Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

White countries map

Rapistcel

Rapistcel

⌖CHOose wisely, CHOose the blackpill⌖
★★★★★
Joined
May 25, 2024
Posts
6,921
Screenshot 20250413 193721

The country that I colored with paint is Albania, a white country.
Dark red means white race is a majority in the country
Soft red means white race is not a majority in the country but it's an important and significant minority
Grey means the white race is a minority in the country.
 
why are slavs trying to be white jfl look at monkeydonians fuckin negroid skull
 
I come from a white nation but sadly my slavic/romanian dad decided to marry my gypsy blooded mom :fuk:
 
View attachment 1427018
The country that I colored with paint is Albania, a white country.
Dark red means white race is a majority in the country
Soft red means white race is not a majority in the country but it's an important and significant minority
Grey means the white race is a minority in the country.
cyprus white, armenia white, brazil somewhat white, but
turkey isn't? kek white supremacists are fucking retarded
 
America doesn't even have a majority white population
yeah but turkey doesn't either. since ''whiteness'' isn't an actual scientific thing i usually go by stats like blue eyes and blond hair percentage by country and the US' is higher
 
cyprus white, armenia white, brazil somewhat white, but

turkey isn't? kek white supremacists are fucking retarded
I presume he colored Brazil that way due to the European minority.

The decision to make Armenia white and Turkey not though is confusing. Neither Armenians nor Turks are part of the European genetic cluster, but they also cluster with each other. Apparently the reason for Turks clustering with Kavkaz as opposed to Euros or MENAs is because of their partial Central Asian ancestry
 
I presume he colored Brazil that way due to the European minority.

The decision to make Armenia white and Turkey not though is confusing. Neither Armenians nor Turks are part of the European genetic cluster, but they also cluster with each other. Apparently the reason for Turks clustering with Kavkaz as opposed to Euros or MENAs is because of their partial Central Asian ancestry
i'm fairly certain that there is more european ancestry in turkey than in brazil though
 
yeah but turkey doesn't either. since ''whiteness'' isn't an actual scientific thing i usually go by stats like blue eyes and blond hair percentage by country and the US' is higher
Turkey has a higher percentage of natural blondes JFL and by that standard Syria is whiter than many European countries.
 
u know you painted half of asia red, russia is like 50% nonwhite
 
Turkey should be a light red since some of them on the West Coast are basically fully Greek or Slavic with possibly a small amount of Central Asian in them

Turkey is a poor country to use as a medium
i'm fairly certain that there is more european ancestry in turkey than in brazil though
Mainly on the West Coast due to them being Greeks who converted or they have Slavic slave blood in them
yeah but turkey doesn't either. since ''whiteness'' isn't an actual scientific thing i
Incorrect




Also:
GIfhB0tWcAARlpC
Main qimg 069e0926f82ff07864a46b85c7afdd17



I've explained this to you before, but all Europeans descend from three ancestral populations which mixed in the late bronze age
usually go by stats like blue eyes and blond hair percentage by country and the US' is higher
Poor way to test things

The decision to make Armenia white and Turkey not though is confusing. Neither Armenians nor Turks are part of the European genetic cluster, but they also cluster with each other. Apparently the reason for Turks clustering with Kavkaz as opposed to Euros or MENAs is because of their partial Central Asian ancestry
Yeah Kavkaz aren't White, though they are closer to us than most MENA I'd say
 
since ''whiteness'' isn't an actual scientific thing
I've explained this to you before, but all Europeans descend from three ancestral populations which mixed in the late bronze age
Maybe there's a miscommunication here. Afaik the statement is technically true that the scientific community no longer accepts "whiteness" (even if it's because said community has been ideologically captured), and fullofchagrin didn't deny European ancestry being a measurable and quantifiable thing. My guess is he doesn't understand that most serious WN/WS define "whiteness" as genetic Europeanness and thinks they go by physical features instead
 
Incorrect




Also:
View attachment 1428847View attachment 1428848


I've explained this to you before, but all Europeans descend from three ancestral populations which mixed in the late bronze age
you obviously know much more about this topic than i do, but i view it as pseudoscience and thus believe that it is irrelevant data. that's why we will never come to an agreement, so let's just agree to disagree.
Poor way to test things
i mean don't white supremacists usually look at someone's appearance to judge their whiteness? a person can be 80% white and 20% black but in most white supremacists' eyes that person will just be a halfbreed nigger while a 90% MENA with 10% european genes who has blue eyes and european facial structure will be seen as white.

