Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Why is the editorial line of an incel site anti-incel?

Cruel and unusual punishment glorification. Not a good look, pal.
Not an amerimutt, mon frer. I do not give a shit about the UN declaration of human rights.
That's what the "Socialism" part of "National Socialism" is for. It's like you can't let go of your college indoctrination. NatSoc shed less blood and did better for the economy than Communism ever did.
If you have even a basic understanding of history then you'd know that the nazis literally buddied up with the capitalists and set them slaves to work in their factories. Some were jooos and fags but most people were just critical of nazism. Le based and trad natsocs literally buddied up with the rich fags who are giving us slave wages and gave them a different demographic of slaves. So instead of the rich fags fucking everyone over they fucked over only certain minorities, which is not a big fucking improvement.

If you agree with me and think that the mega rich fucking us all over is bad then you should probably denounce nazism. But hey, you are just fine with being a slave of capital as long as muh based and trad Elon Musk saves le poor South African farmers.
 
Not an amerimutt, mon frer.
I could have sworn it was spelled frère. Mandela Effect?
If you have even a basic understanding of history then you'd know that the nazis literally buddied up with the capitalists and set them slaves to work in their factories. Some were jooos and fags but most people were just critical of nazism. Le based and trad natsocs literally buddied up with the rich fags who are giving us slave wages and gave them a different demographic of slaves. So instead of the rich fags fucking everyone over they fucked over only certain minorities, which is not a big fucking improvement.
A product of the times. If NatSoc happened in 2020s there would be no need for slavery, since AI is a thing nowadays. 80 years ago, yes there were slaves. What are you arguing for here? It doesn't make any sense.
If you agree with me and think that the mega rich fucking us all over is bad then you should probably denounce nazism. But hey, you are just fine with being a slave of capital as long as muh based and trad Elon Musk saves le poor South African farmers.
Why do you think I'm some WN? I'm not even white lmaoooo.

Battle Deaths15,000,000
Battle Wounded25,000,000
Civilian Deaths45,000,000
100,000,000 is the number of the victims of communism. That's what I said. So don't go around bragging that your enemies are genociders or some shit and then sweep a greater loss of life under the rug.
 
I could have sworn it was spelled frère. Mandela Effect?
It is, but I guess that I misspelled it
no need for slavery, since AI is a thing nowadays.
So AI can load materials into industrial machines?
AI can drive the trucks?
AI can take care of the elderly?
Really? No need for human imput?

This is the worst cope I have ever heard.
Why do you think I'm some WN? I'm not even white lmaoooo.
I do not know your race and I have not assumed it to be white. I just gave you an example of a capitalist thief that gets admired by natsocs.
sweep a greater loss of life under the rug
So we are going to ignore the fact that a nation of 70 million under national socialism lead to that many men dying but the biggest countries in the world under communism only had 35% more victims. Per capita that is a lot less and speaks volumes about how socialism is better than national socialism. Get fucked by your own excuse of an argument.:feelskek:
 
National Socialism takes time to be implemented. It requires traitor purges and economic readjustments. I give a hypothetical NS regime that starts today until 2030 to be fully installed and working at peak condition.
So AI can load materials into industrial machines?
AI can drive the trucks?
AI can take care of the elderly?
In 2030 it can.
Really? No need for human imput?
input*
And human input is middle management cope really, it can either do the job or it can't.
I do not know your race and I have not assumed it to be white. I just gave you an example of a capitalist thief that gets admired by natsocs.
Well those natsocs are not very bright, but you don't judge a group for the actions of the not very bright among them unless they're an overwhelming majority.
So we are going to ignore the fact that a nation of 70 million under national socialism lead to that many men dying but the biggest countries in the world under communism only had 35% more victims. Per capita that is a lot less and speaks volumes about how socialism is better than national socialism. Get fucked by your own excuse of an argument.:feelskek:
No, we're not ignoring shit. Two don't fight if one doesn't want to. Half of the 60 million death toll goes to the Allies for being in warfare, thus the NatSoc regime killed about 30 million people. Since you like percentages, that's a nice rational 33.33...% of Communism's victim count. So it means that you would need two more Nazi Germany states to have the same destructive capacity as one ideology.
 
