It's Over Why does everyone here care so much about feminism, and how our loneliness is society’s fault?

[bonely]

I for one do not actually care what the cause of our rejection is. At the end of the day it all boils down to the fact that we are ugly and lonely, nobody is coming to help us, and nothing we will ever do will elevate us from our position as second rate humans. Under no circumstances would a girl ever truly feel something more than tolerance for us, so why is everyone coping by saying, ‘It was better in the past when girls needed us to survive.’?

Firstly, that’s still not genuine attraction, and seems just as depressing as being alone. I don’t know about you guys but I‘d only be happy if a girl chose to be with me out of genuine attraction. Secondly, most of us here are at the age where girls would still have chosen you based on attractiveness rather than need for financial security, even 200 years ago, so keep coping.

I‘d love to stoicmaxx when I’ve finished my education, but in all honesty I think that would drive me insane . I wish I didn’t feel the need for love.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Because feminism just increased our problems to impossible levels

 

[Patches]

Because feminism just increased our problems to impossible levels

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

Being mad at feminism is unproductive. In fact, being mad at anything is unproductive. The world is what it is. You might as well use your energy to make the best out of it.

 

[Rhaast]

Hi IT, or some journalist.

 

[gimmedatrope999]

Most people can’t love…that’s the problem.

 

[bonely]

Most people can’t love…that’s the problem.

Everyone can love. Men love women, But women only love Chad.

Hi IT, or some journalist.

FBI agent. I’m hiding in your garden.

 

[JoeBruhcel]

Being mad at feminism is unproductive. In fact, being mad at anything is unproductive. The world is what it is. You might as well use your energy to make the best out of it.

And how would you do that, im genuinely curious

Most people can’t love…that’s the problem.

Yep, my entire life I've only known and see hatred and abuse and depression around me, how the fuck would I even know what love is if I never felt it?

 

[bonely]

And how would you do that, im genuinely curious

Yep, my entire life I've only known and see hatred and abuse and depression around me, how the fuck would I even know what love is if I never felt it?

Love is an instinct, you would definitely know. Wether you believe it is just a rebranding of our sexual desire or an entirely different emotion, it is definitely one of the driving forces behind many of our actions. If you don‘t know what love is, why are you on an incel forum? Go and see a prostitute.

 

[Robtical]

Firstly, that’s still not genuine attraction,

It was genuine attraction in the past, because foids weren't easily allowed to be chad chasing rosties. That's why feminism has to be gotten rid of, and bring back slut shaming. Even if it wasn't genuine attraction in the past, it's still better than inceldom. When men have to resort to fucking foids a lot below their looksmatch, you can also say they're not genuinely attracted to those foids.

 

[Robtical]

Being mad at feminism is unproductive. In fact, being mad at anything is unproductive. The world is what it is. You might as well use your energy to make the best out of it.

Use your energy to destroy cuckdom and feminism. Better than rotting.

 

[JoeBruhcel]

Love is an instinct, you would definitely know. Wether you believe it is just a rebranding of our sexual desire or an entirely different emotion, it is definitely one of the driving forces behind many of our actions. If you don‘t know what love is, why are you on an incel forum? Go and see a prostitute.

Just see a prostitute theory

 

[bonely]

It was genuine attraction in the past, because foids weren't easily allowed to be chad chasing rosties. That's why feminism has to be gotten rid of, and bring back slut shaming. Even if it wasn't genuine attraction in the past, it's still better than inceldom. When men have to resort to fucking foids a lot below their looksmatch, you can also say they're not genuinely attracted to those foids.

You have a point, I think as long as social media exists meaning women have even a slight chance of getting a Chad, they will always feel unsatisfied. It’s just their nature, why would they want genetic scum like us? If I was a girl I know I wouldn’t.

 

[Robtical]

You have a point, I think as long as social media exists meaning women have even a slight chance of getting a Chad, they will always feel unsatisfied. It’s just their nature, why would they want genetic scum like us? If I was a girl I know I wouldn’t.

