The Judge
Suzerain of The Earth
★★
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2025
- Posts
- 5,134
- Online time
- 2d 9h
In order to further scrutinize this subject, we must first ask ourselves this—what exactly is morality? Well, from what I've observed, morality has no objective basis. Not only is it a man-made construct, but a man-made construct that is reconstructed indefinitely. If you would to ask someone from today and someone from 10 years ago what constitutes a "good person" their answers would be vastly different. Not to mention someone from even further back in time. For example, marital "rape" was only outlawed in the 1970s—so by definition, a man who lived in the 50s and 60s could be seen as morally upstanding regardless of having forced himself on his wife.
en.wikipedia.org
The Code of Hammurabi, the oldest legal text in existence, (Dating back to 1755–1750 BC) only criminalized rape if it were perpetrated against a married or virgin woman, as it was seen an infringement against her father or husband.
A similar caveat existed nearly every other legal systems throughout the great majority of history. For example:
With all of this in mind, I have realized that caring about what is and isn't "moral" is a fruitless endeavor in the grand scheme of the universe—as there is always a chance that yesterday's good becomes tomorrow's evil.
No, the only (Objective) principles we should believe in are the principles of nature, where survival is paramount. Objectively speaking speaking, humans are animals, and it is an animal's purpose to distribute its seed as much as it can. Why wrap ourselves in the trappings of edification when that is not our nature? Why allow women—who were ultimately designed to be taken against their will, (Judging by the fact that 64% of them fantasize about non-consensual encounters) deny us our biological purpose?
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Dolphins, mallards, and other mammals have been reported to engage in "forcible sexual behavior" with the females of their species. Why should we be the exception?
psycnet.apa.org
If man was not born to rape, nature never would have made human females weaker than the males. This is the only reason why the modern definition of morality was conceived, as to shield the weak from the will of the strong. Why do you think there are more sexually frustrated men now than ever before? Because morality chose to bestow upon women "rights" and "freedoms" they were never meant to have in the first place.
Marital rape in the United States - Wikipedia
The Code of Hammurabi, the oldest legal text in existence, (Dating back to 1755–1750 BC) only criminalized rape if it were perpetrated against a married or virgin woman, as it was seen an infringement against her father or husband.
- Rape of a virgin was punished by death, and the virgin was held blameless.
- Rape of a married woman was considered adultery, and the woman was held equally responsible. Deaths of the rapist and victim were by drowning. The victim's husband had the option of rescuing his wife by pulling her out of the river.
A similar caveat existed nearly every other legal systems throughout the great majority of history. For example:
Hebrews:
- They punished rape by stoning. If a virgin was raped within the city walls (where she could have cried for help) she was stoned along with the rapist.
- If outside the city, she had to marry her rapist and he was forced to pay the bride-price to her father.
- On the other hand, if the virgin was already betrothed, the rapist was stoned, and the girl was sold into marriage for a low price.
- Any married woman who was raped was stoned with her rapist for adultery, and the husband was not permitted to rescue her.
Celtic law (pre-British law)
- Not only was rape recognized as a crime against a woman, punishable by fines, but two kinds of rape were defined: forcible rape (against the woman's will) and rape where the woman was incapable of consent (due to intoxication or mental illness).
- There were certain exceptions - the woman had to cry for help if possible, and had to report the rape immediately.
- Promiscuous and adulterous women were not protected.
With all of this in mind, I have realized that caring about what is and isn't "moral" is a fruitless endeavor in the grand scheme of the universe—as there is always a chance that yesterday's good becomes tomorrow's evil.
No, the only (Objective) principles we should believe in are the principles of nature, where survival is paramount. Objectively speaking speaking, humans are animals, and it is an animal's purpose to distribute its seed as much as it can. Why wrap ourselves in the trappings of edification when that is not our nature? Why allow women—who were ultimately designed to be taken against their will, (Judging by the fact that 64% of them fantasize about non-consensual encounters) deny us our biological purpose?
The nature of women's rape fantasies: an analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents - PubMed
This study evaluated the rape fantasies of female undergraduates (N = 355) using a fantasy checklist that reflected the legal definition of rape and a sexual fantasy log that included systematic prompts and self-ratings. Results indicated that 62% of women have had a rape fantasy, which is...
Dolphins, mallards, and other mammals have been reported to engage in "forcible sexual behavior" with the females of their species. Why should we be the exception?
Log in - American Psychological Association
If man was not born to rape, nature never would have made human females weaker than the males. This is the only reason why the modern definition of morality was conceived, as to shield the weak from the will of the strong. Why do you think there are more sexually frustrated men now than ever before? Because morality chose to bestow upon women "rights" and "freedoms" they were never meant to have in the first place.





