying 10 houses and 10 cars? If it wasn’t for the purpose of using his wealth to attract women, he would be satisfied with living in a one bedroom apartment, eating basic food, wearing unbranded clothes and driving an average car.

A mans desire to attract a woman leaves him with no choice but to innovate, invent, facilitate progress and development in society, in order to generate wealth so that women will consider him a viable partner for sex/reproduction. Society uses women as the carrot on the stick to convince/coerce men to advance their civilisation to higher levels.

Men chase women because women hold the keys to reproduction, women are the ones who give birth to our children who represent the next generation which will carry on society once we’re gone.

[UWSL]This is the reason that Wars have been fought throughout history by men in order to create a safer, more secure and more pleasurable life for [/UWSL][UWSL]Women and children, on the back of the hard work and sacrifice made by men. Women have always been the primary motivators of men. [/UWSL]

[UWSL]If [/UWSL][UWSL]Society rewards men with the ability to attract women, men will become valued contributors to society, but deny men the ability to attract women and watch as they become intent on destroying the society which they consider to be their enemy.[/UWSL]

If men cannot be creators Of society, they will be destroyers of society.

Now It’s up to society which role they want us to follow.
That only works in society. In real life away from matrix you never give a fuck about womans needs except giving bitch a food and clothes for her to not die so you could have sth to fuck. Then you do whatever you want with her because if she won't give up the pussy you kill her.
 
I agree with this mostly, yes to all other users in this thread saying some men don’t need to do stuff with women as a motivator I agree.

but those men are a minority they, they already are sexually secured or the a one of those special hype schizoid autist that likes be alone (Tesla) or they are coping fucking hard to distract from the fact they ain’t getting pussy.
 
However, women can’t live simple lives like men, they have high standards of living because their bodies (by nature) are built in such a way that require luxury in order to feel true comfort.

that’s the reason men aggressively chase wealth and power, why else would a man be buying 10 houses and 10 cars? If it wasn’t for the purpose of using his wealth to attract women, he would be satisfied with living in a one bedroom apartment, eating basic food, wearing unbranded clothes and driving an average car.
Speak for yourself, males excel naturally at acquisition of currency/wealth as well as making that wealth grow, and that's on itself doesn't involve women anyway. e.g. 9 houses can be rented for passive income. And of those who buy 2+ cars, almost all are collectors and don't buy them to drive daily on them. Those can be exclusively used to live a life of luxury and not to attract women, simply because rich guys don't need to, they can just escort away with deluxe prostitutes.

I won't deny that women/sex are primary factors, but the reasoning is flawed. Women don't need 10 cars either, and they live along their husband/beta so there would be no difference in number of houses needed. Not only that but there's a fairly inverse correlation between people wanting to marry and their wealth.

It also can't be denied (as it is already mega obvious) that a male's wealth is a primary drive for females to marry. The reason for this is simple, and already known for centuries, women aren't biologically obligated to conceive from their husbands. They can always get pregnant from another man with better genetics. This is why it's stupid to try and attract women with money/wealth. That "attraction" would be aimed at your resources only and in that aspect a wife would be no different than a prostitute
 
I agree with this mostly, yes to all other users in this thread saying some men don’t need to do stuff with women as a motivator I agree.

but those men are a minority they, they already are sexually secured or the a one of those special hype schizoid autist that likes be alone (Tesla) or they are coping fucking hard to distract from the fact they ain’t getting pussy.
First, genetically superior males (alpha) don't need resources to attract women. That's a fact.

Second, beta males can't naturally attract women, only the resources they can provide ACCORDING TO FEMALE PERCEPTION - meaning a beta male who happens to amass wealth but shows signs that those resources won't be available for females (e.g. a prenup) will also always get rejected by women, BUT a beta male who is poor but appears to be rich or good in social status will be accepted for a relationship. That attraction would, again, be aimed at his resources first, but it will eventually extend to his person too after some time (maybe not to procreate).

Third: Saying "they're a minority" doesn't prove anything per se, because very few people can have a higher impact in the world if they hold positions of power. A single man can declare war on a country, and it doesn't matter if he so does because of a woman - or not - as there will be many people killing and getting killed despite their personal motivations being (or not) attracting women.
 
