Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why are Russians considered non white by Nazis?

D

DonkeyPunch

Officer
★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2018
Posts
636
Never understood this meme. Just because they adopted a savage ideology like communism does not somehow make them non white. Russians look whiter than most UK Chavs tbh and they certainly look whiter than most southern Europeans.

5d5f34c35c6e4940888e36af8db33c96

3c0bc327fb42ca355ce685f938b6a551

Military selfie russia putin

1021932892


And Russians have less mongoloid DNA than Scandinavians do. I mean this is what the native people of Norway look like:

220px Three Smi Lapp women c1890s
 
I'm a Nazi and I consider Russians white.

This is what I believe in as a Nazi.

Because the beauty of the white aryan woman must not 1122426


not a nazi
 
Mongoloid Russians are so QT.

The only white girls I can tolerate are the ones with rice genetics.

Military selfie russia putin


I love that pic just because of her, I've seen it before.

* Notice how Chad Putin keeps her closest to him despite there are your typical "Stacies" around? Based.
 
i thought all europeans were white?
 
The meaning of the word "white" has changed drastically over time. There was a point when not even Germans or Scandinavians were considered white in spite of them "Aryan-mogging" the English(who were considered quintessential whites). The Nazis believed that Slavs(including Russians) were too mixed with Mongoloids and Jews to be considered white-of course this is horseshit because most East Europeans do not show any affinity to East Asians or Jews for that matter. Once you get closer to Siberia though that's a whole other matter I think.
 
The meaning of the word "white" has changed drastically over time. There was a point when not even Germans or Scandinavians were considered white in spite of them "Aryan-mogging" the English(who were considered quintessential whites). The Nazis believed that Slavs(including Russians) were too mixed with Mongoloids and Jews to be considered white-of course this is horseshit because most East Europeans do not show any affinity to East Asians or Jews for that matter. Once you get closer to Siberia though that's a whole other matter I think.

Too bad all white women don't look Siberian.

Maybe they wouldn't be so evil if they atleast looked good on the outside.
 
Too bad all white women don't look Siberian.

Maybe they wouldn't be so evil if they atleast looked good on the outside.

Siberians/Mongols are not good looking. They have poor facial harmony.

DSCN6729.jpg
 
I don't know, but the Slavic untermensch sure kicked the ass of Germans. Иван even had a better tank (the T34), which is strange for a supposedly dumb race.
 
I don't know, but the Slavic untermensch sure kicked the ass of Germans. Иван even had a better tank (the T34), which is strange for a supposedly dumb race.
They aren't dumb at all tbh. A lot of famous scientists, mathematicians, engineers, chess champions, authors etc. were Russian and they were the first to the moon even before the US. Poles also have the undeserved reputation as being dumb when they too are not at all.
 
Slavs have mongol DNA, yes. Germanic Scandinavians have not mixed so much with the natives from Lapony(I think that's the name in English).

But they look white and looks are all that matters.
 
All these ethnicity-obsessed losers should just shoot themselves in the head. The whole ethnic idea in Europe wasn't even a thing before Napoleon's time. Ofc Russians are white. If you have white skin you're white. So most Asians are white too. It's the difference in culture and beliefs that matters.
 
hitler's untermensch stuff seemed to be more about the system they were under than the race, the desolate scenery of filthy hovels and weapon factories. there's some speeches on untermensch, and dealing with captured soviet territory and troops, i don't ever recall hitler saying 'their skulls aren't aryan enough' or whatever, just that communism turns men into beasts, not that they were already beasts for not having blue eyes and perfect skulls like kikes are desperate for you to believe.

at any rate they fucked up there, by both underestimating the slavs and failing to cooperate with their populace. oh well, chances are they were fucked anyway given stalin's plans and how scorched earth tactics of retreating soviet troops was going to make feeding everyone impossible anyway.
 
Siberians/Mongols are not good looking. They have poor facial harmony.

DSCN6729.jpg


They looks so cute, so naive, so childish. I choose them over any European stacies.
 
Because they are a bastion of kikes and yellow men
 
Siberians/Mongols are not good looking. They have poor facial harmony.

DSCN6729.jpg

Volcel if you wouldnt, I'd smash any one of those eskimo looking gooks anyday.
 
It's the Russians themselves who keep arguing they are easterners, in spirit if not in race. This is not true but it's their way of trying to separate themselves from the west.

The perception of Russians in the west is actually that they are as white as it gets. Think of Dolph Lundgren in Rocky 4. That's how westerners think of Russians, they have no idea of how much Baltic and even Asian blood is in there.
 
Slavs have mongol DNA, yes. Germanic Scandinavians have not mixed so much with the natives from Lapony(I think that's the name in English).

But they look white and looks are all that matters.

The original inhabitants of Scandinavia that the Aryans mixed with had no relation to the Sami/Lapps.
 
Only until mid 1942.
If you take production / repair capabilities into account, the T34 stayed the best tank during all the war. German tanks were a notorious nightmare to produce and repair.
 
If you take production / repair capabilities into account, the T34 stayed the best tank during all the war. German tanks were a notorious nightmare to produce and repair.

You're mostly right in those respects, but if you got it into action there is no question the PzKpfw IV F2-J was the superior tank in comparison to the T-34/76 and arguably the T-34/85. Kill ratios should tell you as much.
It's the Russians themselves who keep arguing they are easterners, in spirit if not in race. This is not true but it's their way of trying to separate themselves from the west.

The perception of Russians in the west is actually that they are as white as it gets. Think of Dolph Lundgren in Rocky 4. That's how westerners think of Russians, they have no idea of how much Baltic and even Asian blood is in there.


Indeed. You wouldn't find a national socialist or white nationalist today who would argue otherwise.

The Russians are Slavs. Slavs are Aryans. Consequently, the Russians are white.
 
Last edited:
Never understood this meme. Just because they adopted a savage ideology like communism does not somehow make them non white. Russians look whiter than most UK Chavs tbh and they certainly look whiter than most southern Europeans.

The oldest written source about the history of Russia is the "Primary Chronicle" that was written in in the 12th century.
The author, allegedly a monk called Nestor, wrote about how the Slavs were organized in tribes that kept fighting each other. In order to stop this unorganized level of in-fighting, the Slavs were said to have invited the "Rus" to rule over them. The "Rus" were a Nordic people of Vikings (Rus means rower/oarsmen) who did indeed establish power over the Slavs then. That they were "invited" to rule over them, is most probably not true, of course, but all the other evidence fully supports a Northern people having settled in the Kievan Rus' to rule over them.

From that point on, the Western propaganda was that Slavs are subhumans whose nobility and whose ruling class was "Aryan"/Nordic. So the idea was, that everything that was good in Slavic countries came from this historical Nordic ruling class, from "the good blood" as Himmler called, while the bad came from the Slavic part of the people. Communism was seen as race war in disguise; the idea was that the Jew offers the "solution" to the Capitalist problem he himself had created - but his solution is actually a race-war-in-disguise against the Nordic people and the Nordic element in Russia. By contrast, the Nazis wanted to enslave the Slavic people but get the "good blood" for themselves.
 
Last edited:
The oldest written source about the history of Russia is the "Primary Chronicle" that was written in in the 12th century.
The author, allegedly a monk called Nestor, wrote about how the Slavs were organized in tribes that kept fighting each other. In order to stop this unorganized level of in-fighting, the Slavs were said to have invited the "Rus" to rule over them. The "Rus" were a Nordic people of Vikings (Rus means rower/oarsmen) who did indeed establish power over the Slavs then. That they were "invited" to rule over them, is most probably not true, of course, but all the other evidence fully supports a Northern people having settled in the Kievan Rus' to rule over them.

From that point on, the Western propaganda was that Slavs are subhumans whose nobility and whose ruling class was "Aryan"/Nordic. So the idea was, that everything that was good in Slavic countries came from this historical Nordic ruling class, from "the good blood" as Himmler called, while the bad came from the Slavic part of the people. Communism was seen as race war in disguise; the idea was that the Jew offers the "solution" to the Capitalist problem he himself had created - but his solution is actually a race-war-in-disguise against the Nordic people and the Nordic element in Russia. By contrast, they wanted to enslave the Slavic people but get the "good blood" for themselves.

Interestingly, the "Rus" in rower/oarsmen is derived from Roslagen in Sweden, a region from where many of the Vikings, or Varjags, who travelled, raided and conquered in an eastwardly direction came.
 
The oldest written source about the history of Russia is the "Primary Chronicle" that was written in in the 12th century.
The author, allegedly a monk called Nestor, wrote about how the Slavs were organized in tribes that kept fighting each other. In order to stop this unorganized level of in-fighting, the Slavs were said to have invited the "Rus" to rule over them. The "Rus" were a Nordic people of Vikings (Rus means rower/oarsmen) who did indeed establish power over the Slavs then. That they were "invited" to rule over them, is most probably not true, of course, but all the other evidence fully supports a Northern people having settled in the Kievan Rus' to rule over them.

From that point on, the Western propaganda was that Slavs are subhumans whose nobility and whose ruling class was "Aryan"/Nordic. So the idea was, that everything that was good in Slavic countries came from this historical Nordic ruling class, from "the good blood" as Himmler called, while the bad came from the Slavic part of the people. Communism was seen as race war in disguise; the idea was that the Jew offers the "solution" to the Capitalist problem he himself had created - but his solution is actually a race-war-in-disguise against the Nordic people and the Nordic element in Russia. By contrast, the Nazis wanted to enslave the Slavic people but get the "good blood" for themselves.

