I give you a choice. You can pay someone $1,000 to give you a girl who loves you or a free prostitute. Assume they both give sex, and you keep both forever. Select only one, please. Thanks.
Which Do You Choose: Pay $1,000 for A Girl who loves you or FREE prosttitue
K
Easily a girl who loves you
What do u think 
Pay
If I have to pay $1000 for a girl to love me then it’s not really love tbh
free vs. $1000
is this a srs question
is this a srs question
1000 isn't a lot for eternal love.
A. Make it a poll, its better than way, you can "tally and visualize" the results, edit it quick and add poll to the options before edit time runs out
B. I choose the free prostitute, here's why:
1. Love Doesn't Exist - This is self explanatory, its an illusion, a series of chemical reactions in the brain, I would pay $1000 for a woman who was obsessed with and felt indebted to me, but not for something as vague and arbitrary as "love"
2. Time Constraint - "Love" is fickle, especially since it doesn't really exist (as mentioned in point #1), so how long will she "love" us for, women seem to "fall out of love" quite easily these days coincidentally in times where hypergamy is not restricted and no fault divorce is a thing, hmmm I wonder why, its as if love was merely part of a "bonding process" that women get mentally wrapped up in to acquire resources from males, and their minds trigger them to be "less loving" in these times since men are no longer necessary.
3. All Women Today Are Prostitutes - The difference between a woman who fucked 100 men in two weeks for payment, and a woman who fucked 100 men in 2 months for dinner dates, jewelry, money, gifts, status, etc IS ARBITRARY, they are both whores, but one is OVERT and the other is COVERT
4. The Irony - If you paid to get said love aren't you ironically engaging in prostitution?. So what really is the difference, now the question is really
Free Prostitute VS $1000 Prostitute that has temporary emotional attachments
Last edited:
This might be a bit of me to say, but a girl who loves me is an abnormality (as in, not in the realm of possibility at all) more akin to a miracle. Access to such a scenario is worth way more than $1,000 tbh
of me to say, but a girl who loves me is an abnormality (as in, not in the realm of possibility at all) more akin to a miracle. Access to such a scenario is worth way more than $1,000 tbh
Common sense IQ
1. It was never stipulated that she'd "love" you forever
2. If you paid to get it, is it even really "love" in the usual sense of the word
A. Make it a poll, its better than way, you can "tally and visualize" the results, edit it quick and add poll to the options before edit time runs out
B. I choose the free prostitute, here's why:
1. Love Doesn't Exist - This is self explanatory, its an illusion, a series of chemical reactions in the brain, I would pay $1000 for a woman who was obsessed with and felt indebted to me, but not for something as vague and arbitrary as "love"
2. Time Constraint - "Love" is fickle, especially since it doesn't really exist (as mentioned in point #1), so how long will she "love" us for, women seem to "fall out of love" quite easily these days coincidentally in times where hypergamy is not restricted and no fault divorce is a thing, hmmm I wonder why, its as if love was merely part of a "bonding process" that women get mentally wrapped up in to acquire resources from males, and their minds trigger them to be "less loving" in these times since men are no longer necessary.
3. All Women Today Are Prostitutes - The difference between a woman who fucked 100 men in two weeks for payment, and a woman who fucked 100 men in 2 months for dinner dates, jewelry, money, gifts, status, etc IS ARBITRARY, they are both whores, but one is OVERT and the other is COVERT
4. The Irony - If you paid to get said love aren't you ironically engaging in prostitution?. So what really is the difference, now the question is really
Free Prostitute VS $1000 Prostitute that has temporary emotional attachments
High I.Q
1000 is a very low price tbh
$1,000
But it’s not love if I have to pay for it. Even $1 is $1 too much.
$1000 for a gamer GF who really loves me
K
Love might be the wrong word.A girl who is attracted to you would be better to say
Assume you are paying someone $1,000 to introduce you to the girl.
Say for example a dating service gave you a girl who loved you + sex for $1,000.
That is not the same as prostitution.
This is some high level cope.
