Just now I saw a thread by @Flagellum_Dei about how "all amerimutts and anglos need to be banned" because they're male feminists and racebaiters or what have you. I would think if you're going to call for the ban of 50% of the forum, you should at least be able to name a few users who are prominent examples of why this group is bad.
In general, I've noticed that a lot of people on here like to make inflammatory threads like "all x are fakecels," "all x are racebaiters," "all x," etc., but they never actually provide specific examples of what they're talking about.
The "I don't want to start drama" excuse doesn't work, because if that was the case, you wouldn't be shitting out inflammatory threads based on blanket statements. IDK if people are just making shit up or if this is conflict-avoidant passive-aggresiveness on the threadmakers' parts. For the record, I'm not against making generalizations, hitpieces, calls to action, etc., but you should at least provide evidence to make them somewhat convincing. If you want to make a thread about a problem you have with a group of users, don't be a pussy—name examples
In general, I've noticed that a lot of people on here like to make inflammatory threads like "all x are fakecels," "all x are racebaiters," "all x," etc., but they never actually provide specific examples of what they're talking about.
The "I don't want to start drama" excuse doesn't work, because if that was the case, you wouldn't be shitting out inflammatory threads based on blanket statements. IDK if people are just making shit up or if this is conflict-avoidant passive-aggresiveness on the threadmakers' parts. For the record, I'm not against making generalizations, hitpieces, calls to action, etc., but you should at least provide evidence to make them somewhat convincing. If you want to make a thread about a problem you have with a group of users, don't be a pussy—name examples
Last edited:
