SmhChan
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2023
- Posts
- 7,899
- Online time
- 4d 22h
Men are tested as lab rats, women most affected. Just fuckingYes. Healthcare was made by men, for men. And if you want to point score you can even say men were test subjects which is true, men is prison in many countries were used for autopsies.... Women were not studied in the same way untill female slaves (not serfs) became common place.
You can say rich men used poor men as lab rats but the outcome was knowledge of men's medical problems and an array of ways to solve them. The treatments for the male body exploded and the understanding of the woman's body within the medical profession was so bad that a woman (rich women) was more likely to die during childbirth with a medical doctor than the local women's group.
Yes, of course. Fucking white whores of 1800s lived the lives of cotton-picking niggers.The March towards equality legislation for women came off the back of the march for the abolition of slavery. Women were legally owned by a man in their family. Coverture laws. They are still on some statute books in the US but have been removed from most western countries. So as the argument was put forward that humans are all equal in the eyes of God and therefore no person can be owned and people agreed, overture laws where women are owned by men were also called into question... That is the trigger.
Men get fucked over in court because they just choose not to participate in the "system." LOL! Just fucking LOL! This is delusion into uncharted territories. Also, we men just choose not to do less physically demanding jobs, yet most of us are happy to neetbux instead of laying bricks or mining.And men don't have poorer outcomes when they engage with the system... Any system favours men, even getting children after a divorce if men choose to participate with the system they win on average. They have to have a horrendous criminal rap sheet to not win. But as with healthcare and less physically demanding jobs men choose for their own reasons to not participate and therefore cannot be helped.
How come married men's 'outcomes' are "better" when 50% of them end up divorced and losing custody and house?This is why married men's outcomes are better than single men's... Not because women magically make men more healthy through proximity but because they nag/force those men to participate in the systems that will ensure better outcomes for them.
Of course they entered to create a feminine structure. It's definitely not foids bringing their daily afternoon gossips in the living room to offices. It's definitely not because they just had to sit on their arses, do fuck all, and get paid. It's definitely not because they didn't want to rely on their betabuxxers financially.Society doesn't provide much or any of what women need. It tries to adapt masculine structures, sometimes, to make life less bad for women but that's about it. As women have entered The workforce enmasse post ww2 women try to create feminine structures that serve their needs, sometimes they remain but if they but heads with the masculine structure equivalent they don't last long.
Nah! Bitch, you don't want communities. You just want to have wine-parties, girls-night-outs, go to book-clubs, and be united in your collective hatred against men (which isn't something unique either if we are going off of all the racial and tribal conflicts in history). Foids are the ones who broke the extended families apart. Because unlike familial communities, these degenerate activities in the name of being part of a community don't warrant any responsibilities.As for opting out of structures women psychologically can't, women for biological and psychological reasons need a group and they will bend over backwards to have access to community. So women don't opt out.
Foids suddenly started adapting to patriarchy as soon as modernity arrived and relying on betabuxxing became not a necessity. Again, men are just opting out, because reasons...Women have adapted to the patriarchal structure of society. That has meant for many women not having children or partners but they still participate in society and community. Men can opt out, they can live alone and survive off of spite alone.
Whatever the fuck that means.Many require a tangible return on investment to make it worth participating in so its not that they opt out they just never fully engage.
Last edited:





