I know I know, it's nature's fault that women are attracted to men physically 99% much more than to their "personailty". But think about it! After all, the purpose of lifeforms is not only to evolve physically, but to actually become more intelligent too, so my question is, how come that women will choose a 9/10 chad who is a brainlet over a 5/10 normie who is average looking yet highly intelligent? Of course, while the physically superior chad has a higher chance of survival and to protect the female from predators, the intelligent normie has higher survival chances in other aspects, by planning how to distribute food, how to build a good shelter, and which places are the best for hunting. So how is it that still, even today, in a society where for about the last 10,000 years since the agricultural revolution happened that brains are more important than physical traits, female are still attracted to males solely based on looks? I know evolution is not that quick, but you would expect females standards to actually go down with time in terms of looks, not the other way around....Bloody cunts!
