Based
Idiot degenerate
Same
Dnr, but huge tits and a big ass is hot af
Why I Don’t Like Bitches with Huge Tits and Huge Asses
By Incel Rap Genius
I wanted to elaborate on a post I made here:
As you can tell by the title, I do not like women with overly-exaggerated sexual features, i.e., large boobies and yuge titties. Women who, in the words of the black community, “hang wit dey shit out” (an African-Americanism meaning a woman with an overly large buttocks and gigantic breasts and dresses accordingly), are low-class, spiritually-ugly, disgusting whores who are only good for, as I put it in the quoted post, “busting a nut in.”
You respond: “B-b-b-b-but I-I-Incel Rap Genius, doesn’t that make you gay if you don’t like women who have features similar to prostitutes you see on the streets of every major American city? I-I-I-I’m not g-g-g-gay, you know, I-I-I-I-I’m really not, if you know what I mea—”
My response to your incoherent rambling: “SHUT THE FUCK UP RETARD!!!!!! YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT!!!”
The reason these women are only good for busting in is because that’s what they’re aiming for: male attention and acting like a personal cum dumpster for (usually multiple, at the same time or sequentially/diachronically) men. They dress like whores, wearing tight-fitting clothes that show off their curvaceous bodies, while trying to exaggerate their sexual characteristics, as if they were an ancient Babylonian statue devoted to fertility. They wear so much makeup that they turn their what would otherwise be pretty lips into what looks like a pussy or a baboon’s asscheeks. They have no subtlety: their butts and tits take up most of your field of vision, leaving no room for thinking about anything non-sexual when engaged in conversation with one of these ugly whores. All they want to do is FUCK like a jungle animal. They weaponize and twist sexual desire until it’s unrecognizable as something beautiful and designed for marital union between a man and woman. They distort sexual desire from its original purpose into its teleological antitheses: disgusting and shameful LUST. This type of woman has no shame: she doesn’t care what her father or any respectable man thinks of her because of how darkened her mind is by her only goal—riding the cock carousel.
Figure 1. A prehistoric carved representation of a fertility goddess.
The reason this shit is ugly is because it only appeals to the most base of all instincts: lust. And lust is ugly—when in a state of lust, you will do anything to bust a fat nut. In fact, that’s all you want to do in lust, and you’ll do anything to attain this goal. Why do you think homosexuals exist? Homosexuality is lust taken to its natural end point: a sexualization of all things, including that which shouldn’t be sexualized by men—other men—and, in an even more disgusting turn, children. (Homosexuals, despite being around 5.5% of the population—which I just looked up and is practically a 100% increase from about 10 years ago when it was like ~2-3%—are about 50% of all pedophiles.) Homosexuals are enslaved to lust and so perverted and mentally ill that they chose to, in the words of Saint Paul, “leav[e] the natural use of the woman” and “burn in their lust one toward another” (Romans 1:27). Lust in all forms is bad; it’s the opposite of the feeling inspired by looking at something or someone truly beautiful. This is what makes pornography the opposite of the aesthetic and the sublime, as pornography, like these whorish women, only appeals to LUST. But I digress.
Women who dress scantily and have big butts and big tits have no erotic (I am using erotic as an English adjectivization of the etymologically Greek eros) appeal. Eros is a higher, more intellectual form of sexual desire that is playful, exciting, fun—you retain your intellect, you have complete control over your desires but willingly engage in an act of mutual desire with a woman. Lust, in comparison, takes over the mind and darkens it. You become idiotic, blind; in Eros, however, you retain your rational faculties, you enjoy interacting with the other person, you look forward to meeting up with them, you enjoy conversing with them, etc. Lust darkens, Eros enlightens. Eros is fundamentally designed towards a deeper union or bond between a man and a woman—this is why Eros is impossible between two men or two women. Homosexuals can only lust after one another, but heterosexuals who don’t have somatic or facial features inspiring lust (like big butts, big tits, or the “Thousand Cock Stare”) engage in a beautiful and mutually-enriching interplay across persons of Eros. The heterosexual incel of a higher intellectual magnitude than the rest understands everything I say: namely, the distinction between lust, sexual desire, and Eros; the ugliness of lust; and the beauty of Eros. Basically, if you disagree with this post, you are a subhuman (as in “below human”) retard.
Figure 2. The slow, painful evolution of some foid/whore into possessing a “Thousand Cock Stare.”
Men who chase after such whores are low-class—which is why they tend to be members of inferior races, like negroes. Negro men love the big booty bitches and titted-up sluts, because the only object they can do higher-order processing with is their niggerpenis, not their brain or intellect (they have none of either of those). (Aside: Having a huge dick—say a BBC—is the male equivalent of being a woman with big tits and a big ass. You probably have too much testosterone and are a monkey-ass jungle savage who belongs in a zoo to be gawked at if your dick is too big. About 4 inches is enough to please a woman—but I wouldn’t know, as I am an incel.) Niggers are caught in lust practically all the time. (I mean, just look at their women! They fit the bill of what I am describing here: fat, ugly, bit tits, big ass.) They are animalistic, they lack inhibition, they have no sense of Eros, they live to fuck. Totally taken over by their id, the negroes and men who only chase sluts with exaggerated sex features are less-than-human; they renounce their humanity in favor of just busting a fat one. This is why lust is so ugly. You become less-than-human in a state of lust. You become an animal. You can’t think straight. You become programmable AND easily propagandized. And the Jewish-psyopped women who want this kind of savage man, a man who can only think with his donger, are equally as lustful, ugly, and lacking in spiritual discernment as men caught up in the heat of their lustful concupiscence.
Figure 3. The picture of the sheboon who triggered this rant.
It isn’t just sheboons, though. Many white/Asian/Hispanic women go to the gym to train their butt muscles to be bigger than 200-ton dump trucks. And it’s no coincidence that these whites/Asians/Hispanics like getting piped and slammed by the BBC. It’s an appeal to baseness, and baseness is a quality that isn’t in short supply in the no doubt highly-esteemed and not riotous nor obnoxious Afro-American community. (Don’t get me started on that monkey-screeching, animalistic-thumping “music” they call rap.) If you like women with exaggerated sex characteristics, i.e., big butts and big tits, you are either, (a) a nigger, or (b) a spirtual nigger. There’s no in-between. You are either a man of class or a man of lust. You either love all that is aesthetic or you hate it.
I, however, am not opposed to women with normal-sized breasts and butts. Basically, if you look like a normal human being instead of a gigantic human-sized fuck doll, then you are fit to be my wife for life. I don’t hate the female figure; the opposite is, in fact, true. I love anime women with proportionate butts and titties. But the ones who look like fuck dolls—-hard pass from me. And, if you are a man who appreciates Eros and higher intellectual pursuits such as myself, then you would agree with me.
Rant ended.
How could you not want this????????? You must be secret gay or foid
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
