A Summary of Divorce Statistics
If your future plan is to marry a woman, unless you want to have children, you might as well become an escortmaxxer instead. Marriage is for the most part unrecommendable to zoomer & millenial men in the current state of western society. You have more to lose than you have to gain from living with a wife over the long term. Why is this the case? I’ll show you the stats:
The average length of a marriage prior to divorce is eight years. This means the lifespan of a marriage that will eventually end in divorce, is more or less than eight years. I’ll approximate the figure to 10 years. Of course, there may be divorcees whose marriages lasted more than ten years, but the majority of divorces happen within 10 years of marriage (U.S Census Bureau, 2021)
Most men (64%) and most women (52%) re-marry after divorce. Basically most divorcees have married to two or more different people in their lifetime. Moreover the vast majority of divorced couples (96%) re-marry to new people; only 6% of divorced couples re-marry each other (Love To Know)
It costs around $7,000 to process and complete a divorce. Any person who marries and later divorces, would lose more or less than $7,000 in the divorce process (Forbes Advisor, 2024)
More than half of all marriages end in divorce. The divorce rate for first marriages is 50%, second marriages is 67% and third marriages is 73%. Basically the majority of all marriages end in divorce, but someone who marries a second or third time is more likely to divorce than someone who marries for the first time (Psychology Today, 2012)
The majority of consumer purchases are made by women. In other words women are BY FAR the largest spenders between the two sexes (Nielsen Company, 2020) Think about the implications of this for men who live with their wife or GF. If a man’s wife does the vast majority of spending in the household, who’s money is she likely to spend? Maybe she spends her own, but it wouldn’t be absurd to think she also spends out of her husband’s finance
Around 69% of divorces are initiated by the female spouse. Basically most divorces are initiated by the wife, and married women are 1.5x more likely than married men to initiate a divorce (Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, 2018)
Financial security (42%) is the leading factor for couples to start a marriage, followed by companionship (39%), “love” (36%), “formal act of making a commitment” (34%) and “to start a family” (34%). (Forbes Advisor, 2023). For almost half of all married couples, financial security was the most important factor that encouraged them to start a marriage. Based on what the statistics say, it basically means financial security matters more than love and companionship in respect of starting a marriage
“Lack of family support” (43%) is the leading factor for getting a divorce (Forbes Advisor, 2023). Ideally “lack of family support” can apply to various circumstances. But “lack of family support” is more likely to be a finance-related issue than a non-finance-related issue, because as we already know, “financial security” is the predominant factor that motivates couples to get married. So if one of the two spouses fails to provide “family support”, it is fair to assume that based on the leading factor for couples getting married, the failure to provide sufficient “family support” is more likely to be a finance-related issue
www.census.gov
www.forbes.com
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...gh-failure-rate-of-second-and-third-marriages
www.nielsen.com
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_11.pdf
www.forbes.com
An Estimate for Consumer Spending Activity in Marriage with statistics for the Annual Income of Men and Women in the US
We also need to consider the possibility that a wife may spend her husband’s money over the course of their marriage. I can’t find any data on expenses made by married women using their husband’s finance, but I can make an estimate based on other available data:
For 2022, the average man’s salary in the US was around $62,000; the average woman’s salary in the US was around $52,000 (US Department of Labour, 2022). If we combine their salaries together, it adds to a combined total of $114,000. Also for 2021, the average annual expenditure for a family of two was around $76,000 (US Department of Labour, 2023). According to Nielsen Company, around 89% of women across the world claim to be the one responsible for “controlling or sharing daily shopping needs, household chores and food prep” compared to an average of 41% of men
