Who's the greediest Japanese company, Nintendo, Capcom, square Enix, or Sega

[deleted fren]

I'd say Capcom because they lock osts and content behind day one DLC. Nintendo is slightly less greedy, but their games tend to be more mediocre and under baked. They have a tendency to shit out $60 ports. Square Enix does lazy slop remakes that are overpriced and look worse than their 90s original.

Actually, Sega is probably the worst because like Capcom they lock content behind a paywall, but their games are also much worse. They're somehow worse at making remakes and ports than Nintendo and Square Enix too. Monkey Ball was egregious

 

[Ogostt]

I think Capcom is very greedy but their strategies are quite common, payed osts and dlcs since the game launches are quite common, they also use the fifa strategy of releasing the same game over and over but with minimal changes, idk much about Sega. Nintendo has been more of an overtime thing, lately most games have been copy paste or 70$ slop full of dlcs.

 

[DPRKcel]

Nintendo by a wide margin
Nintendo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capcom >> Square Enix > Sega

 

[Dr. Autismo]

EA

 

[TooSomething]

I don't have the actual numbers, so I have no idea.

 

[blackpillednigga]

I don't have the actual numbers, so I have no idea.

 

[CroatianManlet2]

95% of Japanese companies are extremly fucking greedy although Nintendo takes the crown id say.

 

[nakolas]

b-b-b-but I love mario bros!

 

[TBIcel]

I really don't give a crap about any of them beyond Sega I voted for and that's because they publish the total war games and as someone who played all 3 Warhammer ones, medieval 2, Rome 1 & 2 unlike the other companies I do actually have somewhat personal gripes after being jewed on enough dlc.

 

[PersonalityChad]

Nintendo has always been greedy af since the 80s