Half of the 60 million death toll goes to the Allies for being in warfare, thus the NatSoc regime killed about 30 million people
Brother, stop the cope. The nazis attacked Poland and wanted to conquer the whole of Europe. Every single last one of those deaths are on their hands because were it not for their stupid war initiation then none would have died.
Jesus, you can't get past a mistype. I knew that you were a nazi, don't tell me that you are a grammar nazi too!
In 2030 it can.
Right.... It is not as if they said that 100 years ago that robots would do all of our jibs by the early 2000s. You are channeling your ancestors spirit to gain insight into the hegelian dialectic that is our future. GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!
 
Brother, stop the cope. The nazis attacked Poland and wanted to conquer the whole of Europe. Every single last one of those deaths are on their hands because were it not for their stupid war initiation then none would have died.
NatSocs believe in struggle, what nobler struggle is there than the one against fellow man? Animals and materials have been thoroughly conquered, it was inevitable that Germany would wage war.
Right.... It is not as if they said that 100 years ago that robots would do all of our jibs by the early 2000s. You are channeling your ancestors spirit to gain insight into the hegelian dialectic that is our future. GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!
Robot wasn't even a word in 1925. Stop inventing imaginary scenarios to get the upper hand.

If you're not going to talk about the mods, you leave the thread. You're the one who derailed the discussion entirely.
 
NatSocs believe in struggle, what nobler struggle is there than the one against fellow man? Animals and materials have been thoroughly conquered, it was inevitable that Germany would wage war.
>Muh noble struggle
>We just gonna send you to war and you'll die for your nation, but you'll like it
Listen to this shit. This is the real anti incel shit. The mods have nothing on you.
Robot wasn't even a word in 1925. Stop inventing imaginary scenarios to get the upper hand.
Sure man, they called them machines back then. If you want to be all literal then just say so.
Also people had the concept of robots before they invented the word for it. Just look at this little prediction for the 21st century.
View attachment 0_YMvSVIQuzgut1vYp.webp

Here are some more, but I am not showing you this so that I can debunk your "argument". You have none, you can not see the future and neither could anyone who ever tried to predict it because of a little something called chaos theory. So shut the fuck up about the mods and deal with your own anti brocel shit.

View: https://medium.com/@carlumaliv/predictions-from-the-1900s-for-the-year-2000-b90df4a285ce
 
I can understand why I give off the impression that I wholesale hate all zoomers, but that's honestly not the case.
As a collective we suck
That said there are a lot of idiosyncrasies heavily associated with zoomers that annoy me.
I could write a book called "why I hate zoomers"
I don't like the short attention spans. I don't like the brainrot. I don't like the hyper-competitiveness. I don't like the perpetual insincerity (the ironybro shit).
Same here

I think the brainrot & insincerity are my primary issues; in the US "hyper-competitiveness" has always been the norm i'd say across generations.
But my main issue with zoomers is what they've done to the internet. Anything more than a 3 sentence paragraph is a "wall of text" that's "TL;DR" but they have to reply saying "dnr".
Yeah I get this, it's a big pet-peeve of mine

I know that I don't always make "high effort" things by my definition, but somehow a literal paragraph or two is "too much"
I'm also not going to go full boomer and say zoomers have it easier, because that's generally not the case. I realize that zoomers face unique challenges that older generations didn't face (or at least, didn't face as harshly). The social landscape that zoomers face sounds like absolute hell, everyone is hyper-introverted and terminally online. You also can't express yourself freely and sincerely, you need to hide behind "layers of irony" otherwise it's "cringe".
Nailed it

Growing up in Gen-Z is fucking hell.
I'll also say that when it comes to things like UBI, gen Z is more based than every other generation since they're more supportive of it. Although on the other side of the coin, a lot of zoomers are into "hustle culture" and promote neijuan.

