Discussion Why isn’t it considered immoral to hit short guys?

[Hoodpreet]

READ FULLY BEFORE REPLYING.

If you took the “rational argument” that progressives and other simps use against hitting women at face value (that you shouldn’t hit a woman because they’re weaker on average) then you should consider this question.

If women and men truly possess equal agency and intellect, then how does “don’t attack weaker people” only apply when it’s a female and not a male weaker than you?

Of course, we already know the answer. It never had anything to do with rational thinking. The bias in favor of protecting women at all costs is an instinctual tribal survival heuristic that exists cause females are seen as less reproductively disposable than males. That’s the underlying source of gynocentrism as a whole.

This isn’t a question warranting a response, but rather an argument to bring up if you’re ever in a debate with some soyfag regarding violence against women

 

[Truecel Prophet]

hit in what sense

 

[Hoodpreet]

It’s funny how soys see themselves as above their inborn instincts just cause they subscribe to delusional views that guilt them into suicidal out-group preference, yet they have zero issue following the most base, primitive instinct there is: simpery

 

[BS06]

Heightism is worse than racism

 

[Skoga]

This is why it never began for us manlets. Not just in the dating market but also career and every other aspect of life.

 

[Lonly ghost]

If you took the “rational argument” that progressives and other simps use against hitting women at face value (that you shouldn’t hit a woman because they’re weaker on average) then you should consider this question.

If women and men truly possess equal agency and intellect, then how does “don’t attack weaker people” only apply when it’s a female and not a male weaker than you?

It was never about protecting the weak and vulnerable.

It has always been about privileging women .

Protecting weak and vulnerable people includes physically weaker men and children as well .

But in our foid worshipping society, beating up children and beating up vulnerable physically weaker men are socially acceptable.

But punishing a female criminal, female abuser , female pedophile, female rapists , etc is not acceptable.

Because " protecting the weak " is just an excuse to privilege women and to protect female criminals.

That's why it is socially acceptable to harm men even if they are vulnerable. It is socially acceptable to beat children in the name of " discipline" . Many mothers beat their children and people think it's okay .

My abusive bitch ass mother used to beat me when I was a very small child.

And also , human beings are naturally pro female and anti male .

That's why male genital mutilation (MGM/ circumcision) of little boys is a socially acceptable practice but FGM is banned in many countries.

 

[XUn0rth0doxS0rrowsX]

U shouldn’t put ur hands on anyone in general?

 

[Hoodpreet]

U shouldn’t put ur hands on anyone in general?

Honestly I’m just appalled that this response and your account stayed up, and that you were either

a) dumb enough
b) soy enough

to actually find this thread worth disputing.

I don’t have much to say besides that I hope your head and body get a divorce ASAP

 

[XUn0rth0doxS0rrowsX]

Honestly I’m just appalled that this response and your account stayed up, and that you were either

a) dumb enough
b) soy enough

to actually find this thread worth disputing.

I don’t have much to say besides that I hope your head and body get a divorce ASAP

so lemme get this straight
I’m soy for not wanting violence?
Like look I’m in the same boat as you
But Let us be realistic why are you putting ur hands on anyone at all, unless provoked, in which case the situation is different, regardless of gender

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

U shouldn’t put ur hands on anyone in general?

Ok but women need to be beaten

 

[Super Nigger Boy]

Heightism is worse than racism

 

[drowningindenial]

Heightism is worse than racism

 

[VanGobbel]

Height is the very first factor in determining how others will treat you.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Of course, we already know the answer. It never had anything to do with rational thinking. The bias in favor of protecting women at all costs is an instinctual tribal survival heuristic that exists cause females are seen as less reproductively disposable than males. That’s the underlying source of gynocentrism as a whole.

This isn’t a question warranting a response, but rather an argument to bring up if you’re ever in a debate with some soyfag regarding violence against women

Really not much to add here. Men are much more expendable than women and gain status by acting according to that, which is why videos of short men being beaten up and screaming for help are funny to normies, while women being treated like that is something people would use in political propaganda to get people to hate whatever category the man is a part of. Men are either intimidating, or they are a joke.

 

[autisticsoy]

A short man is still stronger and resilient than a women. And some can still beat a guy bigger than them so long as the difference isnt too much. I think this is the logic people go with that weaker men arent as helpless as women.

 

[Poopless One]

No joke, I had this same discussion back in senior year of HS some friend I used to have.