Blackpill Why Wealthmaxxing should be your FIRST PRIORITY IN LIFE

[Blackpill Bishop]

I have always been a huge proponent of Wealthmaxxing and Looksmaxxing

However Wealthmaxxing should be the absolute FIRST PRIORITY in your life and should take precedence over every single thing

Human beings since the dawn of time have killed, raped and plundered for one purpose only and that is the ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES


If you look at prehistoric humans in the stone age - the primary activity that they concerned themselves with was HUNTING FOR FOOD (RESOURCE)

This was their most important priority and their SOLE PURPOSE in life. Men specialized in the craft of hunting and women rewarded successful hunters with sexual access


As we started farming and moved into the agricultural age, humans started to build civilizations.

Food was more abundant now and we didn't have to physically hunt anymore

So now we concerned ourselves with acquiring LAND AND WOMEN (RESOURCES)

All of the biggest wars and battles in history have always been fought to acquire MORE LAND OR WOMEN


As we further progressed and evolved into our current society - The Digital Age

The basic premise remains the same. We live in a time where Food is abundant and available in excess, Land is owned by the government and Woman are available on the Free market

As a modern day man you need to concern yourself with ACQUIRING WEALTH/MONEY - THE MODERN DAY RESOURCE


What's sad is, the way the elites have set up the entire matrix has made it tremendously hard to accumulate resources and it has become extremely easy to DISTRIBUTE RESOURCES

Every hour you spend on social media, watching tv shows, netflix, movies, video games - you are freely distributing your resources (time, energy, money, attention)


You must FIERCELY PROTECT YOUR RESOURCES and reinvest them for your own benefit

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE - AND THE ONLY OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS AS A MAN

 

[Deleted member 10124]

I have always been a huge proponent of Wealthmaxxing and Looksmaxxing

However Wealthmaxxing should be the absolute FIRST PRIORITY in your life and should take precedence over every single thing

Human beings since the dawn of time have killed, raped and plundered for one purpose only and that is the ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES


If you look at prehistoric humans in the stone age - the primary activity that they concerned themselves with was HUNTING FOR FOOD (RESOURCE)

This was their most important priority and their SOLE PURPOSE in life. Men specialized in the craft of hunting and women rewarded successful hunters with sexual access


As we started farming and moved into the agricultural age, humans started to build civilizations.

Food was more abundant now and we didn't have to physically hunt anymore

So now we concerned ourselves with acquiring LAND AND WOMEN (RESOURCES)

All of the biggest wars and battles in history have always been fought to acquire MORE LAND OR WOMEN


As we further progressed and evolved into our current society - The Digital Age

The basic premise remains the same. We live in a time where Food is abundant and available in excess, Land is owned by the government and Woman are available on the Free market

As a modern day man you need to concern yourself with ACQUIRING WEALTH/MONEY - THE MODERN DAY RESOURCE


What's sad is, the way the elites have set up the entire matrix has made it tremendously hard to accumulate resources and it has become extremely easy to DISTRIBUTE RESOURCES

Every hour you spend on social media, watching tv shows, netflix, movies, video games - you are freely distributing your resources (time, energy, money, attention)


You must FIERCELY PROTECT YOUR RESOURCES and reinvest them for your own benefit

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE

Completely agree. You sure you're not an Alt of another poster here.

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

Completely agree. You sure you're not an Alt of another poster here.

His posts have less narcissism and pseudo intellectualism. I doubt he's who you're thinking of.

 

[XANDIARIES]

how can you wealthmaxx with no educational backing or references rather though?

 

[Deleted member 28903]

did I read?

 

[Irredeemable]

Easier said than done.

 

[Angry_runt]

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE - AND THE ONLY OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS AS A MAN

"If women didn't exist, all the money in the world would have no meaning." - Aristotle Onnasis, the billionaire who married Jackie Kennedy

Accumulation of resources was always just means to an end. You needed resources to attract mates and have successful progeny. In the current environment where women are safer and richer than they've ever been, they won't give up pussy for anything less than riches and even then... Iook at Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Louis CK, those guys are millionaires and yet they had to resort to the weird shit they did.

