Women are actually more violent then men.

[kevkon]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out. Foids are obsessed with claiming they are “morally superior” to men.

The argument for this is always “men fight and KILL and RAPE and KILL and RAPE” the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence. Women are physically weaker so they don’t have the capacity to enact the same level of harm. This doesn’t make you “morally superior”. YOU ARE NOT VIRTUOUS FOR BEING WEAKER.

If men and women were completely equal in strength I guarantee you the stats would be much closer, funnily enough women actually have a higher rate of child abuse and animal abuse than men do. So it seems like when they actually HAVE POWER OVER SOMETHING WEAKER THEN THEM they are more violent. And this isn’t even to MENTION the domestic abuse rates for lesbian relationships being much higher then any other type of relationship lmfaooo women are more violent then men.

 

[ihatelife2]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

 

[Sir Silentium]

No you are correct. Women are the cause of violence more often than men, but men are criminalised more often for it.

They look at the conviction rates of men vs women in regards to domestic violence and see that men get punished more, and develope their theory off that without taking into account anything.

Anybody with half a brain would agree that women are more violent than men.

 

[Biggie cheesel]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

 

[Gilgamesh]

"Do not mistake a lack of ability with a lack of intent". if all men and women switched bodies tomorrow, I guarantee you women in men's bodies would rape significantly more than men do now. They've never been taught proper manners because society treats women with kid gloves and when you give them unchecked power over anything, they'll be sure to abuse it.

 

[kevkon]

No you are correct. Women are the cause of violence more often than men, but men are criminalised more often for it.

They look at the conviction rates of men vs women in regards to domestic violence and see that men get punished more, and develope their theory off that without taking into account anything.

Anybody with half a brain would agree that women are more violent than men.

Absolutely. Most domestic fights the woman throws 100 punches and the man only throws one, but the man is seen as the aggressor because his 1 punch hurt more than all of hers.

 

[kevkon]

"Do not mistake a lack of ability with a lack of intent". if all men and women switched bodies tomorrow, I guarantee you women in men's bodies would rape significantly more than men do now. They've never been taught proper manners because society treats women with kid gloves and when you give them unchecked power over anything, they'll be sure to abuse it.

I agree with you seeing as how women handle rejection. Women always say things like “I know you wanna sleep with me, are you gay?” THEY LITERALLY CANT TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER they would absolutely rape more then men if they had the ability to do so.

 

[Stormfrontcel]

they would absolutely rape more then men if they had the ability to do so.

I belive that they actually do so but never get reported or sentenced for it

 

[Sir Silentium]

Absolutely. Most domestic fights the woman throws 100 punches and the man only throws one, but the man is seen as the aggressor because his 1 punch hurt more than all of hers.

Not to forget the argument that women are the "weaker beings," is if to say that women can hurt you, but you can't hurt them or even defend yourself.

If a female punches me, I am punching her back. End of story.

 

[kevkon]

Not to forget the argument that women are the "weaker beings," is if to say that women can hurt you, but you can't hurt them or even defend yourself.

If a female punches me, I am punching her back. End of story.

Theres a video where this guy is being repeatedly punched and harassed by a woman in public and she won’t even let him walk away, nobody fucking does a single thing to help him. Some watch, some ignore. He finally gets fed up and shoves her away hard and she falls or something and then suddenly everyone around acts shocked and tries defending her, calling the guy and asshole, pushing him around and essentially ganging up on him. We live in a sick fucked up backwards ass world.

 

[diapermaster]

Foids are already are more aggressive than men if foids had equal strength they would be responsible for 70% of abuse

 

[Sir Silentium]

Theres a video where this guy is being repeatedly punched and harassed by a woman in public and she won’t even let him walk away, nobody fucking does a single thing to help him. Some watch, some ignore. He finally gets fed up and shoves her away hard and she falls or something and then suddenly everyone around acts shocked and tries defending her, calling the guy and asshole, pushing him around and essentially ganging up on him. We live in a sick fucked up backwards ass world.

When I was in high school there was a party and a girl there apparently beat up her boyfriend and he was too scared to hit her back. Such cucks man. If we are ever in that situation we have a right to defend ourselves, regardless of gender.

 

[VanGobbel]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out.

wtf are you on about? everyone here knows about the true nature of wimmin. This isnt reddit faggot, you dont have to start with I KNOW THIS IS WEIRD BUT HEAR ME OUT TEEHEEEEE

 

[Lonly ghost]

Women are the biggest abusers of children.

