Why is it so hard for attractive men to accept the blackpill?

[Flaccid_Dave]

Honestly, these handsome blackpill deniers annoy me more than bluepill incel manginas. Why is it so hard for them to acknowledge that they get female attention because of how good they look?

"Dude, I'm ugly as shit but women often approach me. It's because I'm confident and at ease with myself."

"Bro, I usually just go up to women at the mall and say, 'Hey, you look amazing.' I've gotten tons of numbers that way."

Why can they not accept that this doesn't happen to the bottom 80% of men? Women look at me like I'm a sex offender if I ask for the time.

 

[Newbie17]

I think that majority of attractive men are blackpilled

 

[azakhan]

Because it would mean that every success they had with women is thanks to their genes not their amazing personality and genetic entitlement.
They would never admit it.

 

[JestER]

That's like expecting millionaires who inherited their wealth since birth to understand people who live in poverty, it isn't going to happen

 

[based_meme]

Because of something called the false attribution error.

A person's ego will fight hard to convince the self that the good results in life are due to merit and internal, malleable positives (hard work etc.), while the bad results are because of external factors (luck, fault of others etc.).

 

[Gymcelled]

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning

Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

 

[happiless]

Because it would mean that every success they had with women is thanks to their genes not their amazing personality and genetic entitlement.
They would never admit it.

This and because foids are really nice to them, so if they don't have a decent IQ they'll assume it's because foids are nice in general.

I think that majority of attractive men are blackpilled

unproven myth

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Because it does not apply to them. Same reason why a dude on a 100k salary will not accept socialism and visa versa.

 

[Incellectual]

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning

Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

high IQ

 

[Flaccid_Dave]

Because of something called the false attribution error.

A person's ego will fight hard to convince the self that the good results in life are due to merit and internal positives, while the bad results are because of external factors (luck, fault of others etc.).

It this a recognised term in the field of psychological reserach?

I think that majority of attractive men are blackpilled

To some extent. Bodybuilding forum is 50% blackpilled.

 

[based_meme]

It this a recognised term in the field of psychological reserach?

Yes... Dude, it's literally in the first sentence of my post. C'mon son.

 

[Flaccid_Dave]

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning

Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

Wow. Brilliant post. Thankyou.

 

[Subhuman100]

I think that majority of attractive men are blackpilled

Not at all. Most of them are similar to women - they don't realise they are successful because of looks, they think it's because they're funny and charming.

 

[Gymcelled]

Wow. Brilliant post. Thankyou.

It's from the blackpill wiki, it's not OC. But I thought it would answer your question.

 

[Glokta]

Just world fallacy. It's easier to believe you achieved success due to your own merit instead of accepting the harsh truth that for some men the game was rigged from the start.

 

[Hail The Bloatlord]

It's like asking a trust fund brat to accept marxism, it will never resonate to him

 

[Deleted member 21219]

Some of these assholes might be virtuesignalling. Others might have been brainwashed by soyciety from birth.

 

[masterwizard]

Its like trying to explain a fourth spatial dimension to us, beings that can perceive only 3 spatial dimensions. If I told you to go forward 3 steps, left 1 step, down 2 steps, flarb 3 steps, my directions would be utterly inconceivable to you, and you would never be able to arrive at the destination I have given you instructions to reach. It doesn't matter how much I explained it, its something totally inconceivable to your mind, you simply cannot picture or imagine how to move in the flarb direction.

 

[chadalwayswins]

Because of something called the false attribution error.

A person's ego will fight hard to convince the self that the good results in life are due to merit and internal, malleable positives (hard work etc.), while the bad results are because of external factors (luck, fault of others etc.).

High IQ

 

[based_meme]

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning

Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:

• Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
• In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:

• Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]

This is the thread-winning post.

 

[Justdone]

Because of something called the false attribution error.

A person's ego will fight hard to convince the self that the good results in life are due to merit and internal, malleable positives (hard work etc.), while the bad results are because of external factors (luck, fault of others etc.).

“You can overcome the way people judge you bro I saw it in Naruto when I was like 14. Don’t sweat the small stuff bro.”

 

[LitVirgin]

I think most chads understand that they are in their postion because of their genetics if anything its normies and foids who denies it the most. The only chads who deny the black pill are the ones trying to sell their blue pilled ideology in the form of books and pua lessons