Brutal "Women are Chad only" isn't correct. The reality is far more brutal.

[DoomThreeKoala]

I think I actually need to say that "Chad only" is a cope.
This is gonna sound bluepilled at first, but most women do not actually want Chad. Most women only date 1-2 points above their looks level. Hypergamy does exist, but it's not severe as you think it is.

Instead, they are only rejecting the people at the bottom of the barrel, US. They only people they hate is us. Why? Because we are genetic fuckups. You are an incel because you are subhuman. No amount of gym, shower, or anything can get the love women have for the people they are genuinely attracted to. It's over.

A lot of the stuff bluepillers ridicule us for saying is actually just a cope to protect us from an even more brutal part of the blackpill. The BP has no limits. There's a reason why bluepillers don't want to believe this. Curiosity killed the cat. We are operating at a deeper level of truth than they want to go, which causes all sorts of mental disorders. The brain is not designed to believe the blackpill consciously.

 

[Animecel2D]

 

[Kamanbert]

"Chad only" might have some truth to it but it's too university centric if not hyperbolic

 

[Charlie Kirk Koala]

the genuine believers of the sub8 theory or chad only are usually tiktokfags rangiing from 5-6 SMV that want to larp as le backpilled edgy cool incel. its not cope is just normies using the blackpill and incel culture as their new edgy trend

 

[TheRotKing]

A lot of the stuff bluepillers ridicule us for saying is actually just a cope to protect us from an even more brutal part of the blackpill. The BP has no limits. There's a reason why bluepillers don't want to believe this. Curiosity killed the cat. We are operating at a deeper level of truth than they want to go, which causes all sorts of mental disorders. The brain is not designed to believe the blackpill consciously.

BP is like receiving eldritch knowledge. It causes Madness and feelings of Despair. Like something straight out of a Lovecraft Novel.

 

[SmhChan]

"Chad only" might have some truth to it but it's too university centric if not hyperbolic

Foids don't like men at all. The "chad-only" thing comes from the fact that an aesthetically pleasing visage makes a man "temporarily tolerable" for foids. Whereas men like foids regardless. The attractiveness is an added bonus.

 

[blackpillednigga]

Most women only date 1-2 points above their looks level.

yeah to betabuxx, not to have sex

 

[blackpillednigga]

if women really weren't that hypergamous you would see equal amount of women simping for men online as vice versa

 

[blackpillednigga]

Foids don't like men at all. The "chad-only" thing comes from the fact that an aesthetically pleasing visage makes a man "temporarily tolerable" for foids. Whereas men like foids regardless. The attractiveness is an added bonus.

you get it

 

[Captvic]

They might not actually like men but most would prefer to be with a Chad that can provide. That's why they go crazy over celebrities who are attractive. Those guys symbolize what they desire.

 

[Todd Thundercock]

Most women date their looksmatch or a little above. The catch is most of those relationships are oofy doofy. The man is doing whatever to keep her around, and she is not genuinely attracted to him.

Women ALL want Chad, and most know they can fuck one. Chad's are rare though, and not nearly enough to go around. Definitely not enough to have relationships with women demanding them.

63% of millennial men are single, 34% of women are single. And that disparity grows more each day.

 

[BPJ]

of course. they mainly select for looks, neurotypicality and status.

You can be a normie and have a gf, but she will likely be uglier than you, and you have to be neurotypical, aka have a steady job, a healthy social circle with NPC activities etc. Thats what most women select for.

 

[Takeyami1987]

Most women date their looksmatch or a little above. The catch is most of those relationships are oofy doofy. The man is doing whatever to keep her around, and she is not genuinely attracted to him.

Women ALL want Chad, and most know they can fuck one. Chad's are rare though, and not nearly enough to go around. Definitely not enough to have relationships with women demanding them.

63% of millennial men are single, 34% of women are single. And that disparity grows more each day.

Yes, you need to be atleast SMV 3+ (Chad) if you want to sleep around, and you need to be atleast 1-2 if you want to betabuxx. The 63% statistic likely implies that the reality is more like sub-7 theory not sub-8. 7 is what women consider to be “average” and women with 6s believe they are settling

 

[anglocelticcel]

Accurate

 

[lowz1r]

Most women date their looksmatch or a little above. The catch is most of those relationships are oofy doofy. The man is doing whatever to keep her around, and she is not genuinely attracted to him.

Women ALL want Chad, and most know they can fuck one. Chad's are rare though, and not nearly enough to go around. Definitely not enough to have relationships with women demanding them.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

cope, all foids trully wants the 6'5 chad, but yeah because they can't get it. she won t date if he s not 3 points better than her as looks!
so because she dates someone this doesn t mean that she trully wants him, she will dump him for the first tall chad that wants her

 

[Balding Subhuman]

If you don't have the looks, then women will expect you to compensate for that with money. So even if you see looksmatched pairs its a betabuxx relationshit

 

[Senzatetto]

Have you seen the way foids treat their non-Chad boyfriends? I'd rather be incel.

 

[LonerLothario]

Have you seen the way foids treat their non-Chad boyfriends? I'd rather be incel.

Yeah it's all one sided, crazy what guys put up with tbh

 

[Takeyami1987]

cope, all foids trully wants the 6'5 chad, but yeah because they can't get it. she won t date if he s not 3 points better than her as looks!
so because she dates someone this doesn t mean that she trully wants him, she will dump him for the first tall chad that wants her

yes, just because sub-8s technically can get gfs doesn't mean those are particularly happy or loyal relationships. Anything under a 7 women view as settling and it will be noticeable.

 

[Paperman]

yes, just because sub-8s technically can get gfs doesn't mean those are particularly happy or loyal relationships. Anything under a 7 women view as settling and it will be noticeable.

This. It is also why some mediocre men are arrogant: they get women who were rejected by Chad and think that they won something.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

if women really weren't that hypergamous you would see equal amount of women simping for men online as vice versa

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

they are only rejecting the people at the bottom of the barrel,

they are rejecting 60% and more of men

 

[Mixedcel59]

Most women date their looksmatch or a little above. The catch is most of those relationships are oofy doofy. The man is doing whatever to keep her around, and she is not genuinely attracted to him.

Women ALL want Chad, and most know they can fuck one. Chad's are rare though, and not nearly enough to go around. Definitely not enough to have relationships with women demanding them.

63% of millennial men are single, 34% of women are single. And that disparity grows more each day.

Womens single isn’t the same as Man’s single, I’d say if we take into account the real definition of being single, then about 10% of Women are actually single.