Why are female brains stuck in the stone age?

[NeiboltStreet]

Do you guys have any suggestions (or actual scientific papers) why women's brains seem to be stuck in the stone age?

What I mean is this:

Biologically, women should choose the 'fittest' partner to mate with in order to generate the optimal offspring, right?

Now, in the stone age, the 'fittest' partner was either the guy with the most muscles (for defense against enemies), the best hunter (for constant food-supply) or the village elder or whatever (for status). But nowadays, women still choose muscular guys over smart guys, even thought muscles only get you a job at construction sites while smart guys can and do make the big bucks. Plus, the muscular Chad is much more likely to GTFO as soon as she shows signs of pregnancy, leaving her behind with the kids and probably won't even have enough money for child support. Sure, she could pick up a beta with money afterwards, who will provide for her, but her kids will still have the sub-80-IQ genes from The Chadster...

Why haven't women's brains evolved past the stone age and have not yet adapted to the new reality where mental strength > physical strength? Is the evolutionary time span too short since the times when 'muscles > brains' was true? Or is feminism to blame by telling women that 'they are the most important person on earth' and therefore should (and deserve to) get a good-looking guy above all else?

Choosing the Chad as a mate and as sperm donor just doesn't seem reasonable from a evolutionary standpoint to me??

 

[Anub'arak]

If femoids want to be seen as human, they should stop being ignorant and primitive... unless they do, they don't deserve the same rights at all, let alone the millions of privileges they have over men

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

They didn't need to evolve.

 

[L9xddddd]

In every other animalistic society females go for sheer strength over brainpower. The reason being that strength matters much more in the animal kingdom than brains. Why should humans be any different?

 

[NeiboltStreet]

In every other animalistic society females go for sheer strength over brainpower. The reason being that strength matters much more in the animal kingdom than brains. Why should humans be any different?

Because humans have created a world where muscles can easily be replaced by machines, while no other species has accomplished that. All the Chads working on an assembly-line can get replaced by robots immediately, while the guys who design and maintain the robots can't...

 

[rudolfhess]

Do you guys have any suggestions (or actual scientific papers) why women's brains seem to be stuck in the stone age?

What I mean is this:

Biologically, women should choose the 'fittest' partner to mate with in order to generate the optimal offspring, right?

Now, in the stone age, the 'fittest' partner was either the guy with the most muscles (for defense against enemies), the best hunter (for constant food-supply) or the village elder or whatever (for status). But nowadays, women still choose muscular guys over smart guys, even thought muscles only get you a job at construction sites while smart guys can and do make the big bucks. Plus, the muscular Chad is much more likely to GTFO as soon as she shows signs of pregnancy, leaving her behind with the kids and probably won't even have enough money for child support. Sure, she could pick up a beta with money afterwards, who will provide for her, but her kids will still have the sub-80-IQ genes from The Chadster...

Why haven't women's brains evolved past the stone age and have not yet adapted to the new reality where mental strength > physical strength? Is the evolutionary time span too short since the times when 'muscles > brains' was true? Or is feminism to blame by telling women that 'they are the most important person on earth' and therefore should (and deserve to) get a good-looking guy above all else?

Choosing the Chad as a mate and as sperm donor just doesn't seem reasonable from a evolutionary standpoint to me??

You have to remember that the femoid's ultimate wish is for an Alpha outsider to enter her camp and rape her while her beta provider is out on the hunt, and then she can force the beta to raise the healthier bastard child, because the kid will have extra genetic diversity by being born to an outsider. This is why women are more likely to fall pregnant to rape than consensual sex.

 

[L9xddddd]

Because humans have created a world where muscles can easily be replaced by machines, while no other species has accomplished that. All the Chads working on an assembly-line can get replaced by robots immediately, while the guys who design and maintain the robots can't...

But primal biological instinct hasn't been changed at all

 

[NeiboltStreet]

You have to remember that the femoid's ultimate wish is for an Alpha outsider to enter her camp and rape her while her beta provider is out on the hunt, and then she can force the beta to raise the healthier bastard child, because the kid will have extra genetic diversity by being born to an outsider. This is why women are more likely to fall pregnant to rape than consensual sex.

But in modern times that would not provide any evolutionary advantage to her kids (who carry the rapists retardo-genes). Her kids would probably just become criminals themselves because their inherited sub-80 IQ doesn't allow them to do anything remotely useful for society.

