Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting Why did evolution design it so that weak female genes are kept in the gene pool, but weak male genes are supposed to get bred out?

Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A life of poorer quality due to skull & bones
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Posts
4,177
Evolution designed it so that 40% to 50% of men have sex with basically anything including old women past menopause and landwhales. The remaining 50% of men have moderate standards but necessarly high. This means that ugly as fuck landwhales with low iq, no job, no hobbies, living in rented accommodation and nothing going for them get to have partners and babies. Yet the male incel who keeps in non-fat shape, has a basic job, decent iq and his own place does not get to have a partner or babies.

Surely that's a pretty bad design? I thought weak genes were supposed to be bred out. But it seems only weak male genes get bred out, not weak female ones.



(yes I know that society has been constructed such that we have socially enforced monogamy just decades ago, so weak male genes have more of a chance to be kept in the gene pool, but I mean if there were no societal constraints)
 
We just here to provide energy to soul vampires, one giant farm.
 
It's not evolution's fault though.

Weak female genes stay in because it's simple. Guys are not picky. Girls are. That's not evolution.
 
It's only the last 50 or so years this has been a problem. Through most of human history so long as you could provide food, shelter, protection you could get a girl because they NEEDED guys. Religion kept the thots in check and now they don't need us, so those of us at the bottom of the barrel are discarded.

Big daddy government becomes the man all women can turn to in the form of welfare.


There are Chads, Slayers, and then God. God is the government, the true alpha since it has the ability to even kill Chads and slayers if they step too far out of line.

That's why girls vote democrat/for more government more so than men. Look up the voting demographics if you doubt me.
 
Evolution designed it so that 40% to 50% of men have sex with basically anything including old women past menopause and landwhales. The remaining 50% of men have moderate standards but necessarly high. This means that ugly as fuck landwhales with low iq, no job, no hobbies, living in rented accommodation and nothing going for them get to have partners and babies. Yet the male incel who keeps in non-fat shape, has a basic job, decent iq and his own place does not get to have a partner or babies.

Surely that's a pretty bad design? I thought weak genes were supposed to be bred out. But it seems only weak male genes get bred out, not weak female ones.

(yes I know that society has been constructed such that we have socially enforced monogamy just decades ago, so weak male genes have more of a chance to be kept in the gene pool, but I mean if there were no societal constraints)
Idk either but maybe it has to do with women largely being the sexual selectors in the context of consensual sex. Males of the species are driven to spread their seed to every female of the species that is attractive and the females of the species decide whether or not those males are worthy of mating.
It is pretty one-sided but maybe the purpose of a such a system is to mainly breed out weak male genes and not female ones.
Evolutionary fitness seems more of an important requirement in males than females unless there is a species like sea horses where the males and not the females give birth.
 
Females aren't human
 
Idk either but maybe it has to do with women largely being the sexual selectors in the context of consensual sex. Males of the species are driven to spread their seed to every female of the species that is attractive and the females of the species decide whether or not those males are worthy of mating.
It is pretty one-sided but maybe the purpose of a such a system is to mainly breed out weak male genes and not female ones.
Evolutionary fitness seems more of an important requirement in males than females unless there is a species like sea horses where the males and not the females give birth.

But men fuck non attractive foids all the time. Obese monsters get hit on. They can have tons of orbiters on onlyfans.
 
But men fuck non attractive foids all the time. Obese monsters get hit on. They can have tons of orbiters on onlyfans.
It's probably because non attractive foids are still sexual selectors because of men's biological pressure to spread their seed to every female and how "pussy is pussy" to many normies. Obese monsters still have pussy so they are pursued and orbited by men.
Courtship is one sided with most males having to do the work except for chads which have strong genes in the first place. So males that have weak genes don't breed.
But because chads like other males don't have as high standards for women, women with weak genes sometimes get to breed if the chad is feeling horny and they are an easy lay.
Men have lower standards for women than women have for men because men are evolutionary programmed to spread their seed while women have to decide whether that seed is acceptable and so are pickier.
If in some alternate universe it was women that had to had to do the courtship and impregnating maybe it would be different.
 