Now if we extrapolate this statistic for western society (e.g., Europe, North America), we can conclude 89% of US women in a household that has at least two people (e.g., wife/husband, BF/GF) spend around a minimum $76,000 annually. This sum of money would be enough for the average couple in the US to fairly split their household expenditures based on the combined total of their own salaries: $76,000 is two-thirds of $114,000. So if we assume the average couple in the US would split their expenditures proportionately to the sum of their salaries, the annual household expenditure for a co-habitating couple would account for approx. $35,000 (= $52,000 * 2/3) out of the woman’s salary, and $41,000 (= $62,000 * 2/3) out of the man’s salary
Thus we can draw a conclusion that for any man who marries a woman, there’s also an 89% chance that he would allow his wife to spend two-thirds of his financial income (or an average of $41,000 a year), which would amount to around $205,000 in 5 years, and around $410,000 in 10 years
Basically if any random zoomer male were to get married, we can draw these estimations based on the provided stats:
- There’s at least a 50% chance he will receive a divorce. If he does receive a divorce, it would probably happen within 10 years of his marriage, and his wife is most likely the one who’ll initiate the divorce
- If he divorces, he will also lose more or less than $7,000 in the divorce process, and the most likely reason why he’ll receive a divorce is because of his “failure to provide family support” or “failing to commit”, which basically translates to not contributing enough money to household and family maintenance
- If he lives with his wife during the course of his marital relationship, there’s an 89% chance his wife will spend two-thirds of his money every year (on household and family maintenance, and miscellaneous items). If he’s the average adult male in the United States, this expenditure would be more or less than $41,000 a year, which translates to $205,000 in 5 years, $328,000 in 8 years, $410,000 in 10 years
Let’s reflect on these stats. The average man in the US would allow his wife to spend up to two-thirds of his income in the course of a marital relationship. There’s also a >50% chance that he will divorce. If he does divorce, it will probably happen within 10 years, and he will also lose money in the divorce process due to legal fees and redistribution of previously shared property. Also consider the stats for paternity fraud, which show 10% to 30% couples that have a paternity test receive a negative result
If you wish to marry a woman who’ll spend around 2/3 of your annual income every year, potentially cuck you in the process (>10% chance) and potentially divorce you afterwards (>50% chance), is marriage a worthwhile investment in western society? It depends on what you want out of it
Escorts are Generally Cheaper to Maintain than Wives
A wife may have the impression that her husband’s perceived entitlement to sex is based on her status as his wife, e.g., “my husband believes he’s entitled to sex with me for the key reason that I am his wife”
An escort or sugar baby may have the impression that her client’s perceived entitlement to sex is based on her status as a professional sex provider, e.g., “my client believes he’s entitled to sex with me for the sole reason that I am a sex worker by profession and he has fulfilled the requirement that I set for my clients in order to allow them to have consensual sex with me, which is the requirement of a financial compensation”
Now let’s think for a minute: If you wanted to have sex with your “female partner”, would you rely more on a wife to make herself physically available to you within 24 hours of a request for sex, or would you rely more on an escort to make herself physically available to you within 24 hours of a request for sex?
In marriage there’s a potential risk that your wife could altogether discontinue to allow you to have sex with her for some reason that she may or may not say (e.g., sex with husband is no longer fun, I’m seeing someone else who isn’t my husband), but in escortbuxxing this is a lesser risk. An escort can also reject a potential client for some reason that she may or may not say (e.g., some escorts reject black men), but escorts in general have lower genetic standards than ordinary “non-sex working” women in the sexual selection process. To put this simply, a “sex worker” Stacy is more likely to provide sex to the average LTN / subhuman man who transfers the correct amount of money for the service, than a “non-sex worker” Stacy is likely to provide sex to an ordinary LTN / subhuman man who wants to marry her or become her “boyfriend”
A financially responsible escortbuxxer can easily spend no more than $20,000 a year if we assume he escortbuxes every week. Based on estimated consumer spending in a two-person household, if a financially responsible escortbuxer were to escortbux every week for 8 – 10 years straight, he would spend $100,000 to $150,000 less than what he would have spent on a wife who married him and stayed with him for the same amount of time: Approx. $200k - $240k for weekly escortbux over 8-to-10-year period, compared to $300k - $400k for expenses made by wife using husband’s money over 8-to-10-year period