Yeah Kavkaz aren't White, though they are closer to us than most MENA I'd say
definitely are, but why do you guys say ''kavkaz'' instead of caucasian? the english term for it is caucasian i'm pretty sure, kavkaz is in russian. just curious because i've noticed several users here who spell it that way
 
Maybe there's a miscommunication here. Afaik the statement is technically true that the scientific community no longer accepts "whiteness" (even if it's because said community has been ideologically captured), and fullofchagrin didn't deny European ancestry being a measurable and quantifiable thing. My guess is he doesn't understand that most serious WN/WS define "whiteness" as genetic Europeanness and thinks they go by physical features instead
you are correct. but in my experience most white supremacists just look at a person's appearance to judge whether they are aryan or nigger. the actual nazis were definitely more scientific though in that regard
 
you obviously know much more about this topic than i do, but i view it as pseudoscience and thus believe that it is irrelevant data. that's why we will never come to an agreement, so let's just agree to disagree.
How is it "pseudoscience?" These were literal measurable observed differences in skull shape -literal blackpill 101 -alongside literal modern population genetics which groups descend from. Please explain how population genetics & skull shapes are "pseudoscience" especially when you have never researched.

It's disingenuous & ignorant to deny this
i mean don't white supremacists usually look at someone's appearance to judge their whiteness? a person can be 80% white and 20% black but in most white supremacists' eyes that person will just be a halfbreed nigger
because most people with substantial black dna look very mixed, since blacks are very genetically different and also look so different
while a 90% MENA with 10% european genes who has blue eyes and european facial structure will be seen as white.
SMV wise yes 100% but they will still want "ethnic privilege" in the West
definitely are, but why do you guys say ''kavkaz'' instead of caucasian? the english term for it is caucasian i'm pretty sure, kavkaz is in russian. just curious because i've noticed several users here who spell it that way
I do it because it's making a distinction between the broader term for a Caucasian race
 
But saar! Trukiye white pepol saar!
 
you obviously know much more about this topic than i do, but i view it as pseudoscience and thus believe that it is irrelevant data. that's why we will never come to an agreement, so let's just agree to disagree.

i mean don't white supremacists usually look at someone's appearance to judge their whiteness? a person can be 80% white and 20% black but in most white supremacists' eyes that person will just be a halfbreed nigger while a 90% MENA with 10% european genes who has blue eyes and european facial structure will be seen as white.


definitely are, but why do you guys say ''kavkaz'' instead of caucasian? the english term for it is caucasian i'm pretty sure, kavkaz is in russian. just curious because i've noticed several users here who spell it that way
According to that shit jews are also white lol, kys faggot
 
you are correct. but in my experience most white supremacists just look at a person's appearance to judge whether they are aryan or nigger. the actual nazis were definitely more scientific though in that regard
You are a retard
 
Basically total extermination for everything non-nordic.
 
Imagine the amount of baklava you have to eat to honestly believe turkroaches are white. Boza and lokumpilled!
 

Similar threads

Castaway
Replies
15
Views
554
AssyrianCel
AssyrianCel
FemcelAnnihilator
Replies
7
Views
359
Friezacel
Friezacel
D
Replies
14
Views
959
Koomersarj
Koomersarj
madcatgamer
Replies
24
Views
328
madcatgamer
madcatgamer
fullofchagrin
Replies
50
Views
2K
Lonelyus
Lonelyus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top