Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel Which of these is most strongly correlated with dick size?

Which of these is most strongly correlated with dick size?

  • Wrist Circumference

    Votes: 4 8.5%
  • Shoe/Hand Size

    Votes: 14 29.8%
  • Height

    Votes: 29 61.7%

  • Total voters
    47
Quarantined

Quarantined

height = confidence
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 16, 2020
Posts
6,682
Not sure.
I'd say wrist circumference corelates strongest with dick circumference, but maybe height is more important when it come to the length of the penis.

I guess the question should have been which correlates strongest with penis length,
and which corelates with penis circumference
 
Probably none, considering its just random if you get an above average or average dick.

But if i had to pick one, probably height.

Again, its probably just a random factor

20200228 134426
 
Last edited:
Think it’s just random and has to do with hormone levels
 
Neither. If you watch enough porn, it is ALWAYS lanky dudes with low body fat.

You can still be 5'8 and lanky. Just look at black dudes.

It is not height, it is not feet or hand size. Its ALWAYS lanky long limbed dudes with low body fat. It has something to do with strong bone structure and penis size. Although of course if youre lanky, you tend to have bigger feet and hands. No brainer.

If you look at females, its the same. Especially non-Asian women. The lankier their limbs are, the bigger their labia and clitoris tend to be . Also longer looser pussy.

If the male or female is tall but limb proportions are not too lanky, around average genitalia size.

At the same time, look at Asians. High body fat, short limbs, long torso, stocky body. Small genitalia.
 
Last edited:
Neither. If you watch enough porn, it is ALWAYS lanky dudes with low body fat.

You can still be 5'8 and lanky. Just look at black dudes.

It is not height, it is not feet or hand size. Its ALWAYS lanky long limbed dudes with low body fat. It has something to do with strong bone structure and penis size. Although of course if youre lanky, you tend to have bigger feet and hands. No brainer.

If you look at females, its the same. Especially non-Asian women. The lankier their limbs are, the bigger their labia and clitoris tend to be . Also longer looser pussy.

If the male or female is tall but limb proportions are not too lanky, around average genitalia size.

At the same time, look at Asians. High body fat, short limbs, long torso, stocky body. Small genitalia.
 
r/short is rife with big dick braggarts with tiny hands and tiny frames.
 
I'm below average height, small hands, small feet, have 6" wrists and a 6.something" dick
 
None are correlated. But the closest one i would say is usually height. Not always accurate though
 
Not that it matters at this point tbh
Chad can have a micro dick or a slithering anaconda, doesn’t matter, what gets them off is the facial structure.
 
Neither. If you watch enough porn, it is ALWAYS lanky dudes with low body fat.

You can still be 5'8 and lanky. Just look at black dudes.

It is not height, it is not feet or hand size. Its ALWAYS lanky long limbed dudes with low body fat. It has something to do with strong bone structure and penis size. Although of course if youre lanky, you tend to have bigger feet and hands. No brainer.

If you look at females, its the same. Especially non-Asian women. The lankier their limbs are, the bigger their labia and clitoris tend to be . Also longer looser pussy.

If the male or female is tall but limb proportions are not too lanky, around average genitalia size.

At the same time, look at Asians. High body fat, short limbs, long torso, stocky body. Small genitalia.
I've noticed that but I think it might just be that it looks bigger if they're skinny. They would have higher T though. Long limbs might be legit.

Height correlates a bit too I would say.
 
Most likely height
 
Ballsack size.
 
Height their body parts are proportionate simple logic.
 
Nah, I meant dick braggarts. Although some users are probably short anyways.

My point was that height, feet, and frame don't actually apply at all, because there's some goblins on r/short that are packing heat.
 
Actually, the only correlation that's ever been found from size studies was a weak correlation with height. I'm 6', size 13 shoe, 7.25 wrist.
Neither. If you watch enough porn, it is ALWAYS lanky dudes with low body fat.

You can still be 5'8 and lanky. Just look at black dudes.

It is not height, it is not feet or hand size. Its ALWAYS lanky long limbed dudes with low body fat. It has something to do with strong bone structure and penis size. Although of course if youre lanky, you tend to have bigger feet and hands. No brainer.

If you look at females, its the same. Especially non-Asian women. The lankier their limbs are, the bigger their labia and clitoris tend to be . Also longer looser pussy.

If the male or female is tall but limb proportions are not too lanky, around average genitalia size.

At the same time, look at Asians. High body fat, short limbs, long torso, stocky body. Small genitalia.

If you look at the porn star size studies, you are correct when it comes to appearance. Most of the "13 inch" dudes or whatever are lanky guys with no fatpad and 7-8 legit inches.
 
Last edited:
NONE of these things are correlated to dick size. Dick size is determined partially by genetics and environment.
 
its not correlated to anything you mentioned
 
The thinest you are the bigggest your dick seems to be. But it is just a tricky optical efect.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top