Basically we can estimate that escortmaxing is around $100,000 cheaper, or 30% cheaper in financial cost, than long-term marriage for the average man in the US. The monthly or annual expenses of the average adult male can be 30% less, if he were to simply escortbux once or twice a week instead of marry
If your main concern is financial security, I’d say marriage is not worth it. You can easily save more money by escortbuxxing instead of having a wife that lives with you in a shared house. Plus you can rely more on escorts to provide sex at a higher frequency than a wife, because escorts are sex providers by profession, and “wife” or “girlfriend” is not formally understood as a profession of sex work. A woman who provides sex by occupation is more reliable than a woman who does not provide sex by occupation
As for sexual services, escorts are formally paid for their services by direct financial transactio, but "wives" are paid indirectly and more implicitly (i.e., in the form of expenses made using the husband’s finances)
In essence it means an escort is less likely than a “wife” to object to a man’s perceived entitlement to sex, because escorts know that by profession, they are supposed to provide sex upon payment. Whereas “wives” and other “non-single women” do not have the same understanding of their own roles as “wives” or “girlfriends”. In the modern world, women have diverged from the belief that men should be entitled to sex with a woman on the sole basis that he’s in a relationship with that woman. People do not see “wife” or “girlfriend” as a formal profession. Thus they don’t interpret the role of “wife” or “girlfriend” to involve a sexual obligation to her “husband” or “boyfriend” --- A marriage can be sexless when the husband doesn’t want it to be sexless; a “BF/GF” relationship can be sexless when the “boyfriend” doesn’t want it to be sexless. But appointments with escorts who offer sex cannot be sexless if the client doesn’t want it to be sexless. In the world there are “sexless marriages” and "sexless relationships" where the husband / BF doesn’t want to be sexless, but there’s no such thing as a “sexless escort appointment” unless the client doesn’t want to have sex
Escorts have the foreknowledge that they are purposed to provided sex when certain conditions are fulfilled (aka financial / economic compensation), because escorts know it’s a necessary part of their agreement to their profession as a provider of sex upon request. But “wives” and “girlfriends” do not have the foreknowledge that they are purposed to provide sex to their “husband” or “boyfriend”, because “wives” (and non-married women) no longer believe it is a necessary part of their agreement to the non-professional role of a “wife” or “girlfriend” to be a provider of sex to the “husband” or “boyfriend” upon demand. Escorts who offer sexual services do not have the preconception they are not required to provide sex if the client wants it, because they know it will show their failure to commit to the requirements of their occupation. But “wives” and “girlfriends” do have the idea that they aren’t required to provide sex if the “husband” or “boyfriend” wants it, because they do not believe that sex with “husband” or “boyfriend” is the compulsory duty of a “wife” or “girlfriend”
There's a difference between their preconceptions about the sexual obligations of “sex workers” compared to preconceptions about the sexual obligations of “wives” or “girlfriends” - ESCORTS KNOW they are meant to provide sex because THEY KNOW it’s part of their agreement to their PROFESSION as a “sex provider”. WIVES and GFs DO NOT KNOW they are meant to provide sex because THEY DO NOT BELIEVE it’s part of their agreement to their NON-PROFESSIONAL ROLE of a “wife” or “girlfriend”. An escort is more likely to agree that a man is entitled to sex with her on the condition the arranged price for the sex service is paid, than a “non-escort” is likely to agree that a man is entitled to sex with her on the sole basis that she is his “wife” or “girlfriend”
escort who offers sex will provide sex on the condition that a financial compensation is made in advance, and with all due respect a wife is practically no different to an escort, because many women get married for the same reason that escorts sell sex (Remember: Financial security is the most common factor that motivates couples to get married). Although escorts sell sex for the same reason that many women get married - Escorts in general are less discriminative than ordinary women in the sexual selection process. A “sex worker” Stacy is more likely to provide sex to an ordinary escortbux LTN / subhuman male who sends her the correct amount of money, than a “non-sex worker” Stacy is likely to provide sex to an ordinary LTN / subhuman male who wants to be her husband or boyfriend
In the Modern World, Is Marriage Worth It for Young Men?
