Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Why online spaces that allow both men and women don't work

deleted fren

deleted fren

Everything burns
-
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
43,116
Online time
1h 53m
Allowing women in any online space is a horrible choice. As soon as women become prominent, the space loses its focus. A hierarchy usually forms, this hierarchy is
Attractive men at the very top. Most popular members and constantly simped by all the women.

Women below attractive men. Constantly simped by all the sub attractive men, and exploit their attractiveness to men to get what they want.

High status members who made themselves popular by doing something below women. Although, they're not as popular as either the chads or the foids, they're still popular.

Normies below high status members and women. They worship women and constantly try to win their validation. They'll praise the attractive men and suck up to them in hopes of getting attention from the women.

Unattractive men at the very bottom. This can include, looks, more severe autism, or voice. The unattractive men are the punching bags of the group and bullied by all above. Originally, they could've been very prominent and important members in the group before it was invaded by normies and women.


The main issue here is that men and women cannot coexist without sexual competition forming. Women will always exploit their attractiveness to men, and likewise, attractive men will exploit their attractiveness to women. What you end up with is an extremely competitive and miserable space where the dynamics constantly remind of how humans are bound by their instincts. A male only space is much more satisfactory and enjoyable.

Normies and foolish incels believe that if they allow women into their spaces they might be able to garner a girlfriend. This isn't true at all. What actually happens is the women pursue the most attractive men and they're left simping. They'll then take their rage out on less attractive men to try to raise their status.
 
disagree , the foids become the top of the hierarchy and all dickhavERs are sycophantic towards them

see what happened to the Misc and how your avERage disgusting toilet got 3000000 reps in a mattER of weeks from simps
 
Normies below high status members and women. They worship women and constantly try to win their validation. They'll praise the attractive men and suck up to them in hopes of getting attention from the women.
This i hate the most.

Foids i would say are second, but I hate them equally as much.

TTNMD TTFD
 
disagree , the foids become the top of the hierarchy and all dickhavERs are sycophantic towards them

see what happened to the Misc and how your avERage disgusting toilet got 3000000 reps in a mattER of weeks from simps
No, I think attractive men rise to the top because they have power over the foids and often use them to get what they want.
Also, mods/admins, tend to reward the attractive men because they like how they bring girls.
 
This i hate the most.

Foids i would say are second, but I hate them equally as much.

TTNMD TTFD
Normies are by far the dumbest. They're completely ignorant to how foids will simp for the attractive guys even when it's blatantly obvious.
 
Normies are by far the dumbest. They're completely ignorant to how foids will simp for the attractive guys even when it's blatantly obvious.
Cuckmaxxing at its finest.
 
i read so much PUA strategy when i was trying to ascend 10+ years ago

the truth is "flirting" is not complicated at all.

Chad: that bar behind us seems cool. also speaking of behind, id like to take you from behind.

Stacy: OMG so clever hahahaha
 
i read so much PUA strategy when i was trying to ascend 10+ years ago

the truth is "flirting" is not complicated at all.

Chad: that bar behind us seems cool. also speaking of behind, id like to take you from behind.

Stacy: OMG so clever hahahaha
Not even Stacy. Beckie. Stacies are so rare. Chad usually fucks beckies.
 
This is precisely why I loathe "gamer girls". Video games are inherently a male cope because they give a sense of purpose and accomplishment, they let you (virtually) create and prosper and make subhuman unwanted men feel better about themselves. Women don't give a shit about all that. They don't want to build things, they don't want to achieve. Only consume and hoard. It's nature. Going into online gaming for them is *always* with sinister motive because they just want to harvest desperate men's attention.

They will use the most flashy skins, put "she/her" in their tag, literally mention at every possible moment that they're female even if no one asked. No woman cares a fuck about becoming competitive, learning lore or completing games 100%. They play Overwatch and Valorant because hihihi I'm such a quirky gamer girl and let simps orbit them while fucking chad on the side.

It's a mockery, really.
 
This is precisely why I loathe "gamer girls". Video games are inherently a male cope because they give a sense of purpose and accomplishment, they let you (virtually) create and prosper and make subhuman unwanted men feel better about themselves. Women don't give a shit about all that. They don't want to build things, they don't want to achieve. Only consume and hoard. It's nature. Going into online gaming for them is *always* with sinister motive because they just want to harvest desperate men's attention.

They will use the most flashy skins, put "she/her" in their tag, literally mention at every possible moment that they're female even if no one asked. No woman cares a fuck about becoming competitive, learning lore or completing games 100%. They play Overwatch and Valorant because hihihi I'm such a quirky gamer girl and let simps orbit them while fucking chad on the side.