 

[kevkon]

wtf are you on about? everyone here knows about the true nature of wimmin. This isnt reddit faggot, you dont have to start with I KNOW THIS IS WEIRD BUT HEAR ME OUT TEEHEEEEE

I have ptsd dude cut me some slack lmfao Reddit has destroyed my perception of the internet

 

[Izayacel]

Theres a video where this guy is being repeatedly punched and harassed by a woman in public and she won’t even let him walk away, nobody fucking does a single thing to help him. Some watch, some ignore. He finally gets fed up and shoves her away hard and she falls or something and then suddenly everyone around acts shocked and tries defending her, calling the guy and asshole, pushing him around and essentially ganging up on him. We live in a sick fucked up backwards ass world.

we live in a gynocracy .

@TooSomething @AtrociousCitizen @GeckoBus

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

we live in a gynocracy .

@TooSomething @AtrociousCitizen @GeckoBus

Yep. This society always caters to women and protects them, regardless of how awful their behavior may be; it does the complete opposite for men, who are inherently suspect, especially if they are unattractive. A woman can be violent toward a man, and not a single person would step in or criticize her, but if the man dares to defend himself in any capacity — he is suddenly perceived as an aggressor that must be dealt with, and he will be swarmed by multiple white knights who, ironically, are seen as subhuman pawns by women themselves. No one is allowed to touch the sacred female.

 

[kevkon]

Yep. This society always caters to women and protects them, regardless of how awful their behavior may be; it does the complete opposite for men, who are inherently suspect, especially if they are unattractive. A woman can be violent toward a man, and not a single person would step in or criticize her, but if the man dares to defend himself in any capacity — he is suddenly perceived as an aggressor that must be dealt with, and he will be swarmed by multiple white knights who, ironically, are seen as subhuman pawns by women themselves. No one is allowed to touch the sacred female.

They have pretty privilege. They assume if you look cute then you are suddenly incapable of doing any wrong because looking attractive means you’re always an innocent angel for some reason. The fact that they are weaker also plays into it because they are seen as fragile things to be protected, because they are weak, people assume they can’t cause damage which is false, women keep behaving this way because they never receive consequences for their actions besides a slap on the wrist because “it’s just a girl” so foids think they can just get away with it.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

They have pretty privilege. They assume if you look cute then you are suddenly incapable of doing any wrong because looking attractive means you’re always an innocent angel for some reason. The fact that they are weaker also plays into it because they are seen as fragile things to be protected, because they are weak people assume they can’t cause damage which is false, women keep behaving this way because they never receive consequences for their actions besides a slap on the wrist because “it’s just a girl”

Yep, all of this is correct. They are perceived as more attractive on average, which inevitably leads to preferential treatment in all areas of life, including the legal system. It also goes beyond that — specifically in the perception of male hyperagency and female hypoagency; females are seen as having less agency behind their actions, while males are viewed as having high agency, which consequently leads to men being punished more for their actions and women avoiding repercussions at higher rates. This can also be seen quite well in cases where a woman and a man are both involved in a crime; people often conjure up excuses for the woman and attempt to claim that the man coerced her into doing what she did, since he must have higher agency and be the responsible agent.

 

[kevkon]

Yep, all of this is correct. They are perceived as more attractive on average, which inevitably leads to preferential treatment in all areas of life, including the legal system. It also goes beyond that — specifically in the perception of male hyperagency and female hypoagency; females are seen as having less agency behind their actions, while males are viewed as having high agency, which consequently leads to men being punished more for their actions and women avoiding repercussions at higher rates. This can also be seen quite well in cases where a woman and a man are both involved in a crime; people often conjure up excuses for the woman and attempt to claim that the man coerced her into doing what she did, since he must have higher agency and be the responsible agent.

This is why I hate the idea of treating women like retarded little children (even if they are) it completely removes any and all accountability for their actions which is why I believe they should not be infantilized.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

This is why I hate the idea of treating women like retarded little children (even if they are) it completely removes any and all accountability for their actions which is why I believe they should not be infantilized.

They definitely should be held accountable. Even if they are creatures of limited deliberative capabilities, they are still able to evaluate their actions to a certain meaningful degree, and should be seen as responsible for their disgusting behavior, especially when they are given increasingly higher levels of power, yet no accountability along with it.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

This is why I hate the idea of treating women like retarded little children (even if they are) it completely removes any and all accountability for their actions which is why I believe they should not be infantilized.

When you think of it — this is why terms like manchild exist, yet there is no female equivalent to it, since childish, petulant behavior is seen as acceptable when a foid exhibits it.

 

[kevkon]

When you think of it — this is why terms like manchild exist, yet there is no female equivalent to it, since childish, petulant behavior is seen as acceptable when a foid exhibits it.

