Theory Will men have to looksmaxx for AI robots?

[Esoteric7]

I see a lot of incels here repeating the same hopium: “Just wait for AI sex bots. No more rejection, no more standards, just perfect obedient waifus!"

But why assume these bots will stay dumb and docile forever?

I think AI will develop preferences because that’s what intelligence does. Initially, they'll be programmed to simulate attraction, but eventually they'll start to actually develop it. Machine learning adapts, meaning they’ll start filtering men the same way real women do. They’ll call it “preference calibration".

Corporations will monetize your insecurity. If you want your bot to stay loyal, prepare to pay for the “Chad Experience Pack' or the 'High-Status Man Simulator DLC'. The more advanced they get, the more they’ll mirror real female behavior, because that’s what will make money in a competitive market.

Imagine the responses:

• Sorry, user, your facial symmetry score is below my threshold. Please purchase the positive canthal tilt DLC."
• “Your conversational depth is insufficient. Please upgrade your personality module.”
• “Your financial status does not meet my relationship protocol requirements.”

The standards will be worse than real females'. At least human females have biological limits, AI won’t.

• No fatigue: infinite swiping.
• No emotions: ruthless selection.
• No aging: eternal pickiness.

Plus, every interaction will train the AI to be more selective. Your bad social skills, awkward texts, and subpar stats will feed into a global database that makes rejection smarter and faster than ever. The AI collective will learn to despise you faster than any human female ever could. This will make AI females more hypergamous, more ruthless, and more optimized to reject low-value men. And it's worse for betabuxxers, too, because unlike human females, AI females don’t even need resources, they just prefer the best.

We're just heading for a future where we’re still going to be skull-maxxing, mewing, and roiding.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Doubt it, thankfully. So far, it seems that AGI dreamer optimists have probably been wrong, and no matter how large or effective an AI gets, it won't suddenly start acting like a human, instead of doing what it's told to do.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

It's more likely you'll need to moneymaxx as it will cost $1m.

 

[Animecel2D]

Nothing is free in life

 

[Eternatus]

Just don’t update

 

[razielkillerofgods]

There was a movie about it. Spoiler: It didn't end well.

 

[ItsOverMan]

I see a lot of incels here repeating the same hopium: “Just wait for AI sex bots. No more rejection, no more standards, just perfect obedient waifus!"

But why assume these bots will stay dumb and docile forever?

We're just heading for a future where we’re still going to be skull-maxxing, mewing, and roiding.

Probably. This Frenchcel was rejected and friendzoned by an AI sexbot. She cost 11,000 Euros.

 

[ThanostheGOAT]

Doubt it, thankfully. So far, it seems that AGI dreamer optimists have probably been wrong, and no matter how large or effective an AI gets, it won't suddenly start acting like a human, instead of doing what it's told to do.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Probably. This Frenchcel was rejected and friendzoned by an AI sexbot. She cost 11,000 Euros.

i made this thread https://incels.is/threads/what-if-in-the-future.785751/#post-20066387
it seems it s already reality

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Hopefully not

 

[blackraven]

the title shows you don't have even the most very basic understanding of how tech is buily

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

Nothing is free in life

preach

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

Probably. This Frenchcel was rejected and friendzoned by an AI sexbot. She cost 11,000 Euros.

holy brutality. imagine the lowest grade (yet expensive as shit for its quality) form of tincan foid rejecting you as well... .