Autistic question with no nuance put in while thinking, Chad midget is fucked but 6'5 male with 4/10 face can slay. Your SMV is not buffs and debuffs in a video game
A
I think it matters equally, or almost equally, because a tall ogre will still be a cel, and a 5'4 with chad face will still be cel. You need a mixture of both.
Face, I'm 6'2 and I'm an ogre
G
Face is more important. My height has never done anything for me
Face>frame>height
Unless turbomanlet of course.
Unless turbomanlet of course.
JFL at these cherry picking it useless to argue with you. I should've notice it when you cherrypick those short celebrities with status
M
You need both just like you need both two wheels of motorcycle to ride it.
Face > Dick > Height
Two of the most famous actors had a girlfriend who was taller? Lifefuel for manlets!
Is Brad Pitt even still on human level.....
It was you who used twitter posts as proof of something we both claim.JFL at these cherry picking it useless to argue with you. I should've notice it when you cherrypick those short celebrities with status
He has it everything so no.
out of those tweet posts in the pick u pick the one with "people". really dude?
How does women openly hating short men disproves that face is more important? It only shows us that they are more open to express their hate towards short males. The short or ugly are probably the two groups to get most picked on by others.
Remember you only need to tower the girl and that's pretty easy to do, thenyour success with women depends more on your face than your stature.
I think they are about equal tbh, but I'm gonna vote height since I'm short.
I've been to clubs in an attempt to NTmaxx. It's always the average (and often below) faced tallfags who form harems of foids dancing around them, fighting for the privilege to grab their dicks. Guys with nice faces obviously get some of that too, but they don't come close.
Tallness is the most objective way to measure a man's genes.
Tallness is the most objective way to measure a man's genes.
that twitter pic is a response when u said
They dont compare you to themselves. They compare you to the other guys. One of reason why the dating market becomes harder because the dating sites makes the comparing potential suitors easy. The reason why i keep on getting back on that picture(comparison pic) is the presence(mogged) of uglier guy triump over the chad when they exchange height.
You spouting the same reasons all over again without reading mine. Cant really change the mind of someone who is determined not to change it.
I feel like you are just doing this to make this thread more popular or postmaxing
Last edited:
I understand your reasons, and I don't think it's a good pic because the chad head is in a wimp's body so there's nothing to compare, he just looks stupid because it doesn't fit.
Its a satire. and satire is a humor with exaggeration that doesn't mean that it isn't true. it is just exaggerated
look at this thread about that short handsome vs tall ugly
Which would you choose: ugly, tall guy or handsome, short guy?
Personality notwithstanding, of course. Because some tall dudes I've seen are HIT and when I say Hit, HITTT in the face *cough cough* athletes........... and still get all the girls. So, my question is ladies, what are you looking at? Your future tall kids with hit faces? Tall would be...
www.lipstickalley.com
look at how women pick tall ugly more often than handsome short
Just saw this while talking to you
Last edited:
Being short makes it easier to be a movie star since you can fit in frame better. That said, anyone who thinks Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt or RDJ would be incels sans fame and fortune are clearly delusional. Just because you are 5'1" and ugly doesn't mean 5'7" Tom Mapother with a perfect face isn't getting laid far more than 7'7" George Muresan. Height isn't even that important to most foids. Foids average out at 5'4" so if you are above that you are in the clear for 50% of foids
Its a satire. and satire is a humor with exaggeration that doesn't mean that it isn't true. it is just exaggerated
look at this thread about that short handsome vs tall ugly
Which would you choose: ugly, tall guy or handsome, short guy?
Personality notwithstanding, of course. Because some tall dudes I've seen are HIT and when I say Hit, HITTT in the face *cough cough* athletes........... and still get all the girls. So, my question is ladies, what are you looking at? Your future tall kids with hit faces? Tall would be...
look at how women pick tall ugly more often than handsome short
View attachment 161346
View attachment 161347
Just saw this while talking to you
I wrote "fuck". If you're 5'6 and handsome you will still fuck.
They would be universally attractive even if they were not famousTwo of the most famous actors had a girlfriend who was taller? Lifefuel for manlets!
This pic could just as easily argue FRAME
Height
Last edited:
Face won. Manlets need to chill and let us ugly facecels cope in peace.
I'm 5'4 but I'm sure i'd probably slay if I had a good face. I'd just have to go for the short girls.
True. I have seen many short guys with a good face with decent looking foids. Iam 6 4 and have an ugly face.
Face for foids.
Height for status, jobs.
There's a threshold of about 5'7/5'6 for very good looking facially men. If your a 5'5 guy thats very goood looking, then women will prefer a 6'3 average brute to you. Very short good looking men get seen as gay. It must suck.
Both are very important.
Height for status, jobs.
There's a threshold of about 5'7/5'6 for very good looking facially men. If your a 5'5 guy thats very goood looking, then women will prefer a 6'3 average brute to you. Very short good looking men get seen as gay. It must suck.
Both are very important.
I'd be a walking 10/10 head
I
Face matters more than height if you already are what she considers tall enough. I’ve seen 7/10 wahmen with uglyfaced/frame tall guys though.
D
Easily Height. The Heightpill kills us all off... If you're not at least 6ft then it's truly Over. For good... For me it never began... Plus it's easier to looksmax at 6ft & over... You're an 8 PSL. If you're under 6ft than the best you can attain is that of a 7.99 PSL which is the same as being a Sub 0 PSL as an inch of failure is as good as a mile.
Similar threads
GrandWizard_137
based_meme
Users who are viewing this thread