You are one of the most emotionally driven illogical blue pilled posters on this site, the difference is arbitrary, its all prostitution, romantic love never existed to begin with, it was a trade of sex and resources, that's all its ever been between men and women, our brain merely facilitates the illusion of "something deeper" to help the process along.
And I make my brain have the illusion that my sex doll is a real woman.
When I watch the movies, It's an illusion that I'm John Travolta, getting all the women.
When I have sex with the doll, I have the illusion I am having sex with Pamela Grier.
Last edited:
we're largely illogical beings, especially where our emotions are concerned. For whatever reason the male brain is generally more apt at tricking itself that female validation received from the currency of one's genes is somehow more valuable than the female validation received from the literal currency of one's money. I suppose it's to do with the fact that our reproductive success is more contingent upon our genes than it is upon the size of our wallet.
L
In this very hypothetical scenario, I would toss a grand if the girl were also capable to love me forever, without any hypergamy or crappy catches. So unreal, though.
If the above is not possible, welcome free hooker!
By the way, it's similar to prostitution even if there's a minor difference. You pay the middleman, not the direct supplier. But that wouldn't bother me as femoids are always transactional beings at the of the day.
It is NOT PROSTITUTION, because you are not paying the GIRL for sex.
If I pay $1,000 to go to a singles' dance, meet a girl and get sex, that is NOT prostiution.
If the woman was genuinely in love with me(i.e; not just for the money or anything), and wouldn’t leave me, I’d do it. $1000 for a gf is nothing.
L
Formally speaking, I agree with you. But in a way or another you're paying for sexual access, I just think we have different views about it. Nothing bad about it.
I don't see it as a morally negative thing, it's just how the world works when pussy is a commodity characterized by artificially created scarcity.
Damn, 1000$ for a forever pussy is a serious bargain.
That's the thing about these guys, they do see it as something bad because they are egoists, they see themselves as "above that" and above anyone that pays for sex, ironically while being genetic failures, you talk to any of these guys against prostitution long enough and you can get them to admit over time that it has to do with ego and them seeing the act as beneath them, I've done this with like 2 users already on the site and I'm sure he is no different.
Same reason why I created the thread - https://incels.is/threads/nofap-int...tic-self-loathing-behavioural-patterns.90099/
Its the same thing with nofap, these men see themselves as "above masturbation" and that they should get sex "the right way".
I don't believe this is true, I think people just accept this mindset because its "easier"
I think it has more to do with ego than biology, because not to long ago paying for sex was the norm and basically all men did it, culture changed, the practice started being shamed and belittled, so men shield their egos began to avoid it. We reproduced fine in times where female validation was not even a factor.
I don't have 1,000 dollars, and even if I did I wouldn't spend it on a foid. That's cuckoldry. Giving foids money is cuckoldry not spoken about here as much as it needs to be.
I was gonna pick the former,but then I remembered that women cannot love.
So literally ALL men are cuckolds then by your logic
no. But giving foids money for sex so that they can use it for other shit, or tipping foid waitresses, THAT's cuckoldry. Do not give them anymore than you need to.
1. You can't control what someone spends their money on
2. So again I say ALL men then based on your criteria, because all men give women money because it leads to sex, and all women spend that money on "other shit"
Enough to get sex seems like the amount we "need to"
Last edited:
L
I think too there's the ego component, and it's a big one. However, I can't overlook the massive amount of social conditioning spent towards "getting sex the right way". I believe it takes some while before that socially pushed notion gets purged from the system. Ironically, the "right" way is also the most expensive and dangerous, legally speaking.
I find also paradoxical how femoids are rewarded when they commoditize themselves, but men are blamed for accessing such merchandise.
I will surely check out your other thread later.
I believe socialization is the very thing that is used to structure what individuals in general form their egos around, so its not like two separate things, more like social conditioning is used to build up the other (ego), they work in congruence with each other.
Last edited:
a girl who loves me
If it lasts, love
If not, then the hookers
If not, then the hookers
Free of course
Similar threads
Serious
Fuentes being charged with battery proves the cops won't side with you in a self defense case
- manletcel1488
- Inceldom Discussion
AsiaCel
Users who are viewing this thread
