I personally detest both of them, but I still think they were formidable statesmen. I think Stalin was a superior peace time leader and industrializer, while Mao was a better war time leader.
Mao
Stalin turned the USSR into a world superpower capable of standing up to burgerland. He has my vote.
USSR was controlled opposition, so is the US but still
Mao on the other hand actually took China forward, and generally was a great statesman. He was also Chinese actually, unlike Stalin who was a Kavkaz with likely Jewish origins
Both would starve or enslave you, the change is mostly aesthetic if anything at all.
China was ridiculous, the maoist women were literally eating men. Fucking stupid country full of chinks
But Stalin also taxed incels soooo
en.m.wikipedia.org
But Stalin also taxed incels soooo
Tax on childlessness - Wikipedia
We need an incel leader
Basically sums it up perfectly
Although I would give the edge to Mao since he never executed members of his inner circle that he detested such as Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping and merely exiled them or put them under house arrest.
This would be good in the long run since it preserved competent leadership (although I still think Hua Guofeng , Mao's chosen successor, would have been better since Deng Xiaoping introduced too many political freedoms to the Chinese People and many of his initial economic reforms were already formulated while Hua Guofeng was still paramount leader)
China would have been better off maintaining its ruthless police state under Hua Guofeng while modernizing its economy (kind of like the Xinjiang Autonomous Region in modern day China with its omniscient surveillance, concentration camps, and a fast growing economy + innovation in digital surveillance technologies spearheaded by the private sector)
Last edited:
At least toilets were also taxed
Similar threads
InMemoriam
Users who are viewing this thread