Sex is very similar to food IMO, when you have no access and are severely starved of it, it always consumes your mind, and it becomes impossible to focus on doing anything else in life like becoming a Doctor or Lawyer or a CEO
 
First, genetically superior males (alpha) don't need resources to attract women. That's a fact.
When did I say they didn’t?
Second, beta males can't naturally attract women, only the resources they can provide ACCORDING TO FEMALE PERCEPTION - meaning a beta male who happens to amass wealth but shows signs that those resources won't be available for females (e.g. a prenup) will also always get rejected by women, BUT a beta male who is poor but appears to be rich or good in social status will be accepted for a relationship. That attraction would, again, be aimed at his resources first, but it will eventually extend to his person too after some time (maybe not to procreate).
And those type of men make the majority of the male population. They abide by 'rules'
Third: Saying "they're a minority" doesn't prove anything per se, because very few people can have a higher impact in the world if they hold positions of power. A single man can declare war on a country, and it doesn't matter if he so does because of a woman - or not - as there will be many people killing and getting killed despite their personal motivations being (or not) attracting women.
Those small minority of men with power be it with genetics (chads) intelligence (Tesla types) and status (politicians) don’t apply to my comment. It doesn’t matter if they have influence, the rules don’t apply to them. my comment was aimed at the average male population.
I’ll put the words in bold.
I agree with this MOSTLY, yes to all other users in this thread saying SOME men don’t need to do stuff with women as a motivator I agree.

but those men are a MINORITY, they already are SEXUALLY SUCURE or the a one of those special hype schizoid autist that likes be alone (Tesla) or they are coping fucking hard to distract from the fact they ain’t getting pussy.
 
Based post OP. Society neglects the needs of men, so society will invariably suffer the consequences. This is happening by the day. Men are dropping out of the workforce in record numbers. Suicides, violent crime, and mass shooting are all increasing throughout the western world.
 
Those small minority of men with power be it with genetics (chads) intelligence (Tesla types) and status (politicians) don’t apply to my comment. It doesn’t matter if they have influence, the rules don’t apply to them. my comment was aimed at the average male population.
I’ll put the words in bold.
The fact that they will have their way over millions still stands - Impact in society isn't measured by the motivations of the majority but by the motivations of a pretty small number elites.

And there is not such thing as "average males" as a group (that can't bend the rules their way) since just having financial advantage over others is already more than enough to manipulate others, even in a small scale. Women are one of many motivators, but trying to pin on them everything that makes life miserable seems like bait material in order to feed those who criticize inceldom to feel good about themselves
Based post OP. Society neglects the needs of men, so society will invariably suffer the consequences. This is happening by the day. Men are dropping out of the workforce in record numbers. Suicides, violent crime, and mass shooting are all increasing throughout the western world.
Why so many people here trying to personalize society? It's specific people's fault, not society. Blame those in power who abuse said power to manipulate others and take advantage from them
 
Last edited:
Too many assumptions. I like mogging other guys too, and I always want the best even if there are no foids around.
 
And there is not such thing as "average males" as a group (that can't bend the rules their way) since just having financial advantage over others is already more than enough to manipulate others, even in a small scale. Women are one of many motivators, but trying to pin on them everything that makes life miserable seems like bait material in order to feed those who criticize inceldom to feel good about themselves
They are still average males, learn what average means. Yes women are one of many motivators but are the primary ones for most men. You have no idea how pathetic most men are.
Why so many people here trying to personalize society? It's specific people's fault, not society. Blame those in power who abuse said power to manipulate others and take advantage from them
because if most people really wanted change they can rally up and overthrow them. The people at the top need people on bottom to say dumb and docile. Theres a reason suicide was outlawed by the church. Blaming one evil villain is comical. The massages hold responsibility too.
 
The vast majority of trailblazers and inventors have been chaste or men otherwise uninvolved with women. Men have a natural curiosity to understand the world independent of pussy.

Now, as for the standard worker bee drone, yes, vagina and family formation is the carrot and stick that results in widespread upkeep of society. However, its equally maladaptive since women are just as likely to push productivity in useless avenues such as fashion, social nonsense and the like. Also, women demand wealth transfer from men by child support and alimony for frankly doing nothing.

