Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why are some of you guys attracted to underage foids?

Because in these days, many girls are starting to develop really, really early. I remember being somewhat 12 years old and the girls in my classes were as tall as all the boys and they already had fully developed bodies like grown women, just like the teachers. If you were yo see just their body and that alone, without any age disclosure, anyone would think they were women in their 20s. There was literally no difference, just like boys today are getting taller faster in most of the world and developing more frame more rapidly.
We can somewhat see fertility in someone or sense it, it turns people on because of the reproduction instinct as every living thing reproduces.

I don't think this addresses specifically what the OP was referring to. If the females in question are developing earlier sexual characteristics earlier than what would be expected, then one would still be attracted to an older woman. They just misjudged their age. Its the sexual maturity they are attracted to, not the age (which in many cases they are unaware).

There is evidence for this as well. Studies from years back spoke of how girls borne by mothers at young ages and/or with no father around tend to sexually mature quicker. Presumably this is an evolutionary adaptation to facilitate r reproductive strategy (as the family unit is weak). This is probably why you see most twerkers and attention seekers coming from broken homes or poor socioeconomic backgrounds.

Now, the second part, the people that look after the number (age). And some people are attracted to delicate bodies that look underdeveloped and only young girls have that or have delayed puberty even after 15-16 years old, but as they develop faster and faster nowadays, it is harder by the day to find a foid that that has this type of body that many men feel attracted to. Very slim, thin, delicate feminine bodies just in shape and proportional to look very natural.
I for example like very small boobs to flat chest, and for ass, I prefer something that has a definition, it doesn't need to be average or big, just something with definition. It would be easy to get a girl like that (not get to date fuck her, I mean seeing them around) if they were not developing faster nowadays due to better nutrition and vitamins in foods and things alike.
Also, if you like this type of body, you don't need to look for pre pubescent girls, there are a lot of completely legal girls that have this type of body and never really develop that thing you see in porn, gigantic asses, thighs and tits, I particularly don't like it.

The girls I felt attracted to the most were mature girls with slim and delicate bodies with small boobs/ass, and you can find many examples of them online, they will look gorgeous despite being 18 or 29, they just look extremely good for a long time and age very well.
Not talking about criminally underage girls (althought 14 and under is perfectly legal in many countries of the world if you take age restriction into account, including USA), but I am particularly highly physically attracted to this type of body. Everyone has a body preference and I prefer the slim bodies with small boobs and ass. You don't need to look to criminally underage girls for that.

I assume you are talking about these sorts of bodytypes. [1] [2]

They are very lean, and you could say their hips, breasts and ass are undeveloped but they clearly aren't underage. Possessing a decent amount of neoteny is not the same thing. Again, I don't think this is what the OP or most people are referring to.

BTW, I too am partial to this bodytype. It is a close second to my first preference of the toned, athletic look. Think female tennis players.

What these guys are talking about are adolescent girls on the cusp of sexual maturity. They're just learning to put on training bras and such. The types that like anime lolis and such. A girl that may be 14, but looks like she's 12 or so.

But, the ones that talk about it all the time, the criminally underage, are edgy users that are probably fake users trying to steer negative attention to us, from reddit or another place on the internet that hates us and wants to shed a bad light on us and get authorities involved to shut the place down, they are false flag attacks, just like you can sometimes see someone saying they are planning to go ER. 2 days ago someone with a fake account here posted that he was planning a terror attack, like who the fuck outright posts it online in a public forum for everyone to see? It's obviously a false flag attack by infiltrators trying everything possible to bring authoriries here, get people jailed or the place entirely shut down. And some people are just blatant trolling, take Draestyn and JosefMengele for example, I don't believe that they were serious most of the time on the forum (when talking about criminally underage girls), they were really pushing it being edgy and I wouldn't take it seriously, but people outside or people that can't see it will obviously think it is serious and think we are all legit thinking like that.

This is my input, consider it.

I get that a lot of people larp and shitpost quite a bit, but like the race bait posts I also think a great deal of it comes from a deep-rooted personal belief/preference. Like saying something you know will provoke people, but attempting to lessen the impending reaction by claiming, "Its just a joke bro" or even worse gaslighting. "You must be a bluepilled agecuck".

You don't have to be bluepilled or a simp to regard lolicons and preferences for super neoteny as a bit odd. I certainly do, and I'm not convinced of this narrative that 'in the old days, it was common for old men to marry 12-15 year olds'. Even if it was, its paradoxical to support this as an incel since part of the issue with attracting foids is its already difficult enough to attract them in your own age group. So now, youngcels have to compete with older, more established men.
 
Last edited:
Because some girls below 18 look hot.
 
Its the sexual maturity they are attracted to, not the age (which in many cases they are unaware).
This is a good and often overlooked point, which is why blue pilled cucks seethe when a 17 year old the day before her birthday gets fucked by some older guy but don't bat an eye when she fucks him the next day are running completely on NPC.exe.
 
Because some girls below 18 look hot.
More like some girls above 18 look hot.

5A5EF9C7 4606 4358 8293 77382DA0661A


The lost of their neotenic face features and baby skin is a crime against humanity
 
They have a pussiii so thats enough:dab:
 
I don't get it either tbh. It's pretty disgusting.

I'm not like one of those retards who thinks that 16-17 year old girls are literal children, but once you get below that, it's pretty questionable.
you sound pretty soy tbh, thinking age 13-15 is "disgusting".

as if a 13-15 is like a 6-8 year old. come on now dont be stupid

also this thread in general seems whiny. why would you care so much about what other dudes are attracted to?
they are immature (especially since she's a foid).
all foids are immature. they only mature in their abilities to suck dick and manipulate men.
 
also this thread in general seems whiny. why would you care so much about what other dudes are attracted to?
Yes, it is whiny and irrational to care about that. The issue I've always had and have taken up with some of the pedos who used to post here is they would aggressively push their paraphilias as perfectly normal. I don't care what people fap to, but don't fucking gaslight the rest of us into thinking we're strange for not sharing those proclivities.
 
I am 23 yet appear/sound in the age range of 12-15. Most adult women assume I am a young adolescent.
 
Yes, it is whiny and irrational to care about that. The issue I've always had and have taken up with some of the pedos who used to post here is they would aggressively push their paraphilias as perfectly normal. I don't care what people fap to, but don't fucking gaslight the rest of us into thinking we're strange for not sharing those proclivities.
Well, if they are trying to push being attracted to prepubescents as normal then I agree that they are incorrect, attraction to prepubescents is abnormal.

However the other dude said below 16, so that would include females who have hit puberty but are not fully developed, basically in the middle of puberty, which isn't pedophilia. As @SlutLiberationFront said in this thread, it's normal to be attracted to females who have hit puberty and can reproduce. That includes young teens and even preteens.

How young were "pedos" in the past arguing was normal? If its single digit age I agree that is pedo range
 
Yes, it is whiny and irrational to care about that. The issue I've always had and have taken up with some of the pedos who used to post here is they would aggressively push their paraphilias as perfectly normal. I don't care what people fap to, but don't fucking gaslight the rest of us into thinking we're strange for not sharing those proclivities.
Making lolis legal would increase competition in the sexual market and females would have to step up their game if they knew the sexual market now has little girls with angelic personalities (9-12 range) and hot teenagers (13-15)
469CF507 69B0 4729 B788 935C4606B034
32C43DF4 B244 4073 8498 6E83F7C5F4A1
009D51A1 E260 49FD BD75 387C0592FAD9
 
also this thread in general seems whiny. why would you care so much about what other dudes are attracted to?
I usually don't care about what other men are attracted to, but in this case it certainly requires some questioning. I understand if some guys like SlutLiberationFront like those type of builds on legal age females, but lusting over over little girls when there plenty of whores your age is really odd. A lot of you guys say that females Post-16 are sluts, but that doesn't matter to me since I only want to fuck them.
Making lolis legal would increase competition in the sexual market and females would have to step up their game if the knew she has to compete with little girls with angelic personalities (9-12 range) and hot teenagers (13-15)
How many men would you say that are attracted to girls in that age range?
 