And it's not easy to acquire wealth. Merely working hard won't get you the kind of money that would attract women to you. Leaving aside the fact that women who are attracted to your money are whores and that you probably already can afford whores if you have like a regular job.

Money is good for coping though. My 30s are way better than my 20s because I have more money. Women don't care though.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Hard one to say. I would rather be a poor gigachad than a billionaire truecel

 

[Adamhastor]

TLDR, huge wall of text for a "water is wet" post

 

[mNFwTJ3wz9]

Money is generally a means to an end.
If you want expensive copes, it makes sense to moneymaxx.

Every hour you spend on social media, watching tv shows, netflix, movies, video games - you are freely distributing your resources (time, energy, money, attention)


You must FIERCELY PROTECT YOUR RESOURCES and reinvest them for your own benefit

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE - AND THE ONLY OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS AS A MAN

Massive cope.

 

[CleverJester]

Acquiring wealth in a rigged ish world.

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE - AND THE ONLY OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS AS A MAN

It cannot be an objective measure of the success of a man since your looks influence how much you gain (most jobs aren't accessible for unattractive men and you will be promoted less often if you are unattractive) and how much you will spend (escorts, betabuxxing) in comparison with any other more attractive man than you.


How can you measure the success of a man if this said man doesn't exist ? How do you complete the goal of life if life doesn't exist anymore ?
To measure the success of a man (or the goal of life) is simply to see whether his genes will pass on or not. Make as many babies as possible and give them the highest chances of success to do the same. Rich or not, if your bloodline ends, you have failed.
> but being rich is better than nothing
Indeed.

What you are describing is how to measure the success of a betabuxxer obsessed by his ish overlord's currency.

AWW DOODE I NEED TO STOOK MOAR RESOURCES
WHILE I COOM TO ISH PORN!

 

[Deleted member 30248]

why shutting your mouth the fuck up and cutting this redpill bullshit SHOULD BE YOUR FIRST PRIORITY.

 

[happiless]

 

[Lebensmüder]

Acquiring wealth in a rigged ish world.


It cannot be an objective measure of the success of a man since your looks influence how much you gain (most jobs aren't accessible for unattractive men and you will be promoted less often if you are unattractive) and how much you will spend (escorts, betabuxxing) in comparison with any other more attractive man than you.


How can you measure the success of a man if this said man doesn't exist ? How do you complete the goal of life if life doesn't exist anymore ?
To measure the success of a man (or the goal of life) is simply to see whether his genes will pass on or not. Make as many babies as possible and give them the highest chances of success to do the same. Rich or not, if your bloodline ends, you have failed.
> but being rich is better than nothing
Indeed.

What you are describing is how to measure the success of a betabuxxer obsessed by his ish overlord's currency.

AWW DOODE I NEED TO STOOK MOAR RESOURCES
WHILE I COOM TO ISH PORN!

Extremely based and true.

And you also need extreme intelligence to succeed if you are an unattractive male, which is a genetically determined trait (like looks) that cannot be changed. And even if you have high intelligence, you also need a high portion of luck again to be able to make it while also displaying extreme discipline - just to get a damaged product. Jfl, even Moneymaxxing/Betabuxxing cannot be done by everyone - even if it was desirable. Furthermore, to compensate for a lack of looks you must be a millionaire/even richer nowadays, even belonging to the middle class doesn't mean anything anymore - and even if you were a millionaire or even richer you would be absolutely stupid to get a woman because she could just divorce rape you and then it's over.

Always remember: The richest woman on the planet is only so rich because of her divorce and women nowadays have far better job/education opportunities than men - they don't need a provider, it's a cope to think that women can fail nowadays, everything works in their favor. The luck of others is not your luck, it's your bad luck - the greatest lie is that everyone can be satisfied/happy in life, when someone suceeds others automatically fail because life is a zero-sum game, winning means someone else has to lose.

