L
If they are such a tender and emotional gender why do they choose to fuck the chad bully instead of the bullied incel ?
Because he's ugly
A
incels need to have mind control skills
I
Look at your username for the answer to your question
Because "females are the gentler/good-hearted gender" is a meme.
Maybe they were giggling at me when Chad was twisting my arm because they thought I was attractive? hmmm
Because personality of a bullied incel is toxic teheeehe
L
Just imagine the status rush the bullied incel could have if the whole school found out he fucked Stacy. Just a 5-minute act. Would never get bullied again but of course girls are not going to give him that pleasure
Who would believe it? I think only normies benefit from that.
Because girls get wet when bullies bully someone.
Because woman only want bad boys / bullies, that's why. They are attracted to males who have power over other males. They only care about the most genetically advanced Chad.
Women are the gentler gender to peacock for primal capital. This is obvious. They don't care for dragging themselves back from evolution for the weak. Their gentleness is supposed to be them prospect signalling for chad to find them appealing. To nourish their babies. To have top 1% (or as close as possible) children of dominarchical/ primarchical/ existentiarchical prestige. Both in society, and in the naturally occurring altercating/ obstacled competitive battlefields of existence...
It's just now that roles are reversed. Men have to do that for women (be the provident one in the relationship, not the one who is pursued), because female value can attract 90-100% of men, while women are very particular about perfection for a Chad. Female value, pure carnality... is FAR more of a valuable currency than raw-brute prestige in a world where socialism/ welfare state are on the rise, and everyone generally has food in nearly every class/ ladder/ medium in the 1st world.
Because women can have only 1 baby every 9 months, it's very painful/ taxing, and they have to have a lot of capital to have this bullshit even out in the 1st/ humanitarian world. Men can impregnate 10 girls a day, women can only have a baby 1nce a year. They need to feel all around comfortable with a man. Women always had to be more selective in this case because biologically the process of reproduction is a greater burden on them. If you're in the middle of a bunch of a dark forest with several paths around you, then you're going to take the one with the most prospects/ least threat. Women being snooty is just the evolutionary consequence of needing to be critically discerning for their own survival. Men are less so because there was less of an essentiality for them to be insanely inspective.
Men are good as being inspective of the outward world, while women are inspective of mankind in of itself. Evolutionary roles. Men would fight wolves, and women would soothe/ carress/ and manipulate the tribe, and read their facial features/ subjective stances. For social capital gain. Taking social capital/ grace/ refinement/ charm away from a woman is like taking a web away from a spider. Or a dam away from a beaver.
And in the tinder/ facebook age she's hyper-burdened with the majority of mankind at her doorstep. You need to be distinctive out of ALL of humanity now. As opposed to the dark ages when countries were the size of states, and people were scarce/ Now with overpopulation and high communication, women will ghost 99% of men at the slightest finding of flaw. Women do not emphasize attraction on inner bondship, but dominarchical prospects. Why? Because women love the feeling of dominating others, and having the chillaxical veneer while doing it so that people are left dumb, clueless, and coping. This is why most of society is bluepilled, it is misleading mantra after misdirectional mantra to keep people unaware about the ladders of power.
The paths of progressing up the power pyramid are being purged. Beforelong when all retail stores are closed, machines take over, and people are starving in the streets, and amazon/ walmart/disney own everything, then you'll wish you all busted your ass now.
With how fucking obvious women are shallow/ tyrannogamous (tyrannic-gamy), predicated on primal alone... it's honestly a wonder how the fuck people can be more afraid of being social pariahs for not being bluepilled than angry that women are this way, and let their anger override their fear. I guess they're doing what I'm doing, veneering, dark triading.
It's just now that roles are reversed. Men have to do that for women (be the provident one in the relationship, not the one who is pursued), because female value can attract 90-100% of men, while women are very particular about perfection for a Chad. Female value, pure carnality... is FAR more of a valuable currency than raw-brute prestige in a world where socialism/ welfare state are on the rise, and everyone generally has food in nearly every class/ ladder/ medium in the 1st world.