Last edited:
I usually don't care about what other men are attracted to, but in this case it certainly requires some questioning. I understand if some guys like SlutLiberationFront like those type of builds on legal age females, but lusting over over little girls when there plenty of whores your age is really odd. A lot of you guys say that females Post-16 are sluts, but that doesn't matter to me since I only want to fuck them.
Well I'm 16 so I like high school aged females. But some foids in my school bang college dudes, and I don't think those dudes are "pedos"

Maybe incels just want a neotonous foid, who isn't jaded from all the dick and is more virginal?

And I'm sure they would bang a young adult female as well. I would bang a college female if I could I just would prefer a 15 year old if given the choice. She won't be as stuck up and have a lower body count
 
I don't get the appeal, they have no tits or ass and they are immature (especially since she's a foid).
Some of them have extremely beautiful faces that’s why
 
Some of them have extremely beautiful faces that’s why

I would say adulthood is what really separates stacies and beckys, only the top females of our race can remain (facially) attractive while they have completely developed their bodies, meanwhile even low tier early teenagers have ANGELICAL faces and a lot of males are more attracted to skin/face than butts and tits:smonk:
 
Last edited:
but lusting over over little girls when there plenty of whores your age is really odd
It's funny you say this while having a faggot pedo as your pfp :lul:.
 
It's funny you say this while having a faggot pedo as your pfp :lul:.
I can't say if MJ was a pedo or not, but alot of claims don't have enough evidence to say that he was. If was one I'd completely change the pfp.
 
13 year old foids have better asses than grown foids a lot of the time.
 
Well, if they are trying to push being attracted to prepubescents as normal then I agree that they are incorrect, attraction to prepubescents is abnormal.
Yes, it is. There was a lot of friction in the threads. A common tactic is using pejoratives (agecuck) against non-pedos agecucks to discredit their arguments. The tactic is common in all sorts of discourse.

However the other dude said below 16, so that would include females who have hit puberty but are not fully developed, basically in the middle of puberty, which isn't pedophilia. As @SlutLiberationFront said in this thread, it's normal to be attracted to females who have hit puberty and can reproduce. That includes young teens and even preteens.
You're right. If they're sexually mature, then it's technically not pedophilia.

How young were "pedos" in the past arguing was normal? If its single digit age I agree that is pedo range
One was arguing in the single digits. Another was being edgy and pushing the boundary to the point where if she bleeds the day of, she's fair game (clearly without developing any secondary sexual characteristics).

Pedos and faggots attach themselves to incel forums like parasites. It's a strange phenomenon, but not a mysterious one.
 
Yes, it is. There was a lot of friction in the threads. A common tactic is using pejoratives (agecuck) against non-pedos agecucks to discredit their arguments. The tactic is common in all sorts of discourse.


You're right. If they're sexually mature, then it's technically not pedophilia.


One was arguing in the single digits. Another was being edgy and pushing the boundary to the point where if she bleeds the day of, she's fair game (clearly without developing any secondary sexual characteristics).

Pedos and faggots attach themselves to incel forums like parasites. It's a strange phenomenon, but not a mysterious one.

If it enters with lubricant in any of the two holes then she is ready dude stop simping females bro :smonk:
 
You're right. If they're sexually mature, then it's technically not pedophilia.


One was arguing in the single digits. Another was being edgy and pushing the boundary to the point where if she bleeds the day of, she's fair game (clearly without developing any secondary sexual characteristics).

Pedos and faggots attach themselves to incel forums like parasites. It's a strange phenomenon, but not a mysterious one.
Well I'm not sure what "fair game" means. The law of age of consent isn't based on her first menstruation.

Foids hit puberty btw before they have their first period though I'm pretty sure, so if she is bleeding she will have at least some development, so I'm not quite sure why it would be abnormal to be attracted to early puberty.

and fags are worse, but that goes without saying it seems, since the definition of gay is clear cut while normies have completely warped the definition of pedo to mean anything below 18.
 
Well I'm not sure what "fair game" means. The law of age of consent isn't based on her first menstruation.

Foids hit puberty btw before they have their first period though I'm pretty sure, so if she is bleeding she will have at least some development, so I'm not quite sure why it would be abnormal to be attracted to early puberty.

and fags are worse, but that goes without saying it seems, since the definition of gay is clear cut while normies have completely warped the definition of pedo to mean anything below 18.
Why do you spend so much time defending ’’foids rights’’ and similar bullshit like that, they are objects, nohing more, nothing else, some men like hamburgers, some sandwiches, foids rights to be penetrated don’t deserve any more consideration than this :feelsthink:
 
I don't get it either tbh. It's pretty disgusting.

I'm not like one of those retards who thinks that 16-17 year old girls are literal children, but once you get below that, it's pretty questionable.
I just go by whether I think I'd be able to knock them around by casually walking into them. 16 is the minimum age where that starts to happen for the majority of people whether they're male or female.
 
Why do you spend so much time defending ’’foids rights’’ and similar bullshit like that, they are objects, nohing more, nothing else, some men like hamburgers, some sandwiches, foids rights to be penetrated don’t deserve any more consideration than this :feelsthink:
what are you talking about me defending "foids rights"? Since when did I defend any of their supposed rights?
>Muh its abnormal noooo poor little girl

You know what is also abnormal, your retarded incel ass, tecnology, porn, fucking controlling fire is also technically anormal

Idiot simp
are you retarded?

saying its "abnormal" to be attracted to a prepubescent foid is not simping for their rights. its just stating biological facts

I don't care if someone like prepubescent children I'm just stating biological realities.
 
Last edited:
Like I said, the females I felt most attracted to were fully mature in age, 20+ years old but they still had an underdeveloped body. It wouldn't be looked down upon, I mean, what's wrong? She's 20+, she just doesn't have the mega bodies you see in porn. A good reason is that they mostly retain their beauty for most of their lives when they have that type of body and no stretchmarks. Some of these women with underdeveloped bodies but still even above 30 years of age still look incredibly good, delicate and feminine, instead of very used up, tired and the old had bitch stereotype. The tits won't be all loose, and the skin will not be loose as all.

There is simply nothing wrong with that, since they are way, way above any legal age of any country but just looking a lot younger. Just compare them at the same age in later stages of life. A woman with underdeveloped body will still look young, while the one that had a mega turbo developed body will look very used up and flacid when they age, while the other will retain firm skin for the most part thus preserving a "sense" of youth, fertility and some is some sort of uplifting thing to look at. It's like those men in their 60s that still look like they are in their 30s and make young foids drool their whole fluids just from looking at them, for the sense of their "maturity/experience" (age) combined with a young look, which they connect to the good times of life and "wild adventures".

It just hurts to talk about this because why does it matter who I feel attracted to? I will not get anything anyway, be the girl young or past 30s. Desiring and lusting over things you know you can't have is pure pain and I'm tired of it. Every time I go out I see many girls like this. 20+ and outrageously gorgeous with the type of body I like, slim, thin, firm, with that face and youth retained into a mature phase and it's honestly very sad for me because I keep seeing it every time and get reminded that I will never have that. It's like mockery being thrown in my face. "Here, they are everywhere and you will see them every time, but they will never see you or want you because you are invisible to them". Honestly I just want to rope.

@AlphaOmega :feelsYall: for citing me, and yes, there is a threshold where it starts to be abnormal and actually nasty, but as for drawings, I don't give a fuck, they are drawings and they are pretty fucking unrealistic, I don't see a reason why people would care or seethe over it like they do all day.
 
Last edited:
Why do you spend so much time defending ’’foids rights’’ and similar bullshit like that, they are objects, nohing more, nothing else, some men like hamburgers, some sandwiches, foids rights to be penetrated don’t deserve any more consideration than this :feelsthink:
They need to stop worrying where we want to stick our dicks. We don't bother them for wanting old used whores.
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
23
Views
242
Emba
Emba
Based NaziCel
Replies
59
Views
1K
YourTypicalLoner
YourTypicalLoner
Persecuted
Replies
5
Views
214
Based NaziCel
Based NaziCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top