yes exactly.
The first thing to recognize is that women are the ones who created the whole "all men want is sex" meme. Before the 1800s, women were viewed as more sexual than men.
The second thing you an do is to enter any place of female discourse, like r/twoxchromosomes, open a spreadsheet, or grab a piece of paper and create four columns called "men evil," "my vagina," "sex," and "misc."
Then go on the aforementioned subreddit and just scroll through threads for an hour and place each thread you see into one of the four categories. You will find that almost everything women talk about is sex, their pussy and men being evil to them (self victimization).
Another basic argument that follows logically from what even soys believe, is that that women would end up having more sex than men, regardless of lower sex drive. The reason is simple:
Imagine two people, James and john. James is a fatso and has 50% more hunger on average than John. However, James can literally not get food unless he pays most of his salary for it. He has to bribe the baker to give him food. And even then, the food is medicore. Over time, James just get's used to eating no food or only shit food. James sometimes watches hours of others eating food until he gets the feeling he is kinda satisfied.
John on the other hand does not have this problem. Yes, John is less hungry than James, but John literally has people shove food into his mouth in public. In fact, this is so extreme that John has acquired learned behaviors to avoid randos shoving food in his mouth - he only lets 20% of the population do it and when it comes to the other 80%, he sets up loops to jump through before they can do it, to avoid being annoyed by them.
John has never experienced a time when he could not immediately satisfy his hunger. There is always someone around shoving food in his mouth if he just lets them.
So, which of these two, James and John, ends up eating more food? James, who can't even get food unless taking extreme measures, or John, who has to literally develop a defensive stance to avoid people shoving food in his mouth.
Now, all this aside, even in sexual science they are now more and more recognizing that women's sex drive is similar to mens (shocker). Here I quote this paper, which I will attach:
-"Gender Differences in Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors: A Review of Meta-Analytic Results and Large Datasets"
Jennifer L. Petersen & Janet Shibley Hyde, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison
mega.nz
Note that the text highlights that sex is seen as nasty and degenerate, which may be behind our foid worshiping culture is trying to avoid portraying women as sexual beings. As it says, this may push researchers into denying or downplaying evidence for stronger than expected female sexuality. We have seen this in other research too, like on this forums must-read threads on female body-count doubling on fake lie-detector tests:
The thread: https://incels.is/threads/womens-partner-count-doubled-when-they-thought-they-were-hooked-up-to-a-lie-detector.209222/ The Study it refers to: https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/239672/original/Alexander+%26+Fisher+%282003%29.pdf The Articles linked in the thread: a) Article about...
incels.is
In that study we get a classic example of what I just described. Confronted with evidence of women being whores and as sexual as men, the researchers scramble to excuse their own findings away to save their worldview:
"This pattern should be interpreted cautiously because the overall interaction between participants sex and testing condition was not significant."
We also saw the same excuses pop up when they found in another study that women are aroused by literally everything, regardless of what their stated sexual orientation was. This included monkeys, lesbian sex, gay sex between men etc:
"There's the possibility that genital response for women is not necessarily imbued with meaning about her sexual interests," says Chivers. She also emphasized that her findings do not imply women harbor a latent desire for lesbian sex or bestiality."
lists.ibiblio.org
This tendency, to explain away findings that contradict their presuppositions about women and men, is so prevalent that is has been recognized by researchers themselves. I made a thread about the respective data here:
Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society. - research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible - research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible - pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful...
incels.is
So yeah, like I have said 10000 times before, this is not a fight over data, this is a fight over worldviews. Their apriori assumptions about women prevent them from acknowledging data that contradicts their assumptions. And among these apriori presuppositions is the idea that men are the more sexual gender, that men are brutish beasts that lust and hunt after women, like predators, while women are coy, conflict-avoidant and only want kind, soft missionary sex with a loving partner who protects them from da ebil worldd out deree waaaaaaa sniff sniff
In reality any quick study of romance novels, porn statistics, studies on which partners
AHEM women pick will reveal a female preference for danger, conflict, rough hardcore sex and so forth.
But enough of this. I have a vague memory in my mind that
@WorthlessSlavicShit wrote about something like this in a thread, how they accidentally discovered women having same sexual partner count as men or something idk.
