
micropenis29
Banned
-
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2018
- Posts
- 4,183
If we assume that things will get far worse before they become better (assuming they ever become better), then suicide has to at least be on the table for consideration for most men, right? I mean what level of misery should we be willing to tolerate before we seriously consider offing ourselves?
For example, let's say the only hope for near-term improvement is the following:
(1) Large-scale production of affordable, human-like sex bots (that somehow aren't banned by foids and cucks) within the next 15-20 years
(2) Societal collapse within the next 15-20 years that somehow results in a new, male-led social order
I don't think it's a stretch to say that those are our only 2 realistic options at this point. How likely do we really think these scenarios are though? 5% likely? At most?
And so the question this begs is: why aren't more men killing themselves already? Are we about to see suicide numbers skyrocket to never-before-seen levels?
For example, let's say the only hope for near-term improvement is the following:
(1) Large-scale production of affordable, human-like sex bots (that somehow aren't banned by foids and cucks) within the next 15-20 years
(2) Societal collapse within the next 15-20 years that somehow results in a new, male-led social order
I don't think it's a stretch to say that those are our only 2 realistic options at this point. How likely do we really think these scenarios are though? 5% likely? At most?
And so the question this begs is: why aren't more men killing themselves already? Are we about to see suicide numbers skyrocket to never-before-seen levels?