On the other hand, maybe it IS an evolutionary advantage to be dumb but muscular and/or a criminal, if you consider 'simply making it to the next generation' as evolutionary success... because, you know, if her and Chad's kids become muscular criminals and find a mate because of this, they would have successfully spread their genes, right?

 

[MilkingTheEel]

They didn't need to evolve.

This. I doubt Chads are even genetically stupid or whatever.
Guys with shittier looks are smarter because they have to.

 

[NeiboltStreet]

But primal biological instinct hasn't been changed at all

That's the exact thing I was trying to get at when making this thread:

Is the desire to mate with the 'fittest' partner hard-coded so that fittest=physically strongest OR is the notion of 'fitness' malleable so that it adapts to the actual circumstances in a society (why is there no Joker emoji? ) and what is considered 'fit' there?

You could potentially scientifically investigate this by taking women who have selected an 'ugly' mate (of course you'd have to also first prove that her kids are actually offspring of the ugly dude) and see what genes are expressed in her brain during sexual arousal or a 'mating situation' and then do the same with hardcore Stacies and see if there is any difference in the expression patterns. If you find anything, knock out those genes in a mouse model or whatever and see if the females change their mating behaviour (for example: if they still choose the alpha mouse to mate with or if they open up their 'mating range' or whatever)... why is nobody studying this shit??? Once you find the genes, you could genetically engineer females who are attracted to smart/meek guys (provided you find any genes, of course)...

 

[Not_Important]

>The Chad Chug vs the Virgin Grug

 

[Gigacel]

The reason for the fittest is not merely just selection but also scarcity of unfit males. In the past those who couldn’t survive the harsh conditions were few and far in between due to early death. In today’s modern world, Chad may not be getting the most money or status, but he exists in a fairly large number. Therefore, not hard to find a Chad in today’s world. This is why women still chooses the Chad due to genetic health indicators and that he’s not scarce.

 

[MaxZM98]

what about you? will you go after a fat and ugly landwhale instead of a hot blonde just because she's smarter?

 

[NeiboltStreet]

what about you? will you go after a fat and ugly landwhale instead of a hot blonde just because she's smarter?

Of course! Otherwise I would just be a male Stacy, right? Plus, WTF do I want with a hot chick that's as dumb as a piece of toast? Yeah, I could bang a nice butt and all the other guys would be jealous but what do I do with her after nutting? Talk about the latest collection by Dior or what? Nah man, I rather nut in a blow-up doll then. I take an average looking chubby girl who plays video games with me over an IQ80 Stacy any day.

The reason for the fittest is not merely just selection but also scarcity of unfit males. In the past those who couldn’t survive the harsh conditions were few and far in between due to early death. In today’s modern world, Chad may not be getting the most money or status, but he exists in a fairly large number. Therefore, not hard to find a Chad in today’s world. This is why women still chooses the Chad due to genetic health indicators and that he’s not scarce.

I dunno, on my campus Chads and 'average Joes' are about 20/60 with the remaining 20% being ugly dudes or complete nerds... not sure about the rest of society, tho, since I don't go out much and I assume that (since I work on a MINT campus) the number of Chads is limited anyways and the number of nerds is exceptionally high compared to the rest of society.

 

[MaxZM98]

Of course! Otherwise I would just be a male Stacy, right? Plus, WTF do I want with a hot chick that's as dumb as a piece of toast? Yeah, I could bang a nice butt and all the other guys would be jealous but what do I do with her after nutting? Talk about the latest collection by Dior or what? Nah man, I rather nut in a blow-up doll then. I take an average looking chubby girl who plays video games with me over an IQ80 Stacy any day.

but if she's so ugly ur not attracted to her then what's the point? girls find most guys so ugly they are not attracted to them. it's not that their brains are stuck in the stoneage, it's hypergamy.

 

[NeiboltStreet]

but if she's so ugly ur not attracted to her then what's the point? girls find most guys so ugly they are not attracted to them. it's not that their brains are stuck in the stoneage, it's hypergamy.

But what you consider 'attractive' and what is not is determined by your brains biology and society's standards, so depending on which is stronger (biology or society), you'll consider different types of partners for mating. So if the biological part was interchangeable based on what traits actually provide your offspring an advantage (muscles vs. brains), maybe that could 'overrule' the society-part which tells you (very clearly nowadays!) that you're supposed to mate with the handsome muscular guy, right?