Being a non chad doesn't mean you're "genetic scum", that's like saying all non stacys are genetic scum. If men had the same options as foids we'd be "stacy only" too, that's why feminism needs to be put in the trash, and bring back slut shaming.

 

[bonely]

Just see a prostitute theory

tbhngl

Being a non chad doesn't mean you're "genetic scum"

Being an incel does

 

[Robtical]

Being an incel does

No it doesn't, and that's not funny. Most our looksmatched foids would be incel too, or can only fuck incel tier men, if there was no feminism.

 

[MentalistKebab]

Being mad at feminism is unproductive. In fact, being mad at anything is unproductive. The world is what it is. You might as well use your energy to make the best out of it.

Nope. Being mad gives you the reason and energy to fight against the circumstances you borned into.

The world is constantly changing, and the ones who drive these changes are not cuck stoics with their slave mentality.

Its the people who are angry against their environment, and fights to change it.

If everyone had that stoic mentality we would still live in the stone age.

 

[bonely]

No it doesn't, and that's not funny. Most our looksmatched foids would be incel too, or can only fuck incel tier men, if there was no feminism.

Yes it does. We are substandard to every girl. I hate to sound like this, but as a species we quite literally needed a worldwide patriarchal system to make women even put up with us for their own survival. Key words: “Put up”. They are not physically capable of feeling lust towards us as they do Chad. It’s just not possible. Plus, in caveman times they would be part of OogaChad‘s harem.

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

Nope. Being mad gives you the reason and energy to fight against the circumstances you borned into.

The world is constantly changing, and the ones who drive these changes are not cuck stoics with their slave mentality.

Its the people who are angry against their environment, and fights to change it.

If everyone had that stoic mentality we would still live in the stone age.

There's more than these two extremes. All I mean is don't let the anger consume you as it's just a waste of energy.

 

[Robtical]

it does. We are substandard to every girl. I hate to sound like this, but as a species we quite literally needed a worldwide patriarchal system to make women even put up with us for their own survival.

This sounds like feminist cuckery. Nature is patriarchal, we didn't put it into effect. Most mammals are patriarchal, changing nature to allow foids to vote and screw over men in courts isn't natural. Men can invent advanced sex bots and artificial wombs, and most foids would lose all their value.

Plus, in caveman times they would be part of OogaChad‘s harem.

The strongest would get the foids in those times, the ogrecels would kill the weak chads and fuck the stacys.

 

[Furlossus]

Greycel​

★
JoinedDec 17, 2021Posts7Online7h 25m

 

[bonely]

This sounds like feminist cuckery. Nature is patriarchal, we didn't put it into effect. Most mammals are patriarchal, changing nature to allow foids to vote and screw over men in courts isn't natural. Men can invent advanced sex bots and artificial wombs, and most foids would lose all their value.

What I meant to say, was that in caveman times girls were all in OogaChad harems, whereas later in human history a system was put in place so that for the most part everyone was paired up equally.

This sounds like feminist cuckery. Nature is patriarchal, we didn't put it into effect. Most mammals are patriarchal, changing nature to allow foids to vote and screw over men in courts isn't natural. Men can invent advanced sex bots and artificial wombs, and most foids would lose all their value.

The strongest would get the foids in those times, the ogrecels would kill the weak chads and fuck the stacys.

Anyhow, no one likes me, that’s all I can think about at this point

 

[Robtical]

I meant to say, was that in caveman times girls were all in OogaChad harems, whereas later in human history a system was put in place so that for the most part everyone was paired up equally.

In civilization there shouldn't be harams, because we need men to support it and keep it functioning, but denying most men the basic need of sex will make many of them neets and leech from everyone else, and collapse civilization.

Anyhow, no one likes me, that’s all I can think about at this point

That might change if you stop supporting feminist cuckdom.

 

[bonely]

That might change if you stop supporting feminist cuckdom.

I‘m ambivalent towards it, I think social media is the problem

 

[Deleted member 36666]

There's more than these two extremes. All I mean is don't let the anger consume you as it's just a waste of energy.

Bro in another thread you literally said that you want to nuke the entire world to kill off all non-white people

 

[Robtical]

I‘m ambivalent towards it, I think social media is the problem

Feminism is more of a problem, social media would be based if they didn't support feminism and censored based men.

