Serious Why does nature allow this?

[TrueForcedIncel]

It makes no sense, if a human's primary biological imperative is to find a sex partner then why would your own DNA betray you in the pursuit of that goal? What does humanity gain from creating the rejects?

 

[newcel997]

its evloution: only the strong can procriate

 

[User 5309]

Blame modern medicine, which is a relatively new development speaking from an evolution sense. Smaller, weaker creatures die early - often at the hands of their siblings. Society and medicine now prevent this, so we've got a wing of people who technically shouldn't be here if you look at it as an extension of "nature".

Society will catch up in how it handles this, but it's probably going to take a couple of generations.

 

[Colly]

Nature doesn't care

 

[L Lawliet]

Scientists are responsible for this.They don't care about us.They care about space.Space is important than weaks.They are supporting this situation

 

[User 5309]

Scientists are responsible for this.They don't care about us.They care about space.Space is important than weaks.They are supporting this situation

Space is more important, though.

But regardless, your thinking here is deeply disorganised. Cut all space programs and research, spend more money on what exactly?

 

[L Lawliet]

Space is more important, though.

But regardless, your thinking here is deeply disorganised. Cut all space programs and research, spend more money on what exactly?

http://www.naturalheightgrowth.com (This scientist is different he has channel on youtube.He is trying to find cure about height growth)
https://www.youtube.com/user/NaturalHeightGrowth

or they need to make research about natural face/body fix methods

 

[User 5309]

http://www.naturalheightgrowth.com (This scientist is different he has channel on youtube.He is trying to find cure about height growth)
https://www.youtube.com/user/NaturalHeightGrowth

or natural face/body fix methods

Delusional. These treatments will cost money and you'll be priced out of the market. Rich, successful people will benefit and improve themselves further, you'll get nothing.

Any sort of physical engineering will be used to make the best better, even if you get it to - you'll always be playing catchup.

 

[Deleted member 1983]

Nature doesn't care

 

[UnfortunatelyINCEL98]

Nature doesn't care

 

[Letmego]

its evloution: only the strong can procriate

 

[Letmego]

If this was back in the day, Chad would have clubbed most of us to death for raping his precious cunt supply.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

its evloution: only the strong can procriate

Strong how? I'm 6'2 240lb yugefag and I've never been sick or have any health conditions. In natural conditions/prehistoric times, I'd just outsmart and murder the scrawny chadlets, taking the femoids, but since we live in society that basically castrates you and gives femoids the artificial choice to judge you on superficial qualities, I'll probably never procreate. The current gynocracy is as unnatural as it gets.

 

[Mainländer]

I'm sure most people on this site are not deformed, disabled or sick. You're probably ok, in the sense that you're a healthy human being on reproductive age.

The problem is that sexual competition nowadays is absolutely brutal. Women have so fucking many options it's ridiculous. They can all flock towards the few Chads and Chadlites, and their hipergamic tentacles can reach much farther than ever through the internet and modern transportation.

Modern post-feminist Western societies are an absolutely bizarre mix of underdog-helping obsession in the job market, race relations and academia and an absolute ruthless darwinism running rampant in the sexual market. You couldn't expect anything different from a ginocentric society, since women are 100% sexual beings and only really care about reproduction (their purpose on this Earth).

 

[deathgreetsmeslow]

its evloution: only the strong can procriate

 

[Fontaine]

Nature is blind and amoral. It doesn't care. It will condemn your genes to disappear for a very slight mistake that is not even truly important.

My genes will disappear because of a few purely aesthetic physical deformities, despite being in extremely good health.

That's why any incel who isn't against nature (in the form of transhumanism, pro-singularity, etc) is cucked. Nature needs to be overcome. It's a bad computer program in dire need of being rewritten.

 

[User 5309]

[...] since women are 100% sexual beings and only really care about reproduction (their purpose on this Earth).

But to be fair, that's men as well; we all want to pass on our genetics, and men have always been programmed to spread it about as much as possible, because your kids get eaten by apex predators. We're not a survival society any more, which is great for me because I totally wouldn't come out on top in a survival of the fittest scenario - that just means that men and women want to have fun with sex rather than use it to get kids to work on a farm.

I think people just notice it more because of social media.

 

[User 5309]

That's why any incel who isn't against nature (in the form of transhumanism, pro-singularity, etc) is cucked. Nature needs to be overcome. It's a bad computer program in dire need of being rewritten.

Hah. If the singularity comes about, they'll just be cucked by Skynet.

 

[Fontaine]

Hah. If the singularity comes about, they'll just be cucked by Skynet.