Absolute freedom was never a desirable goal, because when there is absolute freedom without any responsibility/regulation only the A-list benefits from it, while their freedom comes at the direct expense of others - this is true for economics and also for social phenomenons.

Total economical freedom without regulation leads to monopolies, the same thing goes for total social freedom which created a bourgeoisie of attractive males and women who live in sexual overindulgence and a precarity of most other males who have (almost) nothing. We see no egalitarianism in our totally free society, but rather "Winner takes it all"-dynamics.

View attachment 375301

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

it's not easy to acquire wealth. Merely working hard won't get you the kind of money that would attract women to you.

Brutal reality pill

 

[Deleted member 30146]

I have always been a huge proponent of Wealthmaxxing and Looksmaxxing

However Wealthmaxxing should be the absolute FIRST PRIORITY in your life and should take precedence over every single thing

Human beings since the dawn of time have killed, raped and plundered for one purpose only and that is the ACCUMULATION OF RESOURCES


If you look at prehistoric humans in the stone age - the primary activity that they concerned themselves with was HUNTING FOR FOOD (RESOURCE)

This was their most important priority and their SOLE PURPOSE in life. Men specialized in the craft of hunting and women rewarded successful hunters with sexual access


As we started farming and moved into the agricultural age, humans started to build civilizations.

Food was more abundant now and we didn't have to physically hunt anymore

So now we concerned ourselves with acquiring LAND AND WOMEN (RESOURCES)

All of the biggest wars and battles in history have always been fought to acquire MORE LAND OR WOMEN


As we further progressed and evolved into our current society - The Digital Age

The basic premise remains the same. We live in a time where Food is abundant and available in excess, Land is owned by the government and Woman are available on the Free market

As a modern day man you need to concern yourself with ACQUIRING WEALTH/MONEY - THE MODERN DAY RESOURCE


What's sad is, the way the elites have set up the entire matrix has made it tremendously hard to accumulate resources and it has become extremely easy to DISTRIBUTE RESOURCES

Every hour you spend on social media, watching tv shows, netflix, movies, video games - you are freely distributing your resources (time, energy, money, attention)


You must FIERCELY PROTECT YOUR RESOURCES and reinvest them for your own benefit

As a Man, WEALTHMAXXING AKA RESOURCE ACCUMULATION IS YOUR NATURAL EVOLUTIONARY PURPOSE - AND THE ONLY OBJECTIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS AS A MAN

I nominate you as the highest IQ poster on this forum.

 

[fyvefhour]

If you can loolsmax before richcelling youll be much better off. Once you look like chad you basically get the halo effect and you just become rich. I spoke to a chad that told me that things just happen for him and thats how he got rich.
You need to make a foidfish account to see what opportunities youd actually have given your character that you built as a man. The drive of a man + the halo effect is basically guarenteed success

 

[Neggr]

His posts have less narcissism and pseudo intellectualism. I doubt he's who you're thinking of.

View attachment 375282

Kek

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

Completely agree. You sure you're not an Alt of another poster here.

Nope I'm not

 

[Pengwin]

Easier said than done.

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

how can you wealthmaxx with no educational backing or references rather though?

It cannot be an objective measure of the success of a man since your looks influence how much you gain (most jobs aren't accessible for unattractive men and you will be promoted less often if you are unattractive) and how much you will spend (escorts, betabuxxing) in comparison with any other more attractive man than you.

I will be making a thread on the 'HOW' of wealthmaxxing for us - since we've faced a lot of negative reinforcement and as you mentioned it may be harder to rise up the corporate ladder/get promoted because of lookism

To measure the success of a man (or the goal of life) is simply to see whether his genes will pass on or not. Make as many babies as possible and give them the highest chances of success to do the same. Rich or not, if your bloodline ends, you have failed.

There are millions if not billions of people living in slums and favelas around the world in third world countries who have passed on their genes, would you consider them as being successful?