 

[bonely]

Bro in another thread you literally said that you want to nuke the entire world to kill off all non-white people

He‘s turning over a new leaf

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

Bro in another thread you literally said that you want to nuke the entire world to kill off all non-white people

I definitely do. But not out of anger in any way. I simply observe that the world would be better off without them.

Mind you, I exclude honorary Aryans (e.g. Iranians, Russians, Japanese). They get to live.

 

[Deleted member 36666]

I simply observe that the world would be better off without them.

The nukes would make the entire planet a wasteland, come on
The global economy would collapse instantly even if you just magically deleted billions of people
It's like saying that you want mosquitoes gone in nature - the whole ecosphere would suffer a tremendous loss

 

[Rhaast]

Everyone can love. Men love women, But women only love Chad.

FBI agent. I’m hiding in your garden.

Im not burger

 

[bonely]

Im not burger

Borgir

 

[Rhaast]

Borgir

 

[FEMCELS FANTASY]

I for one do not actually care what the cause of our rejection is. At the end of thso why is everyone coping by saying, ‘It was better in the past when girls needed us to survive.’?

Firstly, that’s still not genuine attraction, and seems just as depressing as being alone. I don’t know about you guys but I‘d only be happy if a girl chose to be with me out of genuine attraction?

Its not a cope.

It really was better for men in the not so distant past but not because of what the dumbasses that you are referencing have said about the female necessity to get together with undesirable men purely for survival purposes.

No!

The reason it was better then rather than now for men is because of the lack of mass media of news and entertainment and internet social media and dating apps which all give women an unhealthy idea of all that’s potentially out there and available for them leading to both an increase in their natural hypergamy as well a kid in the candy store type of mentality where she now believes she’s entitled to her favorite Chad flavor above all else to the point she wants this particular flavor so bad she is even willing to share it with other girls instead of simply trying a different flavor that she might actually like that would be all her own.

So in short my overall point is women may have actually found lesser men genuinely attractive back in the day if for no other reason than having no other men to compare with the one that they’d got.

 

[LDARbeforeROPE]

Because feminism just increased our problems to impossible levels

Hi IT, or some journalist.

 

[Pepsicel]

I for one do not actually care what the cause of our rejection is. At the end of the day it all boils down to the fact that we are ugly and lonely, nobody is coming to help us, and nothing we will ever do will elevate us from our position as second rate humans. Under no circumstances would a girl ever truly feel something more than tolerance for us, so why is everyone coping by saying, ‘It was better in the past when girls needed us to survive.’?

Firstly, that’s still not genuine attraction, and seems just as depressing as being alone. I don’t know about you guys but I‘d only be happy if a girl chose to be with me out of genuine attraction. Secondly, most of us here are at the age where girls would still have chosen you based on attractiveness rather than need for financial security, even 200 years ago, so keep coping.

I‘d love to stoicmaxx when I’ve finished my education, but in all honesty I think that would drive me insane . I wish I didn’t feel the need for love.

Ok, you have a fair point. The problem is that feminism caused the cock carrousel so for foids is harder to feel genuine attracted to men since they have endless options. Sadly, incels are in the bottom of the barrel as the ugly men they are. If a foid, a lookmatch of an incel just met an incel and fuck that incel for the rest of her life she it would likely to feel genuine attraction than the current state of the sexual dynamics. But lets say that is ok, that indeed, foids have never felt attracted to their incel husbands. Lets move to the next point.


Feminism worsens simps. Reason of why they can't even leave us alone in this forum. Because our narrative is toward feminism narrative. Therefore, the simps who were raised with these feminist ideas ban these spaces from mainstream places like reddit(remember braincels? Remember incelswithouthate? Remember MGTWO? ), because the current excuse o unban prostitution and actually ban prostitution where is legal is feminism. I bet people here would have been less triggered with feminism if feminism hadn't caused the problems I listed before.

 

[GhostedPhantom]

In fact, being mad at anything is unproductive. The world is what it is. You might as well use your enERgy to make the best out of it.

