Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Why black pill and religion are completely antithetical

vco

vco

french ropecel
-
Joined
May 4, 2026
Posts
231
Online time
17h 26m
Why is this space full of pseudo-religious people trying to spread the gospel ?

From a logical standpoint, it's complete nonsense. Black Pill, beyond lookism, is a theory that believes in total genetic determinism.
It assumes that human outcomes are entirely shaped by genetic inheritance and environmental conditioning.

Every trait, every decision, every success or failure is ultimately the mechanical consequence of prior causes over which the individual had no authorship.

In other words, it completely removes the idea of will power (the notion that an individual can make deliberate choices through conscious agency). You have literally zero control over your life, 100% of it is determine by your genome, past and current environment.

The contradiction is obvious: black pill ideology is built on strict determinism, while religion is built on free will.

Religious systems emphasize morality, discipline and repentance, these are all concepts in which you have no control over.

Obviously, a chad born into wealth will be far less inclined to commit crime and overall actions that will lead to damaging society than a poor subhuman.


If there are inherent inequalities between individuals, how can you judge everyone according to a universal moral standard?

PS: I'm agnostic, I have nothing against any religion. I just try to highlight an evident contradiction between two narratives that remain in this space.
 
Free will and genetic determinism don't contradict each other.
 
1778786955722
 
My dick hurts
 
Didn't he marry his former teacher?
yeah, she looks like a trans. You can search "brigitte macron" on google, brutal. But he's based
 
Last edited:
Why is this space full of pseudo-religious people trying to spread the gospel ?

From a logical standpoint, it's complete nonsense. Black Pill, beyond lookism, is a theory that believes in total genetic determinism.
It assumes that human outcomes are entirely shaped by genetic inheritance and environmental conditioning.

Every trait, every decision, every success or failure is ultimately the mechanical consequence of prior causes over which the individual had no authorship.

In other words, it completely removes the idea of will power (the notion that an individual can make deliberate choices through conscious agency). You have literally zero control over your life, 100% of it is determine by your genome, past and current environment.

The contradiction is obvious: black pill ideology is built on strict determinism, while religion is built on free will.

Religious systems emphasize morality, discipline and repentance, these are all concepts in which you have no control over.

Obviously, a chad born into wealth will be far less inclined to commit crime and overall actions that will lead to damaging society than a poor subhuman.


If there are inherent inequalities between individuals, how can you judge everyone according to a universal moral standard?

PS: I'm agnostic, I have nothing against any religion. I just try to highlight an evident contradiction between two narratives that remain in this space.
Also why would an infinitely loving God create sub5s, condemn them to a life of misery and suffering and then sentence them to eternal suffering in hell because they didn't believe due to their life being so brutal? It's completely absurd.
 
I think that most people view the genetic determinism in BP philosophy more from a biological standpoint rather than a philosophical standpoint of determinism that eradicated free will
 
Also why would an infinitely loving God create sub5s, condemn them to a life of misery and suffering and then sentence them to eternal suffering in hell because they didn't believe due to their life being so brutal? It's completely absurd.
Plus the fact that whether you believe it or not isn’t your deliberate choice. It’s your neurochemistry that decides it for you.
 
Why is this space full of pseudo-religious people trying to spread the gospel ?

From a logical standpoint, it's complete nonsense. Black Pill, beyond lookism, is a theory that believes in total genetic determinism.
It assumes that human outcomes are entirely shaped by genetic inheritance and environmental conditioning.

Every trait, every decision, every success or failure is ultimately the mechanical consequence of prior causes over which the individual had no authorship.

In other words, it completely removes the idea of will power (the notion that an individual can make deliberate choices through conscious agency). You have literally zero control over your life, 100% of it is determine by your genome, past and current environment.

The contradiction is obvious: black pill ideology is built on strict determinism, while religion is built on free will.

Religious systems emphasize morality, discipline and repentance, these are all concepts in which you have no control over.

Obviously, a chad born into wealth will be far less inclined to commit crime and overall actions that will lead to damaging society than a poor subhuman.


If there are inherent inequalities between individuals, how can you judge everyone according to a universal moral standard?

PS: I'm agnostic, I have nothing against any religion. I just try to highlight an evident contradiction between two narratives that remain in this space.
based and Christianity is all about forgivness in fact they wrote a story about their kike god washing the sins of a whore
 
Why is this space full of pseudo-religious people trying to spread the gospel ?