Even if we agree that passing on your genes is considered a mark of success, wealthmaxxing is only going to help you fulfill that agenda

If you can loolsmax before richcelling youll be much better off. Once you look like chad you basically get the halo effect and you just become rich. I spoke to a chad that told me that things just happen for him and thats how he got rich.
You need to make a foidfish account to see what opportunities youd actually have given your character that you built as a man. The drive of a man + the halo effect is basically guarenteed success

Yeah, but you would require money to looksmax in the first place (assuming surgerymaxxing), but there's no right or wrong- whatever works for you

And you also need extreme intelligence to succeed if you are an unattractive male, which is a genetically determined trait (like looks) that cannot be changed. And even if you have high intelligence, you also need a high portion of luck again to be able to make it while also displaying extreme discipline -

I'm not denying the role of intelligence and luck, however in today's digital era with the abundance of opportunities available to us, there is truly NO EXCUSE

100 years back these may have been valid points, but not today.

With resource after resource available and the abundance of information at our fingertips- it truly comes down to how bad you want it

just to get a damaged product. Jfl, even Moneymaxxing/Betabuxxing cannot be done by everyone - even if it was desirable. Furthermore, to compensate for a lack of looks you must be a millionaire/even richer nowadays, even belonging to the middle class doesn't mean anything anymore - and even if you were a millionaire or even richer you would be absolutely stupid to get a woman because she could just divorce rape you and then it's over.

Always remember: The richest woman on the planet is only so rich because of her divorce and women nowadays have far better job/education opportunities than men - they don't need a provider, it's a cope to think that women can fail nowadays, everything works in their favor. The luck of others is not your luck, it's your bad luck - the greatest lie is that everyone can be satisfied/happy in life, when someone suceeds others automatically fail because life is a zero-sum game, winning means someone else has to lose.

I have mentioned nothing about betabuxxing/getting married or anything about woman. You could escortmaxx your entire life if you wanted - that's an individual decision

I do agree that life is a zero sum game, that's how its always been since the dawn of mankind

We should be grateful we know this information and use it to our advantage

 

[CleverJester]

There are millions if not billions of people living in slums and favelas around the world in third world countries who have passed on their genes, would you consider them as being successful?

Ask this question to yourself : These beaners living in the favelas have families while i will be dying alone, am i successful ?

Thinking that you are more successful because you are wealthier is a massive cope because anything you own, build, paint will irremediably end up being destroyed in the future. Society will collapse but your genes will be part of the people that will rebuild it.

Even if we agree that passing on your genes is considered a mark of success, wealthmaxxing is only going to help you fulfill that agenda

^

> but being rich is better than nothing
Indeed.

 

[Incline]

Just be born to rich parents in not a shithole country theory.

Easier said than done.

 

[dirtykombatcel]

His posts have less narcissism and pseudo intellectualism. I doubt he's who you're thinking of.

View attachment 375282

I think they are both pretty similar tbh, this guy is trying to tell the exact same thing as blkfaggot with different words. It's just that he's trying to seem more "approachable".

 

[Hector Barbossa]

I know that I should be wealthmaxing, but escortceling is just so tempting. The way I've been living for the past couple of months, I haven't really saved anything. The sad thing is though that there's no way I can justify escortceling at the frequency I need and save money at the same time. It's either I save and waste what's left of my youth experiencing nothing or blow it all on whores and have at least something to remember. I'd welcome any advice about this.

 

[LittleDarkAge]

It's easy to say that we should all be wealthmaxing. But do you actually realistic idea of how to do this that doesn't involve wageslaving for 30 years?

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

I think they are both pretty similar tbh, this guy is trying to tell the exact same thing as blkfaggot with different words. It's just that he's trying to seem more "approachable".

True.

Don't get me wrong, they are saying the same stuff. But this is basically a blackpillpress lite. With out the condescending posts and obnoxious highlighted red text in caps lock.

 

[CleverJester]

Extremely true and based.

you also need a high portion of luck again to be able to make it
The luck of others is not your luck, it's your bad luck - the greatest lie is that everyone can be satisfied/happy in life, when someone succeeds others automatically fail because life is a zero-sum game, winning means someone else has to lose.