I'll also say this much, in the grand scheme of things, boomers (as in actual baby boomer, not "anyone over 30") are a much bigger problem. Zoomers may have ruined the internet, but boomers ruined the economy. They benefitted from a great post-WW2 economy, got high paying jobs easily, then they pulled the ladder up from underneath them and told younger generations to pick themselves up from their bootstraps.
Well said

My generation would still be screwed but eh, won't be as bad
 
I wouldn't call my talking points left-wing.
Oddly enough, they follow the same patter & dialectic as those who also argue against the biological validity of sex(gender is a term they use to deconstruct it.
Just basic logic and observable facts.
:waitwhat:


I never made any political statements in this regard
You have various times, even if it was astroturfed
 
Look at this fucking graph. Look at how the 0.1% are fucking us all over. Fucking rich scumbags deserve themselves to get shishkebabed.

View attachment 1457522
View attachment 1457523
You can still have distribution of wealth & make the 1% pay up without needing full-on Communism/Bolshevism

In fact, even the Kaiser instituted reforms to help the lower-classes.
Not an amerimutt, mon frer. I do not give a shit about the UN declaration of human rights.

If you have even a basic understanding of history then you'd know that the nazis literally buddied up with the capitalists and set them slaves to work in their factories. Some were jooos and fags but most people were just critical of nazism. Le based and trad natsocs literally buddied up with the rich fags who are giving us slave wages and gave them a different demographic of slaves. So instead of the rich fags fucking everyone over they fucked over only certain minorities, which is not a big fucking improvement.
This is grossly incorrect:

We find there was a link between some New York international bankers and many revolutionaries, including Bolsheviks. These banking gentlemen — who are here identified — had a financial stake in, and were rooting for, the success of the Bolshevik Revolution.

On 17 November 1917, the Rothschilds, fearful that replication of this extraordinary example of freedom and prosperity would destroy their malevolent banking empire, instigated and financed a Judeo-Bolshevik revolution in Russia, 11 ^ 1 which wrecked and ruined a wonderful country and resulted in the deaths by murder and starvation, according to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, of 66 million innocent people.^

Wall Street financed Bolsheviks, not the NSDAP
Among the National Socialists in Germany, opposition to international capital figured prominently from the start. The National Socialists, even prior to adopting that name, within the small group, the German Workers’ Party, saw capital as intrinsically anti-national. The earliest party program, in 1919, stated that the party was fighting “against usury… against all those who make high profits without any mental or physical work,” the “drones” who “control and rule us with their money.” It is notable that even then the party did not advocate “ socialization” of industry but profit-sharing and unity among all classes other than “drones.”...

Fritz Thyssen

Sutton quotes Fritz Thyssen as to why he supported Hitler, but does not see that the motives are
different from Wall Street's. Thyssen, and other industrialists such as Krupp, who funded Hitler, did so
openly and for patriotic reasons. Thyssen wrote, as cited by Sutton: "I turned to the National Socialist
party only after I became convinced that the fight against the Young Plan was unavoidable if complete
collapse of Germany was to be prevented. "54 The Young Plan for the payment of World War I
reparations was regarded as the means of controlling Germany with American capital. 55 Thyssen is
hardly an example of a nexus between Nazism and international capitalism; to the contrary, it shows
that German business was motivated by patriotic sentiment to an extent that American business was
not then and is today lesser still.

Thyssen was a Catholic motivated by the Church's social doctrine that sought an alternative to both
Marxism and monopoly capitalism. Like many others throughout the world of all classes, Thyssen
found the corporatist doctrines of Fascism and National Socialism to reflect Church doctrine on social
justice. Thyssen was a member of the conservative National People's Party. While one of the few
industrialists who donated to the NSDAP, at a late date, even this was meagre. The denazification
trials in 1948 found that Thyssen donated about 650,000 Reichsmarks to various right-wing parties
and groups, of which there were many, including the NSDAP, between 1923 and 1932. He was an
adherent of the corporatist theories of Austrian philosopher Othmar Spann. In 1933 Thyssen was
asked by the NSDAP to set up an Institute for Corporatism in Dusseldorf.56 However, this was
regarded as rivalling the Labor Front and was closed in 1936. In 1940, after having emigrated from
Germany, Thyssen and his wife were captured in France and incarcerated in Germany for the duration
of the war.

