L
I've thought a bit about why almost all women seem actually angry that I approached them. I get that, from their point of view, me approaching them might be seen like an indication that I would believe them to be in my league, which is an insult to their looks, but wouldn't this be conducive of a response of disappointment, or frustration that they're uglier than they thought, rather than actual anger? This is like failing a class and getting pissed at the teacher. Of course, that happens, but never at the frequency at which women become enraged at my, and other low smv men's, approaches. Moreover, some of my chad friends have been approached by ugly foids, and not once have I seen them react with even a hint of anger. Some are uncomfortable, but they're never angry. So, why do women react with actual anger?
Guys don't understand how women think about dating. 99.999% of women out there will be flooded with adoration and attention fro the time they turn 13, and most receive disproportionate love before that as well. Moreover, think of social maxims like "never tell a woman they're not beautiful", or "if you dump a woman because they're fat, you're an asshole", while the sexual opposite is never said. Women, enforced by society, experience the ups and downs of life with this as their emotional backdrop. They literally do not know any other way of life. As a result, they believe that they rightfully deserve attention and adoration, and to not receive it is not only painful to them, but they believe that it is necessarily driven by evil, and that their loneliness is an undisputed moral wrongdoing.
Think about Americans claiming that they have a "right" to emergency services, even if they are currently on welfare / not paying taxes. Since America is wealthy enough for most citizens to access emergency services, and since so many have such ubiquitous access, to not have it is seen as a violation of what a human being deserves. In fact, some emergency services have a legally enshrined right to refuse service.
"https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/...ot-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html"
Shocking, right? If you're an Americancel, you probably think of emergency services as a right, but it's not. Watching a man die because an ambulance won;t come is a distressing thought, but it's moral "wrongness" is dictated by our social expectations.
A Ugandan probably wouldn't even blink if some guy got shot, and no ambulance came. They think it's the job of that guy's friends / family / good Samaritans to help him, but they never expect an ambulance to come, because they've never had that embedded at their background expectations. A foid's life is as different from a man's as is an American's life if from a Ugandan's. One cannot be reasonably compared with another, and one cannot reasonably be expected to understand the other.
Guys don't understand how women think about dating. 99.999% of women out there will be flooded with adoration and attention fro the time they turn 13, and most receive disproportionate love before that as well. Moreover, think of social maxims like "never tell a woman they're not beautiful", or "if you dump a woman because they're fat, you're an asshole", while the sexual opposite is never said. Women, enforced by society, experience the ups and downs of life with this as their emotional backdrop. They literally do not know any other way of life. As a result, they believe that they rightfully deserve attention and adoration, and to not receive it is not only painful to them, but they believe that it is necessarily driven by evil, and that their loneliness is an undisputed moral wrongdoing.
Think about Americans claiming that they have a "right" to emergency services, even if they are currently on welfare / not paying taxes. Since America is wealthy enough for most citizens to access emergency services, and since so many have such ubiquitous access, to not have it is seen as a violation of what a human being deserves. In fact, some emergency services have a legally enshrined right to refuse service.
"https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/...ot-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html"
Shocking, right? If you're an Americancel, you probably think of emergency services as a right, but it's not. Watching a man die because an ambulance won;t come is a distressing thought, but it's moral "wrongness" is dictated by our social expectations.
A Ugandan probably wouldn't even blink if some guy got shot, and no ambulance came. They think it's the job of that guy's friends / family / good Samaritans to help him, but they never expect an ambulance to come, because they've never had that embedded at their background expectations. A foid's life is as different from a man's as is an American's life if from a Ugandan's. One cannot be reasonably compared with another, and one cannot reasonably be expected to understand the other.