The "luck"' you are describing is in fact an opportunity.
eg : luckily some people are born attractive (their parents gave them the opportunity), luckily this 6'3 dude got hired in the navy seals.
Even when someone luckily wins a prize from a lottery ticket, on average this person has scraped 500 lottery tickets before this lucky one, it was statistically bound to happen : he created the opportunity (spends 1000$ on tickets) and got lucky (wins 800$ from winning ticket).

True luck is extremely rare (1 lottery ticket bought, 1 lucky lottery ticket), it can happen to anyone, even an ant but since it can happen to anyone, and true bad luck will happen too: it had no value at all.

she could just divorce rape you and then it's over.
Always remember: The richest woman on the planet is only so rich because of her divorce and women nowadays have far better job/education opportunities than men -

Women are far easier to brainwash than men. Just like ethnics, they are a weapon used against us to starve us to death.

Total economical freedom without regulation leads to monopolies, the same thing goes for total social freedom which created a bourgeoisie of attractive males and women who live in sexual overindulgence and a precarity of most other males who have (almost) nothing. We see no egalitarianism in our totally free society, but rather "Winner takes it all"-dynamics.

The system is now perfect, women can get Chad in a 100kms radius thanks to today's technology, in 5 years you will either be the top 3% or you will get nothing.
When the resources are limited, people will compete for it. Who is limiting the resources (inceldom)(controlling currency and brainwashing people and thus women) to make people compete and murder each others (wars) ?

But notice how they don't want EVERYTHING to be perfect. They promote dating apps which make women seek the best looking male which you might think is eugenistic while promoting race-mixing which isn't eugenistic at all. They want a 90IQ average obedients race-mixed citizens who has no culture, no history because these come from your genetics.

Total economical freedom without regulation leads to monopolies just like the uncensored internet and the success of the polred/celblack pills.

because life is a zero-sum game, winning means someone else has to lose.

Speaking outside of the current system, when we are a threat to each other : that's true.

 

[Deleted member 26923]

Easier said than done.

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

Ask this question to yourself : These beaners living in the favelas have families while i will be dying alone, am i successful ?

Thinking that you are more successful because you are wealthier is a massive cope because anything you own, build, paint will irremediably end up being destroyed in the future. Society will collapse but your genes will be part of the people that will rebuild it.

I personally would not consider any of them successful, however I would rather be a wealthmaxxed individual with the ability to escortmax/seamax etc rather than living in poverty in a slum/favela.

Moreover with modern technology if you want to start a family you have several options like IVF programs, so you don't have to necessarily die alone

It's easy to say that we should all be wealthmaxing. But do you actually realistic idea of how to do this that doesn't involve wageslaving for 30 years?

Will be making a thread on this in the future, the 'HOW' of wealthmaxxing

I know that I should be wealthmaxing, but escortceling is just so tempting. The way I've been living for the past couple of months, I haven't really saved anything. The sad thing is though that there's no way I can justify escortceling at the frequency I need and save money at the same time. It's either I save and waste what's left of my youth experiencing nothing or blow it all on whores and have at least something to remember. I'd welcome any advice about this.

It just comes down to how badly you want to wealthmaxx

The fact that you are spending everything you have on escortcelling means that you value it more than wealthmaxxing

You are sacrificing long term wealth creation for short term pleasure

The easiest way is to take small steps - start by limiting the number of escort visits and take it from there - maybe you can find a suitable balance to enjoy the present while at the same time saving enough for the future

 

[CleverJester]

I personally would not consider any of them successful, however I would rather be a wealthmaxxed individual with the ability to escortmax/seamax etc rather than living in poverty in a slum/favela.

