Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Why are there so many Incel Communists here?

Communism is a very noble ideology. It protects the weak from the strong and gives way to the marginalized people by packing them collectively to take out the big giant beast.

Keep on drinking the fluoride; Communist ideology (actual Communism has never existed nor was it ever intended to) merely served as a tool by the global capitalist elite to destroy competitors and to asset-strip nations. How else do you explain the well-known fact that [cough] 'Western' [\cough] bankers financed Lenin's coup? And is it merely a coincidence that the majority of Russia's wealth is now, 100 years after the Revolution, almost completely in the hands of greasy-looking oligarchs?
 
Keep on drinking the fluoride; Communist ideology (actual Communism has never existed nor was it ever intended to) merely served as a tool by the global capitalist elite to destroy competitors and to asset-strip nations. How else do you explain the well-known fact that [cough] 'Western' [\cough] bankers financed Lenin's coup? And is it merely a coincidence that the majority of Russia's wealth is now, 100 years after the Revolution, almost completely in the hands of greasy-looking oligarchs?
I know. I'm not saying that actual communism worked or something, that's why I left the leftist circles.
 
There are also a lot of nazis. Probably they cope as hard as they possibly can.
 
There are also a lot of nazis. Probably they cope as hard as they possibly can.
A Communist subhuman makes plenty of more sense than a Nazi subhuman, if inspiration is to be drawn from 20th century ideologies.

Communism promotes going ER against the ruling classes, and can be interpreted as subhuman supremacism against the hegemony of Chad. Nazism, on the contrary, is Chad supremacism, and a subhuman who advocates for that is a cuckold.
 
Last edited:
A
Communism promotes going ER against the ruling classes, and can be interpreted as subhuman supramacism against the hegemony of Chad. Nazism, on the contrary, is Chad supremacism, and a subhuman who advocates for that is a cuckold.
I can agree with you. But nazism is also a coping for subhumans, especially if they have to think to be superior to other races. Think about IQ-copers.

I’m not promoting an incel-ideology, just stating what I observed.
 
nazism is also a coping for subhumans, especially if they have to think to be superior to other races. Think about IQ-copers.
True. I used to cope this way before being humbled.

For what it's worth, Nazism is abhorred by normalfags and promoting it is the most effective way to blaspheme what they believe, and expose them to the truth of biological determinism. Whereas Communism has definitely become conflated with liberalism, and doesn't carry much emotional stigma given its connotations of equality.

I guess whether a subhuman tends towards Nazism or Communism depends on whether he's more philosophically inclined towards the Blackpill and resigned to his fate to LDAR, or is more activist-oriented and wants institutionalized ERing.
 
I guess whether a subhuman tends towards Nazism or Communism depends on whether he's more philosophically inclined towards the Blackpill, and resigned to his fate to LDAR, or is more activist-oriented, and wants institutionalized ERing.
Good thoughts. Probably you’re right.

Well, I think that for incels only extremes are worth coping. Even anarchy can be good for some incels, even Machiavellian centrism, or other copes.
 
They think they will be given free shit and won't have to work
 
Communists of the past were very masculine, but now because it isn't patrotic women started to meme communism, it is all bullshit, fight for incels and incels only.
 
I can respect sexual Marxism but if you're a regular communist you're either really young and naive, dumb or mendacious (if you have real chances of being part of the high echelons of the party, which is a tiny fraction of people).
 
I can respect sexual Marxism but if you're a regular communist you're either really young and naive, dumb or mendacious (if you have real chances of being part of the high echelons of the party, which is a tiny fraction of people).
people aren't born equal, some are strong, some are smart, and some are handsome, some are all that, and some are noneof that
 
people aren't born equal, some are strong, some are smart, and some are handsome, some are all that, and some are noneof that
This is just one out of tons of reasons why communism doesn't work. It isn't even supposed to work IMO.
 
