Serious "widely published in academic or industry literature" simply means circle jerk

[fukurou]

The Reality of Academic Publishing​

• Opaque Process: Unlike patents, there’s no clear application form or universal procedure. You’re expected to have connections.
• Ghosting Is Common: Many journals don’t respond unless you’re already in their network or institution. Cold submissions from outsiders? ignored.
• Peer Review ≠ Fair Review: again, this is just their university corporation definition for circles of jerkers.
• your ability to publish scientific discoveries is not on the merit of your discovery but based on how much money you got in their pockets, which favors big corporations.
• “published literature” means they’re stuck in a feedback loop — only recognizing what’s already recognized

these normie cunts with their sources worship BS, never look into common sense. its all brands with these NPCs.

brands set in their inferior brains what is the truth.

sites like this are the actual scientific standard.
its actual studies.

not those NPC normie scum with their sources and peer reviews where they circle cakes, jerk off, cum on it then eat it.

 

[Maikowski]

"Publishing" is so fucking dumb, if you have any novel ideas put it on fucking youtube not in paid journals.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

"Publishing" is so fucking dumb, if you have any novel ideas put it on fucking youtube not in paid journals.

I hope this becomes the norm.