If your main concern is financial security, you’d easily have an overall better experience with escorts instead of a wife, because:
Unless your fiancée or potential future wife is a wealthmaxxed millionaire who’ll allow you to have partial or total ownership of her assets upon finalization of marriage, you’re simply better off escortbuxing until further notice if your main concern is financial security
If what you want is “love and companionship” you may as well re-consider searching for a wife, because a wife who’d spend $100,000’s of your money over several years and probably leave or cuck you afterwards, she may not be the “loving wife” you are searching for. In the end, all you may have from a wife is the illusion of “love” as she drains your income and wealth over the course of several years. In practice this is more or less equivalent to a “paid-for GF experience” – A service normally provided by escorts and “sugar babies” who are all in all whores by profession. If you just want “companionship” and the illusion of “love”, an escort or sugar baby can provide you with a similar experience that you would otherwise have from a wife who’d probably divorce or have extramarital partners after years of draining your economic resources
If your main concern is companionship, I’d say marriage is not worth it. An escort who offers GFE can provide you with a congruent experience to having a wife, and weekly escortbuxing can be more cost effective than long-term marriage if done responsibly. A wife is practically the equivalent of an escort – The only difference is the wife would probably be more expensive to maintain, and your prospects of frequent sex with an affordable escort would be higher than your prospects of frequent sex with a wife. As long as you have the money, you can pretty much pay a sex worker to larp as the equivalent of wife or GF
Then again there may be some escorts and sugar babies out there who would take advantage of emotionally vulnerable clients, and financially drain them more than a wife financially drains her husband. That’s why I said, “weekly escortbuxing can be more cost effective than long-term marriage if done responsibly”. Ultimately you can fulfil the same purpose by escortbuxing rather than long-term marriage if your main concern is companionship. But you have to be in the position where you can afford to do it weekly for multiple years, and you have to be sensible enough to not let your escorts get the better of your emotions while interacting with them
If your main concern is pursuit of love or pursuit of a faithful companion, then you can look back on the divorce stats I added to this post, and decide for yourself whether or not you’ll find “the woman who will be faithful to me for life and never leave me”. Statistically speaking your chances of finding this woman is less than 50%. At least half of all men who are in pursuit of a loving, faithful, lifetime companion will not find one. If you plan to search for love or a faithful, lifetime companion, you'd be lucky if your search turns out a success
If your main concern is to have children, then I wouldn’t suggest that you shouldn’t get married, but I would say you should consider the potential threat associated with divorce rape and paternity fraud. As you might want to start a family, there’s still a risk of paternity fraud / divorce rape (e.g., losing custody of kids, being placed under the illusion you are the father of someone else's child). Preferably you do not want to lose custody of your children, cause in divorce process the court tends to favour the female divorcee in having custody of children. If you divorce she’s most likely to win custody of the children by court order. Plus you don’t want to be placed under the illusion you’re the biological father of children who actually came from the seed of another man who impregnated your wife while you weren’t around. Even if you slept with your wife around the same time she conceived, it doesn’t necessarily mean that she couldn’t have slept with another man around that same time. Besides the risk of divorce rape and paternity fraud, marrying under the main interest of having children is not a bad idea
If your future plan is to marry a woman, unless you want to have children, you might as well become an escortmaxxer instead. Marriage is for the most part unrecommendable to zoomer & millenial men in the current state of western society. You have more to lose than you have to gain from living with a wife over the long term. Why is this the case? I’ll show you the stats:
The average length of a marriage prior to divorce is eight years. This means the lifespan of a marriage that will eventually end in divorce, is more or less than eight years. I’ll approximate the figure to 10 years. Of course, there may be divorcees whose marriages lasted more than ten years, but the majority of divorces happen within 10 years of marriage (U.S Census Bureau, 2021)