Last edited:
Evolution designed it so that 40% to 50% of men have sex with basically anything including old women past menopause and landwhales. The remaining 50% of men have moderate standards but necessarly high. This means that ugly as fuck landwhales with low iq, no job, no hobbies, living in rented accommodation and nothing going for them get to have partners and babies. Yet the male incel who keeps in non-fat shape, has a basic job, decent iq and his own place does not get to have a partner or babies.

Surely that's a pretty bad design? I thought weak genes were supposed to be bred out. But it seems only weak male genes get bred out, not weak female ones.



(yes I know that society has been constructed such that we have socially enforced monogamy just decades ago, so weak male genes have more of a chance to be kept in the gene pool, but I mean if there were no societal constraints)

False premise, nature didn't design this system, humans circumvent nature all the time, its humans imposing our will over nature and destroying the balance, you guys have it confused, women were never the choosers, it wasn't women "choosing Chads", it was Chads killing off all of the competition and women submitting to the victor, and likely over time their psychologly adapted to choosing males that "claimed" them (which is why they like Chad traits), as such an adaptation ensures survival and prevents them from being killed for resisting, this myth of women "picking men" needs to stop, its complete bullshit, it is only recently happening because we have laws that keep betas from raping and killing women

JFL if you think betas were just sitting around and letting Chad form harems, betas were being killed off and they were raping too

Its society letting weak female genes survive by allowing women to have unrealistic leverage in the sexual market, they should not be able to own resources, property, etc, their only leverage was supposed to be their body, but they now have the leverage men had a monopoly over, plus their own worth of their body
 
Last edited:
False premise, nature didn't design this system, humans circumvent nature all the time, its humans imposing our will over nature and destroying the balance, you guys have it confused, women were never the choosers, it wasn't women "choosing Chads", it was Chads killing off all of the competition and women submitting to the victor, and likely over time their psychological adapted to choosing males that "claimed" them, as such an adaptation ensures survival and prevents them from being killed for resisting, this myth of women "picking men" needs to stop, its complete bullshit, it is only recently happening because we have laws that keep betas from raping and killing women

JFL if you think betas were just sitting around and letting Chad form harems, betas were being killed off and they were raping too

Its society letting weak female genes survive by allowing women to have unrealistic leverage in the sexual market, they should not be able to own resources, property, etc, their only leverage was supposed to be their body, but they now have the leverage men had a monopoly over, plus their own worth of their body
Where's the red text & BIG letters? Still on point though.
 
False premise, nature didn't design this system, humans circumvent nature all the time, its humans imposing our will over nature and destroying the balance, you guys have it confused, women were never the choosers, it wasn't women "choosing Chads", it was Chads killing off all of the competition and women submitting to the victor, and likely over time their psychological adapted to choosing males that "claimed" them, as such an adaptation ensures survival and prevents them from being killed for resisting, this myth of women "picking men" needs to stop, its complete bullshit, it is only recently happening because we have laws that keep betas from raping and killing women

JFL if you think betas were just sitting around and letting Chad form harems, betas were being killed off and they were raping too

This is seen in other animal species too for male members that aren't able to mate through courtship rituals so it makes sense this might arise in humans too although humans would try to spin in a way that is more palpable and fair to women.

Its society letting weak female genes survive by allowing women to have unrealistic leverage in the sexual market, they should not be able to own resources, property, etc, their only leverage was supposed to be their body, but they now have the leverage men had a monopoly over, plus their own worth of their body
Imo men no longer have the monopoly over provisioning and protection which is done by systems of other people like the governments and police and women can earn their own money so only genetic traits and looks matter for men now when attracting a woman. Like you said what gave men with a lack of appealing genetic traits a leg up is something they don't monopoly over anymore and because of women's continued hypergamy even after they reach parity with men with the ability to own resources and property they still lust after men that are better than them in every measurable way and so the men with a lack of appealing genetic traits are left sexless unless they force themselves on women.
 
Through most of human history so long as you could provide food, shelter, protection you could get a girl because they NEEDED guys.

This is not true at all. For most of human history polygamy was not illegal and the top men with the most resources would horde as many women as possible.
 
