B
to create more trucels
kek
kek
bcs in older generations men have more power and were/are considered more valuable. However in the whole world no matter the culture there is a transitioning period where now its better to be a women.
B
The ancients were more based. Modernity is a scam
i remember my grandpa once telling that India used to have much more foids than men in his era (he was product of 1930s; he was part of 9 siblings out of which three were boys rest were girls)
but despite this, desire for a boy child was always there due to cultural and socioeconomical things - so much that many impoverished ones used to do what is called "DoodhPeeti" = drowning a newborn girl child in a big bucket of milk to get rid of it
then in 70s era upwards both India and China went apeshit in their own ways with all Malthusianism
> India - introduction of modern medical soyence brought those gender testing things for fetus and it gave easy way to pajeet couples to now get rid of girls if fetus turned out to be one via abortion; initially these kind of things were done without much charges in govt run hospitals so a large section of conceiving pajeet couples benefitted from it - so much that it skewed gender ratio in a generation and govt had to bring total ban on that practice and making it a crime but it was too late pajeets had tasted the blood and it still goes on illegally at many places
Even this day a lot of wealthy pajeets go to Dubai or other middle eastern cuntries where this practice is allowed and legal
> China - same thing as above BUT they also brought that gigaretarded "One Child Policy" - thus if you are having only one kid then better it be a Son than a daughter and...yeah retardation followed with many couples only aiming to get a Son - though later CCP too put a lot of restrictions on it and repelled One Child Policy and gave many concessions otherwise to try to balance population but likewise too late now for at least two generations it shall remain stagnated
but despite this, desire for a boy child was always there due to cultural and socioeconomical things - so much that many impoverished ones used to do what is called "DoodhPeeti" = drowning a newborn girl child in a big bucket of milk to get rid of it
then in 70s era upwards both India and China went apeshit in their own ways with all Malthusianism
> India - introduction of modern medical soyence brought those gender testing things for fetus and it gave easy way to pajeet couples to now get rid of girls if fetus turned out to be one via abortion; initially these kind of things were done without much charges in govt run hospitals so a large section of conceiving pajeet couples benefitted from it - so much that it skewed gender ratio in a generation and govt had to bring total ban on that practice and making it a crime but it was too late pajeets had tasted the blood and it still goes on illegally at many places
Even this day a lot of wealthy pajeets go to Dubai or other middle eastern cuntries where this practice is allowed and legal
> China - same thing as above BUT they also brought that gigaretarded "One Child Policy" - thus if you are having only one kid then better it be a Son than a daughter and...yeah retardation followed with many couples only aiming to get a Son - though later CCP too put a lot of restrictions on it and repelled One Child Policy and gave many concessions otherwise to try to balance population but likewise too late now for at least two generations it shall remain stagnated
B
yeah one child policy was indeed the most stupid thing .i remember my grandpa once telling that India used to have much more foids than men in his era (he was product of 1930s; he was part of 9 siblings out of which three were boys rest were girls)
but despite this, desire for a boy child was always there due to cultural and socioeconomical things - so much that many impoverished ones used to do what is called "DoodhPeeti" = drowning a newborn girl child in a big bucket of milk to get rid of it
then in 70s era upwards both India and China went apeshit in their own ways with all Malthusianism
> India - introduction of modern medical soyence brought those gender testing things for fetus and it gave easy way to pajeet couples to now get rid of girls if fetus turned out to be one via abortion; initially these kind of things were done without much charges in govt run hospitals so a large section of conceiving pajeet couples benefitted from it - so much that it skewed gender ratio in a generation and govt had to bring total ban on that practice and making it a crime but it was too late pajeets had tasted the blood and it still goes on illegally at many places
Even this day a lot of wealthy pajeets go to Dubai or other middle eastern cuntries where this practice is allowed and legal
> China - same thing as above BUT they also brought that gigaretarded "One Child Policy" - thus if you are having only one kid then better it be a Son than a daughter and...yeah retardation followed with many couples only aiming to get a Son - though later CCP too put a lot of restrictions on it and repelled One Child Policy and gave many concessions otherwise to try to balance population but likewise too late now for at least two generations it shall remain stagnated
interesting curryland dynamics
i read somewhere on internet , that it said countries with high agriculture food surplus have more boys naturally, because well fed mothers tend to have sons (caloric intake when pregnant) ...
Because subhuman curries don't believe in genetics and think their son will magically somehow be born intelligent and handsome.
It's indeed true, you can see it in sense that most populous state in curryland, called "Uttar Pradesh" (literally translated as 'Northern State' or region) has got river Ganga (Ganges) and Jamuna (Yamuna), Chambal, Sone, Ghaghra, Ken-Betwa and other such big rivers flowing through their lands making it suitable for large scale agriculture, and has got many natural resources and all...THAT STATE OF CURRYLAND ALONE IS MORE POPULOUS THAN MANY OTHER COUNTRIES (in terms of modern boundaries)
That state and adjacent regions like Bihar and all culturally-socioeconomically and linguistically dominated other curries through centuries - it's also big on agriculture output and many industries and all
more like men die more in the past tbb, sure men have more power back then but also heavy responsibility. in the past wars are everywhere, gender that die like dogs are men. thats why men used to be valuable cause they put their life on the line not cause misogyny or wutever.
B
patriarchy became the norm some point in history, because it fosters in group male fitness and the male members don't fight if each man has a wife.
Tribes that didn't follow patriarchy naturally got taken over
B
lol suifuel for @wereq
kek they're incel factories.
B
difference is curries gang rape
rice don't do it cos of high inhibition
True, but curries are also high inhib and low-T. Not as much as riceys, but more so than whites and far more so than Muslims (or maybe it's just their more evolved culture).
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