Who Paid the Nazi Party?

Like the assumption that Ford could have funded Hitler because they had similar views about Jews,
Pool also makes the same assumption about Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England,
Schacht's friend, because Norman was also antagonistic towards Jews (and the French). He deplored
the economic chaos wrought on Germany by the Versailles diktat and the adverse impact that was
having on world trade. On that score, he could have funded the Nazi party, but there is no evidence
for it. Pool's book is useful however insofar as he shows, despite himself, that the Nazi party was not a
tool of big business.

I. G. Farben, for example, often depicted as one of the plutocratic wirepullers of the Nazi regime, and
as the center of a Third Reich industrial death machine, was headed by liberals. Pool states that from
its formation in 1925 I.G. Farben gave funding to all parties except the Nazis and the Communists.

Not until 1932, with the NSDAP as the biggest party in parliament, did two representatives of the firm
meet Hitler to get his views on the production of synthetic fuel. 59 Not surprisingly, Hitler was in favor,
given that it was an important factor in an autarchic economy. However, the matter of funds for the
party was not raised.

The upshot that we learn from Pool in regard to Nazi party funding is that, quoting economist Paul
Drucker:


The really decisive backing came from sections of the lower middle classes, the farmers, and working
class... As far as the Nazi Party is concerned there is good reason to believe that at least three-
quarters of its funds, even after 1930, came from the weekly dues.... And from the entrance fees to
the mass meetings from which members of the upper classes were always conspicuously absent.


Henry Ford - an Early Nazi Party Sponsor?

If there was any wealthy American who should or could have funded Hitler it was Henry Ford Sr.
Indeed, Ford features prominently in allegations that Hitler received financial backing from wealthy






elites. But Ford was not part of the financial elite. He was an industrialist who challenged Wall Street.

If he had backed Hitler that would have been an example of a conflict between "industrial capital" and
"financial capital" that Ford had himself recognized, and that Hitler had alluded to in Mein Kampf. Not
only did his newspaper the Dearborn Independent, under the editorship of W. J. Cameron, run a series
of ninety-one articles on the "Jewish question," but that series was issued as a compendium called The
International Jew, which was translated into German. Such was the pressure from Jewish Wall Street
interests on the Ford Motor Company that Ford recanted, and falsely claimed that he had not
authorized the series in his company newspaper. 16 Yet Ford never funded the Hitlerites, despite
several direct, personal appeals for aid on the basis of "international solidarity" against Jewish
influence.

Sutton did an admirable job of tracing direct and definitive links between Wall Street and the
Bolsheviks. However, perhaps in his eagerness to show the common factor of "socialism" between
National Socialists and Bolsheviks, and the way Wall Street backed opposing movements as part of a
Hegelian dialectical strategy, 17 Sutton seems to have grasped at straws in trying to show a link
between plutocrats and Nazis. Sutton repeats the myth of Ford backing of the Hitlerite party that had
been in circulation since the 1920s. As early as 1922 The New York Times reported that Ford was
funding the embryonic National Socialist party, and the Berliner Tageblatt called on the U.S.
ambassador to investigate Ford's supposed interference in German affairs. 18 The article in its entirety
turns out to be nothing but the vaguest of rumor-mongering, of making something out of nothing at
all, but it is still found to be useful by those perpetrating the myth of big-money backing for Hitler. 19
Dr. Sutton quotes the vice president of the Bavarian Diet, Auer, testifying at the trial of Hitler after the
Munich Putsch in February 1923, that the Diet long had had information that Hitler was being financed
by Ford. Auer alluded to a Ford agent seeking to sell tractors having been in contact with Dietrich
Eckart in 1922, and that shortly after Ford money began going to Munich. 20 Having provided no
evidence whatsoever, Sutton states that "these Ford funds were used by Hitler to foment the Bavarian
rebellion. "21

If you agree with me and think that the mega rich fucking us all over is bad then you should probably denounce nazism. But hey, you are just fine with being a slave of capital as long as muh based and trad Elon Musk saves le poor South African farmers.
Fyi, White South Africans were there before Bantus
It is, but I guess that I misspelled it

So AI can load materials into industrial machines?
AI can drive the trucks?
AI can take care of the elderly?
Really? No need for human imput?