From a logical standpoint, it's complete nonsense. Black Pill, beyond lookism, is a theory that believes in total genetic determinism.
It assumes that human outcomes are entirely shaped by genetic inheritance and environmental conditioning.

Every trait, every decision, every success or failure is ultimately the mechanical consequence of prior causes over which the individual had no authorship.

In other words, it completely removes the idea of will power (the notion that an individual can make deliberate choices through conscious agency). You have literally zero control over your life, 100% of it is determine by your genome, past and current environment.

The contradiction is obvious: black pill ideology is built on strict determinism, while religion is built on free will.

Religious systems emphasize morality, discipline and repentance, these are all concepts in which you have no control over.

Obviously, a chad born into wealth will be far less inclined to commit crime and overall actions that will lead to damaging society than a poor subhuman.


If there are inherent inequalities between individuals, how can you judge everyone according to a universal moral standard?

PS: I'm agnostic, I have nothing against any religion. I just try to highlight an evident contradiction between two narratives that remain in this space.
Without reading this

First, Religion (As a muslim) acknowledges the blackpill and the unfair life
Second, Fuck emmanuel macron, Fuck that faggot motherfucker
 
Without reading this

First, Religion (As a muslim) acknowledges the blackpill and the unfair life
Second, Fuck emmanuel macron, Fuck that faggot motherfucker
Not only the unfair life but the fact that, from the perspective of your neurochemistry, free will does not exist.
 
Religion itself is quite deterministic, Islam's literal meaning is "submission", i.e., submission to the most glorified, the most high, and we believe that everything happens by the will of Allah.

Also, after learning of the blackpill, a misanthropic ideology in contrast with the secular, humanist ideology of the mainstream, I realized the limitations of humanity and accepted that Allah is beyond our comprehension.

But the apparent contradictions of Christianity are much more blatant and problematic, which is why I converted from Christianity to Islam.
 
Last edited:
Not only the unfair life but the fact that, from the perspective of your neurochemistry, free will does not exist.
How can you explain human consciousness?
 
How can you explain human consciousness?
Consciousness and free will are not the same thing. A system can be aware of its own thoughts and experiences without being the ultimate author of them.


You do not choose your genetics, your neurochemistry, your instincts, your traumas, your desires, or even the thoughts that spontaneously appear in your mind. Yet you still experience them subjectively. That subjective experience is consciousness.


In other words, consciousness is the ability to experience reality internally, while free will would be the ability to independently control or originate your decisions. One can exist without the other.

For your own experience :
Try not to think for five minutes. You’ll quickly realize that thoughts appear on their own, without your conscious control
 
pseudo-religious people
Yes, some "religious" people here are just reactionaries and not real believers, like Charles Maurras.
 
Consciousness and free will are not the same thing. A system can be aware of its own thoughts and experiences without being the ultimate author of them.


You do not choose your genetics, your neurochemistry, your instincts, your traumas, your desires, or even the thoughts that spontaneously appear in your mind. Yet you still experience them subjectively. That subjective experience is consciousness.


In other words, consciousness is the ability to experience reality internally, while free will would be the ability to independently control or originate your decisions. One can exist without the other.

For your own experience :
Try not to think for five minutes. You’ll quickly realize that thoughts appear on their own, without your conscious control
If you are a christcuck then you cannot be an incel, because if you want to follow the rules of god you should be fruity and have many kids which is impossible for an incel
 
Consciousness and free will are not the same thing. A system can be aware of its own thoughts and experiences without being the ultimate author of them.


You do not choose your genetics, your neurochemistry, your instincts, your traumas, your desires, or even the thoughts that spontaneously appear in your mind. Yet you still experience them subjectively. That subjective experience is consciousness.


In other words, consciousness is the ability to experience reality internally, while free will would be the ability to independently control or originate your decisions. One can exist without the other.

For your own experience :
Try not to think for five minutes. You’ll quickly realize that thoughts appear on their own, without your conscious control
My bad
 

Similar threads

Persecuted
Replies
34
Views
1K
Persecuted
Persecuted
parbate2025
Replies
15
Views
897
stsaturn
stsaturn
FunneyDonkey
Replies
10
Views
1K
ectomorphuser
ectomorphuser

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top