K
kubakotek
Greycel
★
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2018
- Posts
- 16
even if i find a girlfriend she will reject me because i can't travel
.even if i find a girlfriend she will reject me because i can't travel
Foids travel because they already have a Chad that offers them to take them there.Foids travel to fuck foreign chads
They think it’s “exciting teehee”
Foids travel because they already have a Chad that offers them to take them there.
Every female has a few semi-boyfriends at any period of time, they just sometimes say they're single to appear human and normal.I’ve known tons of single foids who travel solo.
Every female has a few semi-boyfriends at any period of time, they just sometimes say they're single to appear human and normal.
Yeah, true, but “single” in the female sense (ie not exclusively fucking chad and getting things paid for).
Foids travel to fuck foreign chads
They think it’s “exciting teehee”
Most obviously because they think that it increases their status and makes them seem like interesting people. They think it makes them seem like they're not materialistic because it's "experiences", not durable goods, that they crave. But travel is, of course, just another commodity to be bought and sold and the commodification of, say, a luxury sports car is actually less distressing than the buying and selling of an "experience", a culture, a part of the Earth, etc.. And it won't make somebody with a dull, conventional, derivative way of seeing the world any more interesting or profound than if they had stayed at home their entire lives.
It's also a zero effort "hobby" that requires no dedication or skill -- just that you have enough money to get a flight and hotel. (And, of course, the cost of those things, particularly the former, is coming down all the time, so there really isn't, or shouldn't be, any "status" credit attached to this kind of travelling.) Some people have hobbies that require real creativity -- they write, they play a musical instrument, they engage in some artform, they play a sport or engage in a physical activity. Those who can't, or can't be bothered, travel (or play vidya).
There's also the kind of vanity in this that is typical of millennial foids. Nowadays social media means that they can narrativize themselves in this way and score credit amongst thousands of adoring strangers (i.e. beta orbiters and girls they went to school with 15 years ago) rather than just from a tight circles of friends and relatives they can pressgang into viewing a wad of Polaroids. Travel is a good choice of pastime / "hobby" for them because it can easily be shown off externally (see also being a "foodie" -- even lower-effort shit...)
And, yes, there is a degree of imitativeness here too. The celebrities women idolize are always filling their social media accounts with photos of their glamorous paid-for trips. So the woman who is merely a celebrity for herself and her social media followers does the same to further her mental delusion of fame and significance and to publicise her personal brand.
Women are now allowed, and likely, to continue this kind of cunty behaviour into their 30s too since they've gone for the capital expenditure approach to child-rearing (i.e. an abortion) rather than the recurring outlays. And they earn more than in the past, so the money and lack of commitments is there to facilitate this kind of unseriousness for years and even decades after they've reached "adulthood".
So, basically, it's the perfect intersection of all feminine vices: hunger for status; vanity; materialism and non-productivity.
Most obviously because they think that it increases their status and makes them seem like interesting people. They think it makes them seem like they're not materialistic because it's "experiences", not durable goods, that they crave. But travel is, of course, just another commodity to be bought and sold and the commodification of, say, a luxury sports car is actually less distressing than the buying and selling of an "experience", a culture, a part of the Earth, etc.. And it won't make somebody with a dull, conventional, derivative way of seeing the world any more interesting or profound than if they had stayed at home their entire lives.
It's also a zero effort "hobby" that requires no dedication or skill -- just that you have enough money to get a flight and hotel. (And, of course, the cost of those things, particularly the former, is coming down all the time, so there really isn't, or shouldn't be, any "status" credit attached to this kind of travelling.) Some people have hobbies that require real creativity -- they write, they play a musical instrument, they engage in some artform, they play a sport or engage in a physical activity. Those who can't, or can't be bothered, travel (or play vidya).
There's also the kind of vanity in this that is typical of millennial foids. Nowadays social media means that they can narrativize themselves in this way and score credit amongst thousands of adoring strangers (i.e. beta orbiters and girls they went to school with 15 years ago) rather than just from a tight circles of friends and relatives they can pressgang into viewing a wad of Polaroids. Travel is a good choice of pastime / "hobby" for them because it can easily be shown off externally (see also being a "foodie" -- even lower-effort shit...)
And, yes, there is a degree of imitativeness here too. The celebrities women idolize are always filling their social media accounts with photos of their glamorous paid-for trips. So the woman who is merely a celebrity for herself and her social media followers does the same to further her mental delusion of fame and significance and to publicise her personal brand.
Women are now allowed, and likely, to continue this kind of cunty behaviour into their 30s too since they've gone for the capital expenditure approach to child-rearing (i.e. an abortion) rather than the recurring outlays. And they earn more than in the past, so the money and lack of commitments is there to facilitate this kind of unseriousness for years and even decades after they've reached "adulthood".
So, basically, it's the perfect intersection of all feminine vices: hunger for status; vanity; materialism and non-productivity.