This is just one out of tons of reasons why communism doesn't work. It isn't even supposed to work IMO.
also, a communist country would simply be conquered, in real communism, you don't governament or money, all these countries where socialist, and socialism is breeding grounds for corruption, not even for money just politcal power
 
I can respect sexual Marxism but if you're a regular communist you're either really young and naive, dumb or mendacious (if you have real chances of being part of the high echelons of the party, which is a tiny fraction of people).
 
also, a communist country would simply be conquered, in real communism, you don't governament or money, all these countries where socialist, and socialism is breeding grounds for corruption, not even for money just politcal power
"Concentrate all state and economical power in my hands, I promise I'll abolish the state and make things fair for everyone afterwards, teehee".
 
"Concentrate all state and economical power in my hands, I promise I'll abolish the state and make things fair for everyone afterwards, teehee".
yup, even if the first ditactator is honest, the second might be a cuck and get into a power trip, maybe when computers get powerfull enough, we can create a digital dictator to replace politicians, and not fucking steal everything
 
For me, Fascism or National-Corporatism means true Freedom and Dignity. Communism, Socialism is a complete Utopia, which failed, utterly. Fascism, did not fail, since it was destroyed by both Democrats-Capitalists and Communists, in 1945. I've never praised Hitler or even Mussollini, but I found many positive aspects of the political systems, Axis Powers presented. 
We live in such a time, when Fascism is no longer marginal political force. After 70 years of Liberal-Marxist domination, absolutely failed, Liberal-Marxist ideas, like EU for example are coming to an end. We must not fight Fascism, but try to understand its principles. I prefer to speak about Corporatism and Nationalism, instead of Fascism or National-Socialism, since these systems have failed, historically. We live in 21 st Century and we must choose, which path we should follow – Globalism or Nationalism, Capitalism or Corporatism. I made my decision.

Utopia, where everyone loves everyone and "world is united" will never be realized, even when Alien Civilization invades Earth. I've been always followed this way of thinking and I've been always more interested in other countries and nations, than myself. Not because I love them, but because I love my own country and want it to be safe and its population live in decent way. Problem is that in Europe, Nations are full of ignorance and Liberalism, together with Marxism, has detroyed National focus. EU was created to destroy the Nation- state, eradicate Nationalism. In fact, it is Nationalism which is a purely positive idea, unlike Chauvinism and Imperialism. And it is Chauvinism and Imperialism, next to Liberalism and Marxism which are responsible for all of these wars and conflicts.
Sadly, people still believe in Marx's gibberish. Read Marx once more, but this time, do this, upside down and you will realize, what stands behind the curtain.

Marx is the biggest supporter of capitalism, nowadays, since capitalism cannot exist without Marxism, nowadays and vice versa. It is high time to forget about Marx, Engels and forget about materialism. You wrote about "traditional ties", but you support LGBT movements which fight traditional family? That's a contradiction. 
I support traditional, natural laws, that's why I am against capitalism, marxism, materialism, LGBT lobbies and so on. In the same way, people with traditional values are discriminated by LGBT movements, who dare to say, that "gay family" is a normality. No, it is not, even in Bible it is said, that homosexuality is not a part of normality. I prefer Bible than Marxism. And it only shows, what is the true problem for the West. We, thankfully are not a part of the degenerated, Marxist-occupied, West.

I want to remind only, who was Marx and who were the majority of ultra-leftist people, who always been "fighting for equality". 90 or maybe even 95% of them were sons or daughters of the capitalist elite, people who were given everything, without a moment of hardship and toil, so typical for the life of poorer groups. 
Socialists have always been fighting for the better off, on the cost of the worse off. And this trend is clear in pro-refugee camp, where rich people, help not so poor people and the real victims and people in need are completely on the periphery of life. 
So, maybe we should forget about the immigrants and focus on the real people in need, in Europe and outside.

