Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Which forum rule do you find most retarded?

Which forum rule do you find most retarded? (multiple choices possible)

  • No brag rule

    Votes: 16 27.1%
  • Cherry-picking rule (e.g. unattractive men with girlfriends)

    Votes: 10 16.9%
  • Worship rule

    Votes: 17 28.8%
  • No low effort posts rule

    Votes: 31 52.5%
  • The lack of a rule against praising crime and violence.

    Votes: 13 22.0%

  • Total voters
    59
V

virgin4life

Banned
-
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Posts
4,157
Which rule do you find most retarded?

The no brag rule makes sense in a way because if everybody who ascended could just keep posting here it wouldn't really be a safe space for incels anymore. On the other hand I think they are going way too extreme on this. I.e. if you just say you had a blind date with a girl and she laughed at you and went away you already fall under the no brag rule "because truecels don't even have blind dates" (which fucking makes no sense. If she can not see you she can not reject you based on your looks). So they are going too extreme on this.

The cherry pick rule I think is complete nonsense. If I see folks with a foid more attractive than themselves why would I not be allowed to talk about it here? Has incels.is done any statistics on how many couples have a foid more attractive than the male to be 100% sure that the amount is so low that saying such couples exist is unreasonable? And even if they had...why can we not question something that has once be observed. Also it wouldnt even hurt anyone so this rule is just complete nonsense IMO.

The worship rule. Again makes no sense to me at all. Why would we not be allowed to say that a certain female celeb is attractive to us? How does that hurt anyone? And also they are going way too harsh on this one too. Like if you just say: "Hey one time a woman was actually nice to me and helped me out" you already get warned for violating this rule? Why? May the idea that all women are evil not be questioned?

Low effort posts rule. Makes sense to a degree as it will take away server resources. On the other hand low effort posts are part of incel culture and are often quite funny and low effort ist part of the whole incel thing anyway so I think this rule makes no sense either.

The lack of a rule against praising crime and violence - Incels.is mods team appears to totally accept this kind of thing. I personally think they shouldnt do that as it endangers the entire community and makes us an easy target for cucktears.

I am wondering how you guys see those rules...
 
Sarge can do no wrong
 
No brag rule is retarded because most of the time mods don't look at the context. I got a warning for bragging for saying that my oneitis is playing with me and lies that she loves me.
 
All of them because they're pointless.

They'll ban who they don't like for whatever reason.
 
Most of the rules are justified but the new “low effort” rule is bullshit. Reminds me of when I was in high school and had to write thousands of words for an essay when I could easily sum it up in much less.

Just be verbose br0.
 
no low effort role rule tbh

rip my nigga @notafed and @Insalsa
 
The trap rule
 
Can someone explain to me what trap rule actually means? I.e. give an example of how I would violate this rule?
 
Worship rule. While I agree with it, it’s way too strict on what counts as worship.
 
Worship rule. While I agree with it, it’s way too strict on what counts as worship.

Yes...it is not necessarily the rules themselves but the exaggerated way how they are being interpreted especially by Knajjd.
 
Can someone explain to me what trap rule actually means? I.e. give an example of how I would violate this rule?

Discussing traps, etc in casual conversation is fine.

Making threads glorifying traps is not.

Making a thread entitled “Would you have sex with a 9/10 tranny?” will get you a 10% warning. I know that one from experience.
 
I like them all.
 
Making a thread entitled “Would you have sex with a 9/10 tranny?” will get you a 10% warning. I know that one from experience.

So "trap" refers to a transvestite? Interesting. Never heard of this word.
 
All of those rules are good, I don't want this place to be /r9k/.
 
Which rule do you find most retarded?

The no brag rule makes sense in a way because if everybody who ascended could just keep posting here it wouldn't really be a safe space for incels anymore. On the other hand I think they are going way too extreme on this. I.e. if you just say you had a blind date with a girl and she laughed at you and went away you already fall under the no brag rule "because truecels don't even have blind dates" (which fucking makes no sense. If she can not see you she can not reject you based on your looks). So they are going too extreme on this.

The cherry pick rule I think is complete nonsense. If I see folks with a foid more attractive than themselves why would I not be allowed to talk about it here? Has incels.is done any statistics on how many couples have a foid more attractive than the male to be 100% sure that the amount is so low that saying such couples exist is unreasonable? And even if they had...why can we not question something that has once be observed. Also it wouldnt even hurt anyone so this rule is just complete nonsense IMO.

The worship rule. Again makes no sense to me at all. Why would we not be allowed to say that a certain female celeb is attractive to us? How does that hurt anyone? And also they are going way too harsh on this one too. Like if you just say: "Hey one time a woman was actually nice to me and helped me out" you already get warned for violating this rule? Why? May the idea that all women are evil not be questioned?

Low effort posts rule. Makes sense to a degree as it will take away server resources. On the other hand low effort posts are part of incel culture and are often quite funny and low effort ist part of the whole incel thing anyway so I think this rule makes no sense either.

The lack of a rule against praising crime and violence - Incels.is mods team appears to totally accept this kind of thing. I personally think they shouldnt do that as it endangers the entire community and makes us an easy target for cucktears.

I am wondering how you guys see those rules...
I actually think all of those are good.
 
They are ok, but people dont listen to them. You can easily bypass all of the rules.
 
I like the set rules. admittedly though, a rule stopping violent/crime discussion would get people to take us a bit more seriously.
 