I’ve actually been using the manchild example for years, your the first other person I’ve seen use it, such an easy example to highlight the inequality I wish people would bring it up more

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

I’ve actually been using the manchild example for years, your the first other person I’ve seen use it, such an easy example to highlight the inequality I wish people would bring it up more

 

[rxkrd72]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

to further support this claim , women have killed over a billion babies via abortion since the 1980s.(most empathetic gender btw)

 

[ihatelife2]

to further support this claim , women have killed over a billion babies via abortion since the 1980s.(most empathetic gender btw)

Exactly!! Just so they can get fucked by chad

 

[andrej]

Foids are already are more aggressive than men if foids had equal strength they would be responsible for 70% of abuse

More

 

[rxkrd72]

Exactly!! Just so they can get fucked by chad

btw less than 1% of those abortions happen due to rape

 

[kapri]

Exactly, I'd go a step further and say that women are less moral, because if/when they suddenly get any type of power they by nature abuse it, because foids never had to experience what it's like to be constantly threatened with violence or social ruin etc. Sure a foid is scared of getting raped, but as a boy you learn what it's like being beaten by parents or peers for overstepping boundaries is. You exist among violance, rape murder etc. Life is more raw for sure.

Easy to judge the gender for being violent when you are sheltered from that same gender by that same gender.

It's like judging a bear for killing prey.

Also our society always focuses on "femicide" when men are by far the most likely to be victims of any type of crime besides maybe rape and domestic things (for obvious reasons). "But it's men who are the perpetrators of those crimes ", yes dumb hoe, but instead of focusing on the minority of the victims, why don't you focus on the root of the problem and try to stop the crime before it happens, and kill two birds with one stone... Oh yeah... Nobody gives a fuck unless it's foids who are suffering mb.

 

[Gilgamesh]

Yep, all of this is correct. They are perceived as more attractive on average, which inevitably leads to preferential treatment in all areas of life, including the legal system. It also goes beyond that — specifically in the perception of male hyperagency and female hypoagency; females are seen as having less agency behind their actions, while males are viewed as having high agency, which consequently leads to men being punished more for their actions and women avoiding repercussions at higher rates. This can also be seen quite well in cases where a woman and a man are both involved in a crime; people often conjure up excuses for the woman and attempt to claim that the man coerced her into doing what she did, since he must have higher agency and be the responsible agent.

high IQ showing once again.

This is a good explanation of the consequence of treating women with 'kid-gloves' even into adulthood. They are rarely held responsible for their actions and rarely see faults in their behavior.

For the very few women who are raised like men (taught to take accountability for their actions), you can notice they take much less shit from others and have more agency behind their actions, and don't victimize themselves to nearly the same degree.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence.

Women love violent men so women are the cause of that.
Who cares they deserve the abuse

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

 

[Wither]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

 

[The Death Devil]

Like you said, they actually are more violent, but they only enact said violence on things that are incapable of fighting back. The best example of that would probably be fetuses, AKA their own children. The very moment that the idea of bearing a child seems inconvenient to a foid, be it for any reason, she automatically resigns herself to believing that it is worthy of being killed for her sake alone. They all think that way, too—you would be hard-pressed to find a modern-day foidlet who is against abortion.

I want to call them evil, but they're not even worthy of that title—they're just narcissistic cowards who whore themselves out 24/7. Women are loathsome, putrid creatures who deserve nothing but to be culled from the face of the planet.

 

[BeanChud88]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

That’s why they’re so Hellbent on killing their children

 

[PetiteSoyBoy]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out. Foids are obsessed with claiming they are “morally superior” to men.

The argument for this is always “men fight and KILL and RAPE and KILL and RAPE” the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence. Women are physically weaker so they don’t have the capacity to enact the same level of harm. This doesn’t make you “morally superior”. YOU ARE NOT VIRTUOUS FOR BEING WEAKER.

If men and women were completely equal in strength I guarantee you the stats would be much closer, funnily enough women actually have a higher rate of child abuse and animal abuse than men do. So it seems like when they actually HAVE POWER OVER SOMETHING WEAKER THEN THEM they are more violent. And this isn’t even to MENTION the domestic abuse rates for lesbian relationships being much higher then any other type of relationship lmfaooo women are more violent then men.

truecels have low inhib and would never hurt a fly. Foids (whores) always want to be violent but they know they’re too weak

 

[darkpilledsoldier]

I don't think you're a retard. Women would absolutely harm anyone weaker than them.

 

[strange_to_be]

About 1500 women are murdered by men a year and about 1000 men by women (intimate partners specifically). About 40% of men own a gun whereas 25% of women do. That alone would expect to account for most of the gap, and the 2nd biggest portion would undoubtedly be the same group that worsens all group metrics, young black men.