It's a mockery, really.
:yes: :yes: :yes:
 
Allowing women in any online space is a horrible choice. As soon as women become prominent, the space loses its focus. A hierarchy usually forms, this hierarchy is
Attractive men at the very top. Most popular members and constantly simped by all the women.

Women below attractive men. Constantly simped by all the sub attractive men, and exploit their attractiveness to men to get what they want.

High status members who made themselves popular by doing something below women. Although, they're not as popular as either the chads or the foids, they're still popular.

Normies below high status members and women. They worship women and constantly try to win their validation. They'll praise the attractive men and suck up to them in hopes of getting attention from the women.

Unattractive men at the very bottom. This can include, looks, more severe autism, or voice. The unattractive men are the punching bags of the group and bullied by all above. Originally, they could've been very prominent and important members in the group before it was invaded by normies and women.


The main issue here is that men and women cannot coexist without sexual competition forming. Women will always exploit their attractiveness to men, and likewise, attractive men will exploit their attractiveness to women. What you end up with is an extremely competitive and miserable space where the dynamics constantly remind of how humans are bound by their instincts. A male only space is much more satisfactory and enjoyable.

Normies and foolish incels believe that if they allow women into their spaces they might be able to garner a girlfriend. This isn't true at all. What actually happens is the women pursue the most attractive men and they're left simping. They'll then take their rage out on less attractive men to try to raise their status.
doesnt stop just for games
religions , political movements, countries and many more can end up like this

just look at canadian politics where trudeau got elected by foids cuz he was gl
also look at how protestant churches that allowed female pastors do
 
doesnt stop just for games
religions , political movements, countries and many more can end up like this

just look at canadian politics where trudeau got elected by foids cuz he was gl
also look at how protestant churches that allowed female pastors do
Yep. Female nature must be surprised for peace to be established. If it isn't, bad things will occur.
 
just look at "maga" girls
they dont give af about the politics just want validation
like this one:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYLwyCwl4zQ

the foids at the intro

some of hitlers biggest supportrs were foids
same for stalin

It reminds me of all those girls in bikinis dancing with maga hats. Women are parasites. They'll always latch onto men's movements to push the agendas that they want and serve themselves.
 
It reminds me of all those girls in bikinis dancing with maga hats. Women are parasites. They'll always latch onto men's movements to push the agendas that they want and serve themselves.
and some old magaboomers supporting them being whores

even in islamic countries foids are a problem app some cel from .org visited afghanistan and a foid without burka checked his passport
 
and some old magaboomers supporting them being whores

even in islamic countries foids are a problem app some cel from .org visited afghanistan and a foid without burka checked his passport
No surprise.
 
They turn into simp fests.
 
see what happened to the Misc and how your avERage disgusting toilet got 3000000 reps in a mattER of weeks from simps
misc only had subhuman gymcels
 
The instant women appear in a previously male-only space it will change, even if unconsciously. Men will not be themselves as they were before
 
Main problem is you have to kill the vibe and avoid offending the poor wimminz :/ white knights don’t exactly help either
 
Allowing females into the average male only space has the same effect the black plague has. They poison social spheres, degrade morals, devour souls, and create ruin and mental havoc. Rape is the natural solution.
 
There’s a reason historically male-only environments were often more stable and cooperative, as men weren’t subconsciously competing for women. When a woman joins, no one announces it, but the behavior patterns shift immediately. People start performing, signalling, trying to curry favor, and the original purpose of the group gets drowned out. The ironic part here is that many of the people who are in favor of allowing women end up at the lower strata of the hierarchy, and then let out their frustration and desire to compete upon the unfortunate men below them.
 
There’s a reason historically male-only environments were often more stable and cooperative, as men weren’t subconsciously competing for women. When a woman joins, no one announces it, but the behavior patterns shift immediately. People start performing, signalling, trying to curry favor, and the original purpose of the group gets drowned out. The ironic part here is that many of the people who are in favor of allowing women end up at the lower strata of the hierarchy, and then let out their frustration and desire to compete upon the unfortunate men below them.
:yes: :bigbrain:
 

Similar threads

RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
6
Views
375
INVERTER
INVERTER
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
15
Views
772
Grodd
Grodd
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
5
Views
276
Lv99_BixNood
Lv99_BixNood
RealSchizo
Replies
1
Views
399
BricABrac
BricABrac
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
5
Views
427
blackpillforever
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top