Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why is not having a partner a social embarrassment in hypergamous societies?

DankIncel

DankIncel

Captain
★★★
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
1,721
Add to that:

Why is virgin shaming acceptable?


Do these things even make sense?
 
Females like to brag how easy it is for them toobtain sex. So they shame men who can't get it for a self-esteem boost .
 
thetruecelibate said:
Females like to brag how easy it is for them toobtain sex. So they shame men who can't get it for a self-esteem boost .

True. But non incel males shame virgins too. Everyone does this actually. Why?
 
DankIncel said:
True. But non incel males shame virgins too. Everyone does this actually. Why?

Betas do it out of desperation, hoping that it'll increase their SMV. It's just a dumb cope.
 
I always have to avoid talking when anyone discusses sex or their dating life it's horrible.
 
A man's worth is only his genetics and how much he matters to women. Their existence is our existence, at least those are the rules. If you aren't providing for women, whether sexually, emotionally, or financially, you are automatically worthy of being shamed. It's like failing to give the monthly offerings to the gods, that's how much this gynocentric society revolves around making life comfortable for women.
 
HomoheroBishii said:
A man's worth is only his genetics and how much he matters to women. Their existence is our existence, at least those are the rules. If you aren't providing for women, whether sexually, emotionally, or financially, you are automatically worthy of being shamed. It's like failing to give the monthly offerings to the gods, that's how much this gynocentric society revolves around making life comfortable for women.

100% accurate sui fuel. It's strange how so few men realize this. It's so blatantly obvious, especially if you bring up the topic of chivalry and why men work all the hard/dangerous/shitty jobs.
 
HomoheroBishii said:
A man's worth is only his genetics and how much he matters to women. Their existence is our existence, at least those are the rules. If you aren't providing for women, whether sexually, emotionally, or financially, you are automatically worthy of being shamed. It's like failing to give the monthly offerings to the gods, that's how much this gynocentric society revolves around making life comfortable for women.

This is reasonable enough to be truth. I like it.
 
because woman=god in this perverted society
 
I wouldn't say it is. Not having one for an extended period of time is.


jagged0 said:
I always have to avoid talking when anyone discusses sex or their dating life it's horrible.

In uni, this Chadlite student in my study group was talking about how one of his female house mates would beg him for sex.
 
Because it indicates genetic inferiority which the reason anyway in evry case. Women are bound to have sex so they won't be shamed for being single. But if a man is single then he is an incel.
 
incelman said:
Because it indicates genetic inferiority which the reason anyway in evry case. Women are bound to have sex so they won't be shamed for being single. But if a man is single then he is an incel.

Genetic inferiority, sounds about right.
 
HomoheroBishii said:
A man's worth is only his genetics and how much he matters to women. Their existence is our existence, at least those are the rules. If you aren't providing for women, whether sexually, emotionally, or financially, you are automatically worthy of being shamed. It's like failing to give the monthly offerings to the gods, that's how much this gynocentric society revolves around making life comfortable for women.

This. Evolution, baby. This is why misogyny is almost universally seen as such an unspeakable crime. Women are seen as living, breathing gods. Men are not just expendable but society naturally wants to ensure only the top 20% of male genes survive.
 
HomoheroBishii said:
A man's worth is only his genetics and how much he matters to women. Their existence is our existence, at least those are the rules. If you aren't providing for women, whether sexually, emotionally, or financially, you are automatically worthy of being shamed. It's like failing to give the monthly offerings to the gods, that's how much this gynocentric society revolves around making life comfortable for women.

That's true, I was shamed by a guard for not opening the  (not too heavy to begin with) door for a roastie.
 
Our society hasn't been hypergamous for long. If we had polygamy for several centuries, being a single man would be pretty normal and accepted.
 
Because society has become degenerate. Hypergamy will exclude many more men from a normal sex life.
 
BlackPill47 said:
Because society has become degenerate. Hypergamy will exclude many more men from a normal sex life.
Most men are not having sex, so most men on the planet are involuntarily celibate.
 
albinorat said:
Most men are not having sex, so most men on the planet are involuntarily celibate.

And it will only get worse.
 
albinorat said:
Most men are not having sex, so most men on the planet are involuntarily celibate.

This is one of the most laughable copes I've ever encountered. No brethren. Only the bottom 5% of men in terms of looks, money and statues in degenerate hypergamous societies can't have true non cucked sex. Most men around the world do have sex. We are not normal. Our lives aren't normal.
 
DankIncel said:
Add to that:

Why is virgin shaming acceptable?


Do these things even make sense?

To answer the topic:
Women inherently look for status. Status is an aggregate value of looks, career and hobby success, size of friend circle, etc. Status essentially measures how much a person isn’t worth overall, and virginity represents the clear bar of “you have enough status to be validated by someone of the other sex”

2. Because they are low status and virgin shamers work from a high ground of status, ensuring victory and reducing risk. It’s just the pecking order

3. Yes
 

Similar threads

sociology blackpill
Replies
5
Views
202
AngryUbermensch
AngryUbermensch
Mulattocel
Replies
12
Views
523
Intellau_Celistic
Intellau_Celistic
flaK33
Replies
17
Views
324
MisfitPerson
MisfitPerson
ForeverGrey
Replies
28
Views
956
Nagger
Nagger
Logic55
Replies
10
Views
168
supersoldier
supersoldier

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top