Most men (64%) and most women (52%) re-marry after divorce. Basically most divorcees have married to two or more different people in their lifetime. Moreover the vast majority of divorced couples (96%) re-marry to new people; only 6% of divorced couples re-marry each other (Love To Know)
It costs around $7,000 to process and complete a divorce. Any person who marries and later divorces, would lose more or less than $7,000 in the divorce process (Forbes Advisor, 2024)
More than half of all marriages end in divorce. The divorce rate for first marriages is 50%, second marriages is 67% and third marriages is 73%. Basically the majority of all marriages end in divorce, but someone who marries a second or third time is more likely to divorce than someone who marries for the first time (Psychology Today, 2012)
The majority of consumer purchases are made by women. In other words women are BY FAR the largest spenders between the two sexes (Nielsen Company, 2020) Think about the implications of this for men who live with their wife or GF. If a man’s wife does the vast majority of spending in the household, who’s money is she likely to spend? Maybe she spends her own, but it wouldn’t be absurd to think she also spends out of her husband’s finance
Around 69% of divorces are initiated by the female spouse. Basically most divorces are initiated by the wife, and married women are 1.5x more likely than married men to initiate a divorce (Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, 2018)
Financial security (42%) is the leading factor for couples to start a marriage, followed by companionship (39%), “love” (36%), “formal act of making a commitment” (34%) and “to start a family” (34%). (Forbes Advisor, 2023). For almost half of all married couples, financial security was the most important factor that encouraged them to start a marriage. Based on what the statistics say, it basically means financial security matters more than love and companionship in respect of starting a marriage
“Lack of family support” (43%) is the leading factor for getting a divorce (Forbes Advisor, 2023). Ideally “lack of family support” can apply to various circumstances. But “lack of family support” is more likely to be a finance-related issue than a non-finance-related issue, because as we already know, “financial security” is the predominant factor that motivates couples to get married. So if one of the two spouses fails to provide “family support”, it is fair to assume that based on the leading factor for couples getting married, the failure to provide sufficient “family support” is more likely to be a finance-related issue
Number, Timing and Duration of Marriages and Divorces
The report provides a uniquely comprehensive look at marital patterns in the United States.
www.census.gov
How Much Does A Divorce Cost In 2024?
Although the U.S. divorce rate is declining, over 600,000 Americans get divorced each year, sustaining a more than $11 billion-per-year legal industry. What does this mean for individual marriages, and how much does a divorce really cost in ? The median cost of a divorce in the U.S. is $7,000, wh
www.forbes.com
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...gh-failure-rate-of-second-and-third-marriages
Wise up to Women | Nielsen
By 2028, women will own 75% of the discretionary spend, making them the world’s greatest influencers. But they're also shouldering more of the household burdens, feeling less financially secure and still are facing serious barriers when it comes to equality. It's time brands wise up to women.
www.nielsen.com
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_11.pdf
Leading Causes Of Divorce: 43% Report Lack Of Family Support
No one enters their marriage wanting to get divorced. Understanding why marriages fail can help you to make your own union stronger if you are married. It can also guide you in making the right choices about entering into a marriage before you tie the knot and help you support the married couples in
www.forbes.com
An Estimate for Consumer Spending Activity in Marriage with statistics for the Annual Income of Men and Women in the US
We also need to consider the possibility that a wife may spend her husband’s money over the course of their marriage. I can’t find any data on expenses made by married women using their husband’s finance, but I can make an estimate based on other available data:
For 2022, the average man’s salary in the US was around $62,000; the average woman’s salary in the US was around $52,000 (US Department of Labour, 2022). If we combine their salaries together, it adds to a combined total of $114,000. Also for 2021, the average annual expenditure for a family of two was around $76,000 (US Department of Labour, 2023). According to Nielsen Company, around 89% of women across the world claim to be the one responsible for “controlling or sharing daily shopping needs, household chores and food prep” compared to an average of 41% of men
