Red Shambhala
Death to America
★★
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2017
- Posts
- 2,566
On a personal level, I totally understand the desire to take revenge and see it all burn. But as far as politics are concerned, the goal should be the best possible life for the greatest possible number of people. This is not possible with feminism. For instance, because feminism aims to demonize (if not literally criminalize) the sexuality of low-status men while female hypergamy and "hivemindedness" result in harem-situations and social instability.
However, it also is not possible with far-right policies. Their goal is a different one anyway. Given the choice, they would rather hurt a woman than help a man. And men that aren't white, heterosexual, religious and so on and so forth, they'd hurt this way or the other. Just consider the whole right from Fox News to Daily Stormer hating on Orcasio-Cortez lately:
If right-wingers were smart, they would embrace these ideas (except for abolishing ICE, obviously) and promote "national socialism" rather than "national libertarianism."
Most normal Americans strongly support healthcare for all and college for all. This is super popular, even among Republican voters. And the health care sector in Europe is also suffering from capitalist policies: if you're poor, you also don't get all the treatment you need. But no, stupid "National-Libertarians" focus on hating people like Cortez rather than the capitalist Democrat/Republican establishment.
Cortez once tweeted that the US should take the money they spend on wars in the Middle East and use it to rather finance universal healthcare instead. Every sane, normal person agrees with that position. Just /pol/ and the right in the broadest sense of the term was sperging out. If they were smart, they would attack the "moderate" Democrats more so than the "radical" Democrats.
However, it also is not possible with far-right policies. Their goal is a different one anyway. Given the choice, they would rather hurt a woman than help a man. And men that aren't white, heterosexual, religious and so on and so forth, they'd hurt this way or the other. Just consider the whole right from Fox News to Daily Stormer hating on Orcasio-Cortez lately:
If right-wingers were smart, they would embrace these ideas (except for abolishing ICE, obviously) and promote "national socialism" rather than "national libertarianism."
Most normal Americans strongly support healthcare for all and college for all. This is super popular, even among Republican voters. And the health care sector in Europe is also suffering from capitalist policies: if you're poor, you also don't get all the treatment you need. But no, stupid "National-Libertarians" focus on hating people like Cortez rather than the capitalist Democrat/Republican establishment.
Cortez once tweeted that the US should take the money they spend on wars in the Middle East and use it to rather finance universal healthcare instead. Every sane, normal person agrees with that position. Just /pol/ and the right in the broadest sense of the term was sperging out. If they were smart, they would attack the "moderate" Democrats more so than the "radical" Democrats.