Really, capitalist minds are just narrow and short term minds.
Capitalist mind is equally small as Marxist mind. It is not a coincidence that Communist China embraced laissez- faire Capitalism in many areas and combined it with Etatism and Socialism. Chinese "president" praises Marxism and Marx, which shows, that PRC is a Marxist dictatorship (unlike Taiwan, the True China, ruled by Nationalists, even those who call themselves "Liberals").
I wrote precisely, that I am against globalism but I do support openness for the world. Globalism is against the people, it is Marxist idea of transforming humanity into a horde of slaves, ruled by Globalist elite. And EU serves them, not people.

For me it is crystal clear, that we should not make a difference between the branches and focus only on the roots. All of these insane and very often, utterly criminal ideologies and systems, from Maoism, to Socialism have the same root – Marxism, which in fact is nothing more than Materialism. I use the word Marxism to focus on the problem of Materialism. Materialism is both Marxism and Capitalism.

Multiculturalism, multi-racial, multi-religious utopia. I also wrote, plenty of it. As example from USA or post- apartheid South Africa, shows, interracial society, at least in case of these countries, but also in case of Europe, cannot exist. Racial and ethnic problems are as strong as they were in the past. 
Today, we can talk about "zombie-nations", where people, live like zombies, without any purpose. The best example for this is Pokemon Go paranoia. Even in the in Auschwitz Camp, modern zombies try to "catch the Pokemon".

1968 "cultural revolution" has devastated Western Europe morally and culturally, Marxists took power in the elites and they control it, still in many institutions and countries, especially in France. Germany is lost, because of their own mistakes in history and their inability to evaluate them and to transform their own country and mentality in some better direction. France has chance, only if it forgets about devastating effects of French Revolution and similar left-wing, horrific political periods, comparable only to period of Communism in Soviet Union, China, North Korea or Cambodia.
Sorry, I forgot that "European elite" believes today, in Karl Marx or in the Euro bills, not in Jesus.
And have to have additional income from e. g. Goldman Sachs like former EC president Barroso), Barosso-Goldman Sachs Case is the nail to the EU coffin and the decisive argument, most decisive for my general thesis. Who was Barosso in his youngster period? A Communist-party member, 100% Marxist. Has he changed his Marxist views? Don't think so.

I wrote already, one can blame only Marx (with Engels) for majority of crimes, committed in Europe and Asia, Africa, Americas in 20th Century. Marx probably, cynically created such anti-ideology, to figure out, if people are really so dumb and so degenerated to believe in it. He was right, people indeed are like animals. And modern Europeans, are like animals, like swines going to slaughterhouse. Level of degeneration of modern Europeans, make me puke to this degree, that I am really thinking about emigration to some non-European country, maybe USA or even Turkey, Israel (yes, even this). I read some interesting comment on far-right site, from a Swede, so desperate to leave Sweden he was even willing to emigrate to Israel, than to stay in Sweden, the most degenerated country in Europe.

Due to my personal reasons, I will never discriminate anyone, because of the feature, which one person is no depended on. Respect, not completely insane, Communism-based, idea of "equality" is what we, Europeans must embrace. Communism is an idea of a complete hypocrisy and insanity, which left more than 120-130 million people, dead. 2 times more, than the number of both World Wars. Only a human scum, worthless cynic can support Marxism. Marxists are not humans, they must not be considered as human beeings, but as products of "eternal Evil".

Marx and Engels stated that the world they see was divided in classes.
Not really, because if we look on primordial, Tribal Society, there was any stratas. Society was Corporatist one. And I want my country, Europe, whole world to return to this primordial, the best state. Of course, it is also some sort of utopia, but noone even start to create such. Communists, have tried to create a society, free of classes, effect was approximiately 100-120 million "waste". 
You read only 5-10% of Marxist rubbish, I read much more, although not everything, it is very hard to read such a gibberish, but it is really opening-eyes, experience. I want to remind you only, that Marx was a rich person, who has never experienced poverty. Cynical, hypocritical.

Marxist International itself is nothing else than international terrorist organization, comparable to Al-Qaida, ISIL and others.