Because women can have only 1 baby every 9 months, it's very painful/ taxing, and they have to have a lot of capital to have this bullshit even out in the 1st/ humanitarian world. Men can impregnate 10 girls a day, women can only have a baby 1nce a year. They need to feel all around comfortable with a man. Women always had to be more selective in this case because biologically the process of reproduction is a greater burden on them. If you're in the middle of a bunch of a dark forest with several paths around you, then you're going to take the one with the most prospects/ least threat. Women being snooty is just the evolutionary consequence of needing to be critically discerning for their own survival. Men are less so because there was less of an essentiality for them to be insanely inspective.
Men are good as being inspective of the outward world, while women are inspective of mankind in of itself. Evolutionary roles. Men would fight wolves, and women would soothe/ carress/ and manipulate the tribe, and read their facial features/ subjective stances. For social capital gain. Taking social capital/ grace/ refinement/ charm away from a woman is like taking a web away from a spider. Or a dam away from a beaver.
And in the tinder/ facebook age she's hyper-burdened with the majority of mankind at her doorstep. You need to be distinctive out of ALL of humanity now. As opposed to the dark ages when countries were the size of states, and people were scarce/ Now with overpopulation and high communication, women will ghost 99% of men at the slightest finding of flaw. Women do not emphasize attraction on inner bondship, but dominarchical prospects. Why? Because women love the feeling of dominating others, and having the chillaxical veneer while doing it so that people are left dumb, clueless, and coping. This is why most of society is bluepilled, it is misleading mantra after misdirectional mantra to keep people unaware about the ladders of power.
The paths of progressing up the power pyramid are being purged. Beforelong when all retail stores are closed, machines take over, and people are starving in the streets, and amazon/ walmart/disney own everything, then you'll wish you all busted your ass now.
With how fucking obvious women are shallow/ tyrannogamous (tyrannic-gamy), predicated on primal alone... it's honestly a wonder how the fuck people can be more afraid of being social pariahs for not being bluepilled than angry that women are this way, and let their anger override their fear. I guess they're doing what I'm doing, veneering, dark triading.
Last edited:
Even a lot of moms treat their boys worse because they are ugly. I know a mom that treated her chad son and stacy daughter well, but the mom and the others treated their incel looking 3rd brother like shit since he was a baby.
R
Because they don't want their offspring to be bullied incels. And because they are not tender and emotional at all.
females are actually attracted more to bullies because they are " dominant " ( more like sadistic fucks in my eyes but w/e).
their was a good study on it you can find by googling.
their was a good study on it you can find by googling.
It's a veneer in order to procure evasion veils for their dark ambitions, since they are a weaker gender they need to be machiavellian. The ultimate tool/ weapon besides looks for women are the shadow/ unseen regions where people aren't currently looking, and evasion space, such as verbally conduiting a conversation to create teh value filter that makes them be what they wanna be around.
Duh, primality. Everything considered... the inner essence of women alone/ the state of their soul alone... voids them of ever being victims. They're getting their just desserts if you enslave and abuse them.
Because women lack empathy
Because women are hardwired into "naturally" being attracted to the alpha male. AKA the most toughest, roughest, arrogant asshole who can push everyone else aside.
Because the bully has a better personality...
...to women
Because of the incel's misogyny.
hes the hot one youre not, deal with it
They are tender and emotional, but only for Chad
Because women aren't what the media (our culture) presents. It's all lies indoctrinated into our heads at early age to giving a sense of false hope. That's it. Women are collectively pieces of shit that laugh at violence, especially when done to subhumans like us.
nurses are an exception sometimes
D
P h e n o t y p e
Being a bully is evidence of high T, and therefore masculine features. Women fuck bullies because they're attractive, not nessesarly because they're bullies
Because they're weak and ugly
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