Most obviously because they think that it increases their status and makes them seem like interesting people. They think it makes them seem like they're not materialistic because it's "experiences", not durable goods, that they crave. But travel is, of course, just another commodity to be bought and sold and the commodification of, say, a luxury sports car is actually less distressing than the buying and selling of an "experience", a culture, a part of the Earth, etc.. And it won't make somebody with a dull, conventional, derivative way of seeing the world any more interesting or profound than if they had stayed at home their entire lives.
It's also a zero effort "hobby" that requires no dedication or skill -- just that you have enough money to get a flight and hotel. (And, of course, the cost of those things, particularly the former, is coming down all the time, so there really isn't, or shouldn't be, any "status" credit attached to this kind of travelling.) Some people have hobbies that require real creativity -- they write, they play a musical instrument, they engage in some artform, they play a sport or engage in a physical activity. Those who can't, or can't be bothered, travel (or play vidya).
There's also the kind of vanity in this that is typical of millennial foids. Nowadays social media means that they can narrativize themselves in this way and score credit amongst thousands of adoring strangers (i.e. beta orbiters and girls they went to school with 15 years ago) rather than just from a tight circles of friends and relatives they can pressgang into viewing a wad of Polaroids. Travel is a good choice of pastime / "hobby" for them because it can easily be shown off externally (see also being a "foodie" -- even lower-effort shit...)
And, yes, there is a degree of imitativeness here too. The celebrities women idolize are always filling their social media accounts with photos of their glamorous paid-for trips. So the woman who is merely a celebrity for herself and her social media followers does the same to further her mental delusion of fame and significance and to publicise her personal brand.
Women are now allowed, and likely, to continue this kind of cunty behaviour into their 30s too since they've gone for the capital expenditure approach to child-rearing (i.e. an abortion) rather than the recurring outlays. And they earn more than in the past, so the money and lack of commitments is there to facilitate this kind of unseriousness for years and even decades after they've reached "adulthood".
So, basically, it's the perfect intersection of all feminine vices: hunger for status; vanity; materialism and non-productivity.
Why the hell did you trademark “good life”? Is it a product?I also follow some foids on instragram and their lives seem to be one never ending travel trip filled with happiness.
Today they are in Copenhagen, tomorrow in London and next week in the USA.
They all live the »good life™« while i have to suffer in my shithole.
Foids travel to fuck foreign chads
They think it’s “exciting teehee”
Blackpill for locationcelseven if i find a girlfriend she will reject me because i can't travel
Because boring women without real hobbies can pretend to be exciting by taking pictures of themselves in foreign places which they often travel to using betabux
Meanwhile the same women will tell incels that they only don't get laid because of their lack of real hobbies (video games). Just reinforces that being born with a slit between your legs indicates playing life on easy difficulty.
because they take "Fuck The World" literally.
Because boring women without real hobbies can pretend to be exciting by taking pictures of themselves in foreign places which they often travel to using betabux
Meanwhile the same women will tell incels that they only don't get laid because of their lack of real hobbies (video games). Just reinforces that being born with a slit between your legs indicates playing life on easy difficulty.
Y'all high iq, good readMost obviously because they think that it increases their status and makes them seem like interesting people. They think it makes them seem like they're not materialistic because it's "experiences", not durable goods, that they crave. But travel is, of course, just another commodity to be bought and sold and the commodification of, say, a luxury sports car is actually less distressing than the buying and selling of an "experience", a culture, a part of the Earth, etc.. And it won't make somebody with a dull, conventional, derivative way of seeing the world any more interesting or profound than if they had stayed at home their entire lives.
It's also a zero effort "hobby" that requires no dedication or skill -- just that you have enough money to get a flight and hotel. (And, of course, the cost of those things, particularly the former, is coming down all the time, so there really isn't, or shouldn't be, any "status" credit attached to this kind of travelling.) Some people have hobbies that require real creativity -- they write, they play a musical instrument, they engage in some artform, they play a sport or engage in a physical activity. Those who can't, or can't be bothered, travel (or play vidya).
There's also the kind of vanity in this that is typical of millennial foids. Nowadays social media means that they can narrativize themselves in this way and score credit amongst thousands of adoring strangers (i.e. beta orbiters and girls they went to school with 15 years ago) rather than just from a tight circles of friends and relatives they can pressgang into viewing a wad of Polaroids. Travel is a good choice of pastime / "hobby" for them because it can easily be shown off externally (see also being a "foodie" -- even lower-effort shit...)
And, yes, there is a degree of imitativeness here too. The celebrities women idolize are always filling their social media accounts with photos of their glamorous paid-for trips. So the woman who is merely a celebrity for herself and her social media followers does the same to further her mental delusion of fame and significance and to publicise her personal brand.
Women are now allowed, and likely, to continue this kind of cunty behaviour into their 30s too since they've gone for the capital expenditure approach to child-rearing (i.e. an abortion) rather than the recurring outlays. And they earn more than in the past, so the money and lack of commitments is there to facilitate this kind of unseriousness for years and even decades after they've reached "adulthood".
So, basically, it's the perfect intersection of all feminine vices: hunger for status; vanity; materialism and non-productivity.
Why the hell did you trademark “good life”? Is it a product?