Now if we extrapolate this statistic for western society (e.g., Europe, North America), we can conclude 89% of US women in a household that has at least two people (e.g., wife/husband, BF/GF) spend around a minimum $76,000 annually. This sum of money would be enough for the average couple in the US to fairly split their household expenditures based on the combined total of their own salaries: $76,000 is two-thirds of $114,000. So if we assume the average couple in the US would split their expenditures proportionately to the sum of their salaries, the annual household expenditure for a co-habitating couple would account for approx. $35,000 (= $52,000 * 2/3) out of the woman’s salary, and $41,000 (= $62,000 * 2/3) out of the man’s salary
Thus we can draw a conclusion that for any man who marries a woman, there’s also an 89% chance that he would allow his wife to spend two-thirds of his financial income (or an average of $41,000 a year), which would amount to around $205,000 in 5 years, and around $410,000 in 10 years
Basically if any random zoomer male were to get married, we can draw these estimations based on the provided stats:
- There’s at least a 50% chance he will receive a divorce. If he does receive a divorce, it would probably happen within 10 years of his marriage, and his wife is most likely the one who’ll initiate the divorce
- If he divorces, he will also lose more or less than $7,000 in the divorce process, and the most likely reason why he’ll receive a divorce is because of his “failure to provide family support” or “failing to commit”, which basically translates to not contributing enough money to household and family maintenance
- If he lives with his wife during the course of his marital relationship, there’s an 89% chance his wife will spend two-thirds of his money every year (on household and family maintenance, and miscellaneous items). If he’s the average adult male in the United States, this expenditure would be more or less than $41,000 a year, which translates to $205,000 in 5 years, $328,000 in 8 years, $410,000 in 10 years
Let’s reflect on these stats. The average man in the US would allow his wife to spend up to two-thirds of his income in the course of a marital relationship. There’s also a >50% chance that he will divorce. If he does divorce, it will probably happen within 10 years, and he will also lose money in the divorce process due to legal fees and redistribution of previously shared property. Also consider the stats for paternity fraud, which show 10% to 30% couples that have a paternity test receive a negative result
If you wish to marry a woman who’ll spend around 2/3 of your annual income every year, potentially cuck you in the process (>10% chance) and potentially divorce you afterwards (>50% chance), is marriage a worthwhile investment in western society? It depends on what you want out of it
Escorts are Generally Cheaper to Maintain than Wives
A wife may have the impression that her husband’s perceived entitlement to sex is based on her status as his wife, e.g., “my husband believes he’s entitled to sex with me for the key reason that I am his wife”
An escort or sugar baby may have the impression that her client’s perceived entitlement to sex is based on her status as a professional sex provider, e.g., “my client believes he’s entitled to sex with me for the sole reason that I am a sex worker by profession and he has fulfilled the requirement that I set for my clients in order to allow them to have consensual sex with me, which is the requirement of a financial compensation”
Now let’s think for a minute: If you wanted to have sex with your “female partner”, would you rely more on a wife to make herself physically available to you within 24 hours of a request for sex, or would you rely more on an escort to make herself physically available to you within 24 hours of a request for sex?
In marriage there’s a potential risk that your wife could altogether discontinue to allow you to have sex with her for some reason that she may or may not say (e.g., sex with husband is no longer fun, I’m seeing someone else who isn’t my husband), but in escortbuxxing this is a lesser risk. An escort can also reject a potential client for some reason that she may or may not say (e.g., some escorts reject black men), but escorts in general have lower genetic standards than ordinary “non-sex working” women in the sexual selection process. To put this simply, a “sex worker” Stacy is more likely to provide sex to the average LTN / subhuman man who transfers the correct amount of money for the service, than a “non-sex worker” Stacy is likely to provide sex to an ordinary LTN / subhuman man who wants to marry her or become her “boyfriend”
A financially responsible escortbuxxer can easily spend no more than $20,000 a year if we assume he escortbuxes every week. Based on estimated consumer spending in a two-person household, if a financially responsible escortbuxer were to escortbux every week for 8 – 10 years straight, he would spend $100,000 to $150,000 less than what he would have spent on a wife who married him and stayed with him for the same amount of time: Approx. $200k - $240k for weekly escortbux over 8-to-10-year period, compared to $300k - $400k for expenses made by wife using husband’s money over 8-to-10-year period