There is no bigger evil on this planet than Marxism-based ideologies and systems. Because Marxism itself is anti-humane to the bone. Practically everything sounds like a terrible comedy, everything what is Marxist is a one great absurd. Communists, deliberately use this absurd technices to justice their crimes. For example, in Russia, poor peasants were deliberately egged on killing the richer landowners or even their service, who did not want to take part in the massacres. Marxism/Communism is an ideology/political system based on the most primitive human insticts. Communism turns people into animals, literally. So, everyone who considers oneself a decent human, must fight with both, Communism and Marxism. Problem is, that these bastards, disguised themselves, during the Cold War and after it. Now, most of the modern Liberals are in fact Marxists. They spread their venom, everywhere, alongside the society. Effect is a complete moral degeneration and slow processes of "animalization" people. People no longer act like reasonable humans, but as animals. It could be observed in Germany, Sweden, Austria when women were shouting "Refugees welcome". Some time after, they were raped(or even killed, like in Germany, Sweden) by these "poor refugees".

Why is the evident difference between natural law and human manipulation so hard to understand?
I fully agree. It is an effect of Marxist brainwashing. I will repeat the Marx, until the end. Marx wrote two phrases, connected to each other "There is no God, Everything is Material/Everything is a Matter". The second phrase is a complete nonsense, according to the scientific research. Of course, Marx did not live in the times of CERN and could not know, anything about dark matter, dark energy, anti-matter, but even about radiation or X-Rays. Marx did not know, that Universe is build from many elements, like matter, dark matter, dark energy. 
So, Marx was wrong, science is clear "Reality is both, material and unmaterial". The first phrase, I will leave for everyone to rethink. Only animal believes in Marx's crap.

Marxism is not an ideology, but an anti-ideology. If you speak about economic issues, as an anti-Liberal and anti-Capitalist, I wrote, what is the the best response for that: Corporatism.
Marxism is the Corporatist upside down, so, we know, where the problem really (really!) sits. Marxists are current in the essence of the problem, but their conclusion are utterly illogical and irrational. Corporatist would say: 2+2=4, Marxist would say: 2+2=22

I do not want to comment more, since I am against Marx and this whole s... he wrote.
I do not think, that any kind of aggressive discussion or discussion, based on facts is possible with ultra-leftists or people brainwashed by Marxism. They live in their own reality, Utopia. I prefer to live in our disgusting, worthless reality and prefer to make this s...world, better, for everyone, especially for myself, my Family, my Nation, my Race and so on.
 
yup, even if the first ditactator is honest, the second might be a cuck and get into a power trip, maybe when computers get powerfull enough, we can create a digital dictator to replace politicians, and not fucking steal everything
I don't think any of them were honest about those goals to be one. I mean, they were communists in the first place :feelsthink:

But there are also tons of other problems. 100% statized economy doesn't work, power corrupts, etc etc.
 
I don't think any of them were honest about those goals to be one. I mean, they were communists in the first place :feelsthink:

But there are also tons of other problems. 100% statized economy doesn't work, power corrupts, etc etc.
yup a economy is too complex to be centralized yet, maybe when we got some Sylycon muscle to do the job, maybe centralization is viable, but no way a dozen of economist or militaries could to the work to control a economy with millions of people, this quotation from saldanha a chadleet friend of mine (communist would only work in a tribe with 50 people at maxs, no way someone can control 50 million)
 
Why does the capitalist system encourage competition, and many may see it as a threat.
 
Why does the capitalist system encourage competition, and many may see it as a threat.
Capitalism means high level of incomes for few and some remnants for the rest. The alternative is a system, where everyone is able to live, decently.