Moreover with modern technology if you want to start a family you have several options like IVF programs, so you don't have to necessarily die alone

IVF programs ? Just a dad ? If you look up statistics on single-mother's children depression rate and marks it's disastrous. I think it'll be the same with single-dad children. Children biologically need both of them both psychologically and physicaly, eg : kids that didn't breastfeed are mouthbreathers.
Embracing an hedonistic life and then trying to settle down but it won't workout, like a foid i see

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

Money is generally a means to an end.

Its also a means to achieve freedom from the gynocracy if done properly. Which is why its important. Rich incels have more political power than poor normies.

how can you wealthmaxx with no educational backing or references rather though?

Invest in emerging technologies. See crypto for excellent opportunities. Lots of incels got rich off of BTC, ETH and LINK.

why shutting your mouth the fuck up and cutting this redpill bullshit SHOULD BE YOUR FIRST PRIORITY.

Money applied to blackpilled ends is not necessarily bad. A rich blackpill male is far more dangerous to the status quo than a poor blackpilled male.

I think it'll be the same with single-dad children. Children biologically need both of them both psychologically and physicaly, eg : kids that didn't breastfeed are mouthbreathers.

Lol no. Single fathers have much better outcomes on averagethan single mothers. This is especially true for male children. There are many reasons why this is, but the most obvious is that men must sacrifice a lot more than women to have kids.

 

[waste matter]

yeah i can say that shit too, it all comes down to action and only few will be winners.

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

Its also a means to achieve freedom from the gynocracy if done properly. Which is why its important. Rich incels have more political power than poor normies.

Money applied to blackpilled ends is not necessarily bad. A rich blackpill male is far more dangerous to the status quo than a poor blackpilled male.

Exactly

Wealthy blackpilled males are extremely dangerous and lethal to society and the status quo - that's why they don't want to see us winning

They want us to live horrible lives of destitution, loneliness and never amount to anything

This should only serve as more FUEL to wealthmaxx

IVF programs ? Just a dad ? If you look up statistics on single-mother's children depression rate and marks it's disastrous. I think it'll be the same with single-dad children. Children biologically need both of them both psychologically and physicaly, eg : kids that didn't breastfeed are mouthbreathers.

Lol no. Single fathers have much better outcomes on averagethan single mothers. This is especially true for male children. There are many reasons why this is, but the most obvious is that men must sacrifice a lot more than women to have kids.

Why in the world would you ever want to raise a child with a women after being blackpilled? We know the reality of women and raising a child and cohabiting with them is only going to be a suicide mission

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

@Blackpill Bishop are doing something to wealthmaxx?

Yes I am, will make a thread going into detail on that in the future, talking about the best possible wealthmaxxing avenues specifically for us

 

[SlayerSlayer]

wealthmaxxing is a must if you are PSL 5 and below, because we need wealth to cope

Anything above that I would say cocainemaxxing is more important

 

[Lebensmüder]

But notice how they don't want EVERYTHING to be perfect. They promote dating apps which make women seek the best looking male which you might think is eugenistic while promoting race-mixing which isn't eugenistic at all. They want a 90IQ average obedients race-mixed citizens who has no culture, no history because these come from your genetics.

This. Furthermore: Sexual selection =/= Natural selection, many of the traits favored by sexual selection are actually deleterious for survival and this led to the extinction of many species in the past; jfl, when I think about female mating patterns the last thing I personally think of is eugenics (the prefix "dys-" would be better fitting when you see who profits the most from our current system).

Furthermore, eugenics (e.g. significant changes in the frequency of certain traits) are impossible in a forseeable timespan and whether some traits are deemed beneficial or not changes with time and depends on the subjective will/perspective of a certain person- and the last person who should define beneficial/deleterious traits (in my eyes) is a woman when you see what people they worship.

 

[Blackpill Bishop]

Does it include crypto?

@ me when you make that thread please.

Okay. yes crpyto is one of them

 

[Deleted member 31092]

With the Central Banks printing trillions of dollars out of nothing, and with women having so many economic opportunities that they often out-earn men, "wealthmaxxing" means less than ever.

Now, in a harsh environment (which is what I think we're heading for), where women's economic opportunities are mostly limited to prostitute, wealth maxxing is valid.

 

[polar inertia]

Yes I am, will make a thread going into detail on that in the future, talking about the best possible wealthmaxxing avenues specifically for us

Looking forward to it



Neurons are firing, good thread.

 

[CleverJester]

This. Furthermore: Sexual selection =/= Natural selection, many of the traits favored by sexual selection are actually deleterious for survival and this led to the extinction of many species in the past; jfl, when I think about female mating patterns the last thing I personally think of is eugenics (the prefix "dys-" would be better fitting when you see who profits the most from our current system).

Furthermore, eugenics (e.g. significant changes in the frequency of certain traits) are impossible in a forseeable timespan and whether some traits are deemed beneficial or not changes with time and depends on the subjective will/perspective of a certain person- and the last person who should define beneficial/deleterious traits (in my eyes) is a woman when you see what people they worship.

If you look at the peacock, in order to be attractive he has to wear these shiny feathers which displays himself as an easy target for predators and it consume energy to grow these feathers : bad for survival. Their strategy to charm a mate is by putting an handicap on themselves. They don't have Tinder, feminism and they have survived for millions of years.

How is Sexual selection =/= Natural selection ? It's the female that determines who breeds, who cares if you are a godlike survivor if you can't breed ? Your genes will not be part of that said Natural selection.

Women are eugenistic. Humans are on the top of the foodchain, the only threat to humans are humans. That's why foids seek tall men.
That said, we are an intelligent specie, there's more ugly people than attractive one therefore i'm sure attractive ones will have to come to an agreement with the ugly to avoid a massive ER wave : such as the marriage, abolishing women's right and getting rid of them

Lol no. Single fathers have much better outcomes on averagethan single mothers. This is especially true for male children. There are many reasons why this is, but the most obvious is that men must sacrifice a lot more than women to have kids.

There's no doubt than a single father will raise better than a single mother, having both considering that the woman isn't crazy : is optimal.

That's always the same shit. You think that can have kids by yourself, you do, but Chad that has a wife will raise them better because their mommy is at home while your children will end up being alone at home and rot and be social freaks (eg : "you don't have a mother, freak!").
It's like sexdolls, if you consider foids not being humans, then you will have no problem having a sexdoll, but sexdoll are meant to look like foids, therefore it cannot be better than what it tries to copy. All of this is cope.

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

That's always the same shit. You think that can have kids by yourself, you do, but Chad that has a wife will raise them better because their mommy is at home while your children will end up being alone at home and rot and be social freaks (eg : "you don't have a mother, freak!").

Children raise themselves once a certain level of maturity is reached. Being a social outcast is mostly a consequence of being ugly or autistic. If the child is neither, he won't have problems socializing. If the child is a chad, he could be an orphan and still rule the roost.

And no, the two parent solution is not necessarily good. Imagine if you were raised by a blackpilled father who told you what was going to happen and why? And he made you lift, take HGH, etc. Would a mother allow her son to be blackpilled this way?

 

[Emba]

Cash me ouside!

 

[BITG]

His posts have less narcissism and pseudo intellectualism. I doubt he's who you're thinking of.

View attachment 375282

Press of the blk pill?

 

[NothinButAComedy]

Based as Usual

 

[muharremabi]

You need extreme intelligence to succeed if you are an unattractive male, which is a genetically determined trait (like looks) that cannot be changed.

 

[NothinButAComedy]

why shutting your mouth the fuck up and cutting this redpill bullshit SHOULD BE YOUR FIRST PRIORITY.

There is truth to the redpill

 

[LittleDarkAge]

Yes I am, will make a thread going into detail on that in the future, talking about the best possible wealthmaxxing avenues specifically for us

Hey @Blackpill Bishop where's our moneymaxxing guide you massive bluepilled BITCH

 

[BlkPillPres]

Completely agree. You sure you're not an Alt of another poster here.

JFL no he's its not me, and only waste of space troll users create alt accounts

 

[ShortAndUgly]

This guy is not blackpilled