Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Will Chads/Chadlites be the only male species in 3 generatios?

B

BlondeBeast

-
-
Joined
Mar 9, 2024
Posts
18
With the rise of the Internet and easy access to make mass media, the beauty standarts went too high, so this means now not even being in the top 20% will guarantee you anything. But at the same time those atractive guys don't want to date mid girls. Are we really into the great purge of looks by this point?
 
Yeah, it's already hapenning. I noticed that a lot of kids now have chad jaws and hunter eyes
 
Most of current chads will be considered truecels in 20 years because of unleashed hypergamy.
 
It's already underway , god forbid an average betabuxx joe has a kid in this day and age
 
No because trash foids will always reproduce easily, bringing down the genepool for as long as humanity exists.
Also being a good looking male doesn't guarantee you have good genetics. Probably they have lots of uglies with same genes but different phenotypes in their family tree.
 
It's already happening. Many kids I see are future chads in the making. What we call Chad today will be seen as MTN in 20 years.
 
No because trash foids will always reproduce easily, bringing down the genepool for as long as humanity exists.
Also being a good looking male doesn't guarantee you have good genetics. Probably they have lots of uglies with same genes but different phenotypes in their family tree.
:yes: :blackpill: :blackpill:
 
no. ethnics are still reproducing in alerting level and after a few decads they will outpopulating whites even in western countries. world gets ugliler and uglier. This is the main reason why sexual selection isn't same thing with natural selection. Allowing western females reproductive rights is against natural selection and good of humanity. it's dysgenic.
 
No because ugly women still get to reproduce
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top