Basically we can estimate that escortmaxing is around $100,000 cheaper, or 30% cheaper in financial cost, than long-term marriage for the average man in the US. The monthly or annual expenses of the average adult male can be 30% less, if he were to simply escortbux once or twice a week instead of marry
If your main concern is financial security, I’d say marriage is not worth it. You can easily save more money by escortbuxxing instead of having a wife that lives with you in a shared house. Plus you can rely more on escorts to provide sex at a higher frequency than a wife, because escorts are sex providers by profession, and “wife” or “girlfriend” is not formally understood as a profession of sex work. A woman who provides sex by occupation is more reliable than a woman who does not provide sex by occupation
As for sexual services, escorts are formally paid for their services by direct financial transactio, but "wives" are paid indirectly and more implicitly (i.e., in the form of expenses made using the husband’s finances)
In essence it means an escort is less likely than a “wife” to object to a man’s perceived entitlement to sex, because escorts know that by profession, they are supposed to provide sex upon payment. Whereas “wives” and other “non-single women” do not have the same understanding of their own roles as “wives” or “girlfriends”. In the modern world, women have diverged from the belief that men should be entitled to sex with a woman on the sole basis that he’s in a relationship with that woman. People do not see “wife” or “girlfriend” as a formal profession. Thus they don’t interpret the role of “wife” or “girlfriend” to involve a sexual obligation to her “husband” or “boyfriend” --- A marriage can be sexless when the husband doesn’t want it to be sexless; a “BF/GF” relationship can be sexless when the “boyfriend” doesn’t want it to be sexless. But appointments with escorts who offer sex cannot be sexless if the client doesn’t want it to be sexless. In the world there are “sexless marriages” and "sexless relationships" where the husband / BF doesn’t want to be sexless, but there’s no such thing as a “sexless escort appointment” unless the client doesn’t want to have sex
Escorts have the foreknowledge that they are purposed to provided sex when certain conditions are fulfilled (aka financial / economic compensation), because escorts know it’s a necessary part of their agreement to their profession as a provider of sex upon request. But “wives” and “girlfriends” do not have the foreknowledge that they are purposed to provide sex to their “husband” or “boyfriend”, because “wives” (and non-married women) no longer believe it is a necessary part of their agreement to the non-professional role of a “wife” or “girlfriend” to be a provider of sex to the “husband” or “boyfriend” upon demand. Escorts who offer sexual services do not have the preconception they are not required to provide sex if the client wants it, because they know it will show their failure to commit to the requirements of their occupation. But “wives” and “girlfriends” do have the idea that they aren’t required to provide sex if the “husband” or “boyfriend” wants it, because they do not believe that sex with “husband” or “boyfriend” is the compulsory duty of a “wife” or “girlfriend”
There's a difference between their preconceptions about the sexual obligations of “sex workers” compared to preconceptions about the sexual obligations of “wives” or “girlfriends” - ESCORTS KNOW they are meant to provide sex because THEY KNOW it’s part of their agreement to their PROFESSION as a “sex provider”. WIVES and GFs DO NOT KNOW they are meant to provide sex because THEY DO NOT BELIEVE it’s part of their agreement to their NON-PROFESSIONAL ROLE of a “wife” or “girlfriend”. An escort is more likely to agree that a man is entitled to sex with her on the condition the arranged price for the sex service is paid, than a “non-escort” is likely to agree that a man is entitled to sex with her on the sole basis that she is his “wife” or “girlfriend”
escort who offers sex will provide sex on the condition that a financial compensation is made in advance, and with all due respect a wife is practically no different to an escort, because many women get married for the same reason that escorts sell sex (Remember: Financial security is the most common factor that motivates couples to get married). Although escorts sell sex for the same reason that many women get married - Escorts in general are less discriminative than ordinary women in the sexual selection process. A “sex worker” Stacy is more likely to provide sex to an ordinary escortbux LTN / subhuman male who sends her the correct amount of money, than a “non-sex worker” Stacy is likely to provide sex to an ordinary LTN / subhuman male who wants to be her husband or boyfriend
In the Modern World, Is Marriage Worth It for Young Men?