Capitalism is based on enslavement (by capitalists) the same as socialism or even social democracy (by state), taxation is also a form of enslavement. I do want to pay taxes for state, because I do not need a state and its "help". State should seek money somewhere else, then in taxation, for example in business. Who said, that private ownership should have monopoly? Mixed ownership, where individuals, cooperatives but also state provide businesses is the most optimal. Such competition on truly "free", also from taxation, market could bring the best benefits. Of course, some kind of taxation might be introduced, but income taxes or corporative taxes is an complete madness and literally, a robbery. People should not be robbed, they want to live on this, what they earned. Competition is the very basic of market economy. Enterprises should compete with one another to attract the client and to earn the money. From our, consumers side it is a great thing to have a wide spectrum of offers, with goods and services. We simply choose the best product, suitable for us. Without the competition, we would have one product on the shelf or maybe 2, just like it was under Socialism, in Socialist Poland, before 1988.

Capitalism is as idiotic as Socialism, I do not see any bigger differences between these 2, very similar to one another, systems. Both Capitalism and Socialism are based on the same, Marxist idea – Materialism. Remember, what Marx said "There is no God, everything is a Matter". I do not believe in God, nor in this Marxist bullshit. I believe in Nature and Natural Laws, which are "eternal".

Socialism or communism only the other side of the same coin. There is no difference between socialism and capitalism at all, because they are based on the social conflict, not on cooperation.
Solidarism, Catholic corporatism, distributism are these systems which are based exactly on cooperation.
Of course, it is exactly, what I am trying to say. That Capitalists are equally to blame for massive immigration, multi-culturalism like Marxists. In many ways, even more, because Capitalist economy, does not need workers, it needs slaves. And immigrants are first and foremost the worst-paid workers.

You promote dictatorship and totalitarian regimes over democracy. 
Democracy works in countries like USA or rather it worked in 18th or 19th Century United States or in Ancient Greece. Today there is no democracy, but a system where small cliques, privileged by some "elites" rule under the sea of their slaves. 
And I do not want to live like a slave in liberal democracy and capitalist-socialist system. 


State investments to boost the economy are forced measures which people would not voluntarily make.
 Such a policy, Socialism in practice is nothing more than a "steal and give" policy. Steal from the poor workers and give to poor lazybones. In Socialism, industrious beggars were feeding the indolent beggars. In Capitalism, industrious beggars are feeding the indolent exploiters and cynical, industrious Capitalists. In Corporatism, everyone works for oneself and the Family. I wonder, which country will be the first which embrace Corporatist policies of self-responsibility?

Capitalism is strictly correlated with globalization, so we have to be anti-globalist, to defend the population against multinational corporations who are the only ones who benefit from globalization. Socialism is similar system, to capitalism, where everything is dominated by the state, Eastern Europe and big part of Asia, had enough experience with that. 


People in Europe are fed up with Capitalism, but also with Socialism. Both system, affected disastrous social-economic policies, effect of which is clearly visible in Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, France.
I could say, that reformed France, no matter by whom, could bring the positive change. France is nowadays dominated by so called "national champions", big groups, dominating its retail and vast sectors of economy. Small business is slowly being wiped out from the scene, by red tape, high taxes. France is a classical model of Socialist Capitalism, something what is visible also in Poland and what is the worst nightmare, one can imagine. Micro-entrepreneurs and ordinary workers are being treated like modern slaves by the State and the Capitalists.

For a long time after the WWII Western Europe constructed a model on which left and right found a consensus on fundamental things based on an idea of balancing social inequalities and with that to maintain social peace. The Swedish social-democracy was probably the best expression of that model.
And this, clearly socialist model has come to the end, just like in late 1980's, in Eastern Europe. If you criticize capitalism, you should better, start reading The Bible. Even if you’re an atheist. I am not interested in religion, but I've just found out, that The Bible is saying about everything or majority of things, happening today. Someone who wrote it, predicted everything. The Bible also is anti-capitalist, but socialist as many may think, it is pure corporatism.