Fixed.

 

[BrettyBoy]

Feminism is cheating us.

 

[Toxic_Manbabby]

Feminism is more of a problem, social media would be based if they didn't support feminism and censored based men.

"This thing would be based if it were based."

 

[Robtical]

"This thing would be based if it were based."

Imagine if cucks controlled cars, and only let us drive it to cucked areas. They control social media the same way as that. Social media could be used for good or evil depending on who's running it.

 

[Deleted member 38579]

''stop complaining about things that affect your quality of life and your future stupid inkwel''

I for one do not actually care what the cause of our rejection is.

greycel moment

nobody is coming to help us, and nothing we will ever do will elevate us from our position as second rate humans.

this doesn't apply to foids thanks to feminism though; so(y)ciety is helping them and have them in a pedestal.

Under no circumstances would a girl ever truly feel something more than tolerance for us,

there's no tolerance for men just blatant hate towards men in general nowadays thanks to feminism. this is significantly worse when we talk about short and ugly men

so why is everyone coping by saying, ‘It was better in the past when girls needed us to survive.’?

Because it was. Relationships also lasted longer.

Secondly, most of us here are at the age where girls would still have chosen you based on attractiveness rather than need for financial security, even 200 years ago, so keep coping.

This doesn't make any sense.

 

[Immolator]

Because feminism just increased our problems to impossible levels

 

[yez]

Because it is. At past ugly males were happy at least. Foids were innocent. Feminism brainwashed them.

 

[DepravedAndDeprived]

Fixed.

 

[Deleted member 36508]

Feminism pushed women into "not settling for", along planting into them the hate and loath for unsuccessful (but still working) men. Feminists are breaking the social structure of society.

What society and media should teach instead, is for women to love and respect their fellow men, showing them more compassion and positivity. Women should be told that men are very vulnerable and sensitive beings, given the hard(er) life they most often live; so women should never mock men, never insult men, never disrespect men. Or at least, not the working and society integrated men.

 

[Toxic_Manbabby]

Imagine if cucks controlled cars, and only let us drive it to cucked areas. They control social media the same way as that. Social media could be used for good or evil depending on who's running it.

I was just saying that I found it funny to say that. I could keep going on about other examples such as "I'd be so happy if I was happy". It also hits close to home with how my parents keep saying that I need to think positively if I wish I could think positively.

 

[MaxZM98]

feminism pedestalises foids to the point where their ego tells them they’re better than most guys, and that inflates their standards, increasing male loneliness.

 

[nystagmuscel]

Just ignore the root cause of your suffering bro

 

[keithbauhaus]

I for one do not actually care what the cause of our rejection is. At the end of the day it all boils down to the fact that we are ugly and lonely, nobody is coming to help us, and nothing we will ever do will elevate us from our position as second rate humans. Under no circumstances would a girl ever truly feel something more than tolerance for us, so why is everyone coping by saying, ‘It was better in the past when girls needed us to survive.’?

Firstly, that’s still not genuine attraction, and seems just as depressing as being alone. I don’t know about you guys but I‘d only be happy if a girl chose to be with me out of genuine attraction. Secondly, most of us here are at the age where girls would still have chosen you based on attractiveness rather than need for financial security, even 200 years ago, so keep coping.

I‘d love to stoicmaxx when I’ve finished my education, but in all honesty I think that would drive me insane . I wish I didn’t feel the need for love.

I have unironically considered chemical castration for this reason. I'd rather live life as a stoic & recluse somewhere in the countryside, but my (quixotic) sex drive prevents this from coming into fruition.

 

[Deleted member 39443]

Society is directly to blame because most incels have experienced social rejection, not only in the loving sense, but also in other aspects, such as the indifference with which we are treated just for being ugly or weird (not NT), we don't deserve bullying or to be ignored just for being different, but society believes it is so, that everything bad that happens to us is our fault and we deserve it for being weak, that logic is only applied by those who have no idea of social marginalization, leave the forum

 

[Subhuman Niceguy]

Feminism = white foids complaining that they don't have it as easy as white men.