Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Women are superior to men, the truth incels don't want to hear.

You're blabbering all of this nonsense on the assumption that women can "intuitively recognize who is capable of building civilization or not". This isn't true in the slightest: there's a difference between sexual selection and natural selection. Sexual selection is the reason why incels can't reproduce: because we possess certain traits that (rather arbitrarily) are not seen as attractive by females. Sexual selection is not fruitful for human civilization and on the contrary can be harmful: read up on how sexual selection resulted in the eventual extinction of the Irish elk since the biological ornaments selected for eventually became maladaptive and made the Irish elk vulnerable to prey.

Even if that wasn't the case, the traits that females select for are clearly not "advancing human civilization". Females don't see the nerdy geek who will later become a Nobel-Prize winning scientist as "sexy", they see the fratboys and the jocks as sexy. This is because their preferences are largely shaped by what would've conferred reproductive success thousands of years ago when humans lived hunter-gatherer or sedentary agricultural lifestyles, and not what would've been beneficial in the context of modern, 21st century human society. In fact, there's always a time-gap between our evolved traits and the present, since evolution operates over lengthy timeframes and doesn't react instantly to changing environmental conditions unless some type of bottleneck event occurs.
:yes:
 
Incomprehensibly based.
 
The problem is that the "women value" is constructed. Women are biologically breeding and raising machines. In all other things is really hard to find things which foids are better than man - basically nothing, to be honest. Nor physically nor in mind.

Therefore foids use their single useful thing to society and men biological desires to appear superior, but that's only because it relies on men biological needs which are very strong. If males suddenly lost all desire for sex/reproduction, what's their use? They can't compete equally.
This.
 
Seems like male feminist tripe
 
You're blabbering all of this nonsense on the assumption that women can "intuitively recognize who is capable of building civilization or not". This isn't true in the slightest: there's a difference between sexual selection and natural selection. Sexual selection is the reason why incels can't reproduce: because we possess certain traits that (rather arbitrarily) are not seen as attractive by females. Sexual selection is not fruitful for human civilization and on the contrary can be harmful: read up on how sexual selection resulted in the eventual extinction of the Irish elk since the biological ornaments selected for eventually became maladaptive and made the Irish elk vulnerable to prey.

Even if that wasn't the case, the traits that females select for are clearly not "advancing human civilization". Females don't see the nerdy geek who will later become a Nobel-Prize winning scientist as "sexy", they see the fratboys and the jocks as sexy. This is because their preferences are largely shaped by what would've conferred reproductive success thousands of years ago when humans lived hunter-gatherer or sedentary agricultural lifestyles, and not what would've been beneficial in the context of modern, 21st century human society. In fact, there's always a time-gap between our evolved traits and the present, since evolution operates over lengthy timeframes and doesn't react instantly to changing environmental conditions unless some type of bottleneck event occurs.
Damn this post should be stickied somewhere, probably the most important points raised when it comes to gender discussion
 
The nazis and fascists had it wrong. The true definition of biological inferiority has nothing to do with race, sexual orientation, gender, IQ, disability, ethnicity, etc, etc. The true definition of biological inferiority has to do with whether or not you're an incel. Inceldom is the true definition of biological inferiority, and it happens through the process of natural selection, it isn't something that's forced like eugenics. Mother nature already has a perfect and intelligent way of getting rid of its inferiors, it's through women and their reproductive choices. Women are the biggest and most effective nazis of them all. Men will never be as effective at nazism as women are, the holocaust looks like a joke compared to women.
The holocaust was a joke. Lol.


Wooden doors! Lol!

Hey Franz, let's put that deadly poison gas into this colander and kill some juden! Rouse!
 