Another thing is, that after the Russian Civil War (1917-1922) that followed World War I and Russian Revolution and that resulted in up to 12 million casualties, Russia looked less European than before. So the rise of Hitler occurs in that historical window where Russia is transforming ideologically, but due to the death toll after Word War, Revolutions and Civil War, also ethnically. (And then Stalin's "Great Terror" begun in 1936.)
 
The oldest written source about the history of Russia is the "Primary Chronicle" that was written in in the 12th century.
The author, allegedly a monk called Nestor, wrote about how the Slavs were organized in tribes that kept fighting each other. In order to stop this unorganized level of in-fighting, the Slavs were said to have invited the "Rus" to rule over them. The "Rus" were a Nordic people of Vikings (Rus means rower/oarsmen) who did indeed establish power over the Slavs then. That they were "invited" to rule over them, is most probably not true, of course, but all the other evidence fully supports a Northern people having settled in the Kievan Rus' to rule over them.

From that point on, the Western propaganda was that Slavs are subhumans whose nobility and whose ruling class was "Aryan"/Nordic. So the idea was, that everything that was good in Slavic countries came from this historical Nordic ruling class, from "the good blood" as Himmler called, while the bad came from the Slavic part of the people. Communism was seen as race war in disguise; the idea was that the Jew offers the "solution" to the Capitalist problem he himself had created - but his solution is actually a race-war-in-disguise against the Nordic people and the Nordic element in Russia. By contrast, the Nazis wanted to enslave the Slavic people but get the "good blood" for themselves.
Interesting.
 
Hitler did, but certain other NatSocs didn't, including the SA and Ernst Niekisch, etc.
 
because Hitler was born in the Austro-Hungarian Empire which got wrecked by a Slav chimpout so he thought they were white niggers
 
le russians represent all slavs xD
Slavs as a people don't exist. It's a linguistic group like Latin Europeans.
 
Hitler did, but certain other NatSocs didn't, including the SA and Ernst Niekisch, etc.
the SA was full of literal fags and bashed people in the streets for no good reason, so bad Hitler shut them down as soon as they stopped being useful.
 
Just because they adopted a savage ideology like communism does not somehow make them non white.
They didn't accept shit. It was a top down revolution funded by wall street kikes you fucking retard
 
the SA was full of literal fags and bashed people in the streets for no good reason, so bad Hitler shut them down as soon as they stopped being useful.

yeah I understand that but Hitler's capitulating to international markets after the long knives was over hurt him in the long run.
They didn't accept shit. It was a top down revolution funded by wall street kikes you fucking retard

two words: POL POT. literally an anti-urbanite revolution. even if the funding did happen (which it likely did) if they lasted, they could've forced the wall street kikes in slavery afterwards. let them give you the money to which you will buy the rope to hang them with.
 
yeah I understand that but Hitler's capitulating to international markets after the long knives was over hurt him in the long run.
no excuse for a bunch of thugs who buggered eachother on the reg
Also what really hurt Hitler in the long run was a lack of oil, which is why reddit makes fun of the Nazis for invading Russia with horses and why they were trying to get to the Caucasus. If he'd have won the war politics wouldn't have been enough to topple him.
 
two words: POL POT. literally an anti-urbanite revolution. even if the funding did happen (which it likely did) if they lasted, they could've forced the wall street kikes in slavery afterwards. let them give you the money to which you will buy the rope to hang them with.
This is essentialy what happened with Stalin, he cleansed kikery in USSR. NKVD was like 70% jewish in officer talent, that went down significantly in KGB
 
two words: POL POT. literally an anti-urbanite revolution. even if the funding did happen (which it likely did) if they lasted, they could've forced the wall street kikes in slavery afterwards. let them give you the money to which you will buy the rope to hang them with.
Didn't the CIA fund Pol Pot against the Bolshies?
Seems like some ISIS tier geopolitical praxis.
 
no excuse for a bunch of thugs who buggered eachother on the reg
Also what really hurt Hitler in the long run was a lack of oil, which is why reddit makes fun of the Nazis for invading Russia with horses and why they were trying to get to the Caucasus. If he'd have won the war politics wouldn't have been enough to topple him.

I understand that. but Libertarian Capitalism can't make Nationalism last very long. I laugh constantly at NEETs who still live with their parents. until you're forced to live on your own, often under less than 1%er conditions, you have no right to bitch.
Didn't the CIA fund Pol Pot against the Bolshies?
Seems like some ISIS tier geopolitical praxis.

the US supported them only after they toppled Pol Pot.
 
Because a lot of technically white Russians are Jews.
 

Similar threads

Regenerator
Replies
30
Views
1K
KinkyKanga
KinkyKanga
Regenerator
Replies
42
Views
2K
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
lifesucksandyoudie
Replies
23
Views
1K
starcrapoo
starcrapoo
Made in Heaven
Replies
946
Views
55K
Sergeant Kelly
Sergeant Kelly

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top