If your main concern is financial security, you’d easily have an overall better experience with escorts instead of a wife, because:
1. Escortmaxing is overall cheaper than marriage. You’ll almost surely save thousands in cash by slaying escorts instead of having a wife who lives with you and spends your money. Frequent sex with an escort can cost up to $2000 a month, or between 1/4 and 1/2 of your monthly income, compared to having a wife who’ll spend an average $3400 of your money each month, or 2/3 of your monthly income. Basically escorts are about 30% cheaper than wives,
2. You’ll have better prospects of frequent access to sex and ultimately avoid landing in a “sexless marriage”
3. In marriage your odds of divorce are more than 50%, and there’s a moderate to high risk of divorce rape or/and paternity fraud. In escortmaxxing there’s zero risk of paternity fraud or divorce rape
4. Escorts overall have lower standards than non-escorts in respect of genetic traits of men who may be sexually interested them. An escort is more likely than a non-escort to take on a LTN / subhuman male as a sex partner, as long as LTN / subhuman sends over the correct amount of money for the sex service. Escorts are less discriminatory to MTNs, LTNs and truecels, which also means you’ll have an easier time finding high SMV females (aka Stacylite or Stacy escorts) who would agree to sex in exchange for financial compensation
5. Many women get married for the same reason escorts sell sex. Financial security is the predominant factor that motivates almost half of all couples to start a marriage. Basically financial security is the primary factor that motivates both wives and escorts to have a sexual relation with men or live with men in the same house
Unless your fiancée or potential future wife is a wealthmaxxed millionaire who’ll allow you to have partial or total ownership of her assets upon finalization of marriage, you’re simply better off escortbuxing until further notice if your main concern is financial security
If what you want is “love and companionship” you may as well re-consider searching for a wife, because a wife who’d spend $100,000’s of your money over several years and probably leave or cuck you afterwards, she may not be the “loving wife” you are searching for. In the end, all you may have from a wife is the illusion of “love” as she drains your income and wealth over the course of several years. In practice this is more or less equivalent to a “paid-for GF experience” – A service normally provided by escorts and “sugar babies” who are all in all whores by profession. If you just want “companionship” and the illusion of “love”, an escort or sugar baby can provide you with a similar experience that you would otherwise have from a wife who’d probably divorce or have extramarital partners after years of draining your economic resources
If your main concern is companionship, I’d say marriage is not worth it. An escort who offers GFE can provide you with a congruent experience to having a wife, and weekly escortbuxing can be more cost effective than long-term marriage if done responsibly. A wife is practically the equivalent of an escort – The only difference is the wife would probably be more expensive to maintain, and your prospects of frequent sex with an affordable escort would be higher than your prospects of frequent sex with a wife. As long as you have the money, you can pretty much pay a sex worker to larp as the equivalent of wife or GF
Then again there may be some escorts and sugar babies out there who would take advantage of emotionally vulnerable clients, and financially drain them more than a wife financially drains her husband. That’s why I said, “weekly escortbuxing can be more cost effective than long-term marriage if done responsibly”. Ultimately you can fulfil the same purpose by escortbuxing rather than long-term marriage if your main concern is companionship. But you have to be in the position where you can afford to do it weekly for multiple years, and you have to be sensible enough to not let your escorts get the better of your emotions while interacting with them
If your main concern is pursuit of love or pursuit of a faithful companion, then you can look back on the divorce stats I added to this post, and decide for yourself whether or not you’ll find “the woman who will be faithful to me for life and never leave me”. Statistically speaking your chances of finding this woman is less than 50%. At least half of all men who are in pursuit of a loving, faithful, lifetime companion will not find one. If you plan to search for love or a faithful, lifetime companion, you'd be lucky if your search turns out a success
If your main concern is to have children, then I wouldn’t suggest that you shouldn’t get married, but I would say you should consider the potential threat associated with divorce rape and paternity fraud. As you might want to start a family, there’s still a risk of paternity fraud / divorce rape (e.g., losing custody of kids, being placed under the illusion you are the father of someone else's child). Preferably you do not want to lose custody of your children, cause in divorce process the court tends to favour the female divorcee in having custody of children. If you divorce she’s most likely to win custody of the children by court order. Plus you don’t want to be placed under the illusion you’re the biological father of children who actually came from the seed of another man who impregnated your wife while you weren’t around. Even if you slept with your wife around the same time she conceived, it doesn’t necessarily mean that she couldn’t have slept with another man around that same time. Besides the risk of divorce rape and paternity fraud, marrying under the main interest of having children is not a bad idea
Last edited:
