www.reddit.com
One of the replies unironically mentions this, or rather the patronizing attitudes that NT supremacists have when discussing autistic mens' perceptions of women, as if they are stupid and their lived experiences don't matter (but the lived experiences of low-IQ, psychopathic thugs like George Floyd do matter, of course):
This is an IT poster attempting to co-opt autistic male consciousness to the cause of feminism, despite the fact that women universally revile and shun autistic men for failing to demonstrate sufficient social conformity.Cope levels - Beyond AstronomicalReddit - Dive into anything
tbh
And yet we're privileged somehow
To call men "privileged" is to consider capitalist wageslavery and social alienation as an ideal, and this is exactly what contemporary feminists do. They wish that women could be as antisocial and cut-throat as men and be rewarded for it by the system; they wish, for example, that psychopathic women like Hillary Clinton could become president instead of psychopathic men like Donald Trump.And yet we're privileged somehow
It's insane how the people who think of themselves as tolerant rebels are the biggest bootlickers of the system, they're the ones who believe that the system is just.
women universally revile and shun autistic men for failing to demonstrate sufficient social conformity.
And when these autistic men attempt to solve this problem through narcissistic mimicry, a positive adaptation to their inhumane surroundings, they are called toxic
Rebelliousness in American politics has long just been a pretense that serves to promote conformity.
Tbh the whole 20th century was socially engineered bullshit, at least in terms of cultural changes. Muh rebels being fully supported by the rulers
The rebelliousness of people is exploited and misdirected nowadays i've noticed. The system doesn't try to fight this but instead gives people meaningless bullshit to be upset about. Like metoo, manspreading, mansplaining, the wage gap, George floyd, lgbt shit and more
insane blackpill. soys won't touch this
cope autistic chad
That feminists are completely fine with the idea that men have to prove their value while women have value just for existing shows what frauds they are.
You probably mog me tbh.
The main basis of American electoral politics since the Nixon era has been about rebellion, in the sense of negatively voting against the opposing candidate moreso than affirmatively voting for your preferred candidate.Tbh the whole 20th century was socially engineered bullshit, at least in terms of cultural changes. Muh rebels being fully supported by the rulers
because females can't think anything beyond what they can only see physically; on average most are not capable of abstract thinking or even questioning anything at all (This is repeated but should be stated), especially that which is in their favour. Just like flies, once they taste what affection towards them and constant compliments are like, they start to crave those sensations like the flies constantly craving for whatever they find, if it doesn't occur then they start going crazy and pulling all of the "muh mental illness" shenanigans and other issues, when there are those who are genuinely mentally ill and don't brag post about it all the time, in comparison to those that state "mental illness is real and should be talked about" nonsense but then are fine after a few minutes or so.
Good, you shouldn't like women being anywhere but the kitchen tbh
Based
As it's commonly understood, an "incel ideologist" is an involuntary celibate who externalizes blame for his condition, instead of internalizing blame.
