What would you guys say?
D
Prolly russia and jewSA
Pakistan. @RREEEEEEEEE 
Can not name a single military defeat by them as a Bangladeshi.
Can not name a single military defeat by them as a Bangladeshi.
Let's be realistic - USA still has the most powerful military in the world
Russia and china are close, but not at the US level yet
Russia and china are close, but not at the US level yet
D
But the JewSA is working on making their army weaker with the lbtgq propaganda
Kyrgyzstan
For Cyber Warfare maybe Israel.
I also think surface ships are very vunerable to modern missile attacks making navies redundant, except for their submarines.
I also think surface ships are very vunerable to modern missile attacks making navies redundant, except for their submarines.
Last edited:
China by far - America has a few more fancy boats but that won't last for long. They are too busy implementing MUH DIVERSITY and promoting foids into officer positions.
US, china
Russia and China are close but only in statistics. They both have a mandatory draft, a fraction of the military budget, shittier equipment and worse geographic position.
From a equipment prospective? USA hands down, just because we pump so much money into our military industrial complex.
That being said the US military would probably fall apart if we fought an actual war against a bigger force then a few thousand sandnigs with aks from the 60s because
That being said the US military would probably fall apart if we fought an actual war against a bigger force then a few thousand sandnigs with aks from the 60s because
D
Zimbabwe has the strongest military.
US
Lol you are kidding right? I'm just going to point out just a little interesting fact... USA has around 45% of all aircraft carriers in the world. Just gonna stop there because I don't wanna make USAcels cum from the jerk off they are already getting in this thread.
Army is one thing, but what about nukes and icbms. How does Russia compare with the US?
Russia, they have new anti air device
The towelban
The problem is China and Russia have haypersonic missles that no defence system can stop as of now. So whats the point of having aircraft carriers that can be sunk before they even reach their target? Untill the US can build an adequate defence system then there is a problem. Unless I overlooked something and missed that the US actually already has such a defence system?
depends on how you compare them. by equipment? by size? by budget? and you need to know that armies for every nation have a different role. armies can be maintained purely to intimidate neighbors, to flex muscle on the world stage, to pacify any possible internal revolts, to assist a friendly military as an expeditionary force, to actually fight, and more. if you want to hypothetically have them all 1v1 in a big open field i would say USA wins. but of course thats not how war in real life works
madagascar
Jewsa> Russia> China
Russia is a worthless shithole, will never catch up to USA. As for China, possibly or probably eventually
True Israel mogged Iran multiple times with virus
A
I would like to give a mention to my country's IRA, they took on one of the strongest armies in the world and the government ended up having to negotiate with them. The British say they defeated the IRA but you don't negotiate with people you defeated.
usa have all those airplanes but they don't know how to fly properly
Biggest - China
Strongest - USA
Strongest - USA
E
The united states and anyone that says otherwise is coping. Although china is making gains, I'll admit
I think the Chinese tested an orbital satellite carrying hypersonic weapons.
The problem is that the USA can detect a ground missile launch from their warning satellites but they cannot detect a hypersonic missile launched from a satellite in low earth orbit. This introduces uncertainty whether a first strike is underway which reduces nuclear weapons stability.
That's what I understood from reading this article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/21/what-did-china-test-space-exactly-why/
This is an interesting read to learn more about nuclear weapons attack plans:
https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/41/4/9/12158/The-New-Era-of-Counterforce-Technological-Change
Note Table 1 and the text describing the rows such as:
Row 4 shows attack outcomes for a Trident II/W88 with 90 percent reliability. Row 5 shows the consequences if the United States can reprogram its missiles to replace boost-phase failures. As row 5 reveals, a 2-on-1 attack with reprogramming would be expected to destroy every hardened shelter or silo. Row 6 omits reprogramming, but it demonstrates the impact of the decline in fratricide by adding a third warhead to each target, resulting again in the destruction of either target set.
Last edited:
Thnaks for the link. Very informative information
1) The United States - Money
2) China - Size
3) Russia - Nuclear
4) Turkey - Strategic Location
2) China - Size
3) Russia - Nuclear
4) Turkey - Strategic Location
W
Actually USA but soon China will surpass them (hopefully in less than decade )
)
China US or Russia
Similar threads
blackpillednigga
Users who are viewing this thread
