Venting "Why do inkels think they know more about how to have le secksy times than people who actually have le secksy times?"

[KingOfRome]

Think of it this way.

You were born without hands, and you want to play tennis. But when you try to grab the racket, you can't. So you ask someone around you, who does have hands, why you can't grab the racket. The other person says it's because you don't try. You try to grab the racket, and fail. Again, you are accused of not trying. Understandably, this annoys you. The other person senses this, gets offended, and calls you lazy and entitled for expecting the racket to do all the work for you while you don't even try, and if you didn't have such a toxic personality, you would be able to grab the racket. Confused, you take a close look at the situation in front of you, think it through, perhaps even refer to a book or two about human anatomy and biomechanics if there are any nearby. At this point, you come to a startling revelation: to grab certain items, like rackets, you need hands. But when you tell this to the other person, they get mad at you and ask why you think you know more about grabbing things as someone who's never grabbed anything in his life than someone to whom grabbing things comes naturally. It never occurs to this person that it's not his personality that lets him grab the tennis racket, but his hands.

 

[mental_out]

It's just a catch 22 they set up to invalidate incels opinions. It's an arbitrary caveat so they don't have to actually argue the points. If an incel says that looks matter most and thats why they can't get laid, they say "how can you know what women want if you've never been with one", but obviously if the incel is right, there's no actual way for him be with one, meaning even if he's right he's wrong via their arbitrary criteria. I'd consider it effectively a logical fallacy.

Obviously you don't need to fuck women to know what they want, that's just fucking retarded, you can observe the people they go for without actually dating women. A lack of success with women can show you what they prefer in its own way, sometimes more accurately than people who are successful with women, who'll often attribute it all to their own personal effort.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

Confused, you take a close look at the situation in front of you, think it through, perhaps even refer to a book or two about human anatomy and biomechanics if there are any nearby. At this point, you come to a startling revelation: to grab certain items, like rackets, you need hands. But when you tell this to the other person, they get mad at you and ask why you think you know more about grabbing things as someone who's never grabbed anything in his life than someone to whom grabbing things comes naturally.

[Based]

I have this argument with coping boomercels who lie about their body count. "How do you know about female nature if you've never even been with a woman? You know how retarded that makes you sound! You have no qualification to talk about female nature until you have sex, idiot. You're so fucking dumb dude." I'll tell them that a microbiologist knows a lot about microbiology, even though he isn't a microorganism because he studies microorganism and perhaps, he even knows more about microorganisms than the microorganisms themselves... "You're just a stupid 4chan retard who hates women because you're GAAAAAAY! You fucking socialist scum! Any man can get laid dude, it's easy, if you're not getting laid it's because you like men, homo." The guy who told me this lives alone and drinks himself to death every night after getting divorce raped and cucked. He's known for being the drunken fool of our voice chat groups.

 

[Teutonic Knight]

This is the most dumb argument. Using this logic, you should talk about what politicians do because you were never a politician yourself.

 

[FinnCel]

OP = Newton IQ

 

[Emergency Manual]

Most film critics have never directed a film. Most restaurant critics have never ran a restaurant. Most car reviewers have never designed and built a car. Most astronomers have never been to space. Most therapists have never needed therapy.

 

[mental_out]

Most film critics have never directed a film. Most restaurant critics have never ran a restaurant. Most car reviewers have never designed and built a car. Most astronomers have never been to space. Most therapists have never needed therapy.

Yeah they seem to forget you can study things without being directly involved.

 

[littlemanhikicel]

High IQ post. They ignore ugly men reality because normies virtue signal sending the bluepill , if they would recognize the point of view of the incel , they would recognize that their society is unfair and bad and incel a victim, so they will never recognize it.

 

[N-Digger]

By that logic how can we know so much about history if we were not around to see events take place with our own eyes.

 

[FlyFace]

Giant IQ post OP.

By that logic how can we know so much about history if we were not around to see events take place with our own eyes.

Exactly.. I have the exact same thought pattern.. if you can't touch history, does it even exist? I feel as if history has been edited to suit someone's agenda.. soon history will be straight out censored so historical facts that are deemed a problem to that agenda are scrubbed clean.

The guy who told me this lives alone and drinks himself to death every night after getting divorce raped and cucked. He's known for being the drunken fool of our voice chat groups.

What a sad person that guy is.

I'll tell them that a microbiologist knows a lot about microbiology, even though he isn't a microorganism because he studies microorganism and perhaps, he even knows more about microorganisms than the microorganisms themselves... "You're just a stupid 4chan retard who hates women because you're GAAAAAAY!

Provide a factual, thought out and well documented through reality response and watch their Cognitive Dissonance kick in. Straight away they respond too.. like they are programmed robots that are doing what their programming tells them to do.

 

[Deleted member 250]

You don't need to drive a car to know how it works.

 

[needsolution]

By that logic how can we know so much about history if we were not around to see events take place with our own eyes.