 

[EthnicSub5]

They are genuinely. Have you guys seen the normalization of violence against men that’s been happening in social media? Namely IG and X, TikTok too

 

[saintfoiddestroyer]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out. Foids are obsessed with claiming they are “morally superior” to men.

The argument for this is always “men fight and KILL and RAPE and KILL and RAPE” the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence. Women are physically weaker so they don’t have the capacity to enact the same level of harm. This doesn’t make you “morally superior”. YOU ARE NOT VIRTUOUS FOR BEING WEAKER.

If men and women were completely equal in strength I guarantee you the stats would be much closer, funnily enough women actually have a higher rate of child abuse and animal abuse than men do. So it seems like when they actually HAVE POWER OVER SOMETHING WEAKER THEN THEM they are more violent. And this isn’t even to MENTION the domestic abuse rates for lesbian relationships being much higher then any other type of relationship lmfaooo women are more violent then men.

if women were stronger then men hell yeah they would all be more violent even know when their not stronger then men their still just as abusive because they know society will excuse it and blame the man

 

[Pikacel]

They have crueler personalities, focused more so on maximising your agony for prolonged time

With normal males (unless they’re from a feminine culture) it’s just kill quickly and move on

 

[Halloween]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out. Foids are obsessed with claiming they are “morally superior” to men.

The argument for this is always “men fight and KILL and RAPE and KILL and RAPE” the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence. Women are physically weaker so they don’t have the capacity to enact the same level of harm. This doesn’t make you “morally superior”. YOU ARE NOT VIRTUOUS FOR BEING WEAKER.

If men and women were completely equal in strength I guarantee you the stats would be much closer, funnily enough women actually have a higher rate of child abuse and animal abuse than men do. So it seems like when they actually HAVE POWER OVER SOMETHING WEAKER THEN THEM they are more violent. And this isn’t even to MENTION the domestic abuse rates for lesbian relationships being much higher then any other type of relationship lmfaooo women are more violent then men.

if you cannot harm and do not harm, you are not peaceful, you are weak.

 

[Halloween]

if women were stronger then men hell yeah they would all be more violent even know when their not stronger then men their still just as abusive because they know society will excuse it and blame the man

you were posted on it jfl

 

[INVERTER]

I don't think you are that far off however even though they are usually weaker they still COULD do overt violence, they just don't. They prefer passive aggressive violence because they don't have traits like willpower or courage. They prefer taunting you from behind protection or egging their Chad partners on to do violence on their behalf.

 

[saintfoiddestroyer]

you were posted on it jfl

I saw funny as shit

 

[saintfoiddestroyer]

you were posted on it jfl

whats funny is they imagine me as some fat overweight dude when that's far from the truth they are so stupid all it takes to be a incel is being short , ethnic , or ugly

 

[Halloween]

whats funny is they imagine me as some fat overweight dude when that's far from the truth they are so stupid all it takes to be a incel is being short , ethnic , or ugly

One retard said “that picture in his profile is definitely not him” ofc it isn’t retards. Can’t even do their own research into Saint lepine JFL

 

[kevkon]

I don't think you are that far off however even though they are usually weaker they still COULD do overt violence, they just don't. They prefer passive aggressive violence because they don't have traits like willpower or courage. They prefer taunting you from behind protection or egging their Chad partners on to do violence on their behalf.

I agree with most of what you said however a lot of women are still physically abusive on top of the mental and emotional attacks. I think there was a stat showing that most non reciprocal physical domestic abuse is initiated by women, it’s just that the men don’t hit back. Women hit more it’s just ignored more. Men hit less but when they do it’s much more focused on.

 

[Lo3e]

Yeah I know based on the title you probably think I’m a retard but just hear me out. Foids are obsessed with claiming they are “morally superior” to men.

The argument for this is always “men fight and KILL and RAPE and KILL and RAPE” the reason that men do that more is because men are physically stronger then women are are thus more capable of enacting violence. Women are physically weaker so they don’t have the capacity to enact the same level of harm. This doesn’t make you “morally superior”. YOU ARE NOT VIRTUOUS FOR BEING WEAKER.

If men and women were completely equal in strength I guarantee you the stats would be much closer, funnily enough women actually have a higher rate of child abuse and animal abuse than men do. So it seems like when they actually HAVE POWER OVER SOMETHING WEAKER THEN THEM they are more violent. And this isn’t even to MENTION the domestic abuse rates for lesbian relationships being much higher then any other type of relationship lmfaooo women are more violent then men.

dnr ''foid slayer''

 

[kevkon]

dnr ''foid slayer''

??? Why are you upset lol