The ECB was been the cash cow for everyone. Everyone wanted to milk only, no one wanted to feed.
Very well said. It only shows, that in capitalism, it is a socialism, in the heart of it. Everyone wants to get, none wants to give. In socialism, people wanted state to give, whatever they want. In capitalism, the owners, want more and more and more, they do not want to give, better salaries for example. It is strictly correlated with moral disaster of people. Lack of responsibility, lack of will to do something, not for oneself, for bigger cause, in collective way, lack of order. It's typical for liberal societies, where everyone thinks, that "should be given", people only want to get, new rights, more and more and more. There's too much personal rights and too little duties and responsibilities. 
That's why I say, that liberalism and capitalism are self-destructible systems, like communism was. This system, will collapse, sooner or later and people who stand behind it, oligarchs will have to pay, not with money, but something what cannot be bought – with their own lives. Revolution is inevitable, but this time, capitalists and socialists will be together, defending their positions. 


USA, indeed has problem with its "TOP 1%", but the source of it is...Wall Street. As long as Wall Street is the main source of the wealth accumulated, within the financial and services sector, mostly through ordinary speculative policies and actions, American-style Capitalism will be perceived as "inhumane". Without Wall Street, American-style Capitalism, would be the best form of Capitalist system, ever. Mostly, because of the American entrepreneurial spirit and big role of Christian values in American society. 
Corporatism, based on the Christian, but also Platonist values is nothing else than Capitalism upside down, where it is the small entrepreneur and ordinary worker, instead of Big Business and Multinationals, creates the wealth of the Nation.

Sadly, majority of people in the West, do not realize this. Instead, they prefer to live as slaves of Consumptionism, as zombies, products of Capitalism and Materialism.

I blame Jews for support of Communism, Socialism and Capitalism, Liberalism. For nothing else.

I believe in something more than s...than money, career, consumption and the rest of the capitalist- consumptionist products, invented to make people mental slaves.

Capitalism is dominating the world and it is a system which is based on the principle of small monopolies. We live in Global Capitalism and thanks to Globalization, multi-national corporations are growing, wiping out small competition. It is 19-20th Century reminiscence but modern Capitalism is far worse. In 19-20th Century, technology was poor. Now, thanks to technology, World is a One Economy. So, we can say, that World is the Global Market. Who earns biggest profits? The biggest firms. Who benefits? Small elite. 
What is the outcome? Global Enslavement, supported by Global institutions and projects like UN, NATO, EU, Eurasian Union, ASEAN, Mercosur, One Road-One Belt and many others. 
What is the anti-Capitalism then? Socialism or Social Capitalism with open borders? No, it is Nationalism, National-Corporatism to be precise. Every country to be truly free must say no to Globalization and follow the anti-Globalist, Nationalist path.

Furthermore, Tea Party, because it is a libertarian, laissez-faire party, which wants to turn ordinary workers into slaves. I am diehard anti-capitalist, although I am an micro-entrepreneur. Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe, after the collapse of "real socialism", became an economic colony for Western capitalists. I already wrote it, but I repeat, one firm in Łódź, offered a job with wage...20-30 USD per months (20 cents per hour). This is not a joke, Poland is a low wage country and Polish capitalists, the same as Western, earn on it. We live in 19th Century America, mixed with neo-socialist measures. If someone is interested how life looked like in 19th Century industrialist states, should come to Poland, Romania, Bulgaria. Not to Warsaw or some bigger cities but on the province. 


Sorry but I do not understand what it has to do with the Right of Left of the political spectrum. Both leftists and rightists, support the same, pathological Capitalist system. Difference lies in the form of it – Social or Liberal one. I am against Capitalism as a whole, because I support Natural Economy. Economy based on natural social- economic doctrine – Corporatism. Economy with low taxes, small state, dominated by family- and workers- owned firms. Where "everyone lives on its own", free of capitalist exploitation and socialist inefficiency.