OP should have made it public so we can see which fakecels voted no brag rule
 
Yes...it is not necessarily the rules themselves but the exaggerated way how they are being interpreted especially by Knajjd.
yes, you do a better job at interpreting the rules than actual mods. jesus. merely reading your OP is enough to figure that this is not true, because you fail to see the necessity beneath any single one of them.
 
I agree with all of those tbh. But the last one isn't accurate, we do have rules against that here.

I have some minor questionings about the no-brag rule but that's it.
 
I'm glad traps are not allowed. Thanks admin and mods for this rule. Peace be upon you and may God forgive your sins
 
No brag and cherry picking for sure. Prevents any sort of truly objective discussion about inceldom and turns this place into another bullshit circlejerk.

The no brag rule should be replaced with "Don't talk about any non-negative personal interaction with women" because that is basically what it is. Could get banned for saying you just had a pleasant talk with a woman.
 
The female avatar ban as considered female worship. Apparently, female anime avatars does not count. The cope.
 
yes, you do a better job at interpreting the rules than actual mods. jesus. merely reading your OP is enough to figure that this is not true, because you fail to see the necessity beneath any single one of them.

The rules are to ideological. Pretty much like on an SJW board they make sure you can not say anything that might make people question SJW ideology. But an ideology that does not allow to question itself is always suspicious to me.
 
the first 2 are fine but the last 3 i dont agree with tbh
 
Bragging and worshipping.
The female avatar ban as considered female worship. Apparently, female anime avatars does not count. The cope.
This rule is so hypocritical because many to many of the members on here it´s not just an innocent anime or hentai character they literally worships them.
Yes...it is not necessarily the rules themselves but the exaggerated
This is very true like if you mention you had eye contact with a girl for 0.0001 seconds it will count as bragging.
 
No worship rule is good. I'm getting bombarded with half naked foids all day long. I enjoy getting a break from it while I'm here.
No brag in general is fine, because it just makes you feel even worse reading about brags from other guys.
But there is an exception.
Incels who were part of the forum for a longer period of time and manage to ascend should be allowed to post about it. We all have the same goal: Escaping inceldom. It doesn't make sense, that we don't take advice from guys who managed to do it.
 
No worship rule is good. I'm getting bombarded with half naked foids all day long. I enjoy getting a break from it while I'm here.
No brag in general is fine, because it just makes you feel even worse reading about brags from other guys.
But there is an exception.
Incels who were part of the forum for a longer period of time and manage to ascend should be allowed to post about it. We all have the same goal: Escaping inceldom. It doesn't make sense, that we don't take advice from guys who managed to do it.
"advice" like what? are you even blackpilled?
 
I can't really think of one.
 
"advice" like what? are you even blackpilled?
Advice might have been the wrong word, but I'm certainly interested in the story of how an incel managed to ascend.
Sure, you could say that an incel who ascends never really was an incel, but maybe there are things to learn from ascension stories.
Ascension is our goal, so I don't understand why we reject ascension stories as a source of information.
 
Advice might have been the wrong word, but I'm certainly interested in the story of how an incel managed to ascend.
Sure, you could say that an incel who ascends never really was an incel, but maybe there are things to learn from ascension stories.
Ascension is our goal, so I don't understand why we reject ascension stories as a source of information.
looks/money/status, there's nothing more to learn. it'd be a big "fuck you" to the community to allow a bunch of patronising shitbags talk about how they got laid while we continue to wallow here. they can go to looksmax.org, and you can go to r/theredpill or something if you want to read such "sources of information".
 
looks/money/status, there's nothing more to learn. it'd be a big "fuck you" to the community to allow a bunch of patronising shitbags talk about how they got laid while we continue to wallow here. they can go to looksmax.org, and you can go to r/theredpill or something if you want to read such "sources of information".
I don't browse reddit or looksmax.
It's not like I need ascension stories, it was more of a suggestion. I'm cool without them and can see why you wouldn't want to have them.
 
Probably the rule against the gay. We talk about races, violence, etc - but gettin' faggy wit' it is off limits? I guess a lot of guys get uncomfortable with men fucking men, but I'm an old piece of shit nihilist and it doesn't faze me at all by this point.

But to be honest I hate all rules. I hate hate hate rules and limits on free-speech, as necessary as they may be.
 
Im happy with all the rules. But i think were a bit too strict on female worship (aka id be fine with pictures of women)

But yeah the rules are fair
 
the no worship rule is whats keeping this place from turning into /r9k/ or lookism.net
 
I don't have problem with any rule here tbh, it would be annoying to see people brag here openly / using cherry picking arguments for bluepilled stuff / see people glorify attention whores

for the lows efforts posts I don't know, some peoples are spamming lows efforts contents just for colors and it's pointless, but it's can be funny to shitpost sometimes so meh, If it's not actual spam it's okay imo
 
The low effort rule. Not sure how long I should make my responses or how well-thought out.
 
Bring back low effort posts, many of us are autist retards and cant type like normies
 

Similar threads

SlayerSlayer
Replies
7
Views
319
SlayerSlayer
SlayerSlayer
MASSIVE KOALA SHIT
Replies
20
Views
140
MASSIVE KOALA SHIT
MASSIVE KOALA SHIT
nazianime
Replies
15
Views
316
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
Stupid Clown
Replies
24
Views
299
Caesercel
Caesercel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top