Incels like to call women evil because they reject us. In reality, women intuitively recognize that we are innately genetically inferior which is why they won't allow us to spread our inferior genes to the next generation. We deserve to be rejected by foids because we are at the bottom of the hierarchy, people at the bottom don't deserve love or sex. Toilets don't reject us because they are evil, they reject us because we are evil. They don't want us to spread our subhuman DNA. We are rejected by all of society because we embody the absolute worst and most degenerate aspects of human nature. It's not just that we are evil, it's that we are pathetic, socially awkward, incompetent losers. It isn't our fault no matter how much normies like to gaslight us about it though. We were born this way, it is in our DNA to be the lolcows of society, just like trannies. We are in the bottom 1% of men, and our status as being extremely low-value will stick with us until the day we die. No matter how desperate we are to escape it, we will never be able to, it sticks with us like glue, glued together until we finally meet with a glorious death. Women are actually better people than men are, we men rape, kill, and start wars, women don't do that. All men are biologically designed to be sociopaths, this isn't a bad thing, it's good for survival and advancing civilization. If men weren't sociopaths, we would still be living in huts. Women definitely would not be capable of building up civilization, but they are much better people than we are. In order to advance civilization women need to select men that are genetically superior in order to weed out the inferior. So if you are on the inferior side of nature, your genes get wiped out otherwise humanity wouldn't be capable of evolving. So the lowest tier men need to be left to rot and alienated from all of society, so that their inferior genes don't spread. It means that everyone in this world must be apathetic to our pain, suffering, and loneliness, leaving us to rot alone with nobody until the day we die. It means that in this cruel world, we are not allowed to experience love, friendship and connection. We get none of that, just apathy from all of society until the day we die. This is the clown world that we live in. But this is a good thing, it has to be this way. Be honest, do you want more abominations like yourself to be created? Obviously not, so foids deciding to not be with us is clearly an intelligent and wise decision on their part, it prevents inferior disgusting abominations like us from being created, and deep down women understand this is the truth, which is why they want nothing to do with us. Imagine if you spread your genes, imagine the disgusting worthless abominations that would be created. Do you want that? Obviously not, so why would a toilet want that either? If you had a child, they would be socially awkward, weird, ugly, and nobody would like them. They would go to school and everyone would get away from them and they would sit at the lunch table cafeteria alone, or with other weird awkward losers like themselves. You would just create more incel offspring, like yourself. Every human being would find your child to be completely repulsive to look at and be around. Just looking at them would make them fucking puke. If they heard your child speak or interacted with them, they would develop a fever that would take days to be cured from.


We don't deserve a woman, a woman needs a man that is superior to her in order to advance civilization. Any man that is inferior to a woman gets rejected by the woman. If she doesn't feel like you are of higher value than her, she won't breed with you. So the fact that every single woman on the planet rejects us means that we are inferior to every single woman and man. Us having children means that we retard civilization, higher-value superior men breeding with women means civilization becomes stronger and more beautiful. Lower-value men having children means that it becomes degenerate and weak. The inferior needs to be wiped out in order for civilization to grow. It isn't fair but luckily death is inevitable so the cruelty will eventually end. I want to say that it's over, but the truth is that it never even began for us, this was our biological destiny :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:
I think a lot of this is bullshit. Its just the world has gone very insane because of the media.
 
You're blabbering all of this nonsense on the assumption that women can "intuitively recognize who is capable of building civilization or not". This isn't true in the slightest: there's a difference between sexual selection and natural selection. Sexual selection is the reason why incels can't reproduce: because we possess certain traits that (rather arbitrarily) are not seen as attractive by females. Sexual selection is not fruitful for human civilization and on the contrary can be harmful: read up on how sexual selection resulted in the eventual extinction of the Irish elk since the biological ornaments selected for eventually became maladaptive and made the Irish elk vulnerable to prey.

Even if that wasn't the case, the traits that females select for are clearly not "advancing human civilization". Females don't see the nerdy geek who will later become a Nobel-Prize winning scientist as "sexy", they see the fratboys and the jocks as sexy. This is because their preferences are largely shaped by what would've conferred reproductive success thousands of years ago when humans lived hunter-gatherer or sedentary agricultural lifestyles, and not what would've been beneficial in the context of modern, 21st century human society. In fact, there's always a time-gap between our evolved traits and the present, since evolution operates over lengthy timeframes and doesn't react instantly to changing environmental conditions unless some type of bottleneck event occurs.
Based af
 
mostly just throw yourself in a blender tbh
 
This is what @mentalcel1 died for
 
I started reading it, but then I remembered that Lizzo is a fat nigger who is disgusting yet she has a body count. Adele is a fat cracker, she has a body count. A foid can never be too fat, ugly, short, dopey, poor, or autistic to get fucked.

Nice try nigger, go back to IT. Foids are shallow toilets, and they deserve what they fucking deserve.
 
Men are far superior to foids.
 
Soyboy dance
 
"Young, fertile women are the most valuable good on Earth. Male Thirst is the most worthless" - A quote from based TAILS

Truth really does hurt
 
Agreed with some parts tbh
 

Similar threads

Vlarke
Replies
17
Views
361
WeirdoDesperado
WeirdoDesperado
T
Replies
11
Views
852
balkanceI
balkanceI
MisfitPerson
Replies
23
Views
380
Robb97
Robb97
Balding Subhuman
Replies
6
Views
253
lifeisbullshit95
lifeisbullshit95
SlayerSlayer
Replies
8
Views
331
edgelordcel
edgelordcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top