This is not true at all. For most of human history polygamy was not illegal and the top men with the most resources would horde as many women as possible.
Depends on how far back you go. I was talking about modern history like last 1000 or so years. Marriage was created and it dictated that women can only fuck one man or else. Of course kings and people on the top always did that but it wasn't that big of a demographic breaker because men died earlier so there were plenty of women to go around. polygamy forms when you don't have constraints. So yeah back before the major religions were a thing, hunter gatherer days that happened a lot. But back then you could also just get a rock and come up behind the alpha and kill him. Alphas and really all males life expectancy was always shorter than females.
 
For most of human history polygamy was not illegal and the top men with the most resources would horde as many women as possible.

I think you need to google "most", the concept of "ownership" is rather new for human history, there were no police to "arrest" someone for "stealing" for MOST of human history, so you saying those guys hoarded all the resources and women as if there was some magic force field stopping other men from stealing it sounds like a joke, that man would require other men to guard his shit (women included) and he would have to offer them something (women included) to get it

Hoarding women and resources only became a norm when humans started forming "civilizations" and having "laws", its new for our species, it did not happen for MOST of your existence at all, that's literally not possible, you can't hoard 20 women with sharp stick when 19 other men with sharp sticks are coming after you, you'd have to share in order to hold on to what is yours, there are no fenced communities, bank accounts, etc to hoard anything like rich men can do today
 
The Y chromosome from the male sperm is what brings differentiation / variability to a new human being. The X chromosome from the female's egg basically is pretty much the same, which explains why all women are kinda the same, and act the same, and have the same low IQ and don't do anything except crave cock. So its basically 99% up to the male to make the children be attractive / strong / intelligent, and foids subconsciously know this because its been genetically encoded into their DNA that they should get creampied by as many Chads as possible at all costs.
 
It's not evolution's fault though.

Weak female genes stay in because it's simple. Guys are not picky. Girls are. That's not evolution.
THIS
 
False premise, nature didn't design this system, humans circumvent nature all the time, its humans imposing our will over nature and destroying the balance, you guys have it confused, women were never the choosers, it wasn't women "choosing Chads", it was Chads killing off all of the competition and women submitting to the victor, and likely over time their psychologly adapted to choosing males that "claimed" them (which is why they like Chad traits), as such an adaptation ensures survival and prevents them from being killed for resisting, this myth of women "picking men" needs to stop, its complete bullshit, it is only recently happening because we have laws that keep betas from raping and killing women

JFL if you think betas were just sitting around and letting Chad form harems, betas were being killed off and they were raping too

Its society letting weak female genes survive by allowing women to have unrealistic leverage in the sexual market, they should not be able to own resources, property, etc, their only leverage was supposed to be their body, but they now have the leverage men had a monopoly over, plus their own worth of their body
Iq’s me AGAIN! :feelsree: :feelsree: :feelsree:

BTW @BlkPillPres, when you say “which is why they like chad traits”, are you refering to physical features, or body language/dark triad traits? Or both?
 
Last edited:
Because women want to have incel children
 
Evolution designed it so that 40% to 50% of men have sex with basically anything including old women past menopause and landwhales. The remaining 50% of men have moderate standards but necessarly high. This means that ugly as fuck landwhales with low iq, no job, no hobbies, living in rented accommodation and nothing going for them get to have partners and babies. Yet the male incel who keeps in non-fat shape, has a basic job, decent iq and his own place does not get to have a partner or babies.

Surely that's a pretty bad design? I thought weak genes were supposed to be bred out. But it seems only weak male genes get bred out, not weak female ones.



(yes I know that society has been constructed such that we have socially enforced monogamy just decades ago, so weak male genes have more of a chance to be kept in the gene pool, but I mean if there were no societal constraints)
Evolution is a lie.
 
This is the problem with foids and why they need to have their rights revoked. Men do not have much standards but foids have unreasonably high standards. They must be redistributed to everyone so that all men can have sex and not just the top 20%. Foids are absolutely retarded and cannot think for themselves and if they aren’t put in their place then they will ruin humanity
 
Because nature itself is a hole worshiping entity
 

Similar threads

ForeverGrey
Replies
53
Views
4K
Julaybib
Julaybib
Efiliste
Replies
27
Views
3K
shitholeamerica
S
Todd Thundercock
Replies
32
Views
2K
Electus
Electus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top