I've long since argued that even if women were a positive force for human advancement (and even then, through no effort of their own), they have now become obsolete and even regressive. They are now an impediment to human progress due to the lack of selection pressure (ie, their mating habits, behavior and preferences are stuck in the damn stone age).

For humans to achieve the next level of advancement they will have to either remove the shackles that is woman and heterosexual reproduction and/or evolve into something that is above these things.

It bothers me to no end that so many men, 'based and blackpilled incels' in particular, want to revert us to a state where they can blissfully be workhorses for women simply for a taste of vagina.
Just evolve into a non-species theory.
“womens mating habits are stuck in the Stone Age” is such a retarded argument. Their mating habits never change throughout time. What selective pressure would invoke such a change? Why would it change? Is it not serving them well? Industrialization doesn’t magically change the genetic stock of a species. Think about all the sources of pleasure we have. Food, security, comfort, safety, pussy, social validation, etc, etc. all things that exist outside of the modern world. Those same sources of pleasure have existed for the duration of humanity’s existence. There is no moving away “Stone Age mating habits” and evolving past heterosexual reproduction; the object of a self propagating organism’s life is to propagate. And if you somehow evolved a population to be something other than that, meaning they now have values higher than propagating, for which they would sacrifice propagating, the species would be unviable and go extinct almost immediately.

Human progress is a meme IMO. Read Ted Kaczynski.

Nothing new under the sun. Everybody just wants to eat and fuck. There is no end goal to progress, no particular direction it’s going in other than “stuff that hasn’t existed before, therefore it must be objectively a good thing”, and really no rational reason for pursuing it other than it kind of makes our lives a little easier in some small, usually trivial way.
 
Inventions that sparked development and progress were done by a few notable individuals, including women, motivated by their problem-solving mindsets. If they really were motivated by money, they'd monetise their work. No need to look at further than, OSS communities. Those nerds need female touch more than any other guys. Yet, they still give them away for free. I'm sure there are examples in other industries, as well. Making money and becoming a consumer don't cause development and progress, solving problems does. Although not surprised, incel communities perceive everything through their narrow lens of mating strategy.
 
Men through history chased power, status and wealth to show dominance over other men as women were a commodity that every man could acquire.
 
Chad can be broke and attract a woman that’ll stay by his side for life. This is what betabuxxers use to cope
 
I doubt Einstein, Tesla, Mozart etc. innovated and created because they wanted to get their dick wet. :feelskek:

Yes, great men get their dick wet as a SIDE EFFECT of their work but I doubt it was their main motivation.

This is classic foid thinking: Doing something only to get something else. Yet men who are fascinated by nature, technology etc.. do that FOR ITS OWN SAKE. That is what made them great. Sorry to say this, but the premise of this thread is cucked even if there are some blackpills.
 
The requirements women expect now are so out of reach many are deciding not to bother or no matter what you do your starting deficit was so big you cannot overcome.
 
The vast majority of trailblazers and inventors have been chaste or men otherwise uninvolved with women. Men have a natural curiosity to understand the world independent of pussy.

Now, as for the standard worker bee drone, yes, vagina and family formation is the carrot and stick that results in widespread upkeep of society. However, its equally maladaptive since women are just as likely to push productivity in useless avenues such as fashion, social nonsense and the like. Also, women demand wealth transfer from men by child support and alimony for frankly doing nothing.

I've long since argued that even if women were a positive force for human advancement (and even then, through no effort of their own), they have now become obsolete and even regressive. They are now an impediment to human progress due to the lack of selection pressure (ie, their mating habits, behavior and preferences are stuck in the damn stone age).

For humans to achieve the next level of advancement they will have to either remove the shackles that is woman and heterosexual reproduction and/or evolve into something that is above these things.

It bothers me to no end that so many men, 'based and blackpilled incels' in particular, want to revert us to a state where they can blissfully be workhorses for women simply for a taste of vagina.
Based post, but will probably go over the head of many retards here
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
11
Views
436
Julaybib
Julaybib
Seahorsecel
Replies
27
Views
691
Seahorsecel
Seahorsecel
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
27
Views
483
Freixel
Freixel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top