This is the worst cope I have ever heard.
I agree with this, fair enough point in this regard
Brother, stop the cope. The nazis attacked Poland and wanted to conquer the whole of Europe. Every single last one of those deaths are on their hands because were it not for their stupid war initiation then none would have died.
Hitler actually sought for peace:


J. P. Morgan & Co. - Thomas Lamont

Thomas W. Lamont, senior partner in J. P. Morgan, was in the forefront of Wall Street agitation for
war. Lamont, a supporter of Roosevelt's New Deal, was a keen protagonist of internationalism.



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1b1M9lPJ_k


GF6Ba9XXcAASm3d.jpg:large



View: https://x.com/LetsGoBrando45/status/1926639102356570186

>Muh noble struggle
>We just gonna send you to war and you'll die for your nation, but you'll like it
Listen to this shit. This is the real anti incel shit. The mods have nothing on you.
"noble struggle" is just a metaphor/hyperbole

The fact is, life is struggle- we as Incels should get that.
Here are some more, but I am not showing you this so that I can debunk your "argument". You have none, you can not see the future and neither could anyone who ever tried to predict it because of a little something called chaos theory. So shut the fuck up about the mods and deal with your own anti brocel shit.
No need to be a dick, i've noticed Lefotidcels often tend to have the smug, arrogance which most Redditors, aka most leftists who adore your precious Communism

You're acting the way one of them does all because someone here, expresses "Right-Wing" views which are
 
No need to be a dick, i've noticed Lefotidcels often tend to have the smug, arrogance which most Redditors, aka most leftists who adore your precious Communism
First off I am not going to read all of that.
Second of all I am just an economic leftist, if you bunch me up with the re******s then there is nothing to talk about. And my communism isn't precious, it is just the only alternative we have to this capitalistic nightmare of shit. If there'd be anything better I'd take it but communism is the most comfy ideology that actually worked to a degree at least in my home nation of Romania. Were it not for the stupid Ameriniggers then the revolution would have never happened. My father regrets fighting in it even though he is relatively wealthy because of capitalism.
 
First off I am not going to read all of that.
Second of all I am just an economic leftist, if you bunch me up with the re******s then there is nothing to talk about. And my communism isn't precious, it is just the only alternative we have to this capitalistic nightmare of shit. If there'd be anything better I'd take it but communism is the most comfy ideology that actually worked to a degree at least in my home nation of Romania. Were it not for the stupid Ameriniggers then the revolution would have never happened. My father regrets fighting in it even though he is relatively wealthy because of capitalism.
how is romania worse now


communism and capitalism are both shit due to human nature


in capitalism inequality is far greater but everyone is richer, in communism people (still not everyone) are more equal but everyone is poorer
 
First off I am not going to read all of that.
K, whatever
Second of all I am just an economic leftist,
I've seen you argue like a social one
if you bunch me up with the re******s then there is nothing to talk about.
Sorry, but that's how you come across
And my communism isn't precious, it is just the only alternative we have to this capitalistic nightmare of shit.
Not it isn't

Capitalism just as subversive as marxism

If there'd be anything better I'd take it but communism is the most comfy ideology that actually worked to a degree at least in my home nation of Romania. Were it not for the stupid Ameriniggers
>Denies any semblance of the JQ
>Balmes Amerigoys for everything(partly correct, but Jews are involved)
 

Similar threads

Dr. Autismo
Replies
40
Views
820
Serpents reign
Serpents reign
daydreamER
Replies
45
Views
1K
Youthpilled
Youthpilled
Just say NIGGER!
Replies
94
Views
2K
FuckYou
FuckYou
tehgymcel420
Replies
17
Views
1K
ULTRAMAN
ULTRAMAN
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
10
Views
374
sullen
sullen

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top