Today there is no freedom at all. Crony Capitalism and de facto, lack of any changes in the ideology of the System (Socialism and Capitalism are the 2 sides of the same coin), have brough Eastern Europe on its knees. I am not surprised, that people are leaving, prospects for ordinary people look very bleak. Marxism is only one side of coin. Second one is Capitalism or Liberalism-Conservatism. Everyone who supports Capitalism, Liberalism or Conservativsm is a semi-Marxist. Why? Because Marxism is about the division, Marxism bases itself on the notion of division among the people. Division is something completely difference between the difference.

Problem is Globalization and Internationalism. Trump as an American Nationalists and supporters of protectionism, wants to the defend the American Working Class. If he succeeds, I am highly doubtful, yet he shows, that West needs and change and it is high time to embrace Economic Nationalism, Protectionism and Corporatism. Of course, foreign investors are important but interests of the domestic SME's, cooperative firms and its workers is the key. 
Therefore, to truly heal the European Economies, one has to destroy EU itself which walks on the leash of Socialism and Global Capitalism. Socialism=Capitalism=poverty for the working people.

Globalism is a New Slavery, Globalism means enslavement of mankind. Everyone who support Globalism, support slavery. 


You are a Capitalist then, a Neo-Liberal, who supports Global Capitalism and its Project Fear, then. Am I right?

The very fundamental basis for private economy development is stability of peace and money. 
Of course. That's why Market Economy must be based on stable, stable governance and strong, competitive economy. Taxes must low, wages must be high, unemployment practically non-existent – only these 3 principles deliver "True Market". I am anti-Liberal, anti-Socialist, anti-Communist, anti-Globalist person, so you should not speak me about Liberal policies. I know, how economy works, I was working for my own, for several years, until Socialism and Liberalism, made me to be a part-time worker and a work-jumper, jumping from job to job and obeyed to pay for health insurance from my own cash. Poland is a perfect example, why Socialism and Liberalism do not work and I am not willing to speak about it, any more.

And I do agree, that decent, intelligent people should better do something not to help committing the same mistakes, all the time. Problem is, that they are also loosing, because majority of people prefers moral and mental slavery than a freedom. Modern people, all across the world are nothing more than slaves of the political-social-economic system, we live in. It is high time to destroy it, not to "reform it".

I've never supported economic liberals nor socialists, for me capitalism is the same slavish system as socialism. In capitalism, person is a slave of greedy capitalists, in socialism of greedy state and useless officials who live on the cost of the worker. 


So, choice today is very simple: Nationalism or Liberalism/Marxism. You can also put in, in social-economic meaning: National-Syndicalist Corporatism or Liberal Capitalism/Socialism-Communism. I've chosen Nationalism, because of social-economic doctrine, long time ago. I simply treat both Marxism and Capitalism with complete disdain as totally inhumane social-economic systems, transforming people into sub-humans.

Liberal Democracy+Capitalism+Marxism=Plutocratic Oligarkhy. 
And we, ordinary "citizens" are noone else, than slaves. Question is, do you accept, being a slave?
 
Because capitalism is doomed to collapse. It relies on indefinite compound economic growth just to stay afloat.
 
Because capitalism is doomed to collapse. It relies on indefinite compound economic growth just to stay afloat.

It will take more than one planet to expand and for the time being we still send rockets with burning ...
 
It will take more than one planet to expand and for the time being we still send rockets with burning ...
The system will collapse long before the prospect of an interplanetary civilization becomes viable.
 
equal distribution of pussy now
 
A Communist subhuman makes plenty of more sense than a Nazi subhuman, if inspiration is to be drawn from 20th century ideologies.

Communism promotes going ER against the ruling classes, and can be interpreted as subhuman supremacism against the hegemony of Chad. Nazism, on the contrary, is Chad supremacism, and a subhuman who advocates for that is a cuckold.
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
11
Views
294
Da_Yunez
Da_Yunez
Biowaste Removal
Replies
31
Views
619
anandkonda
anandkonda
slapthatsillywilly
Replies
8
Views
174
slapthatsillywilly
slapthatsillywilly
O
Replies
18
Views
395
RandomGuy
RandomGuy

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top