I want to be cucked by skynet tbh, my dream is seeing the universe conquered by a new master race, asexual and immortal.

 

[User 5309]

I want to be cucked by skynet tbh, my dream is seeing the universe conquered by a new master race, asexual and immortal.

Oh totally. Watching Alpha Zero do it's thing was like watching the birth of a god.

 

[Mainländer]

But to be fair, that's men as well; we all want to pass on our genetics, and men have always been programmed to spread it about as much as possible, because your kids get eaten by apex predators. We're not a survival society any more, which is great for me because I totally wouldn't come out on top in a survival of the fittest scenario - that just means that men and women want to have fun with sex rather than use it to get kids to work on a farm.

I think people just notice it more because of social media.

Men surely have a higher sex drive, but we bust a nut and we're clear-minded for a good while. Fertile women think about sex and relationships all the time and all they do in their lives has a relation to it.

 

[Weirdcel]

women are 100% sexual beings and only really care about reproduction (their purpose on this Earth).

This is true. Women's lives revolve around sex.

You ever notice that 100% of music by women is about relationships?

 

[User 5309]

Men surely have a higher sex drive, but we bust a nut and we're clear-minded for a good while. Fertile women think about sex and relationships all the time and all they do in their lives has a relation to it.

Everything men do is about it as well though. It's an absolute cornerstone of psychology. I think you're painting a cartoon portrait of women there, though. Totally, as a society we're way more open about sex and people can talk about and do things they absolutely wouldn't have been able to in periods past - but to say that women are addle-brained constantly with the need bear child, while men are only periodically interested in sex is a bit revisionist.

 

[User 5309]

You ever notice that 100% of music by women is about relationships?

lol

 

[Misery]

This is true. Women's lives revolve around sex.

You ever notice that 100% of music by women is about relationships?

Espcially about complaining about men

 

[grayjedi90]

It makes no sense, if a human's primary biological imperative is to find a sex partner then why would your own DNA betray you in the pursuit of that goal? What does humanity gain from creating the rejects?

Because that is how evolution works! Nature always experiments with life and those who are good enough get to procreate the others are genetic death ends that can die off. Your sex drive is only there because you are programmed to fuck, whether you succed or not doesn't concern nature.

 

[musicel]

what many of you dont realise is that genetics arent as simple as you think. because of mutations the child can be ugly even if the parents are super models, although the chances are relatively low. even as a child food and environment influece your appearance. the result is tht there will always be ugly people. it is not possible to change that. they eill become less because women refuse to date their looksmatches but still. beside that i want to have as many uhlx people as possible that can iq max and make my life as good as possible as an incel: excellent medical treatment, good infrastructure, good eucation, leds crime and so on.

 

[Mainländer]

Everything men do is about it as well though. It's an absolute cornerstone of psychology. I think you're painting a cartoon portrait of women there, though. Totally, as a society we're way more open about sex and people can talk about and do things they absolutely wouldn't have been able to in periods past - but to say that women are addle-brained constantly with the need bear child, while men are only periodically interested in sex is a bit revisionist.

The way women dress, their tastes, everything is in relation to attracting and getting validation from men.

I think about women and sex a lot, but when I have just ejaculated through masturbation and I have to go to the bakery, for example, I just wear any shit I grab from around me and go there, without really caring about how people/women perceive me and without thinking about females for a while. Fertile women are not like that at all.

Ever noticed how women adapt their interests in relation to their appearances? I always notice how women with good bodies AND face tend to be into more mainstream stuff while women that are, for example, cute facially but fat, tend to pretend they're "nerds xD" to try to get attention from the top men of this category, which is bellow, say, the Chads in sports.

 

[_incelinside]

Your DNA isn't betraying you, you are simply carrier for your DNA which cant help being shit

 

[AdolfHitlerOfficial]

Aryan Ubermensch DNA is the only one that will survive.

 

[Deleted member 3725]

“Good enough” is natures moto. At one point in time all of this was good enough but not now.

 

[Namaste]

If this was back in the day, Chad would have clubbed most of us to death for raping his precious cunt supply.

I really don´t think so, back in the days Chad will be murdered while sleep like a gazillion times for trying to cope every woman, thats why every succesfull civilization had some way of sexual distribution (Call it monogamy or promiscuity with even ugly ones).

Tribes who didnt had eternal civil wars and leader assasination attemps made it to civilization, the ones who didn´t where lost in the sands of time.

Also this is my first post so i hopei didnt break any rule or something ^^

 

[deathgreetsmeslow]

I want to be cucked by skynet tbh, my dream is seeing the universe conquered by a new master race, asexual and immortal.

