I've made the argument that Incels should support free market capitalism and traditional monogamy. Basically economically and socially far right. Some Incels have made the economic comparisons and claim that wealth inequality and sexual inequality are somewhat related or analogous. I fully disagree, and here's why
1) Wealth is not a zero sum like toilets. There is an equal ratio of toilets to men, and there's nothing we can do (besides sex selective abortion or genetic engineering) to change that. When a billionnaire becomes richer, he's not doing it at the expense of anyone else. In fact, in a market society, you become richer by making everyone else richer too. Jeff Bezos is rich, but not by stealing from the poor. In the process of becoming rich, Bezos created millions of jobs, lowered prices, and gave us access to a great platform that lets us buy whatever we want whenever we want as efficiently as possible. When Chad hooks up with another toilet, he's consuming a LIMITED RESOURCE that is now no longer availble for a normie or Incel. When Chad strings along 8 toilets, he's taking up 8 toilets that are now off the dating market. This is a fundamental difference between the economy and the dating scene that cannot be overlooked.
2) The economy is much more meritocratic than the dating market. Although some people do have inherent advantages (parents, inherited wealth), the economy gives far more options to those just willing to work hard. If you work hard, you can become a tradesmen and make TONS of money, and I mean an Ungodly amount, this can then be invested in companies like Berkshire Hathaway and Amazon to crank out even more returns. In the dating market, if you aren't born with the right facial features, it's OVER for you. Even ugly and obese toilets won't even look your way. I get rejected from the fat and ugly toilets all the time.
3) There's disadvantages to being extremely wealthy, there's no disadvantages to being attractive. When you become very very wealthy, sure you get some additional benefits and can buy more things, but in many ways your life becomes worse. The IRS takes note of you, Federal Agencies start looking at ways to harass you, the public loses sympathy and starts cheering for your downfall, you're demonized in the media, etc. Attractive people get none of that, the Halo effect elevates them in the minds of the public. When people are really good looking, people assume the best in them, when someone is very wealthy, people assume the worst.
1) Wealth is not a zero sum like toilets. There is an equal ratio of toilets to men, and there's nothing we can do (besides sex selective abortion or genetic engineering) to change that. When a billionnaire becomes richer, he's not doing it at the expense of anyone else. In fact, in a market society, you become richer by making everyone else richer too. Jeff Bezos is rich, but not by stealing from the poor. In the process of becoming rich, Bezos created millions of jobs, lowered prices, and gave us access to a great platform that lets us buy whatever we want whenever we want as efficiently as possible. When Chad hooks up with another toilet, he's consuming a LIMITED RESOURCE that is now no longer availble for a normie or Incel. When Chad strings along 8 toilets, he's taking up 8 toilets that are now off the dating market. This is a fundamental difference between the economy and the dating scene that cannot be overlooked.
2) The economy is much more meritocratic than the dating market. Although some people do have inherent advantages (parents, inherited wealth), the economy gives far more options to those just willing to work hard. If you work hard, you can become a tradesmen and make TONS of money, and I mean an Ungodly amount, this can then be invested in companies like Berkshire Hathaway and Amazon to crank out even more returns. In the dating market, if you aren't born with the right facial features, it's OVER for you. Even ugly and obese toilets won't even look your way. I get rejected from the fat and ugly toilets all the time.
3) There's disadvantages to being extremely wealthy, there's no disadvantages to being attractive. When you become very very wealthy, sure you get some additional benefits and can buy more things, but in many ways your life becomes worse. The IRS takes note of you, Federal Agencies start looking at ways to harass you, the public loses sympathy and starts cheering for your downfall, you're demonized in the media, etc. Attractive people get none of that, the Halo effect elevates them in the minds of the public. When people are really good looking, people assume the best in them, when someone is very wealthy, people assume the worst.
