Why the normie masses get angry at every political system

[WizardofSoda]

80%+ of people are first line worker guys by genetic intellectual potential. Those that work hard and get a useful skill they do the work of the world, and they don't get paid badly or goodly. They make your standard normie career income. So middling money. Why don't they make more than that. Because there are millions of normies just like them with the same skills as them so the market averages out the incomes.

Ok so middling isn't too bad, in America as a middling income normie in flyover country they have a family, their own house, truck, hobbies, appliances, utilities, etc.. Ok so why are they are so angry then. Because of all the big swinging dicks rich guys above them in the status hierarchy.

What about in communism. Well your standard worker gets his commie car, commie block apartment and commie family, so sounds pretty good to me. But they are mad as hell because the big swinging dick communist big wigs have their luxury houses, big offices, secretaries, dachas, power ordering people around etc.

 

[Lonelyus]

BC of liberals

 

[Govid_Dorious]

they are just never satisfied, development leads to boredom and boredom leads to dumb thoughts

 

[Govid_Dorious]

also, commies think by switching from capitalism to communism will change the 1% vs 99% question, well, that won't happen because the commie party will be the new 1% like in China

 

[WizardofSoda]

also, commies think by switching from capitalism to communism will change the 1% vs 99% question, well, that won't happen because the commie party will be the new 1% like in China

Thats exactly it. I once read in China in 3,000 years there has been 6 successful 'communist' revolutions, aka once every 500 years. And many unsuccessful attempts. That were always the revolutionary organizing the angry rural masses into seizing power by force with the intent of redistributing the wealth of the urban rich to themselves.

Each time there was a brief period of advance, until the new leaders made themselves the new aristocracy. Often its the children of the original revolutions who set in place the new order with the new 1%.

 

[stalin22]

Thats exactly it. I once read in China in 3,000 years there has been 6 successful 'communist' revolutions, aka once every 500 years. And many unsuccessful attempts. That were always the revolutionary organizing the angry rural masses into seizing power by force with the intent of redistributing the wealth of the urban rich to themselves.

Each time there was a brief period of advance, until the new leaders made themselves the new aristocracy. Often its the children of the original revolutions who set in place the new order with the new 1%.

There was never communism in either china or Russia