 

[InebriatedIrish]

It’s not. Humans have bypassed natural selection, and were the effect of it. Forced selection is needed for the betterment of mankind. Institute euthanization now!

 

[PleaseKillMeLoseSkin]

Technically speaking for a time you were your mother and fathers validation toy/thing so they were more or less forced to have you. Unless you come from a loving relationship where you had a good father that actually raised you properly and a mother that monitored you and didn't feed you McDicks err day you never really had a chance. Sorry

 

[Hardworkingcel]

its evloution: only the strong can procriate

Yep, but after 2000 years of evolution, I would though that that the bottom 10% would look better than what they actually look. Sometimes I see a guy and I think : "How that guy was able to survive thousands of years of evolution? How did his ancestors came so far?".

 

[newcel997]

Strong how? I'm 6'2 240lb yugefag and I've never been sick or have any health conditions. In natural conditions/prehistoric times, I'd just outsmart and murder the scrawny chadlets, taking the femoids, but since we live in society that basically castrates you and gives femoids the artificial choice to judge you on superficial qualities, I'll probably never procreate. The current gynocracy is as unnatural as it gets.

theres more to genetics than height and why do you think peacocks have such useless yet beautiful tails

Yep, but after 2000 years of evolution, I would though that that the bottom 10% would look better than what they actually look. Sometimes I see a guy and I think : "How that guy was able to survive thousands of years of evolution? How did his ancestors came so far?".

think 50 million years and all his ancestors don't have to be ugly for him to be ugly. he could have gotten his looks from his mom

 

[newcel997]

Nature doesn't care

sad but true

 

[Deleted member 6101]

theres more to genetics than height and why do you think peacocks have such useless yet beautiful tails

Femoids didn't really have a say in the matter in the good 'ol times. Being stronger and smarter was what mattered.

 

[newcel997]

Femoids didn't really have a say in the matter in the good 'ol times. Being stronger and smarter was what mattered.

in nature foids did have a say and yes they still went for the most attractive man with the most resources

 

[patheticmanletcel]

Scientists should try to find a cure for manletism

 

[Deleted member 6101]

they still went for the most attractive man with the most resources

Being "attractive" didn't have the same meaning as it does now. Also, being big and smart is what got you resources.

 

[newcel997]

Being "attractive" didn't have the same meaning as it does now. Also, being big and smart is what got you resources.

big and strong looking has always been attractive as have good bones and eyes, foids are just more picky now as they have more options. and yes being big/smart got you resources, but that was barely enough for our ape ancestor

 

[seclod]

It makes no sense, if a human's primary biological imperative is to find a sex partner then why would your own DNA betray you in the pursuit of that goal? What does humanity gain from creating the rejects?

If you really want to know see this thread:
https://incels.is/threads/ethnicel-origin-story.41860/

It's from the perspective of an Ethnicel but it highlights how this kinda stuff happens.

 

[ArtoriasWolf]

I dont want to be here, others dont want me here, nature doesnt want me here, nothing wants me here. Despite that I was forced into being here.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

"Nature creates" random results

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

Blame modern medicine, which is a relatively new development speaking from an evolution sense. Smaller, weaker creatures die early - often at the hands of their siblings. Society and medicine now prevent this, so we've got a wing of people who technically shouldn't be here if you look at it as an extension of "nature".

Society will catch up in how it handles this, but it's probably going to take a couple of generations.

Damn, we werent even meant to exist after all.

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

Because that is how evolution works! Nature always experiments with life and those who are good enough get to procreate the others are genetic death ends that can die off. Your sex drive is only there because you are programmed to fuck, whether you succed or not doesn't concern nature.

I really don´t think so, back in the days Chad will be murdered while sleep like a gazillion times for trying to cope every woman, thats why every succesfull civilization had some way of sexual distribution (Call it monogamy or promiscuity with even ugly ones).

Tribes who didnt had eternal civil wars and leader assasination attemps made it to civilization, the ones who didn´t where lost in the sands of time.

Also this is my first post so i hopei didnt break any rule or something ^^

"Nature creates" random results

Too many blackpills in this thread to swallow

 

[Letmego]

It makes no sense, if a human's primary biological imperative is to find a sex partner then why would your own DNA betray you in the pursuit of that goal? What does humanity gain from creating the rejects?

We in past probably functioned as a buffer and probably existed in much smaller numbers.

 

[Deleted member 2119]

Too many blackpills in this thread to swallow

Yeah it is pretty brutal.
Take a break if it is too much